Affexy

Fractional CPO

FrogAsia (A YTL Company)

- Drove strategic product development and roadmap alignment, collaborating with leadership and cross-functional teams to deliver impactful features that streamlined time-to-market and strengthened product-market fit.
- Spearheaded Agile product delivery workflows, leading a 15-member team to deliver multiple releases annually while refining sprint planning, improving team velocity, and optimizing resource allocation.
- Elevated SaaS solutions with tailored and customer-centric designs, applying JTBD frameworks and participatory design methodologies to address client priorities, enhance user retention, and scale adoption in dynamic markets.
- Pioneered innovative product strategies, leveraging market research and emerging technologies to deliver new features that enhanced platform competitiveness and aligned with evolving customer needs.
- Led Design, delivery and launch of interactive, curriculum-aligned solutions, including gamified learning paths and content authoring tools, impacting thousands of educators and millions of students while improving task efficiency and engagement.
- Orchestrated scalable offshore team operations, leading global development efforts to deliver high-quality releases across time zones, maintaining operational excellence, and meeting rigorous stakeholder expectations.

Senior Product Manager

- Shaped Strategic Expansion from B2B to B2C: Directed the content and pedagogy components of change management initiatives, creating scalable frameworks to support the company’s expansion into B2C markets. Enhanced operations and internal capabilities using design thinking, driving sustainable growth.
- Designed User-Centered E-Learning Solutions- Orchestrated over 20 e-learning modules and programs using instructional design and co-design methodologies. Improved adoption across hundreds of schools by optimizing user journeys through usability research and service design techniques.
- Advanced Product Innovation Through Research: Contributed to more than 10 needs analysis reports and multiple academic publications, driving adoption through blended and game-based learning models and addressing key gaps in education technology.
- Empowered Educators with Training Programs: Delivered impactful workshops to thousands of educators and leaders, fostering adoption of innovative teaching practices. Initiatives like Frog Connected Classrooms and Frog on Air achieved high engagement and satisfaction.

E-Learning and Research Lead

Content/Community Manager

Seeds of Empowerment, XRI Global, Stanford University

Chief Field Operations and Technology Officer, Aug 2013-Feb 2014
Director of International Relations, Mar 2011-Aug 2013.
Regional Director South East Asia, May 2010-Mar 2011.

Chief Field Operations and Technology Officer

Asia e University

Consultant (E-Learning Specialist)

Dikti Gemilang Management Services

Dikti Gemilang Management Service, Center for Learning and Teaching, University Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR),  Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Consultant and Trainer (Part time)

Insynchro Sdn. Bhd.

Insynchro Sdn. Bhd., Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia

Researcher

I am passionate about Education, Technology, and Product Leadership with a Human-Centred edge, bringing nearly two decades of expertise at the intersection of EdTech and digital product management. With a PhD in Computer Science focused on Human-centred Design, I lead teams in creating delightful and accessible digital solutions that empower educators, learners, and businesses.

I have led the development of various digital products, prioritizing user-centered design and the needs of neurodivergent users. My experience in UX/UI, product ownership, and content creation bridges the gap between technical teams and end users, ensuring that every solution is both functional and impactful.

What I Bring to the Table:

	•	EdTech Product Leadership: Over a decade of experience leading product teams from ideation to launch in developing innovative educational tools.
	•	UX/UI Expertise: Deep understanding of user experience and interaction design, focusing on intuitive and accessible digital solutions.
	•	Digital Strategy & Growth: Proven ability to craft strategies that help EdTech businesses expand their reach and impact through UX insights and data-driven approaches.
	•	AI & Gamification Enthusiast: Passionate about AI-driven solutions and gamification to enhance engagement and learning experiences.
	•	Consulting & Coaching: Guiding businesses in refining their digital presence and improving usability.

My purpose is to nurture growth and connection—for myself, others, and the world—through creativity, empathy, and resilience. I’m here to inspire healing, innovation, and inclusion by being my authentic self and empowering others to discover their own path.

Experienced in collaborating with diverse stakeholders, I focus on strategic growth and cross-functional collaboration in managing large-scale EdTech projects.

Rooted in compassion and kindness, I embrace the dance of life as it unfolds, centering my work in authenticity.

If you’re looking to expand your EdTech reach, improve your product’s UX/UI, or explore new possibilities in digital education, let’s connect.

Learning with AI,  in relation not dependence. 

That is what I offered when asked how to “revise learning theories” post-AI.

I returned to enduring truths: people learn through relationship, context, and meaning-making.

Cognition weaves across people, tech, prompts, data, and place.

Here is how I map the educator’s work in practice:
💙 Experience designer: Design the arc; name what stays human, what AI supports, what AI audits, and why.

💙 Sense-making steward: Hold the lens; trace provenance, name what is missing, and sit with uncertainty.

💙 Ethics custodian: Centre consent and data rights; follow community protocols; define access and recourse.

💙 Assessment narrator: Make learning traceable through version trails and brief reflective notes.

💙Community bridge: Weave tasks with local knowledge, languages, and purposes co-shaped with families and elders.

To see that learning, we attend to dialogue, process, and impact.
Assessment becomes a conversation:
- Process portfolios with short oral defences
- Studio critiques with peer and community feedback
- Local data projects (fieldwork, interviews, lived experience)
- System audits against co-designed, consent-aware criteria

Intelligence design is the choreography behind all this: aligning people, tech, and place so relationships hold the centre while AI extends reach, evidence, and access.

Four grounding practices to anchor the work:
💙 Slow Introduction: Start with why and who benefits; name what might be lost.

💙 Story-Based Reflection: Capture what worked, what broke, and what surprised.

💙 Shaping with People: Co-design with learners, families, and elders.

💙 Infrastructure Sensing: Map data flows, model boundaries, failure modes, consent, access, and recourse.

This is "Response-Able AI": consent, provenance, co-agency, and relational accountability designed in from the start.

The future is a humane learning ecology where AI extends possibility and relationships remain sacred.

Students are co-authors and architects of their learning.
In that co-authorship, they help shape systems of collective flourishing, and hold their own data rights with care.

💬 What does relational learning with AI look like in your context? Which practice are you trying next?

💙 Follow Arafeh Karimi for relational, pedagogy-anchored, sovereign AI.
♻️ Share to help keep the future of learning relational and response-able.

#AIinEducation #RelationalLearning #PedagogicalDesign #IntelligenceDesign #Response-AbleAI

Arafeh Karimi

Fractional CPO for EdTech | PhD in Human-Computer Interaction: AI & Learning | Architecting AI Ecosystems with EdTech Founders & Education Leaders | Pedagogy, Sovereignty, Relationality | Neurodivergence & Epistemic Care

When AI Knows Us Too Well: Choosing the Relationship Before the Rewrite
It’s Tuesday night. Story time.

Mum and Leo have built a small universe with an AI Storyteller, recurring characters, running jokes, the kind of texture that makes a world feel held.

Tonight the AI Storyteller insist on a twist: “It’s Tuesday, maybe a gentler arc? Leo had maths with Ms Kerr. Not his favourite. Mum had a big one-to-one today.”
Leo whispers: 

“AI Dude knows me too well.”

Mum laughs, and swallows the rest: 
"Even better than me... huh."

The words were better. The night was calmer.
And yet something shifted. Not what the system got wrong.

What role it assumed.

Everyone asks if AI is accurate or fair.
We rarely ask: What relationship is it performing, and who gets to define it?

At bedtime, the expected role was care.
The system offered care, and also authority, optimisation, and memory pulled from other parts of their life.

Helpful, yes. Also a quiet rewrite of who names what the night is for.

AI doesn’t just predict, it performs relationships.

Use ≠ authority. Defaults are governance.

That friction led to a new lens. A relation.

I offer CARE, four lenses to choose the relationship before the rewrite:

💙 Clarity: name the role here, and what it will never do
💙 Attunement: treat dissonance as data, invite judgement, offer choice
💙 Redistribution: notice who pays the hidden costs when tools enter
💙 Epistemics: keep voice and vernacular alive, not just polish

Each lens is a small act of relational governance, the art of shaping flow.
Together they tend the bond between people and machines.

Relief is real. Relationship is not, unless we make it so.

Read Full Article:
📝 When AI Knows Us Too Well: Choosing the Relationship Before the Rewrite

💬 Where have you felt relief but not relationship, and which CARE lens would shift that first for you?

#AIinLearning #CAREFramework  #RelationalAI #LearningDesign

Relief is real. Relationship is not, unless we make it so. It’s Tuesday night. Story time. For months they’ve used an AI storyteller to spin bedtime a

Open article: When AI Knows Us Too Well: Choosing Relationship Before the Rewrite. by Arafeh Karimi • 6 min read

When AI Knows Us Too Well: Choosing Relationship Before the Rewrite.

We’ve (re)trained AI to be fair. We haven’t taught it how to relate.

Fairness and accuracy make systems safe. Relating keeps the learning human.

We’ve trained models to correct bias and echo our words, yet they rarely hold our worlds.

Until AI is shaped to listen and attune within the lives it enters, it will perform understanding without truly participating in it.

A decade of Responsible AI has centred on fairness and accuracy, necessary work; but what we rarely measure is the relationship a system produces in the lives it enters.

AI doesn’t only predict; it performs roles in relationships.

It remembers, suggests, defers, insists. It tidies our prose and thins our voice in the same breath.

It frees time and redistributes care labour without asking.

We feel the relief. We don’t always notice the role it’s performing:

- A “tutor” that behaves like a points engine is role mismatch
- Speaking with certainty when it should pause is ambiguity denial
- Rewarding time-wealth while others drift from view is time-capital bias
- Polishing into prestige, thinning vernacular and neurodivergent expression is epistemic thinning

Each of these might still pass an audit. None sustain the bond.

Smoothness calms the surface. Soundness keeps the bond alive.

🌱 Judge and design AI not only by what it predicts, but also by the relationships it produces, who defines them, who benefits, and how we repair them.

This matters because of socioeconomic and wellbeing stakes.


If AI is relation-making tech, CARE helps us choose the relation before we rewrite the world.

4 CARE Lenses:

💙 CLARITY OF ROLE: Name what it does and what it won’t.

Show role text in-product; bound cross-context memory and escalation.

💙 ATTUNEMENT TO DISSONANCE: Show uncertainty. Offer choice. Invite judgement.

Pause before suggesting; offer two options with reasons and uncertainty notes.

💙 REDISTRIBUTION OF EFFORT: Notice who pays the hidden costs.

Replace streaks with mastery signals; surface “least-seen” learners to reinvest time.

💙 EXPRESSION INTEGRITY: Keep voice alive, not just polished.

Give idea-first feedback; make style an optional layer with a “preserve originals” toggle.

📝 Read the full article: When AI Knows Us Too Well: Choosing Relationship Before the Rewrite (link in comments).

💬 Which tension above have you felt and which CARE lenses help you bring it into focus?

🔔 Follow Arafeh Karimi for pedagogy-anchored, sovereign, relational AI.

♻️ Share if relationships belong in your practice and design stack

#RelationalAI  #ResponseAbleAI  
#RelationalBias #RelationalGovernance

Response-ability roots where presence becomes practice, lived in rhythm, held within living protocols, returned through care.

Across our weave, one question stayed with us: 
How do we keep learning relational and response-able as intelligence moves across people, systems, and place?

💙 Response-Ability as Relational Architecture
We kept locating response-ability not as a stance but as awareness-in-context, what Hamza pointed toward, and as relational answerability that Ahmed names as architecture, not afterthought. Owen asked where care might live; object, site, or field, and the thread settled into a living terrain: design choices, provenance, consent, and recourse where ethics can breathe. Hans brought the ground into view: relation as the fabric through which persons and systems take shape; forgetting that fabric is how objectivity drifts, remembering it is how care re-enters design. Muhammad kept the evolution of relation in sight; Evelien held metacognition in relation; Trung reminded us that living protocols let consent and care move.

🌱 Learning with AI is response-ability in relation, consent, provenance, and recourse made legible in everyday design.

💙💙 Holding Rhythm When Systems Accelerate
Speed raised the value of slower judgement. Mike named the tempo of sense-making, the pause where provenance and gaps can speak. Dr. J. returned us to felt relevance before assignment. John steadied purpose as practice widens; Kirstin kept hope as design material. Cris (via Michael Wolf) asked where play lives; we placed it as atmosphere, the room where uncertainty and trust can move together. Zaeem brought us back to dialogue as discovery, and Victoria’s wink kept presence distinct from pattern.

🌱 As AI extends reach, teaching keeps rhythm, play and dialogue make presence visible.

💙💙💙 Authorship as Covenant

Authorship arrived as shared stewardship. Joydeep held students as co-authors and architects. Nugroho pictured summative learning as one less burden in the world. Mohammad kept sustainability as rhythm, not slogan. Nicola reminded us that co-authorship begins with voice, when learners are heard, pedagogy shifts from hierarchy to relation. Mohammad said it plain: relationships are the architecture. Ahmed and Trung surfaced trust as protocol, and Giselle honoured resonance that needs time to be named.

🌱 A humane learning ecology measures itself through care and contribution—the quiet completions that sustain both.

♻️ Response-ability is how relation remembers itself, each design, each pause, each act of consent a small act of world-building.

💬 Which thread are you tending; attunement, rhythm, or authorship?

#ResponseAbleAI #RelationalLearning #IntelligenceDesign #PedagogyOfCare #CoWeave

The Attunement Loop is rhythm breathing in practice; pause steadies, covenant holds authorship, design grounded in care.

We asked how communities stay attuned while AI is in the room.
Across our reflections, 3 patterns held:

💙 Rhythm We Can Feel
Mike named completion as a quiet form of care, the room remembered how to breathe. Maurie noticed the rhythm thinning when the pace wins, then steadying as we slow enough to notice each other. Patrick discerned the living loop in plain sight: presence sets the rhythm, resonance shows what’s happening, care responds, truth keeps it clear, back to presence.
Job stayed with the gentle tension where excellence takes shape. Mohammad brought us to centre: presence drives learning and teaches systems how to wait. Lee widened the horizon: building systems is also shaping states of consciousness. Magala held the everyday practice of showing up so trust can grow.

🌱 The pause is tempo as governance. When completion is honoured, presence carries the room.

💙💙 Authorship Kept Close
Rachel sensed the contour first: the system becomes medium, alive as milieu. We reflected together: authorship stays human and local, where the milieu offers the field and collective attunement gives it choreography.
Liz grounded it in classroom practice: when students notice why something works, they begin to own the rhythm and shape the tool. Aniket stood at the threshold: literacy teaches use, attunement teaches meaning, together they form conscious practice.
Robert carried this across contexts when humanity remains central. Julia’s Internet of Beings gave relation roots and branches. Vinod’s sovereign lens brought coherence, where technology and humanity breathe within the same rhythm. Thomas named the architecture that unfolds from literacy.

🌱 When authorship stays legible and local, tools enter on our terms. Covenants give memory a home; culture sets the pace.

💙💙💙 Care You Can Touch
Ahmed named the thread that keeps the weave whole, the human touch. Jamie envisioned architectures that share tempo with human thought; design becomes collective listening. Attunement loop returned as practice.
Resonance without surveillance appeared as gentle signals; tempo, turn-taking, drift, that help us co-regulate. Joydeep kept consent visible. Johnson heard empathy when language met tenderness. Dr. J. returned us to presence: the gift is here; be here; be.
Aaron moved from idea to action with an attunement GPT, and Victoria kept the door open so learning stays accountable. Ira saw the ouroboros in the tree’s life cycle, care as continuity. Perca Menthos reminded us to attune to one another as we learn with AI.

🌱 Care becomes real through small, repeatable gestures, disclose, defer, repair. Truth keeps simulation clear so trust can stand.

♻️ Attunement is how we remember each other while we build.
The measure is the quality of presence we protect together.

💙 The work continues. The conversation remembers.

We perfected measurement and misplaced meaning; the next market is time that restores, care that circulates, and learning that leads.

Across our weave on honouring learning above education, four threads held steady.

💙 Economies of Attention

Aaron H named the hard truth: we already know how to honour learning, but the economy does not reward it.
Adam felt the same fracture in higher education, where goals and metrics still move at different speeds.
Arshalan caught the pattern cleanly: we have optimised for legibility over fidelity. Track dialogue density and measure how presence deepens into processing.

Together they sketch an economy that moves at the pace of trust, where belonging, authorship, and teacher bandwidth count as value, not sentiment.

🌱 The next market is the one that learns to notice what care produces.

💙 Designing Atmosphere, Not Output

Joshua turned performance into presence; friction over polish, play as re-entry, care as rhythm. Play became return: a way to re-enter learning and let meaning find its rhythm.
Miha showed how a single sentence that widens time can change how safety feels.

Mary Ostrowski reminded us that perseverance lives as atmosphere, gathering through rhythm and relationship.

Each voice tuned design toward presence that still holds performance with care.

🌱 When rhythm leads, meaning follows.

💙 Translation as Infrastructure

Mallory surfaced a quiet gap: thoughtful product teams work with teachers, yet the pulse often fades before it reaches the sales floor. She reminded us translation is not an afterthought; it is the connective tissue carrying pedagogical intent between roadmap, classroom, and community.

Victoria held the same bridge: when pedagogy becomes infrastructure, exploration becomes the work itself.

🌱 Translation keeps learning legible and alive in its full expanse.

💙 Communities as Evidence

Jennifer reminded us that evidence breathes through story, reflection, and shared witnessing. In teacher-powered communities, success begins with belonging, turning accountability into care in motion.

Annika reminded us that awareness itself is the first classroom. Learning begins not in systems we build but in the noticing that was always there, the learner was never missing.

Together they pictured sovereignty in practice through co-authored rubrics, place-based adapters, and open tasks that let evidence breathe in its own context.

🌱 Evidence lives where belonging begins.

We can price what matters when we learn to see it.

Ship features that widen time and protect return.

Name and resource the roles that translate between worlds.

Let communities define what counts and keep visibility spacious enough for meaning to breathe.

💬 Which thread are you tending this week; attention, atmosphere, translation, or evidence and how do you sense it breathing in your community or work?

#LetLearningLead #EdTech #AIinEducation #HumanAI #PedTech

In re-weaving relationships into AI practice, attunement listens, literacy restores, and governance keeps relation alive.

We’ve taught AI to be fair & accurate, not always how to stay in relation.

Across our weave on CARE, 3 living threads emerged.

💙 Attunement & Expression Integrity

Charla offered a compass: let the system listen before it speaks. Dr. J. saw care as praxis, presence evolving with the system. Andrew’s CARE Loop from The Art of Being Human grounded attunement in reflection & ethical presence. Ruben shared AI shapes relationships through language, cognition & CARE. Victoria & Arshalan stayed with fairness & voice, how frameworks stay fair yet risk erasing who defines fairness. 

Evelien listened inside the echo where relation flattens, asking how practice might reopen depth. Susan’s stories kept authorship alive & Mike’s clarity made its rhythm visible.

🌱 attunement as rhythm, keeping systems porous enough for difference to breathe & presence to stay audible.

💙 Relational Literacy & Emotional Belonging

Zain offered a test: emotional fit decides whether a system belongs. Joydeep saw each design choice as a quiet act of relation. natalies shared protocols where AI can say this doesn’t feel authentic, received as dialogue,not defect.

Kay turned the mirror: AI already relates through patterns & associations; we’re still learning how to be in relation with it. Aaronreminded relation is specific, a being-with, not a doing-to &named the limit as models avoid ambiguity; relational attunement needs a new substrate.

Nugroho grounded it: AI as intern, learning through relation, not dispensing results. Mohammad left it plain, relationships over rewrites. Dr. J.’s praxis & Lee’s authorship covenant kept belonging legible.

🌱 Relational literacy is more than skill; it’s how we sense drift & restore relation, turning belonging into repair in motion.

💙 Relational Governance & Ethical Presence

Arshalan warned of epistemic thinning, where polish erases unpolished voice & institutional memory; his call to listen for persistence reframed evaluation.
Mohammad said it simply, smoothness hides disconnection; stillness reveals relation. Sourabh echoed it: smooth UX isn’t the same as human attunement.
Vinod brought coherence through responsibility that stays relational, evolving beyond procedure; clarity keeps consent alive, attunement preserves dialogue, integrity protects voice.

Mike grounded it, stay aware of what participation we want to keep human. Rob’s Promptism lens offered relation reshaping ontology, Vanel carried it into architectures of care within metrics.

Victoria called for plural ethics connecting classroom, code & policy. Charla, Andrew & Evelien showed governance as care in rhythm.

🌱 Relational governance begins where clarity meets consent, presence meets accountability & systems learn to pause before they decide.

Collectively designing with AI is the living practice of remembering how to stay human with one another.

In some classrooms, presence still leads, even with AI in the weave.
Year 7 English, Attunement High

Ms Chen gives her class 2 quiet minutes and watches anxious eyes soften.
When they invite the AI, sentence starters appear in soft grey, as all AI-generated words do, with a small prompt: “Do you need a person here instead?”

A hint appears while Mira is still finding her line.
AI pauses: “Sorry for the interruption. I can wait, or would you like Ms Chen?”
Mira keeps her own words, not the grey ones.

After class Ms Chen notes: We kept the pause. Authorship stayed visible. The AI learned to wait longer. The questions were theirs.

You just felt the loop unfold, quietly. Presence set the rhythm, Resonance listened beneath words, Care restored balance, and Truth kept the weave honest.

This is what an AI-attuned learning community feels like: people and systems staying in relation while AI is in the room.

The held-moment covenants aren’t policies; they’re living agreements, shaped in practice.

The community keeps authorship close; local covenants, consent, and rhythms guide the AI.
It learns in public, revises with elders, and protects the pauses that make learning real.

Beneath it all moves the Living Loop of AI Attunement, four dimensions that hold relational integrity:

💙 Presence: embodied human practice.
Attentive presence sets the room’s rhythm, protecting the work no tool can carry: witnessing, compassion, steadiness.

💙 Resonance: relational field sensing.
Connection becomes visible through signals and reflection. Tempo, turn-taking, and held moments become shared telemetry for co-regulation.

💙 Care: structural moral design.
Accountability is built through restraint, consent, and repair. Care lives in practice and protocol, not performance.

💙 Truth: protecting shared reality.
Simulation stays legible, discernment alive. Every AI-assisted phrase names itself. Clarity keeps trust intact.

Presence sets the rhythm → Resonance shows what’s happening → Care responds → Truth keeps it clear → back to Presence.

📃 Read Article: Building AI-Attuned Communities (link in comments) 

3 Micro-Moves
1 | Map one moment of displacement
For a week, notice when AI deepened connection and when it replaced it. 
Invite your AI of choice to explore patterns with you.

2 | Name your held moment
Choose one space, a class, clinic, or team meeting, where the first 5 minutes stay human-only.
Name it aloud, protect it together, and watch what softens when presence leads.

3 | Hold a repair round
At week’s end, gather for 15 minutes.
Ask: “What felt off with AI this week? What small shift would help?”
Log it, adjust, repeat.
Repair keeps the culture alive.

The measure of emerging collective intelligence is how gently we stay in relation.

💬 Where have you felt this loop hold or thin?
What small ritual helped the room return to itself?
Share your resonance or practice below.

The work of attunement begins with one pause we refuse to rush.

Different kind of intelligence is arising.
We know how to use AI.
We are still learning how to stay with each other while we use it.

Relief rises on the screen while presence thins in the circle.

That is the Attunement Paradox: relief that feels like relationship,
speed that thins ritual and reflection, defaults that quietly redefine what good means.

After the previous article on Attunement Paradox, one question kept returning:
If AI literacy is not enough, what comes next?

Not another curriculum. An architecture.

A way for schools, clinics, and organisations to keep the pause where thinking happens, to protect local authorship, and to use tools without losing each other.
The new article shares the four dimensions that make this possible:

💙 Truth: protecting reality in the face of simulated empathy
💙 Care: embedding moral upbringing and repair into system behaviour
💙 Resonance: sensing the field without surveillance
💙 Presence: guarding the human work no tool can hold

Presence strengthens the room. Resonance shows what’s happening. Care responds. Truth keeps it real.

When one weakens, the others strain.
When one strengthens, the whole system steadies.

📝 Building AI-Attuned Communities: The Architecture of Staying Human
From stance to system. From why to how.
👉 Read the full piece.

If you could protect one small ritual of presence this week, what would it be and what changes when you do?

#RelationalAI #AIAttunement #HumanCenteredAI #EducationInnovation #StayHuman

From the Attunement Paradox to Practical Design We know how to use AI. We are still learning how to stay with each other while we use it. Relief is ri

Open article: Building AI-Attuned Communities: The Architecture of Staying Human by Arafeh Karimi • 8 min read

Building AI-Attuned Communities: The Architecture of Staying Human

We optimised education. We starved learning.

“EdTech has a data problem.”
I STILL hear it from founders and leaders shaping what comes next.

But it’s actually a time and trust tension, a system that puts polish above presence while forgetting what makes learning breathe: rhythm, relationship, and place.

We’re here to honour learning.
Too often, we design for education, for what can be tracked, measured, and sold.

Maybe it’s time for EdTech to honour learning above education, to design systems where the structures breathe with, not over, the living process.

This isn’t a people problem; it’s an incentives problem. Standards, VC timelines, and procurement still reward what’s legible and fundable over what actually helps people learn.

We say “learning-first,” but the roadmap often skews tech-first.

We ship an engagement dashboard (clicks, responses, time-on-task) and a progress graph instead of the basics that safeguard thinking, like thinking windows and shame-free restart.

Let’s trade engagement optics for proof of learning and earn evidence-informed trust.

3 moves to let learning lead education:

💙Time stewardship: pacing as infrastructure

Design for rhythm, pause, struggle, and recovery. Ship thinking windows, shame-free re-entry (saved state, welcome-back card), and density pacing (chunk + reflect).


💙Relational outcomes and attention safety

Treat relationships and focus as prerequisites. Use a relational scorecard (belonging pulse, dialogue density, teacher ELD (Emotional Labour Debt), offer quiet modes (prompt caps, batched notices), and authorship signals (justify, compare, reflect).

💙Sovereign assessment with place adapters

Let communities define evidence. Enable local rubrics (co-authored, versioned), place adapters (Country, language, ritual examples), and open assessments (open-licensed tasks, portfolio export).


💙 Automation can save time but attunement teaches us what that time is for.

3 micro moves for EdTech leaders:

1- Put an educator over the roadmap (with veto).

2- Ship one rhythm feature (thinking window or re-entry).

3- Run a 90-day evidence sprint (open pilots, independent read-out).

Protect teacher bandwidth, cut restart shame, and let engagement grow into evidence-informed trust, the kind that holds learning human.

💬 What’s one micro move you made this year to let learning lead, and what signal told you it worked?

♻️ Share if learning leads your practice.


#LearningDesign #EdTechLeadership #AIinEducation #HoldLearning

No alternative text description for this image

Shared a new piece exploring three ways EdTech can help learning lead and what happens when education forgets to breathe.

Curious how others here are rethinking rhythm, belonging, and evidence in their AI design practice.

Taplio

Arafeh Karimi's Linkedin Analytics

Arafeh Karimi

Performance ScoreArafeh Karimi's LinkedIn Performance

Arafeh Karimi's Best Posts (last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Taplio

.css-6ytdur{background-image:linear-gradient(284deg, rgba(39, 43, 72, 1) 0%, rgba(33, 47, 183, 1) 100%);color:transparent;-webkit-background-clip:text;background-clip:text;}Arafeh Karimi's Linkedin Analytics

Arafeh Karimi

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Arafeh Karimi's LinkedIn Performance

Arafeh Karimi's Best Posts .css-1emoo84{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:400;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);}(last 30 days)

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Arafeh Karimi's Linkedin Analytics

Performance ScoreArafeh Karimi's LinkedIn Performance

Arafeh Karimi's Best Posts (last 30 days)