As an AI Product Growth Leader, I’m on a mission to revolutionize how businesses harness data and AI to drive innovation, accelerate growth, and scale impact. I lead with a strategic vision: to make data collaboration seamless, AI adoption intuitive, and business-centric innovation scalable.

At @DataGOL, I drive growth initiatives that position us as the go-to solution for intelligent business enablement. From BusinessOS to AI Agents and Self-Serve Analytics, I build intelligent experience engines that empower business users—not just data teams—to make faster, smarter decisions.

With 20+ years across enterprise SaaS, data platforms, and AI/ML products, I operate at the intersection of strategy, technology, and customer-centricity. My passion lies in translating complex capabilities into simple, scalable value—whether that’s through a game-changing product, a repeatable growth engine, or a transformative AI initiative.

I don’t chase hype. I build real-world, value-driven solutions that solve real business problems.

🤝 Let’s connect if you’re serious about using AI and data to redefine what’s possible for your business.

𝗙𝗶𝘅 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲.

A new Head of Data walks in.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝟵𝟬 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁.

Many start with dashboards, pipelines, and plans. They rebuild what’s broken and expect trust to follow.

𝗕𝘂𝘁, 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹.

They forget that trust, not tools, is the real foundation. You can fix every schema and still have leaders asking, “Why are we still in this mess?”

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀:

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟭: 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝗲, 𝗗𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿.

Meet every key person. Ask what data they trust. Listen to real pain, not just reports. Find your “data superusers.” See where data dies before it reaches the decision.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟮: 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻.

Prioritize quick wins. Rank by impact, complexity, reach, and risk. Set clear ownership for metrics. Share updates every week.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝟯: 𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳, 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀.

Pick the highest priority. Deliver one visible win in 30-45 days. Align on definitions so everyone speaks the same language. Over communicate wins and issues.

𝗔𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗽𝘀:

• Don’t rush to buy new tools.
• Don’t rebuild dashboards before fixing trust.
• Don’t promise AI if you have ten definitions of revenue.

The first 90 days decide if data drives growth or stays a reporting chore.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗙𝗢 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝟵𝟬, 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀.

Trust comes first.

Visible wins come next.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻” 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀?

Vinod SP

Building AI Agents that are powerful enough to run your business @DataGOL | Ex-Meta | AI Product Builder | Chief Data & AI officer | Harvard Business School

No alternative text description for this image

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀

I've had the same conversation with 3 different CFOs this month.

They all said some version of this: 

"My finance team just ran their own margin analysis. Without the data team. In 30 seconds."

🔁 𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮. 𝗭𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁. 𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹.

"𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲" becomes a standard function and the data < >finance wall collapses.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:

The era of descriptive dashboards is ending. AI agents are forcing the shift to diagnostic analytics.

𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲: "Revenue was $2.3M in May"

𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰: "Revenue spiked because Product X drove 47% of new bookings, but COGS increased 23% due to supplier changes"

One tells you the score. The other tells you how to change the game.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴:

→ DataGOL launches a "𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁" that confirms account ranges with CFOs before calculating margins (human-in-the-loop, not black box)

→ Finance teams moving from "what happened" to "why it happened" without writing SQL

→ The "golden layer" (clean, standardized data) becoming the moat not the dashboard itself

𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲:

• 𝗕𝗜 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 → AI-driven diagnostic layers

• 𝗔𝗱-𝗵𝗼𝗰 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 → Conversational agents

• 𝗠𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝘆𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀 → Real-time variance investigation

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸-𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲.

→ It'll be your diagnostic intelligence layer.

→ The teams that own this conversation will have a seat at the board table.

→ The ones still building dashboards that answer "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁" will keep wondering why no one looks at them.

Are you still answering "𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱" while your board wants to know "𝘄𝗵𝘆"?.

Check out DataGOL DataScience Agent in the comment.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 “𝗔𝗜 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀” 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗳𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗲𝗴𝗼?


Call yourself an AI PM, AI Engineer, AI Consultant, AI Lead…
stick around long enough and you learn the job title is fake.

𝗬𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗿.
And the real problem is usually not AI — it’s data.

𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝗜 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁:
✅ “10 advanced RAG methods”
✅ “multi-agent workflows”
✅ “the newest eval harness”

Cool. 𝗠𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲:
Does it work on your data, in your business, with your constraints?
…and how will you know (beyond a demo)?
Because most “AI wins” die the same way:
𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝟭: wow demo
𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝟮: reality (missing fields, broken joins, no ground truth, no owner)
𝗪𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝟯: “let’s try a newer architecture” 🙃

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗱𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁:
1) 𝗗𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗜?
If rules + UX + process fixes solve it… ship that.
2) 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 “𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻-𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮”
What data must be true enough to trust a decision?
3) 𝗣𝘂𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 + 𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲
Schemas, freshness, lineage, accountability. No owner = no reliability.
4) 𝗧𝗶𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲
Not “the answer looks good” — did the decision improve?
5) 𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽
Outcomes → retrieval → labeling → model → outcomes. Repeat.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲.
The teams that win aren’t chasing the newest RAG or agent setup.
They’re building the unsexy advantage:
𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗽𝘂𝘁𝘀 + 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗽 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘀 + 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁.
Because AI is the engine…
but data is the fuel.
𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝘁𝘆, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝘀…𝘇𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗥𝗢𝗜.

What’s your team rewarded for right now?
𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀… 𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗶𝘅𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 + 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗜 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹?

DataGOL

undefined undefined

datagol

We make data business-ready@DataGOL | Ex-Meta | Chief Data & AI officer | Harvard Business School

If you’re serious about moving AI from pilot to production, this is the kind of session you don’t skip.

Most teams aren’t blocked by “better models”, they’re blocked by fragmented data, missing context, and workflows that AI can’t reliably execute or verify. Practitioners like Vishal Singh will share what actually breaks in real deployments (security, correctness, adoption) and the practical patterns that get agents shipped inside operational processes — not just demos.

Worth attending if you want fewer experiments and more outcomes

https://lnkd.in/gGg3APis

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗸.

They fail because the information AI depends on is fragmented, out of context, and disconnected from real business processes.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘀𝗼 𝗺𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗔𝗜 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘁𝘀.
We are hosting a short session on what should be the real focus, why focusing on infrastructure misses the real bottleneck, and what actually changes when AI is designed around shared context, execution, and verification.

DataGOL, we have helped early adopter and committed organizations launch and use AI agents within their products and internal usage, bring AI pilots out of experimentation and into production environments with practical considerations around security, data, and correctness. We have seen firsthand what breaks, what slows down teams, and what it actually takes to launch AI successfully inside real operational workflows.

𝗪𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆.

𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 —> https://lnkd.in/gtTnNrT2

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀?


Stop thinking about models. Start thinking about decisions.

There is a lot of noise around “AI strategy” right now.
The way I see companies cut through it is by separating what powers the system from what powers the business.

Model choices protect the capability.
They are about latency, accuracy, context length, cost, security.
They answer: Can this AI technically handle the work?

Decision design protects the outcome.
It is about ownership, guardrails, feedback loops, and incentives.
It answers: Should this AI be allowed to make or support this decision?

Both matter.
Both are essential.
But they live in different worlds.

In almost every organisation I worked with last year, AI did not sit neatly with one owner.
Product, data, security, compliance, operations, finance, and business lines all held a piece.

That is normal. Because the decisions touch revenue, risk, and reputation at the same time.

The companies making real progress connect the two:

They start with decision clarity.
They list the 10 real decisions that drive their business, then pick the 3 that matter most.
They define “what good looks like” before they plug in any model.

Then they layer AI into those decisions as an accelerator, not a replacement.
They add evaluation, monitoring, and human oversight so leaders can trust the system enough to actually use it.

When you put models and decisions side by side, you quickly see where your AI is ready for production…
and where it is still just an experiment with a nice demo.

Where does AI decision ownership live in your organisation right now, and is it working?

Found this useful? Share with your network and drop a comment with how you are connecting AI capabilities to real business decisions.
#DataGOL

𝗦𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲
Be willing to do what most won't

𝗜𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲, “𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗜” 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀:
- chatting with it vs configuring it to work for you.
- One feels productive. The other actually compounds.

This week I watched a team celebrate “AI adoption.”
They were… copy-pasting prompts into ChatGPT like it’s a smarter search bar.
Meanwhile, the quiet operator in the corner had:
- a reusable system prompt + context pack
- a couple API connections
- one lightweight RAG pipeline pulling their docs
- a few automations that ran while everyone else was in meetings
𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀. 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿 𝗥𝗢𝗜, 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗯 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗿:
- Chat → ask questions
- Prompt → get consistent outputs
- Configure → structure context + constraints + tools
- Operate → connect APIs, automate workflows, evaluate quality

𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 (𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗻𝗲𝗴𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲):
- how context windows really behave
- tool calling / agents (even simple ones)
- API wiring (one integration = a new superpower)
- RAG with your data (so it stops hallucinating your business)

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁.
It’s tolerance for the “ugh” phase: logs, retries, edge cases, evaluation.
Most people stop at prompting because it feels finished.
Operators keep going until it ships.

𝗕𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁: are you chatting, prompting, or operating right now and what’s the one configuration skill you’ll learn this month?

𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗜.

It’ll reward the AI that survives the audit: 𝗥𝗢𝗜, 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 inside real teams, real systems, with real guardrails.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 “𝗔𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀” 𝗜 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:
✅ a pilot that generates
❌ a workplace that can’t metabolize the output
So the org gets buried under polished drafts… and nobody’s sure what’s true, what’s safe, or what’s worth acting on.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝟯 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘀

𝗖𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝗽 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 → retire bad routines before AI scales them.

𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 → permissions, monitoring, compliance: non-negotiable.

𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱 → proprietary data + human expertise + intentional creativity.

The “𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲” isn’t less human. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 because:

• Creativity becomes scarce advantage when output is frictionless.

• Human expertise gets pricier when AI sounds confident about everything.

• And if AI smooths away the messy debate, you lose the work trails that keep teams aligned.

If your org gets judged on measurable value in 2026…
𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝘂𝗻𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁: meetings, workflows, reports, approvals or “AI-generated busywork”?

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿: 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗛𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲! 🔥

Ever wonder why it's SO HARD to stick with something new? The answer is simpler than you think! 😊

Visuals by @Pejman Milani

Look at willpower like a candle - it starts strong but eventually burns out. We've all been there... super excited on day 1, kinda tired by day 3, and completely giving up by day 7! 🕯️
But habits? They're like an endless energy source! ⚡
The science is clear:

Willpower runs out (just like your phone battery)
Habits run on autopilot (like breathing!)
Small daily actions > big one-time efforts

What's ONE tiny habit you could start today? Maybe drinking a glass of water when you wake up? Or spending 5 minutes reading before bed?

Remember: Consistency beats intensity! Build those habit flames and watch them power your success! 🚀

hashtag#HabitHacks

𝟭𝟭 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝘆 𝗝𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 🚀

Ever wonder why some leaders effortlessly inspire while others struggle despite the fancy title?

Visuals from @Pejman Milani

I've distilled my leadership journey into 11 visual frameworks that changed my approach. (#10 was my personal game-changer!)

Three Core Leadership Principles:
✅ Today's hard choices create tomorrow's success
✅ Authority comes from action, not position
✅ Clear thinking creates clear direction

𝗠𝘆 𝟭𝟭 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗱:
1️⃣ 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿
Leadership is earned daily through consistent actions that build trust, not handed out with business cards.
2️⃣ 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝘃𝗮𝗴𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿
Put thoughts on paper and watch how quickly the gaps appear! Clear documentation transforms good thinking into great execution.
3️⃣ 𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴
Great teams aren't born—they're methodically built through consistent effort.
4️⃣ 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲
Transform failures into frameworks for future success through systematic learning.
5️⃣ 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲. 𝗘𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲
The courage to make difficult choices today prevents bigger crises tomorrow.
6️⃣ 𝗙𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆
Action is the antidote to anxiety. Start before you feel ready—momentum creates clarity.
7️⃣ 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺
Yesterday's perfect solution needs today's fresh perspective.
8️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀
Progress rarely follows a neat path. Small, sustainable steps consistently taken beat sporadic giant leaps.
9️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘁
Today's effort prevents tomorrow's pain. Disciplined processes create freedom, not restriction.
🔟 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴
Focus beats fragmentation. Choosing what to ignore is as strategic as choosing what to pursue.
1️⃣1️⃣ 𝗔 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆
Vision without action is just daydreaming. Your example speaks louder than any mission statement.

Which framework resonates most with your current challenges? I'd love to hear which one hits closest to home!
♻️ Repost this to help your network level up their leadership toolkit!

carousel.pdf

𝟭𝟬 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲

We are done playing with AI.

In 2026, AI agents enter work. Quiet. Deep. For real. 

I see 10 big shifts coming for enterprise and mid-market teams.

Here is my view:

1️⃣ 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸
Not chatbots.
They read, write, click, move data, trigger flows.
They act in tools you use now.
Your team starts to manage agents, not chats.

2️⃣ 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀
No more “cool demo” with no owner.
CFO asks one question:
→ Where is ROI in 90 days?
If you show value, you scale.
If not, budget dies. Fast.

3️⃣ 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁-𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆
Agents fail if data is messy.
You need data that is:
→ Easy to find
→ Clean and linked
→ Safe for wide access
I call this “business-ready data”.

4️⃣ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿
You do not want 15 data tools.
You want one brain.
One place for:
→ Pipelines
→ Store
→ Metrics
AI-native platforms win here.

5️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄
Engineers write less raw code.
Agents draft flows and tests.
Your best people:
→ Set clear specs
→ Review diffs
→ Guard quality at scale

6️⃣ 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹
Regulators wake up.
You must show:
→ Who touched what data
→ How AI made each call
→ Why output is safe
No proof, no trust.

7️⃣ 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁𝘀
Per seat makes no sense when agents do work.
Expect:
→ Pay per outcome
→ Pay per use
→ Mix of both for large deals

8️⃣ 𝗠𝗶𝗱-𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗺𝗽𝘀 𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱
Less tech debt.
Faster change.
Strong AI-native tools mean a small firm with clear data beats a slow giant with old stacks. 🚀

9️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘃𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝘆 𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀
Home-grown AI infra looks cool.
Cost, talent, and risk say no.
You still build use cases.
You buy the boring layers.

🔟 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁
Big press drops fade.
Real edge comes from:
→ One agent that cuts 30% cycle time
→ One workflow with clean, shared data
No noise. Only impact.

I spend my days at @DataGOL on one question:
𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝗜 “𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆” 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀?

What part of this future feels closest to your world right now?

𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘂𝗽, 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗢𝗦 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁!

AI is making execution simple, which means good judgment is your new superpower.
Stop competing on speed and start building an 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗣𝗠 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺.

I will be writing the detailed series over the following week.

My 5-part series is your blueprint for this shift:
𝗘𝗺𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁: Your new moat is not in features, it's in turning chaos into clear decisions and defining high-integrity constraints.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗-𝗔-𝗘 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸: Use the Delegate, Amplify, Elevate model. Give all the repeatable tasks to AI and focus human energy on irreversible decisions.

𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 & 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴: Get better at interpreting data (Signal) and naming the real problem (Sensemaking). Always look for "𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲."

𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆: When you build AI, you are shipping a system, not just a feature. Govern it with a clear Decision Contract.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗠𝗼𝗮𝘁: Your value is defined by four things: providing Clarity, making Evaluation the new UX, designing for Trust, and running the Machine-Human system.

The winners won’t be the ones who “move fast.”
They’ll be the ones who decide well—𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀.

𝗜𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱… 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗱 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲?

📉 𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝘃𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀.


You optimized your pipelines, warehouses, and data stack.
You invested in Snowflake, Databricks, dbt, and orchestration tools.
You assumed that would make AI work in real business workflows.

𝗜𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁.

Because AI doesn’t fail from lack of data. It fails from lack of context.

𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿, 𝘄𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵:

• Why “data access” ≠ “operational understanding”
• How missing context erodes trustand destroys adoption
• What it really takes to move from dashboards to autonomous agents that explain, verify, and act
• Why current stacks optimize for storage and compute—not decision quality

🚫 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲.
✅ Start embedding business context into the foundation of your data systems.

If your AI can’t reason through a workflow like your top analyst, then all you’ve built is a very expensive tool.

https://lnkd.in/gnNP5JXJ

Product + Growth @ DataGol | AI | Financial Transformation | Defi

Thank you to everyone who joined us yesterday. If you missed the session, or are based in Europe, we will be hosting it again next week for our European partners.

Most AI projects do not fail because the models are weak.
They fail because the teams are focusing on infrastructure plumbing and get stuck with optimizing the infra. 

In our recent DataGOL webinar, we broke down a pattern we keep seeing:
Teams invest heavily in pipelines, warehouses, and data stack optimization.
Then they expect AI to reason, explain, and act inside real workflows.

It cannot.
So trust erodes.
Answers get discarded.
Momentum stalls.

We covered:

How missing business context destroys trust in AI outputs

The difference between “data access” and “operational understanding”

What it actually takes to move from dashboards to agents that can explain, verify, and take action

Why Snowflake/Databricks-style stacks optimize storage and compute, but not decision quality

The shift is simple to describe, but hard to execute:
Stop building more AI infrastructure.

Start building a #ConextOS that understands the business.
Reach out to us for 1:1 AI consulting session.

#AIinProduction #EnterpriseAI #DataPlatforms #AIInfrastructure #AgenticAI #DataGOL #OperationalIntelligence

Focus on AI Outcomes, Not Infrastructure

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿.

You add “AI on top” of a broken stack.

I see this again and again when I talk with B2B founders and operators.

- The story is always the same.
- The product helps clients save time.
- The team still drowns in manual work.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵.
His SaaS app cuts 80–90% of founder time in fundraising.
- Strong value.
- Happy users.

𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺, 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀:
• Call transcripts land in the CRM
• Team members read each call
• They pull out fund mandate, stage, check size
• They paste data into fields, one by one
• Boards in Asana do not move unless someone drags cards.
• Research for each investor runs “one by one by one” because bulk tools hallucinate.

𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿.
- The service scales.
- The engine does not.
- The answer for him was not a “new all-in-one platform.”
- He needed one intelligent system between all his tools.
That is where we brought in @DataGOL as "AI Native Intelligence & Execution Platform"

Here is how we implemented it:

→ 𝗘𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿
- Transcripts go in.
- AI pulls structured fields with a shared language.
- Data flows back into the CRM without a human hand.

→ 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗿
- CRM actions trigger status changes.
- Project tools move on their own.
- No one drags cards all day.

→ 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲
• Multi-agent AI runs deep research in bulk.
• Scores and ranks targets.
• Shows sources so you can trust the results.

→ 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
- Once the middleware works well, you replace old tools
- One by one
- With less risk and clear ROI proof.

Fast ROI comes from one AI Native layer that makes your whole stack work like one product.

DataGOL

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗹𝗲: 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟'𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁

There's a shift happening in how SaaS based finance teams interact with their data.
I'm calling it 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲.

𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸: AI that doesn't just tell you what happened, but identifies exactly why it happened. In seconds.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲:
𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 = "Revenue down 12%. Margins compressed."
𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 = "May COGS spike in Product Line X. Drove 73% of the margin erosion."
One reports the score. The other finds the insights that lost the game.

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱.
They want to know why Q2 margins spiked while Q3 collapsed.
And right now?
Your data team finds out what was presented... after the meeting.

𝗜'𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀.
CFO builds the board deck. The data team scrambles to reverse-engineer the "why" question two weeks later.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀:
→ Hire expensive consultants for ad-hoc analyses ($50k+ per engagement)
→ Duct-tape BI tools that still need manual SQL and weeks of turnaround
Neither gets you diagnostic depth in real-time.

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟'𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄.
Here's what happens now:
✓ 𝗔𝘀𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵: "What drove the margin variance in Q3?"
✓ 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘀 your Chart of Accounts before calculating (human-in-the-loop)
✓ 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀—product line, customer segment, cost category
✓ Suggests the 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 before you ask it
✓ 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸—Python code, logic trail, audit-ready transparency

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀:
→ From raw NetSuite chaos → boardroom-ready insight in under 60 seconds.
→ Full transparency into how every number was calculated.
→ No more "black box" AI guessing.

𝗡𝗼 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱. 𝗡𝗼 𝗦𝗤𝗟. 𝗡𝗼 𝗽𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆.𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝗸.
Diagnostic Finance isn't about prettier dashboards.
𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 "𝘄𝗵𝘆" 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀.

Are you still reporting what happened? Or are you ready to diagnose why?

DataGOL

𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧 stands out as it delivers real time business ready insights directly embedded into your finance, sales, product workflows.

It's deeply integrated, maintains context across your data, proactive and action oriented, solving the "𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮" problem and driving decisions.

𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗪𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗢𝗡, 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗫𝗧 𝗔𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗘, 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗙𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗗 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗡𝗘𝗥

𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦!!

T𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧 - Assisting your Finance, Product and Sales Team. 𝗔𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 - Responding within minutes with insights that were not possible before.

Whether you are analyzing revenue trends, sales or.. etc..

𝗦𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝗲𝘁 - directly creating and accessing data pipelines, managing context and creating intelligence from your data.

Want a personalized 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗟 Comment below.

#DataScience #Transparency #TrustInAI #DataGOL

𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀. 𝟴𝘅 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴.
We looked at a “successful” gaming platform: 10M active free-to-play users, super sticky… and still stuck at ~8x exit.

I saw this in a gaming client at @DataGOL
- Free-to-play.
- Very sticky.
- Exit stuck at 8x.

𝗪𝗵𝘆?
User data looked nice on a slide.
Inside, they had HTML + vibes.
- No real events.
- No cohorts.
- No path from “player” to “payer”.

𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗗𝗔𝗨, 𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴.

The truth is:
- You don’t scale from 8x to 20x with more features.
- You scale with a better brain.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄:

𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 + 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁.
- One lake for all data.
- One “virtual CRM” on top.
- One clean stream of events from product and ads.
Then I stop saying “users”.
I see segments, with clear intent.

𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁, 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸𝘀.
- Every campaign message flows into the same brain.
- Every deposit and payment links back to a touch.
- I can ask “what creates LTV?” and get a clear view.
Most tools stop here.
They show reports, not answers.

𝗟𝗮𝘀𝘁, 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀.
- Small Python agents watch each player.
- They look at recency, frequency, and value.
- They trigger one next action, not ten.
Email, offer, KYC nudge, in-game push.
Personal, fast, cheap.

𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁:
- Lower cost to reactivate.
- Less waste in marketing.
- More users move to deposit, subscribe, or compete.

Teams say “we have a monetization issue”.
I see an intelligence gap.

𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝟭𝟬𝗠 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲?

If you want to build that intelligence for your product, @DataGOL helps teams build the full stack AI agents.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀?

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗠 𝗠𝗼𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗖𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲

There's a role emerging in AI-native companies that doesn't have a name yet.
It's the "Judgment PM".

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲:
𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗠 = Discovery → prioritization → requirements → delivery → iterate
𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗠 = Turns ambiguity into irreversible decisions that machines can't make

𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁.
Ship faster. Write more PRDs. Run more sprints.
That era is over.
In an AI-native world, execution speed is no longer scarce.
Judgment is. Context is. Trust is.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄, most product teams are responding the wrong way.
More gates. More committees. More process.
That's not a strategy. That's organizational scar tissue.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗣𝗠 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆:
✓ 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 — turns chaos into a sharp decision: "We're doing X, not Y, because Z"
✓ 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 — treats eval as a first-class product capability ("Evaluation is the new UX")
✓ 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 — ships explanations, confidence scores, and undo/rollback as core features

𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁.
✓ Your operating model must increase the surface area of what can be validated.
✓ The PMs who figure this out will own the decisions that matter.
✓ The ones who don't will keep writing PRDs that machines could generate in 30 seconds.

Comment if you're already making this shift?

DataGOL = 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗿 + 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺

I've had the same conversation with 5 different performance marketing teams this Month.

They all said some version of:
"𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝘆 𝗖M𝗢 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵. 𝗜 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺."
This isn't a data quality problem. It's a trust problem.
And it's driving a shift from "𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸-𝗕𝗼𝘅 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀" to what I'm calling "𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀".

Here's the difference:
𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸-𝗕𝗼𝘅 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 = Dashboards you can't trace. Numbers you can't validate. Feature requests for every custom query.
𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 = Full visibility into SQL structure. Complete data lineage. Slice data any way you need, instantly.

𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗖𝗔𝗖 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝟮𝟬%.
- You pull the dashboard. The number's there.
- But you can't explain how it was calculated. You can't trace it back to the source.
You're defending a number you don't fully understand.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀:
→ Accept the black box (and the trust gap)
→ Build custom solutions (and burn budget on data engineers instead of User Acquisition )
We built DataGOL "Data Science Agent" to eliminate that trade-off.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄:
✓ 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗦𝗤𝗟 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆—trace any metric to source in seconds
✓ 𝗦𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀—no feature requests
✓ 𝗔𝗜-𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀 (imagine Looker with ChatGPT built in) - AI and agent capabilities directly into the workflow
✓ 𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - to understand nuanced user behaviour

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁? Budget that used to fund data validation now goes directly into user acquisition.

The teams that figure this out will outspend competitors where it matters.

Are you still working with black-box tools? Or have you made the shift to trust-first?

#DataScience #Transparency #DataAnalytics #TrustInAI #DataGOL

𝗜 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 “𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱.”

𝗜 𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 “𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻.”

𝗗𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗯𝗼𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁.

A new tool goes live, charts load, colours move, leaders clap.
Then nothing in the business changes.

𝗔𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗮, 𝗮𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗿𝗱, 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝘁 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗚𝗢𝗟, 𝗜 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻.

• Speed to screen gets all the praise.
• Speed to trust stays invisible.

𝗔 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀.

• Shared meaning for every key metric.
• Clear link from signal to action.
• Proof that the last decision from data did not burn people.

𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹.

• A smart system does more than match a query to a chart.
• It understands entities, joins signals, brings context from a knowledge graph, and lands one clear next step for a real owner.
• No one in a boardroom says, “Great, we shipped our first dashboard in seven days.”
• They say, “We used data to change this price, stop this churn, shift this budget.”
That moment is the real launch.

𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀, 𝗜 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸:

• Time to first shared definition.
• Time to first decision with data in the room.
• Time to first leader who asks for the same view again because they now trust it.
Dashboards support that journey. They do not define it.

𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗻, 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆?

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝟱𝟲% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗘𝗢𝘀 𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗡𝗼 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀

𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗻𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄.
Leadership thinks the infrastructure is in place.
Employees say it isn't even close.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴.
81% of the C-suite believe a clear AI policy exists in their organization.
Only 28% of employees agree.
That's a 53-point perception gap.

𝗢𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝟴𝟭% 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗜.
Only 27% of individual contributors say the same.
On tool access? 80% vs. 32%.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴...
This isn't a communication problem. It's a feedback loop failure.
If leadership believes the foundation is already built, they remain blind to the bottlenecks preventing teams from moving beyond basic prompting.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀.
Workday found that 37% of AI time savings are immediately lost to rework, employees cleaning up outputs that weren't good enough the first time.

𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲.
Meanwhile, PWC data shows 56% of CEOs report no significant financial return from AI.
But 12%—the "Vanguard"—are seeing simultaneous cost and revenue gains.
The difference? They're 2.6x more likely to have embedded AI into core processes, not peripheral tasks.

𝗠𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻:
- The AI winners of 2026 won't have better models.
- They'll have closed the 53-point gap between what the boardroom believes and what the frontline experiences.
- The technology is not the bottleneck.
- The misalignment is.
𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? 𝗢𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁?

taplio

Vinod SP's Linkedin Analytics

Vinod SP

Performance ScoreVinod SP's LinkedIn Performance

Who is engaging with Vinod

Vinod SP's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Vinod SP's Linkedin Analytics

Vinod SP

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Vinod SP's LinkedIn Performance

Who is engaging with Vinod

Vinod SP's Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Vinod SP's Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreVinod SP's LinkedIn Performance

Vinod SP's Best Posts (last 30 days)