Susanne Ekström

I Coach CEOs to Build Winning Companies Where People 💜 to Work (SME:s) | +$30M Client Profit Generated | Top Ranked Management & Leadership Creator Globally (#1 in Sweden) | Serial Entrepreneur

💡 Are you enthusiastic about waking up in the morning to be the master strategist of your company, or are you dreading another day spent fighting fires and not getting anything significant done?

👋 Hey! I'm Susanne, a CEO Coach, entrepreneur, #1 international bestselling author, and the founder of BeASmarterLeader and SEE Management.

𝐌𝐲 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: To guide CEOs like you in reaching the top of your game.
I specialize in turning your big business dreams into reality, making your company richer, your team happier, and your business more robust.
And if you're up for it, we'll boost your bottom line by $499k in 99 days.


𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈 𝐆𝐨𝐭 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞: Back in 2001, life was amazing. I co-owned a big Swedish dot.com company and started our Netherlands office. I invested my heart, time, and money into it. But then, everything fell apart when the company went bankrupt. I lost everything, and it was devastating—going from a dream job to no job at all.


𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐖𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐖𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠: We made these 4 epic failures!
⛔ We didn't delegate effectively
⛔ We weren't ready for massive growth
⛔ We didn't have streamlined processes in place
⛔ We, the C-Suite, stopped listening to our people


𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝: Combining 20+ years in management consulting, over a decade in leadership, and hard-earned lessons from my dot.com collapse led me to develop a foolproof system to help CEOs like you:
✅ Boost your profits
✅ Keep your best people
✅ 'Buy back' +8 hours a week
✅ Build a scalable business model for growth


Great leaders aren't born; they're made.
True transformation can be challenging, so I've designed my system to help you save time, reach your potential, and become a top-notch CEO. 


𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫: Strategies to:
⭐ 'Buy back' your time so you can lead, not be 'all-over the place'
⭐ Create a CEO role that you'll absolutely LOVE having
⭐ Create space for innovation & big-picture planning
⭐ Create trust, structure, and sustainable growth
⭐ Build a winning, scalable company culture



𝐌𝐲 𝐅𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬: CEOs of SME companies on the U.S. East Coast, Canada, and Europe.
But why is this Swedish lady targeting the U.S. and Canada?
The mindset around the importance and value of a coach differs in the US and Canada from the rest of the world. I also love to speak English.
𝘚𝘔𝘌 = 𝘚𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘔𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘶𝘮-𝘴𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦


𝐍𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐩: Book a 15-minute Opportunity Call today!
👉 https://calendly.com/susanne-ekstrom/15mincall

Susanne Ekström
📞 +46 70 205 40 44
✉ susanne@beasmarterleader.com
🌐 www.beasmarterleader.com

Founder & CEO | BeaSmarterLeader

🔥 We help CEOs and Owners of Companies with $5-20 Million in Revenue, Strategically Work ON the Business Instead of Being Stuck IN it.

BeaSmarterLeader is 100% dedicated to helping CEOs and Owners across dynamic industries scale business operations and obtain unparalleled marketplace advantages to unlock transformative, growth-driven futures.

As the Founder & CEO, I work confidently with you while providing all of the dynamic tools and coaching methodologies required to take your business to the next level with The CEO Profit System!

Ultimately, I’m here to help enable the conditions for your peak performance, and you'll drive your business forward in ways previously unimagined. Sign up today to double your profits and cut your daily workload by 50% in less than 4 weeks!

👉 www.beasmarterleader.com/ceopsli (With a Large Discount)

Ever hired someone brilliant… but “a little odd”?
🤔 Maybe they avoided small talk.
🤔 Could never sit completely still.
🤔 Had problems with eye contact.
🤔 Laser-focused on obscure details.
🤔 Struggled with time management.
🤔 Or asked questions no one else dared to ask.

You might have chalked it up to personality.
But what if it was neurodiversity?

Yesterday, I shared a personal post about my son and me, both navigating life with ADHD and autism in different ways. Today, I want to discuss what that looks like in your company.

Because here’s the truth:
You already have neurodivergent people on your team.
- Some have been diagnosed.
- Most haven’t.
- And many won't dare to tell you even if they have been diagnosed.

If you don’t know how to lead them, you’re leaving potential (and revenue) on the table.

CEOs ask me, “How do I support these folks without lowering the bar?”
That's the wrong question.

The right one is: "How do I design a culture that brings out the best in every kind of brain?"

Especially when one of those brains might be… your own. 💜 

Because many of the founders and execs I coach have ADHD or autism themselves, and they’ve spent decades compensating, masking, or white-knuckling through systems that were never built for them.

Tomorrow, I’ll share about how to leverage neurodiversity as a leader, without burning out or losing control.

𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 - look around your team.
- Who’s been labeled “difficult,” “intense,” or “disorganized”?
- What might change if you saw them through the lens of neurodiversity?
- And most importantly, do you know what it means to be neurodivergent?

This is personal for me. As a mom. As a founder. 
Because when we get this right, everyone wins.


👉 Anything you'd add?

PS. I'll add the link to yesterday's post in the comments.

I Coach CEOs to Build Winning Companies Where People Love to Work (SMEs) | +$30M Client Profit Generated in the Last 5 Years | #1 International Best-Selling Author | Serial Entrepreneur

How do you know if someone on your team might be neurodivergent?
Short answer: You often don’t.
Longer answer: You notice patterns. And you lead accordingly.

Because not everyone will tell you they have ADHD or autism.
Some don’t even know themselves.
But their behavior might whisper it.
If you’re listening.

As a mom to a son with ADHD and autism, and in my work with founders and teams, I’ve learned to watch for two kinds of signs:

𝗖𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗲𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀
- Asks unexpected questions that challenge assumptions
- Hyper-focused one moment, totally distracted the next
- Struggles with transitions or shifting between tasks
- Strategic brilliance, but forgetful with logistics
- Comes across as blunt, intense, or “too much”
- Thrives with structure… or resists it entirely
- Sensitive to noise, light, or smells

𝗣𝗵𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗖𝘂𝗲𝘀
- Avoids or resists eye contact
- Constantly fidgeting or can’t sit still
- Forgets next steps unless written or visual
- Looks disengaged, but later recalls everything
- Tunes out during long explanations or detailed talks
- Needs headphones, sunglasses, or quiet spaces to focus
- Paces while thinking or prefers movement to concentrate

These aren’t flaws.
They’re flags that someone might need something different to thrive.

Not lower expectations, but more transparent communication, better scaffolding, or more autonomy.

You don’t need a formal diagnosis to support someone’s best work.
You just need to notice how they work best, and meet them there.

That’s not therapy.
That’s leadership. 💜 


👉 Anything you'd add?


PS. This is my 4th and last post on neurodivergence, for now.
I'll add the links to my previous posts in the comments.

If your company can’t run 30 days without you, you don’t own a business.
You 𝙖𝙧𝙚 the business.

I was sitting with a CEO who was exhausted.
He told me, “𝘐 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘬. 𝘐 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘐 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘐 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘺 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦’𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘴. 𝘐𝘧 𝘐 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘸𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘴.”

That’s the reality for many CEOs.
The business runs, but only because they’re pushing every lever.
It feels responsible. It feels necessary.
But it’s also the ceiling on growth.

Here’s what I see again and again:
❌ Culture depends on their mood that week.
❌ Decisions get stuck waiting for their approval.
❌ The CEO’s calendar is owned by everyone but them.
❌ They delegate activity, not ownership, so work bounces back.

And then the shift happens.

When the CEO reclaims their time, everything changes:
✅ They spend hours painting the bigger picture instead of chasing details.
✅ Their leadership team starts owning results, not just tasks.
✅ Culture becomes the engine, not the weight.
✅ The company scales beyond them. Finally.

That’s when leadership becomes lighter.
That’s when growth feels possible again.

If your company had to run for 30 days without you, what would break first?
If you don’t like your answer to that question, send me a DM.
We’ll discuss how to make the change. 💜 
 
 
👉 Anything you'd add?

Are meetings making you money... OR costing you? 
 
I'm pretty frankly really frustrated with how we treat our people's time when it comes to meetings. 
 
If you were a machine that stopped, we would try to fix you (the machine) asap to keep production flowing, BUT we tend not to have any problem inviting people to meetings without questioning how much of their time we consume. 
 
Even worse, if we don't have a clear goal and agenda for the meeting, people will feel frustrated and stressed. 
 
Cutting down the number of meetings and/or meeting time is one successful way in which you can: 
 
✅ Reduce costs 
✅ Delete the frustration of boring meetings 
✅ Make your business more productive & profitable 
 
...at the same time. 
 
A study at Bain & Company found that a single weekly meeting of mid-level managers costs one organization $15 million annually! 
 
Do you think those meetings generated more than $15 million annually? 
 
Are the meetings within your company making or costing you money? 💜 

👉 Anything you'd add?

CEOs: You make million-dollar decisions...
...but are you treating your own time like a 10x growth lever?

Most leaders think they are stuck in "2x tasks" (incremental growth).
The reality? Most are stuck in 0x tasks.

If your revenue is $8M–$20M, your time is worth ~$2,000 per hour.
But you're likely spending it on "low-leverage" tasks that yield $0 in new value.

𝗟𝗲𝘁’𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗻 "𝗕𝘂𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗮𝗰𝗸" 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝟭𝟬𝘅 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗽:
💰 CEO Effect: Reclaiming 8 hours a week = $16,000 in unlocked value every week.

💰 C-Suite Effect: If 5 leaders reclaim 8 hours (at $500/hr), that’s $20,000 per week.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗻𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁?
That’s $1.8M in leadership capacity currently being "leaked" into zero-ROI low-value busy-work.

𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟭𝟬𝘅 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁:
↠ Stop doing the "0x" low-leverage tasks that don't move the needle.

↠ Reinvest those 48+ hours into the 20% that creates 10x momentum.

↠ Watch your impact 10x as you ditch your "Firefighter" mode.

👉 What is one low-leverage task you are doing today that provides $0 in growth?

PS. You can't build a 10x future while living on a 0x schedule. 💜

Are you planning your agendas, or are your meetings a time-suck?

Lisa, a CEO with 85 employees, conducted many meetings that kept her busy almost all week.

When she had some time in between the meetings, she had a line of employees who wanted to:

💢 ask questions
💢 get her decision on a specific matter

She rarely had time to work on her essential tasks during office hours.

WHAT DID WE DO?

We:
〰️ Drastically decreased the meeting time
〰️ Implemented the tips for crafting a "Killer" agenda


THE RESULTS WERE:
✅ 45% more free time in just 3 weeks
✅ Better prepared, motivated participants
✅ Enhanced accountability/results pre & post meetings

...& this was just the first step on our list for her & her people to be more productive.

Do you want to be the next Lisa? 💜
Send me a DM with the word "Killer."


👉 Anything you'd add?

How to Design a Killer Agenda

From pitch black to a life worth living in 2,5 months.
How I helped my son turn his life around.

I’m a single mother of two sons, and one of them has autism and ADHD.

Little over 2,5 years ago, he had been home for 4 years, 24*7.
❌ Not going out at all
❌ Not attending school
❌ Not having any IRL friends
❌ Not doing ANYTHING with his life

So, about 30 months ago, I started transforming our relationship completely.

This led him to move to a specialized boarding school and ‘restarting’ his life!

From being 4 years behind in school when he started, he’s now on track to graduate from high school in 3 months' time (only 1 year behind).

If you are a parent of a child or children with autism and/or ADHD, and you’re:
😢 Feeling you’re failing your kid
😢 Feeling love and affinity is lost
😢 Feeling like everything is hopeless
😢 Feeling like there’s nothing more you can do

I GET YOU! 💜
This is how I felt for many years.

HOW COULD I MAKE THIS POSSIBLE?
I attended a course, and while I was participating, it hit me hard.

〰I want to FIX my son!
〰Because this is NOT the life I was supposed to have.
〰AND I’m the reason we’re stuck!

Even if we have a great relationship, something needs to change.

I need to shift the way I speak to him and the way I listen to him.

I also realize – I can love him for everything he is and also for everything he isn’t.

For me, my kids are the most important thing in my life.

Seeing one of them not ‘participating in life’ has been totally devastating.

But now, I see a future for him. 💜

This video shares one of the questions I got when I spoke at the LeadHERship Unveiled, a 3-day virtual summit, about my journey as a person, a CEO coach, and a mother.

PS. If you know a parent like this, please tag them in a comment.

PPS. The link to my whole speech is here: https://lnkd.in/eyNk_WeQ



👉 Anything you'd add?

In 5 words or less, what advice would you give a CEO who's always busy and never has time?

If you're a CEO with ADHD or autism, you're not wired for business-as-usual.
You're wired for vision, velocity, and out-of-the-box thinking.

You can’t lead the way everyone else does, and you don’t have to.

You’ve probably been told to be more organized, more consistent, more emotionally neutral, more… something.

As a mother to a son with ADHD and autism, and also in my coaching work with neurodivergent founders, I’ve seen:

💫 Pattern recognition that’s lightning-fast
💫 Brains that leap to insights no one else sees
💫 Creative thinking that breaks through walls others never question

You’re not “too much.” You’re exactly enough when you stop trying to lead like someone else.

The key isn’t to mask or muscle through.
It’s to design a business that matches your brain. 💜 

It’s about building systems around your strengths and delegating tasks around your struggles.
- Hire great people who love the details
- Set check-ins so nothing relies on memory
- Shape your role around what energizes you

This isn’t about doing less.
It’s about doing what only you can do.
And building the right team to do the rest.

Neurodivergent leadership isn’t a liability. It’s a competitive edge.
But only if you stop fighting yourself...
and start building systems that fit.


👉 Anything you'd add?

PS. This is my 3rd post on neurodivergence. I'll add the link to my previous posts in the comments.

PPS. This is how my son explains what his ADHD/autism brain sounds like:
https://lnkd.in/e3JxK3VP (video credit to connorcallec, it's not my son)

Imagine being a CEO and having hours back in your day. Unthinkable? 
Here is the reality... 👇 
 
❌ 𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀:
↳ Micromanage employees 
↳ Fail to delegate effectively 
↳ Fail to prioritize your calendar 
↳ Spend much time on low-priority tasks 
↳ Attend meetings without a clear agenda 
 
✅ 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀: 
↳ Paint the big picture for your company 
↳ Develop & execute a strategic plan 
↳ Build a kickass company culture 
↳ Lead & inspire by example 
↳ Recruit & nurture talent 
 
 
And...
DITCH the Chief Problem Solver hat! 💜 
 
 
👉 Anything you'd add?

𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀
- Avoiding hard conversations, Westley Harnett
- Too many "priorities" at once, Jill Avey

The Day I Earned My Place -- with a Kebab Pizza!!
When I was new at a management consulting firm, I was invited to join a colleague at a client site.

As soon as I arrived, the CEO told me:
“We have a special tradition for new consultants, haha, you’ll see.”

At lunchtime, he took me to a pizzeria and said,
“This is your challenge. No other consultant has ever finished this.”

He ordered me the "House Special” - a kebab pizza loaded with sauce, fries, and extra everything.

I thought, "This is my moment," so I ate the whole thing.

He looked at me and said, “Wow. Not even I have finished it. I always leave the crust!”

And then he said, “I’m in love. Shall we go home and share 2 kilos of tenderloin?”

That afternoon, as we walked around the office, he kept telling people:
“She ate the whole pizza. She ate the 𝙒𝙃𝙊𝙇𝙀 pizza.”

Looking back, it was more than just a funny memory; it was also a test of my resilience.

Here’s what I learned about leadership from that pizza challenge.

- 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀
It wasn’t about the pizza. It was about showing up, saying yes, and giving something your best shot - even when it’s uncomfortable, unusual, or hard. 

- 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁
Had I refused or given up halfway, the outcome might have been different. Often, people respect the effort even more than the result, but in this case, finishing was what mattered.

- 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 “𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀”
Whether it’s the first big client meeting, a difficult decision, or (yes) a giant pizza, teams test how you show up under pressure. Leaders remember that and help others succeed in those moments.

- 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿
Yes, we laughed. But I also felt accepted. Leaders create moments that people remember. Those moments often mix challenge, kindness, and fun.

Sometimes leadership starts with a pizza. 💜 


👉 Anything you'd add?

Uncomfortable conversations - how do you deal with them?

Are you approaching them head-on, delaying them, or sticking your head in the sand and hoping they will solve themselves somehow?

This is what I'll be talking about in today's episode of 'Uncomfortable Conversations' on e360tv.

Hi all - time for a poll!
What do you say about this one? :)

If you could travel back in time and relive your life, would you choose the same career/life?

The author can see how you vote. Learn more

Colin Gallagher

The AI Marketing Guy — Building a community & bootstrapping an AI writing SaaS to $1 million per year | Join 15,000+ AI marketing newsletter subscribers to future proof your career & build brands with AI.

If you sell b2b these days... landing premium clients consistently is as difficult as finding a needle in a haystack.

You've probably tried:

❌ Daily LinkedIn content — But got lost in the noise
❌ Generic outreach — Getting ignored or attracting tire-kickers
❌ Referral networking — Great when it works, but too unpredictable
❌ Being a "marketing generalist" — Only to compete on price with cheap freelancers

These approaches "work"...

But let's be honest - they're costing you more time and energy than they're worth... especially when you're trying to command $5K-$10K monthly retainers.

That's why we help b2b companies to unlock predictable client acquisition through Linkedin.

Within just 90 days, our team will help you:

✅ Position yourself as the premium choice in your niche (without becoming an "influencer")
✅ Build relationships with 1,000 dream clients (companies you'd be proud to feature on your website)
✅ Generate high-quality leads using a proven system that doesn't require daily posting
✅ Close retainer clients at 2-3x your current rates

Premium clients will be booking into your calendar each month…

All you'll have to do is close deals with prospects who already see your value.

We've helped 100+ businesses to book 2,000+ sales calls and earn millions in revenue through LinkedIn. Here's what our clients say:

"Within 22 days of implementing this system, I went from charging $1,000 to $3,000 per month and signed 4 new retainer clients." — John A., Marketing Consultant

"We added $160,000 in revenue within 6-months" — Ben, CEO @ Seneca Business Solutions

Ready to start attracting premium clients who value your expertise?

P.S. Our approach isn't about posting content every day or becoming another "LinkedIn expert". It's about building a systematic way to attract and close premium clients. Speak soon!

Head Growth Coach

Click the link below for 7 ChatGPT Prompts to help you write 7-days of Linkedin content in 10-minutes a day (...or less).

I stopped using ChatGPT 3 months ago. The Claude system I built instead runs my entire LinkedIn lead generation engine on autopilot.

Comment "SYSTEM" and I'll send you the full breakdown.

Not because ChatGPT is bad at writing. It's great at writing.

But writing was never the bottleneck. 
Research was.

Finding which prospects are actually showing buying signals right now. 

Qualifying them against a specific ICP. Writing a message that references the exact reason they showed up on the list.

That's 3-4 hours of skilled SDR work per day. 
And ChatGPT can't do any of it — because it can't connect to your tools.

Claude can.

Here's what the system actually does:

1️⃣ Signal detection

Claude connects directly to Apollo through an MCP connector — no copy-pasting, no exporting CSVs, no middleware.

It runs a search I built for each client's buying signals:

→ Companies that just posted a VP of Sales role (scaling team, need pipeline) → Founders who recently raised a round (have budget, need growth) 
→ Businesses hiring SDRs (outbound is already a priority)

2️⃣ Qualification

Every prospect gets filtered against the client's ICP — industry, headcount, geography, tech stack.

The filter isn't a prompt. It's a saved Skill — a reusable workflow file that runs the same criteria every time without me re-explaining the rules.

3️⃣ Script generation

For every qualified prospect, Claude writes a message that references the specific signal. Not "I noticed your company is growing." More like "Saw you're hiring 3 SDRs in EMEA — curious how you're handling pipeline for the new reps."

The signal is the reason for reaching out. The message just states it.

4️⃣ Scheduling

The entire pipeline runs on a schedule. 

Every morning at 7am, Claude pulls fresh signals, qualifies them, writes the scripts, and saves everything to a folder I review over coffee.

I spend 15 minutes checking the output. That used to be a full-time person's entire morning.

The gap between ChatGPT and Claude for outreach isn't the writing quality. It's that Claude connects to your data, saves your workflows, and runs them while you sleep.

Comment "SYSTEM" below and I'll send you the step-by-step guide to build this yourself.

Claude turns you into a top 1% lead generation machine.

I built the system that replaced a $6,000/mo SDR - here's the exact workflow ↓

Comment "BUILD" and I'll send you the full breakdown with every prompt and every filter.

The system does 5 things:

-> Pulls buying signals from Apollo (job postings, funding rounds, executive hires) -> Scores and ranks leads by signal strength 
-> Writes personalized DMs based on each prospect's specific signals 
-> Runs on a schedule - every morning, fresh leads, fresh messages 
-> Tracks replies and adjusts targeting based on what's converting

The best part - once it's set up, the system runs silently in the background. You wake up to qualified leads sitting in your inbox. 

Comment "BUILD" for the full guide.

Replace your $6,000/month for $20

ONE specific number explains why your Linkedin outreach isn't working.

It's not your message. 
It's not your offer. 
It's not your follow-up sequence.

3-7%.

That's the percentage of your target market that's in an active buying window at any given time.

You could have the perfect list. 
Perfect ICP. 
Perfect copy.

If you're blasting 100% of the market hoping to catch the 3-7%, you're selling to people who are "qualified" on sales navigator...

But have no interested in buying what' you're selling right now. 

I just recorded a full breakdown of:

→ What the 3-7% rule means for your pipeline
→ Real client results: from 3-4 replies per 100 (mostly negative) to 12 replies per 100 (mostly positive)
→ The two systems you need running simultaneously
→ How to spot buying signals hiding in plain sight on LinkedIn
I also put together the complete buying signal detection framework — every signal type, what it indicates, and how to build a system around it. The full playbook.

Watch the video. 

Then if you want the framework:

→ Comment "Clients" below
→ Follow + connect so I can DM you

We spend $5,200/month to run signal-based LinkedIn outreach properly for our clients.

I know because we built the system.

Here's the actual cost stack:

→ Signal monitoring + Sales Navigator: $200-300/mo
→ LinkedIn enrichment APIs: $1,500/mo
→ Company intelligence (Apollo or similar): $500-1,000/mo 
→ AI agent building tools: $500/mo
→ AI subscriptions: $20-100/mo → LinkedIn automation tool: $200-300/mo
→ Developer to build & maintain it: $1,500/mo

And that's just infrastructure.

It doesn't include the months of trial and error figuring out which prompts work, which enrichment data actually matters, how to handle edge cases, or how to tune the AI so it doesn't flood you with garbage leads.

But here's the thing...

When it works, it WORKS.

We took a client campaign from below benchmarks (5-10% reply rate) to 40%+ reply rate and 40%+ acceptance rate.

Because instead of blasting templates, the system:

✅ Detects real-time buying signals on LinkedIn
✅ Enriches leads with profile data, company intel, and content history
✅ AI-qualifies every lead before a message goes out
✅ Writes hyper-personalized 4-message sequences from actual behavioral data

I broke down the entire 5-stage pipeline in the video below — with real examples, real AI prompts, and the exact scripts the system generates.

Want the full system doc with pipeline breakdown, cost stack, and example campaign?

>>> Like this post
>>> Comment "PIPELINE" below

I'll DM it to you.

PS — We run this entire system for our clients so they don't have to. Free pilot — we build the campaign, contact 200 prospects, you see the results. Book a call: https://growlancer.ai/

How to put LinkedIn lead magnet creation on 100% autopilot (I built this system with Claude + scheduled tasks)

Every morning before I open Slack, a system I built produces a complete content package. Lead magnet. Two LinkedIn posts. Carousel. All from one topic.

Comment AUTOPILOT and I'll send you the full blueprint.

Here's the architecture:

→ A scheduled task fires every morning at 7am
→ Claude pulls trending topics from 8 LinkedIn creators I track
→ It cross-references what I've already posted so nothing repeats
→ It drafts a lead magnet HTML with scroll-reveal animations and interactive elements
→ It generates 2 post options in my voice with different formats
→ It builds an 8-slide carousel PDF
→ Everything lands in a folder, ready for me to review

The whole thing runs on Claude Pro ($20/month) and a scheduling layer. No custom code. No dev team. No content agency.

I still review everything before it ships. The system doesn't replace my judgment - it replaces the 3-4 hours I used to spend staring at a blank doc wondering what to write about.

The biggest unlock wasn't the AI. It was building the system around the AI.

Comment AUTOPILOT below and I'll send you the exact blueprint - prompt chains, file structure, scheduling config, all of it.

The best cold message I ever sent took 30 seconds to write.

People think personalization is the hard part of outreach. It's not. Research is.

When you know that a VP of Marketing just commented about demand-gen challenges, her company posted three new marketing roles this week, and she's been engaging with a competing agency's content — the message practically writes itself.

You don't need to be clever. 

You don't need a hook framework. 

You just reference what's actually happening in their world.

The reason most outreach sounds robotic is because the sender has zero context. 

They're guessing at problems. Manufacturing relevance. Writing around the fact that they don't actually know anything about the person.

When you have deep context — real signals, real company intelligence, real activity data — the message becomes a conversation starter, not a pitch.

We built a system to use AI to write fully personalized four-message sequences for every individual lead. 

Not mail merge with a first name. 

Personalized to their specific signals, company situation, and recent activity.

The prospect should read it and think "they've been researching me." Because the system has. 

It's pulled their last ten posts, their company's last ten posts, hiring data, tech stack changes, press coverage — everything an SDR would look at before sending a manual DM.

Except it happens automatically for every lead in the pipeline.

The irony: the more work you put in before writing, the less work the writing takes. Context is the shortcut everyone skips.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

My $720/month AI stack generates more leads than a $500,000/year marketing department.

Here's what's in it:

Comment STACK and I'll send you the full breakdown with costs, prompts, and how everything connects.

→ Claude for writing outreach scripts, content, and lead research - $200/mo → Apollo for finding companies showing active buying intent - $60/mo 

→ Airtable for tracking every lead, signal, and conversation in one place - $100/mo 

→ Make(.)com for connecting everything so it runs while I sleep - $60/mo 

→ Data APIs for enriching leads with real-time company and contact intel - $300/mo

5 tools. 
$720/month combined.

The $500K marketing department has 6 people, a Salesforce license, and a 3-month ramp time for every new hire.

My stack was running campaigns within a week.

It doesn't take PTO. 
It doesn't need onboarding. 
And it gets smarter every time I use it.

Comment STACK and I'll send you the full AI stack guide - every tool, what it costs, what it replaced, and the exact workflows connecting them.

PS - For quick access, dm or InMail me with the word "Stack"

My $500,000 AI Marketing Department

I don't know who needs to hear this, if your AI outreach is sloppy, it's not AI, it's you. 

ChatGPT can write your outreach in seconds. So can everyone else's.

"Hey Jessica, I noticed we're both in the SaaS space. We help marketing teams like yours scale demand gen through performance marketing. Love to connect and see if there's a fit."

That message took ChatGPT four seconds to generate. It'll get you a sub-2% reply rate. 

You'd need 200-500 sends just to book a single meeting.

And every one of your competitors can produce the exact same message just as fast.

The problem isn't AI. The problem is what YOU are feeding it.

Generic prompt. Generic ICP data. Generic output. 

The AI has nothing to work with except your product description and a first name.

Ofcourse you're going to get sloppy outreach that uses the words "craft and crickets"

Now give it something real.

Jessica just commented on a competing agency's post saying "this is exactly what we're facing in Q1." 

Her company posted three new marketing roles this week. 

She's been engaging with growth content for the last seven days.

Feed that into the same AI and the output is unrecognisable. 

It references her actual situation. 

It speaks to a problem she publicly confirmed she has. 

It reads like someone spent 15 minutes researching her — because the system did.

Same tool. Radically different input. Completely different result.

AI didn't make outreach worse. 

It made lazy outreach easier to produce at scale. 

The people using AI to write messages without signal data are just automating mediocrity.

The ones feeding it real intelligence are getting 40%+ reply rates.

The gap isn't the technology. It's what you know about the person before you hit send.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

Some industries hand you buying signals daily. Others make you guess.

Not every market produces the same volume of signals on LinkedIn. When we started running signal-based campaigns, this became obvious fast.

B2B SaaS is the most signal-rich vertical on LinkedIn right now. 

The people in that space live on the platform. 

They post constantly. 

They comment on competitors. 

They announce funding rounds, product launches, and hiring sprees publicly.

Their competitors are doing the same thing — which means even more signals to capture.

There's a culture in SaaS of building in public. 

Founders and VPs openly share the challenges they're going through. 

When a VP of Marketing comments "this is exactly what we're facing in Q1" on a post about scaling demand gen — that's not a hint. 

That's a neon sign.

Sales tech, marketing tech, HR tech, RevOps, AI platforms — they all sit in this category. 

High velocity of change. 

Active content ecosystems. 

Frequent trigger events.

Compare that to an industry where decision-makers rarely post, never comment, and don't engage with competitors publicly. 

The signals still exist — job postings, hiring patterns, tech changes — but the behavioral layer is thinner. 

You're working with less data.

This doesn't mean signal-based outreach won't work in quieter verticals.

It means the signal mix changes. 

You lean harder on structural data — headcount shifts, department changes, job openings — and less on content engagement.

The first question we ask any client now: how signal-rich is your target market? 

Because that determines the entire campaign architecture.

If you sell into SaaS, fintech, or any tech-adjacent space — you're sitting on a goldmine of intent data that most of your competitors aren't using.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

93% of your market doesn't need you right now. Stop messaging all of them.

In most markets, only 3-7% of prospects are ready to buy at any given time.

A list of 1,000 ICP-fit people means 30-70 actually need what you're selling today. 

The other 930 might need you in six months, a year, or never.

When you message all 1,000 with the same pitch, you're hoping to land in front of one of those 30-70 by chance. 

That's a 3-7% shot at relevance — before your message quality even matters.

That's why standard cold outreach gets 1-3% reply rates. 

Despite what the cold email bro's will tell you- the math is against you from the start.

Now flip it. 

Identify which of those 1,000 are in the buying window right now.

You message 50 instead of 1,000. 

Reply rates jump to 15-25% because every person you contact is actively dealing with the problem you solve. 

We've had campaigns above 50%.

Twenty times less volume. 

Sixty percent more qualified leads. 

And your brand takes 99% less damage.

That last part matters more than people think. 

When you spam 930 people who don't need you, that's 930 future buyers who now associate your name with irrelevant outreach. 

In a smaller market, that's devastating.

The question is: how do you actually find the 3-7%?

You can't do it with a static list. 

Buying windows open and close constantly. 

Someone who wasn't ready last month might be ready today because they just lost a key hire, engaged with a competitor, or started scaling a new department.

That's why we use AI agents that continuously monitor behavioral and structural signals across your entire TAM and surface the leads showing intent right now.

The system re-evaluates constantly. 

Your outreach list on Monday looks different from Thursday because the signals changed. 

Leads move in and out of the buying window, and the AI tracks it so you don't have to.

Layer those signals together and you stop guessing. 

You reach people at the moment they're most likely to buy.

That's the difference between outreach and spam. 

One is timed. The other is random.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

Your prospects don't want to hear about your process — they want to hear about their outcome.

Every cold message I see starts the same way:

"We help companies with our proven 3-step framework..."
"Our unique methodology delivers..."
"We use advanced techniques to..."

Completely backward.

Your prospect doesn't care about your process. They care about their problem.

Instead of explaining HOW you do it, lead with WHAT happens when you do.

"Your sales team books 12 qualified meetings per month."
"Your pipeline stays full without you personally prospecting."
"You close deals while your competitors wait for inbound leads."

The process comes later. The outcome comes first.

We've booked 2,000+ sales meetings by talking about client results, not our methodology.

Start with their finish line, not your starting blocks.

Claude AI turns you into a 1-person LinkedIn outreach team that books more sales meetings than 20 human SDRs

I built a system that finds high-intent buyers & writes relevant DMs in one conversation.

Comment "SIGNAL" and I'll send you the full setup + 5 message templates.

Here's what it does:

Most AI outreach tools insert [First Name] and [Company] and call it "personalization."

That's not personalization. 
That's a mail merge with a better vocabulary.

My system does 3 things differently:

→ It searches Apollo for prospects showing specific buying signals - job postings open 45+ days, new VP hires, headcount spikes, recent funding - all inside the same Claude conversation

→ It writes DMs under 60 words that reference the signal, not the job title. "45 days into the SDR Manager search - how's the team holding up?" hits different than "I help companies improve their sales process"

→ It builds a follow-up sequence where every message adds a new angle instead of "just bumping this to the top of your inbox"

The difference comes down to one number.

Only 3-7% of any market is in an active buying window at any given time. If you message everyone with the right job title, 93% of them don't have a reason to care today.

Signals find the ones who do.

The playbook covers:

→ The 6 buying signals that actually matter for B2B outreach 
→ The research prompt that turns a profile + signal into a relevant DM 
→ 5 LinkedIn message templates - one for each signal type 
→ How to wire Apollo + Airtable + Claude into one workflow using MCP connectors 
→ The follow-up sequence that converts connections into calls

Comment "SIGNAL" and I'll DM you the link.

We discard 99% of the LinkedIn signals we collect. That's the point.

Let me explain.. 

Finding signals is the easy part. 

Knowing which ones matter is where most people get stuck.

Our system pulls thousands of signals every month — post engagement, job changes, hiring activity, competitor interactions. 

The vast majority of them aren't qualified for our clients' campaigns.

Someone liked a competitor's post. Great. 
Are they the right title? Right company size? Right industry? Do they have budget authority? Is their company actually in a position to buy?

Most of the time, the answer is no.

That's why we built an AI qualification layer between signal detection and outreach. 

Every lead that triggers a signal gets automatically enriched — their LinkedIn history, past roles, posting behaviour, company intelligence, hiring trends, tech stack, recent press coverage.

Then AI evaluates all of it against the client's qualification criteria and scores each lead as highly qualified, disqualified, or edge case — with a confidence rating.

This is the step that separates signal-based outreach from just reacting to LinkedIn notifications. 

Without it, you're messaging everyone who liked a post. 

With it, you're messaging the handful who liked a post AND match your ICP AND are at a company showing multiple buying indicators.

We pay roughly $1,500 a month in LinkedIn and enrichment 

APIs alone because we're processing massive volumes of data. 99% gets filtered out. 

The 1% that makes it through into campaigns is why the reply rates are what they are.

The signals get you attention. The qualification gets you meetings.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

Every irrelevant message you send trains a future buyer to ignore you.

This is the part of outreach nobody wants to think about.

Including an earlier version of me.

You send 500 messages. Maybe 15-25 people actually need what you sell right now. 

The other 475? 

They're not annoyed because your copy was bad. 

They're annoyed because you interrupted them about a problem they don't have.

And they remember that micro-moment of "this person doesn't know me at all." 

Now here's where it gets expensive.

Those 475 people aren't strangers. 

They're your TAM. 

Some of them will need you in three months, six months, a year. 

But when that buying window opens, you're not starting from neutral. You're starting from "oh, another one of those messages."

In smaller markets specifically — where your total addressable audience might be a few thousand people — this is slow-motion reputation damage. 

You're burning through future pipeline to fill today's activity metrics.

The fix isn't better copy. It's better timing.

We use AI to monitor when prospects are actually showing buying signals — hiring patterns shifting, departments expanding, competitors being evaluated — so the only people who hear from us are the ones dealing with the problem right now.

When your message lands at the right moment, it doesn't feel like outreach. It feels like relevance.

And relevance is the only thing that separates "thanks for reaching out" from the archive button.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

Signal-based outreach costs $4-5K/month to run properly. Here's where the money goes.

I'm going to be transparent about something most agencies won't tell you.

If you wanted to build the signal-based outreach system we run for clients — yourself, from scratch — it would cost roughly $4,000 to $5,000 per month in tools alone. 

Before your time.  Before the developer who sets it up and maintains it.

Here's the breakdown:

- LinkedIn Sales Navigator and enrichment APIs: around $1,500/month. 

We're scraping large amounts of data because 99% of signals don't qualify. But you have to check them all.

- AI API subscriptions: anywhere from $200 to $1,000/month depending on volume. 

We spent $1,000 with Anthropic last month alone because of the amount of qualification and research the system processes.

- AI agent building tools: roughly $500/month. 

Plus developer maintenance ($500-$1000), because these systems break. Regularly.

- Outreach automation tools: variable, but factor in another few hundred at least- we spend arounf $500-$1000 in any given month.

And that's assuming everything works. 

It doesn't account for the weeks of setup, the debugging, the N8N workflows that need rebuilding, or the developer who doesn't always answer when you message them.

I'm not saying this to scare anyone off building it themselves. 

Some companies should. 

If you have the technical team and the patience, the ROI is there.

But most founders I talk to don't have 3-6 months to build infrastructure. 

They need pipeline now. That's the real trade-off — not money, but time to value.

Whether you build it or buy it, now you know what the actual investment looks like.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

How to build a sales pipeline for your cybersecurity firm on LinkedIn with AI in 2026 (the system behind 112 winning B2B campaigns)

Comment PIPELINE and I'll send you the full playbook.

Cybersecurity founders have a targeting problem. Your buyers - CISOs, VPs of IT, security directors - get 30+ vendor pitches a week. Most of those pitches land on people who signed a contract 3 months ago.

The fix is signals. 

AI lets you find the 3-7% of your market that's actively looking right now - and reach them before your competitors do.

Here's the pipeline architecture we run for B2B service companies:

→ Signal detection layer - AI scans for buying triggers specific to cybersecurity: compliance deadlines, new security hires, breach disclosures, tool migration announcements, budget cycle timing  
→ Qualification layer - each prospect gets scored against fit criteria before a single message goes out  
→ Personalized outreach - every DM references the specific signal, not the job title  
→ Follow-up engine - the system re-engages warm prospects automatically when new signals appear

The whole thing runs in the background. 

You wake up to qualified conversations, not a list of names to cold-message.

Comment PIPELINE and I'll send you the full playbook - including the exact signals that work for cybersecurity buyers and the AI prompts behind each layer.

Build Cybersecurity Sales Pipeline

The worst outreach I've ever seen was written by the best AI tools.

Flawless grammar. Professional tone. Clean formatting. Absolutely zero reason to reply.

That's what happens when you hand GPT-4 your website copy and say "write me a LinkedIn outreach sequence."

It'll give you something polished. Something that sounds like a sales email from 2019 wearing a better suit. 

And your prospect will archive it alongside the nine other messages they got today that read exactly the same way.

The AI did its job perfectly. It took what you gave it and made it sound good.

The problem is that sounding good and being relevant are completely different things.

I've reviewed hundreds of AI-generated outreach sequences at this point. 

The pattern is always the same. The sender knows nothing about the recipient except their name and job title. 

So the AI fills the gap with vague flattery and generic value props.

"I admire what you're building at [Company]."
"Teams like yours often struggle with [broad problem]."
"Would love to explore synergies."

It's technically competent. It's emotionally empty. The prospect feels nothing because the message says nothing specific to them.

Now compare that to a message where the AI knows the prospect commented about demand-gen challenges last week, their company just posted three marketing roles, and they've been engaging with a competitor's content.

Same AI. Same capability. 

But now it has something real to work with — and the output reads like a human who's done their homework.

Your prospects can't tell the difference between AI and human anymore. But they can absolutely tell the difference between someone who knows their situation and someone who doesn't.

The tool isn't the bottleneck. The intelligence you feed it is.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

Content creators making $10K/month have fewer LinkedIn followers than B2B founders making $100K/month.

Why?

Content creators need followers to sell courses and coaching.

B2B founders need customers to sell services.

Completely different games.

The B2B founder with 2,000 followers books 15 sales calls per month through targeted outreach.

The content creator with 50,000 followers converts 0.1% into paying customers.

Guess which business model scales faster?

I've watched clients go from 0 to $300K in revenue with under 5,000 connections.

Meanwhile, LinkedIn "gurus" with massive followings struggle to fill $500 courses.

Content supports your outreach. It doesn't replace it.

When prospects research you after receiving your message, they need to see you know what you're talking about.

That's it.

I watched 47 B2B founders waste $200K+ on LinkedIn content while their sales teams missed quota.

They hired content creators, posted daily, got likes and comments.

Zero pipeline.

Here's what they believed: "If I build an audience, qualified leads will find me."

Here's reality: B2B buyers don't browse LinkedIn looking for vendors. They're heads down solving problems.

Your VP of Sales doesn't care if your post got 500 likes. She cares about hitting quota.

80% of our clients' meetings come from outreach, not content.

Content supports outreach by building trust when prospects check your profile after you reach out.

But content alone? It's expensive brand awareness disguised as lead generation.

One client spent 8 months building a following. Got featured in LinkedIn newsletters. Felt like a thought leader.

Generated 2 qualified meetings.

We switched him to outreach-first. 4 qualified meetings in the first 3 weeks.

They liked your post. They're still wrong for you.

Someone in your target market just engaged with a post about the exact problem you solve. Most people would add them to a campaign immediately.

But here's what they're missing:

Behavioral signals — what people do on LinkedIn — only tell half the story. 

The other half is structural signals. The situation they're actually in.

We sell lead generation (amongst other things).When someone engages with lead gen content, that looks like a signal. 

But if their company has a 15-person marketing department with a VP of Demand Gen and three SDRs — they're not outsourcing lead gen anytime soon. 

Their structure says they've solved this internally.

Same logic everywhere. 

You sell outsourced accounting and the prospect has a CFO, VP of Finance, and a bookkeeping team? 

Engagement with accounting content doesn't mean they need you.

Structural signals include headcount growth or decline in specific departments, hiring velocity, employee churn in key functions, what technologies they're adopting or dropping, and whether teams are expanding or contracting.

The challenge is that no human can monitor all of this across hundreds of companies simultaneously. 

That's where AI comes in. 

We use AI agents that pull structural data  through APIs and cross-reference it against behavioral activity in real time.

The agent doesn't just flag that a CMO liked a competitor's post. 

It checks whether that CMO's company grew marketing 33% year-on-year and shrank their design department at the same time. That combination tells you they're almost certainly outsourcing creative work right now.

Behavioral says: "This person is interested in what I do."
Structural says: "This person is actually in a position to buy."

You need both. And you need a system that can evaluate both at scale — because doing it manually for every lead in your market isn't realistic.

Stop treating every LinkedIn interaction as a buying signal. Start looking at the full picture.

✅

PS - If I could book you 2-3 meetings every week with your ideal customers through LinkedIn, would you be open to a chat?

We'll launch your LinkedIn outreach campaign and contact 600 qualified leads for free, so you can sample real results...

Before deciding whether you'd like to move forward.

Interested? Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gXS4jJ45

taplio

The Battle

Susanne Ekström

Colin Gallagher

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreSusanne Ekström's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreColin Gallagher's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Susanne Ekström

Colin Gallagher

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Susanne Ekström's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreColin Gallagher's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreSusanne Ekström's LinkedIn Performance