Serkan Ferah 🌈

Founder @ Native | Gamified Audience Engagement | Join the Waitlist

Building a behavioural technology company for sports that turns cultural capital into a commercial engine.

Clicks and views never tell you the real story.

Native defines behaviour as cultural signals — turning offline and online fan actions, taste profiles, and tone of voice into first‑party data. This helps right holders and media brands monetise fans directly and via sponsors, while hyper‑personalising journeys across apps and experiences.

Without needing a technical team...

Founder

Our mission from the start has been to enable people to communicate effectively and build meaningful relationships in business.

We launched our automated pitch builder in July 2021 as a gateway product for startups and now working on our actual product that will change the future of economic relationships using gamification.

👉 Gained 1800+ organic users as of March 2023

👉 Have been generating revenue since Dec'22

👉 98% organic growth, @2.5 CAC and 10% average MoM growth rate

👉 Partnered with Virgin Startups, Swoop Funding, Digital Catapult and BlockDojo

Helping non-tech businesses build software products in 8-12 weeks | DM me your app ideas | Owner - Ionio |

Hi, I'm Rohan! I run Ionio — a strategic AI consultancy for Retail & Ecom SaaS. We help mid-market platforms ($5M-100M ARR) build AI features that reduce churn, justify premium pricing, and turn their product into something merchants can't live without.

Over the past 5 years, we built 40+ products and helped founders go from zero to seven figures multiple times. Same playbook, over and over: take an idea, ship it fast, make it work, scale it.

After doing that tens of times, we wanted to take everything we learned and bring that energy to companies at the next stage. That's how we ended up focused on mid-market Retail & Ecom SaaS.

I'm genuinely passionate about this space. Generative AI lets us do something that was never possible before: personalize every single customer interaction. Not segments. Not cohorts. Actual one-on-one conversations at scale. Retail and ecom is where that has the biggest impact.

I've been working in AI since 2016 — back when that meant computer vision, not ChatGPT. Smart cameras, facial recognition, number plate recognition. That foundation matters when you're building production systems that actually need to work.

Previously: From 18 to 20, Sr. Software Engineer at SmartCow (Deep Tech AI company in Malta). At 17, Python work for a Mumbai startup, who are YET to pay me. At 15, building websites and apps for family friends in Java. It's been over a decade.

I started Ionio as a college junior, from my parent's bedroom, while hiring someone to do my assignments & a chauffeur to take me to college. Now it's a little less grunge than that.

In another life: rapper, musician, and cinematographer. Now I just build AI for retail... :(

What our clients say:

"Working with Ionio felt like having an extension of my own team — professionals who genuinely cared about delivering results, not just collecting a check."
— Stefan Georgi, Founder, 9-figure ecom founder

"Fastest I've ever launched a polished product. From wireframes to +1000 paying users in <8 weeks."
— Brad Milne, CTO, SupplierHQ

"Ionio has the character to navigate challenges and the technical depth to turn our 'AI-first' vision into reality."
— Sallyann Della Casa, CEO, Gleac

Read 35+ case studies on our site.

I post about: AI strategy for retail, technical deep dives, and behind-the-scenes of building Ionio.

If you're leading product, engineering, or strategy at a Retail & Ecom SaaS company, or a founder in any space — DM me, I always reply. If you're in Mumbai, I'll buy you a coffee.

Rohan Sawant

Every week I get on a call with a CEO who spent a weekend on Lovable and now thinks his engineering team is lying about timelines

It always goes the same way. They find Lovable, Emergent, bolt.new or Replit Agent, mess around for 2 days and suddenly they have something that looks like a real product.

They screenshot it, show the engineering team on Monday and go “I did this in two days why the fuck are you telling me 5 months”

And honestly? The CEO is right to be pissed

Not about the Lovable prototype being production ready, it’s not. But about the speed. 

Any engineering team in 2026 still operating at pre-AI timelines is just doing something wrong. 

If they’re not shipping at least 3x faster than they were 2 years ago you need to have a hard conversation with your developers

The leading players in every category are already building at this speed. 

The problem is both sides are delusional. The CEO thinks the Lovable thing is the product. The engineering team thinks 5 months is still a reasonable timeline. Both are wrong

We show up to the second call with a working prototype before the contract is even signed. Then we throw it away. 

Its only job was getting everyone aligned in 3 days instead of 6 weeks of arguing about button placement

Then we rebuild it properly. Production grade. In 6-8 weeks and not 5 months

If that sounds fast it’s because it is. And if your team can’t do it that’s the conversation you actually need to be having

No alternative text description for this image

Nobody in B2B is competing on this one thing - “taste”

I’ve been looking at companies that have raised 50, 70, 100 million dollars and their landing pages feel like templates, their content is educational but forgettable and their product demos could belong to any of the hundred other tools in their category.

Then you look at the brands they’re trying to sell to, luxury D2C, premium ecommerce, companies that obsess over every pixel on their product page and the SaaS vendor pitching them can’t even get their own site to feel intentional.

What most founders miss is that when anyone can ship features in a weekend and the tech gap is shrinking by the month. 

A great product gets you in the room, but taste is what closes the deal.

When everyone is using the same models to write code, the same tools to ship faster and the same frameworks to build products, every app starts to look and feel like every other app. 

The UI feels generated, the experience feels generic and nothing has a point of view.

Taste is what defines your pricing, gets you into the premium segment of customers and increases your margins when everyone else is competing on features and discounts.

Nobody in B2B SaaS is competing on this. Everyone is racing to ship more AI features faster and the company that slows down enough to get the look and feel right will win deals they have no business winning.

PS: Pinak F. is on the 6th iteration of the UI just to get this right. That's the work nobody sees but everyone notices.

I can’t charge prices we charge I’m not confident the client will make money working with us. 

That’s our whole pricing philosophy. Projecting attributeable ROI. Working backwards.

I’ve had calls where I quote $$$ amount and someone says another agency quoted half, or a third.

I tell them... go with the other agency and i don’t argue. 

I don’t compare deliverables or explain why we’re different.

Because the only question that matters is whether I believe this project will actually generate big enough ROI at a low enough risk factor.

If we quote $$$ it’s ONLY because I see a path to making that client significantly more than what they’re paying us. 

Not in highlevel consultant theory but in specific mechanisms I can point to.

When there's conviction we have 0 hesitation asking for it. 

When I don’t have it I just procrastinate the proposal. Sometimes outright reject it.

Would rather walk away than take money from someone I’m not sure I can help.

This has cost us deals. It’s also the reason, we've won deals :)

Every week I get on a call with an ecom SaaS founder who just saw a competitor’s demo and is panicking.

“Have you seen this? They’ve built so much.” and I tell them the same thing every time.

That demo means LITERALLY nothing.

It now costs almost nothing to build a clean dashboard, record a walkthrough and make it look like a real product.

What used to take months and money can now be done in days. Which means most of the signals founders rely on are broken like - screenshots, product videos and polished websites.

Even when they’re real, they’re still far easier to ship than they were a year ago.

Non-technical founders are now shipping products that look indistinguishable from developer-built software.

And very soon, you won’t be able to tell the difference at all. So let’s be honest about what’s happening.

1️⃣ Software is no longer the advantage
If it can be built, it can be rebuilt. Faster, cheaper, by more people. AI hasn’t made you special. It has removed the barrier for everyone else.

2️⃣ Speed and building are now baseline
Entire products can be shipped in weeks. If you’re still “building from scratch”, you’re just burning time to feel productive.

3️⃣ Moats have shifted away from code
Your real moat is what customers can’t easily take with them:
Data, workflows, integrations, habits built over years

Because if your product can be rebuilt in 5 weeks… It’s not an advantage but a head start with an expiry date.

Curious to know how you’re thinking about moats in a world where software is becoming free?

"bae pls go to sleep you are not on linkedin anymore, it's 3am on saturday"
.
"Last week I got on a call with a SaaS CEO. Retail space. <$5M ARR. Sideways growth.

He told me they'd been planning an AI feature since December. Two months in, they JUST had wireframes and a Figma prototype. Bunch of screens that looked pretty in a presentation. Fake demos on the landing page.

His exact words: "We're probably ~5 months out from shipping something."

5 MONTHS. GPT-4.5 was 5-6 months ago. The entire landscape shifts in that window.

"This is not even 2 months of work," I told him.

2 days later, we took the call transcript and showed up to the next meeting with a clickable Lovable prototype of the same feature. The call after that, we'd started fleshing out actual React components — 20% of functionality done.

Here's how: Pinak F. sketched rough screens in Excalidraw — maybe 15 minutes — then recorded an audio walkthrough of what each screen should do. 

That audio got fed into Claude to generate component-level prompts. Those prompts went into Antigravity IDE, which generated the full UI. Then Cursor Claude polished everything into clean, production-ready React.

Total time from "here's what I want" to clickable prototype: half a day.

His designers spent weeks on wireframes that could've been a 5-minute sketch. His product team spent weeks in Figma building pixel-perfect mockups nobody outside the company ever saw. His engineers hadn't written a single line of code in 2 months of "planning."

Meanwhile his competitors — GenZ YC brollihaired founders — are turboramming and rebuilding his product brick by brick.

The month most teams spend going from idea to mockup? Now less than a week. The 4-6 months of dev after that? Closer to two. Timelines have 1/3rd-ed themselves.

You don't have to work with us. Work with anyone who understands this. 

But if your team is still running the wireframe, Figma, sprint planning, dev, QA pipeline for EVERY feature...

Do they not know these tools exist? Or do they know, and they're just not telling you? 

Godspeed.

The skills that made someone a “senior developer” five years ago are becoming a liability in client conversations.

I watched it happen on a call last month. Senior dev from another org, sharp guy, asking the right questions - asking about AWS infrastructure, backend stack, what programming language to use, QA processes, the PRD.

All the things you’re supposed to ask before you scope a project.

The prospect got annoyed by question 3.

And I chuckled - it’s not that the questions were bad. It’s that the questions don’t matter anymore. 

Now we can build the thing he was trying to scope faster than he can finish writing the PRD spec for it.

That’s the part nobody is talking about. We talk about AI replacing junior developers. We don’t talk about how it’s making senior developers’ instincts outdated.

The instinct to ask, plan, scope, architect, question - that was the whole job. That’s what made you senior. 

Your judgment about what to build and how.

Now the build takes a day. The judgment that matters isn’t technical anymore. 

It’s “what does this data turn the business into.”
And that’s a completely different skill. 

One that most technical people were never trained for and don’t know they’re missing.

taplio

The Battle

Serkan Ferah 🌈

Rohan Sawant

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreRohan Sawant's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Serkan Ferah 🌈

Rohan Sawant

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Rohan Sawant's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreRohan Sawant's LinkedIn Performance