Premium Ghostwriter. I help busy people build their personal brand and online presence.

Hi! Welcome to my profile.

If you’re here, it means one of two things:

1/ You’re probably considering hiring a ghostwriter (in that case, welcome)
2/ You have no idea who I am and why you ended up here (but now that you’re here, maybe hear me out?)

Writing is my dream and I have been living it for the last ten years.

My first piece of writing was a blog I published on a ‘flower’.

I never had the chance to look back at it because of how cringe it was.

But today, I write for some of the most powerful people who run big companies that my mind can only fathom.

So maybe I do have to thank that ‘flower’ blog after all.

Once I realised the power writing has on personal and professional life (I mean I am making money off of pushing a few buttons on my keyboard), I realised how powerful this can be for others as well.

So I started writing for others and never looked back.

Today, I write for Founders and CEOs and help tell their story online.

I've written 4 books as a ghostwriter with some of the most talented founders and leaders I've met. 

I’ve helped my clients go on podcasts as guests, got them more business, and a better network of high-net individuals to name a few.

And I would love it if you would want to be next.

If not, I am always happy to just chat, pick your brain, and share a coffee and book.

If that sounds interesting, you can reach out to me at hi@tanishavenkani.com.

And if you reached there, it means my writing was bearable for you. Thank you for allowing me to live my dream of writing!

Tanisha Venkani

If you are a founder or CXO and someone tells you they have cracked the LinkedIn algorithm, please be a little suspicious.

One of our clients recently had two text-only posts.

One got 385 likes and around 40,000 impressions. The other got 335 likes and around 20,000 impressions.

Only 50 likes apart. And yet, a 20,000-impression gap.

That is exactly why I do not take LinkedIn “formulas” too seriously.

A post does not spread only because people liked it.

It spreads when it reaches the right people.

When the right people comment, when it feels relevant to your own community, when people save it, share it, or send it to someone quietly.

So let's not judge a post only by visible numbers.

So when someone says image posts work better, or carousels work better, or a particular template is viral, I would take that advice very lightly.

Because both of these were text-only posts and core related to subject matter expertise.

The question you should ask: Did the post actually speak to the people you wanted to reach?

That usually matters more than any algorithm theory.

And yes, I still back-text posts. The LinkedIn algorithm has commitment issues anyway.

Human Notetaker | LinkedIn Ghostwriter | 8M+ impressions | 4X Book Ghostwriter | My parents don’t understand what I do for a living

Happy Women's Day. Let's bring more women leaders' voices to LinkedIn!

Happy Women's Day to the most incredible women who have worked with us in the team, our clients who are some real badasses!

More to come!

"I'll write on LinkedIn using ChatGPT."

Sure!

A well-known founder from India’s stock market circles once told us that he did not think we could write for him.

Fair enough.

We took a bet. We said, “Let us write one piece for you. You give the topic. If you do not like it, we will step back.”

He said, “Okay. Show me what you’ve got.” That conversation happened in May 2025.

It is March 2026 now, and we are close to completing a year of working together.

I still think about that often, because it reminded me of something I tell every founder and CXO very openly: I am not the expert in your field.

You are.

My work begins somewhere else. My work is to understand how you think. To study your space seriously. To find the right facts, shape the argument properly, and then write in a way that feels like you said it, not me.

That trust was never a small thing to me.

Writing for someone was never about sounding smart after reading a few articles in their industry.

It was always about listening properly. Paying attention. Doing the work well enough to carry someone else’s voice with care.

Right now, I work across five different industries. And in many of them, there was a first time.

A first project. A first learning curve. A first founder deciding whether to trust us without seeing a long list of category-specific samples.

I have always been grateful for that.

Because the people who gave us a chance were not only looking at whether we had worked in their exact industry before.

They were looking at something deeper.

Can this person listen well? Can this person understand the thinking? Can this person do the research properly? Can this person write in a way that can hold the weight of my name?

I think that is where good writing in niche industries really begins.

So this post is really a thank you.

To the founders and CXOs who gave us a chance before we had “proof” in their category.

To the ones who looked at the seriousness of our craft before the case studies.
To the ones who let the work speak first.

Some of our best client relationships began with doubt. They stayed because the work held up.

And honestly, that is still one of my favourite ways to earn trust. Sometimes it begins with one simple line: “Alright. Show me.”

While I understand skill learning in the age of Ai this seemed like a good reminder.

Book: Psycho-Cybernetics by Maxwell Maltz

'Thrilled' is old. It is now crying in public with bullet points.

The most difficult question as a founder of a ghostwriting agency I get on client calls is: “Can I see what you have written?”

And I always have to answer with a polite no.

That answer has never been easy.

When you are building any kind of service business, people want proof. They want samples, names, and visible work. Something they can hold and assess quickly.

I understand that.

But ghostwriting asks for a different kind of boundary.

A founder trusts you with their thoughts, their voice, their reputation, and often the parts of their thinking that are still taking shape. Once that trust is given, I do not believe it should be passed around to make the next sale easier.

So a lot of this work stays invisible.

I cannot always point at a post and say, we did that. I cannot always mention the client. I cannot always explain what sat behind the final version.

That is the nature of the work. And over time, I have come to respect that more deeply.

Some of the writing I am proudest of carries someone else’s name completely. Quietly. Fully. As it should.

It does make the business harder in certain moments. But there are a few lines that matter more than convenience. This has always been one of them.

The people who understand ghostwriting properly usually understand this too.
They are not only judging the visible output.

They are paying attention to how you listen, how you think, how carefully you handle someone else’s voice, and whether you know how to treat trust with discipline.

Some of our best relationships have started right after that polite no and maybe that is the strange beauty of this business.

A lot of the work you do well cannot be claimed loudly.Still, the right people know.

Bindu Balan - people working in education would be lucky to have her in your team.

K–12 Learning Content & Training | Instructional Design

Hi everyone! I’m seeking a new role and would appreciate your support. If you hear of any opportunities or just want to catch up, please send me a message or comment below. I’d love to reconnect. #OpenToWork

About me & what I’m looking for:
💼 I’m looking for Senior Editor and Training Specialist roles.
🌎 I’m open to roles in Bengaluru.
⭐ I’ve previously worked at Educational Initiatives.

Looking for Senior Editor, Training Specialist and Curriculum Specialist roles

How to stop being the most interesting person in the room and the most forgettable one on LinkedIn?

I came across a LinkedIn post from a mental health startup founder today. Although the post had decent engagement and ticked all the LinkedIn-formatting boxes,

Everything in the post could have been written by anyone.

And this is a Forbes 30 Under 30 founder. Someone who built a company from scratch because the system was broken. Someone with stories, opinions, and a point of view that could genuinely stop a scroll.

But none of that was in the post.

And that's not the founder's fault. It's the fault of the PROCESS being used to create content.

- it's probably a bad ghostwriting job
- or the founder decided to ChatGPT it and spit out the first draft

Such generic posts are costing you SOOOO much:

Investors who scroll past because nothing made them stop, or the customers who don't feel the conviction behind the product. A potential employee who chose someone else because that someone else sounded like they meant it. 

And WORST OF ALL - your reputation took a serious hit because everyone knows what AI-slop (internet's fav word of 2026) looks like.

You don't get those first impressions back.

There's some sort of cruel irony here because I am sure the founder has the opinions, stories, he could talk about the rage that built the company.

It just never made it into the brief. So it never made it into the post.

You cannot build a credible brand without credibility.

Empowering SaaS businesses to thrive online by crafting growth-focused Webflow websites with exceptional user experiences. | Webflow Expert

I'm a Design Consultant specialising in the following: User Centric Design, Growth Driven Design, Webflow design and development, UI/UX Design, Web Development, Web Design, Wordpress Development, Graphic Design, Internet Marketing. 

I have 14+ years experience in digital design, and I'm very well versed in every aspect of design and development, from conceptualization to implementation and maintenance.

I have developed an obsession for trying to help businesses grow through technology and helping them become more successful through the right implementation of a successful marketing strategy.

Robert Smart

Making a video is not a small thing.

There is the idea, the script, the recording, the editing, the thumbnail, the title. For most creators that is the better part of two days. Sometimes more.

Then it goes out and gets 4000 views. People watch it. Some share it. The comments are good.

Nine email signups.

At some point you have to sit with that maths. Not because the content was bad. Not because the audience was wrong. But because 4000 people showed up, paid attention, and then had nowhere to go.

That is not a content problem. That is a capture problem.

We built Clickk because that gap between views and leads should not be as wide as it is. Interactive moments placed inside the video itself, timed to appear while a viewer is still engaged. Not a link in bio. Not a CTA at the end. Something that meets them where their attention already is.

You can still join the waitlist at clickk(dot)com.

#creator #contentcreator #clickk #video #funnel

"We have 60% of the homepage designed... but the copy isn't signed off yet."

A potential client told me this on a discovery call recently.

They wanted to hit the ground running. Show momentum. Get the rebrand moving.

So they started designing the homepage. Mockups, layouts, visual direction. All looking good.

Except nobody agreed on what the homepage should actually say.

Now they're stuck. Beautiful designs built around placeholder copy that might completely change once messaging is finalized.

This happens more than you'd think.

The logic makes sense: "Let's get the design started while we work on copy. We can swap the words in later."

But here's what actually happens:

The design gets built around Lorem Ipsum or rough draft copy. Then the real messaging comes through and it's longer. Or shorter. Or needs a completely different structure.

Now you're either forcing copy to fit a design that wasn't built for it, or you're redoing the design to fit the actual message.

Either way, you're reworking something that should have been done once.

Copy before design isn't just a workflow preference. It's how you avoid expensive revisions.

Because design should serve the message, not the other way around.

When you know what you need to say, the design can be built to support that message. The layout works. The hierarchy makes sense. The visuals reinforce the words.

When you design first and add copy later, you're hoping the message fits the container. And it rarely does.

The fix is simple but uncomfortable:

Pause the design work until messaging is locked in.

I know it feels slower. I know stakeholders want to see pretty mockups. I know designers want to start creating.

But writing first, designing second saves you weeks of rework down the line.

Even if the copy isn't perfect. Even if it's a rough first draft. Get alignment on what you're actually saying before you design how it looks.

Your timeline will thank you. Your budget will thank you. And your designer definitely will.

--

Building websites where the message comes first and the design supports it. Let's talk if you're tired of redesigning things that should have been right the first time.

#website #ai #copy #growth #webflow

Sometimes I would get spam calls and when I hear that it is an AI voice I would repeat the same things they are saying just to annoy them. Doesn't really work though. They just continue with the script 🤣

Views are vanity. Your email list is the asset.

Most creators and marketers know this. Yet the way we measure content success is still heavily weighted towards platform metrics. Views, watch time, retention, reach. Numbers that live inside someone else's ecosystem.

The problem is that optimising for those numbers and building something you actually own are two different goals. A video can perform exceptionally well by every platform standard and still do very little for your business if there is no mechanism to move people from viewer to subscriber while they are still engaged.

That handoff is where most content strategies quietly fall apart.

We built Clickk to fix that specific moment. Interactive elements placed directly inside a video, timed to appear while a viewer is most engaged. Not a link in bio. Not a CTA after the video ends. Something that captures intent before the platform moves them on to the next piece of content.

Waitlist is still open. 

#clickk #metrics #video #youtube #growth #emaillist

You're not losing viewers because your content is bad.

You're losing them because by the time you ask them to do something, they've already moved on.

People watch your videos, engage with your content, and disappear. No lead. No sale. Just a view count that doesn't pay the bills.

That's the gap Clickk was built to close.

Most creators get one shot at conversion. A link in bio. A CTA at the end. A "check the description." By then the moment has passed. The viewer has moved on emotionally even if they're still on the page.

Clickk works differently. You build a timeline directly inside your video. Polls, quizzes, lead magnets, offers. Each one placed at the exact moment in your content where a viewer is most engaged. Not after the video. During it. While they still care.

The screenshot is a real timeline we built inside Clickk. Every marker you see is an interaction point a creator placed at a specific timestamp. Each one is a chance to capture intent before it fades.

We're launching this week and the waitlist is still open.

If you create content and you're tired of watching engagement go nowhere, this was built for you.

clickk.com

#clickk #marketing #youtube #vimeo #marketer #contentcreator

Most creators I watch put out genuinely good content.

The engagement tells you that. The comments tell you that. The watch time tells you that.

But somewhere between someone finishing a video and becoming a lead, something breaks down.

We've been thinking about this a lot while building Clickk. The content isn't the problem. The offer isn't the problem. It's the moment between the two. By the time a viewer sees a CTA, the emotional context that made them ready to act has already faded.

That's what we've been trying to solve. A way to place interactive moments directly inside a video, timed to appear while a viewer is still engaged. Not after. During.

If this sounds like something you've been thinking about too, the waitlist is still open. 

#contentcreator #video #youtube #marketing #content

There is advice every creator gets at some point.

Just keep posting. Stay consistent. The audience will come.

And a lot of creators do exactly that. They show up every week, they put out good work, they build an audience that genuinely cares about what they are making.

Then they look at their revenue and wonder what went wrong.

Consistency was never the problem. It was never going to be the problem. But somewhere along the way it became the whole strategy. Keep posting and hope that volume eventually converts into something.

Consistency gets you an audience. But an audience without a way to capture intent is just a number that doesn't pay the bills. That's the problem we built Clickk to solve.

The waitlist is still open - drop a comment or follow our page for updates.

#clickk #waitlist #contentcreators #content #keepposting

"What's the problem with the current website?"

"Everything."

That was the answer I got on a call with a prospect recently.

Not "the navigation is confusing" or "we need better CTAs."

Just... everything.

The site was built by a junior person in the company a few years back. No strategy. No buyer personas. No goal beyond "we need a website."

It exists. It's live. It has pages and content and a contact form.

But it doesn't actually work.

And here's the thing: most B2B websites fall into this exact category.

They were built to check a box. "We have a website" becomes the entire objective.

Nobody asked:

- Who is this for?
- What problem does it solve?
- What do we want people to do when they land here?
- How does this support our business goals?

So the site just... sits there. Looking professional enough. Saying nothing specific. Converting nobody.

It's decoration. Digital wallpaper. Proof that the company exists, but not much else.

The tell is when prospects approach a redesign like they don't have a website at all.

Because functionally, they don't.

If your current site isn't driving leads, isn't supporting sales, isn't answering prospect questions, isn't doing anything measurable... do you really have a website? Or do you just have a URL?

This isn't about the design looking bad.

The internet is filled with beautiful websites that do absolutely nothing. Clean layouts, nice colours, professional photography. And zero strategy.

The problem isn't pixels. It's purpose.

If you're planning a website project and the honest answer to "what's wrong with the current site" is "everything," you're not alone.

Most companies are in the same boat. A site that exists but doesn't work.

The good news? Starting from scratch with actual strategy behind it is easier than trying to fix a site that was never built with a goal in mind.

Just don't make the same mistake twice. Know who it's for. Know what it needs to do. Build it with intention.

Otherwise you'll be back here in three years saying "everything" again.

--

Building websites with strategy, not just to check a box. Let's talk if your current site exists but doesn't actually work.

#webflow #website #strategy #growth

"We need this done in 9 weeks."

"That's doable... if content doesn't hold us up."

I said this on a discovery call recently. The client had an ambitious timeline, clear goals, and a hard deadline.

They even had copy. First drafts. Good starting points.

What they didn't have? Sign-off.

The copy existed but wasn't finalized. Not approved. Not locked in.

Just drafts and a hope that approval would happen somewhere along the way.

Here's what I've learned after years of building websites:

Technical complexity rarely kills timelines. Waiting for content approval always does.

I can build, test, and launch a site in 8-12 weeks without breaking a sweat. The design gets done. The development gets done. Integrations work. QA happens.
And then the site sits there. Waiting. For weeks. Sometimes months.

Waiting for stakeholders to approve the homepage headline. Waiting for leadership to sign off on messaging. Waiting for copy that's been "almost ready" since week two.

The pattern is always the same:

Weeks 1-3: Discovery and strategy (smooth)
Weeks 4-6: Design built around draft copy (mostly smooth)
Weeks 7-10: Development (smooth)
Weeks 11-18: Waiting on final copy approval (chaos)

The wireframes are done. The staging site is live. The launch checklist is ready.
But the About page copy is still "pending review."

This isn't a developer problem. It's a decision-making problem.

Finalising website copy requires alignment that most companies underestimate:

Does this messaging reflect who we actually are?
Will leadership approve this tone?
Does this differentiate us enough?
Are we comfortable committing to this positioning?

Those decisions take time. They need multiple rounds of review. They require buy-in from people who are juggling ten other priorities.

And until those approvals happen, you're building around copy that might completely change.

If you're planning a website project with a tight deadline, here's my advice:

Don't start design until copy is finalised. Not drafted. Finalised.

I know it feels slower upfront. I know stakeholders want to see progress. I know designers want to start creating.

But designing around draft copy that changes later means rework. And rework kills your 9-week deadline faster than anything else.

Get the approvals first. Lock in the messaging. Then build.

Because a website that launches on time with finalised copy beats a beautiful design stuck in revision limbo every single time.

Your 9-week deadline is doable. But only if content approval doesn't hold you up.

--

Building websites for teams who finalize copy before we touch design. Let's talk if you're ready to get approvals out of the way first.

#website #copy #webflow #websitedevelopment #websiteproject

"Hi there Bob"

Nobody calls me Bob.

Not clients. Not friends. Not even my mom.

But apparently someone sending me cold outreach does. Twice now.

Look, I get it. Cold outreach is a numbers game. AI writes the emails. Templates save time.

But if you're going to claim you did research on my business and have "exclusive access to my entire market," maybe start by getting my name right.

And the business name they mentioned? Not mine. Never has been.

This is the problem with AI-generated outbound right now.

It pretends to be personalised while being completely generic.

"We have exclusive access to your entire market" - Do you though?

"20-50 ready decision-makers onto your calendar weekly" - Based on what?

Here's the thing: I actually respect good outbound. I work with outbound companies. I know it works when it's done right.

But this isn't it.

If you're going to reach out cold, at least get the basics right. My actual name. My actual business. Something that shows a human looked at this for more than 3 seconds.

Otherwise you're just noise in my inbox.

And for everyone else getting these emails: you're not alone. Apparently we're all Bob now.

PS. The eagle has landed 🛬

#outreach #outbound #agencylife

For 4 weeks, I was creating content to drive waitlist signups.

Reddit posts. Twitter threads. Trying to get traction for Clickk's waitlist.

Zero signups.

I thought: "Maybe I'm not posting enough. Maybe I need to try different subreddits. Maybe I'm not being consistent enough."

Turns out, the form just didn't work.

Here's what happened:

A few weeks back, we noticed weird email signups on our waitlist. Stuff like: an.ataw.agg.agde@gmail.com

Classic bot behaviour.

So we implemented a honeypot solution. Tested it. Worked perfectly. Bots stopped. Problem solved.

Or so I thought.

Fast forward 4 weeks. Someone tries to sign up and can't submit. The form just... doesn't work.

The honeypot solution had stopped working. And I had no idea.

For a month, I was writing posts, creating content, driving traffic to a waitlist that nobody could actually join.

Zero signups wasn't a content problem. It was a broken form.

The lesson: 

Test your forms. Regularly.

Not just when you set them up. Not just when you make changes.

Actually submit a test entry every few weeks. Make it part of your routine.

Because broken forms fail silently. No error messages. No alerts. Just... nothing.

You'll sit there wondering why your content isn't working when the real problem is nobody can actually submit.

Whether you're using native platform forms, custom solutions, or integrations with your CRM - test them. Monthly at minimum.

I wasted 4 weeks of effort driving traffic to a form that didn't work.

Don't be me. Test your forms.

taplio

The Battle

Tanisha Venkani

Robert Smart

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTanisha Venkani's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRobert Smart's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Tanisha Venkani

Robert Smart

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tanisha Venkani's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreRobert Smart's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTanisha Venkani's LinkedIn Performance