🌐 Sebastian Bimbi

I turn you into Webflow Expert from any level | Global Community Leader @ Webflow

Sebastian is a strategic Webflow development partner for growth-stage companies, transforming websites from static assets into revenue-driving machines.

After 5+ years building enterprise-level Webflow experiences for companies like Charly, Entertact, and Phase56, he's learned that most businesses don't need another developer - they need a technical partner who understands growth.

✦ WHAT SEBASTIAN DOES DIFFERENTLY

𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Every line of code serves business objectives

𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽: Flexible retainers starting at 5 hours monthly

𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵-𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: Conversion optimization baked into every update

𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: Spots opportunities before clients ask
___

✦ RESULTS THAT MATTER

• Increased conversion rates by 40% for SaaS client through strategic redesign

• Reduced website maintenance time by 75% with scalable Webflow systems

• Generated 6-7 figure revenue increases through website optimization

• Enabled marketing teams to launch campaigns 3x faster

• Built 10+ enterprise websites across Gaming, Tech, and SaaS
___

🛠️ TECH STACK

𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲:
• Webflow
• Notion
• Client-First, Saddle & Lumos Framework
• Custom Code Integration

𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁:
• HTML, CSS, JavaScript
• CMS & E-commerce Solutions
• Figma to Webflow Workflows
• Performance Optimization
• API Integrations
___

🏆 RECOGNITION

• 𝗪𝗲𝗯𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗔𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿 - Community MVP
• 𝗪𝗲𝗯𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 (2023-Present)
• 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗺𝗯𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗿 (April 2025)
• 𝗖𝗼-𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 & 𝗖𝗧𝗢 - Statistical Research Corporation (src.mx)
___

✦ WHO SEBASTIAN SERVES

Growth-stage companies (Series A-C) and established businesses who:

• Need consistent Webflow expertise without hiring in-house

• Want a partner who thinks beyond tickets to business impact

• Value strategic recommendations alongside flawless execution
___

🌎 COMMUNITY IMPACT

𝗖𝗼-𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲.𝗹𝗮𝘁 - 
Empowering Latin America's next generation of no-code developers through:

• Career transition guidance
• Free educational resources
• Building in public philosophy
• Personal branding mentorship
___

📍 CONNECT

𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲?

→ Book a consultation: https://cal.com/sebasbimbi

Serving clients globally | Leading LATAM's no-code movement

Founder & Creative Director

We are a highly skilled, adaptable, and multicultural company that specializes in branding and online development.

Our objective is to help businesses stand out, communicate effectively, and improve important metrics like revenue, acquisition, and interaction.

Our team is committed, moral, and hands-on.

In my job, I help businesses expand by: 
• Analyzing the company model and establishing or aiding in the formulation of a long-term plan to increase leads, conversion, and ROI within available funds.
• Creating website wireframes.
• In charge of overseeing website design and development.

Sebastian Bimbi 🧩

I tried Google's Gemini 3 Pro today.

Built my entire Bimbi Digital website in 15 minutes. 👇

5 minutes prompting.
10 minutes recording the process.
Everything ready to ship.

Three.js animations? ✅
Scroll interactions? ✅
Fully responsive? ✅

Here's what blew my mind:

The AI didn't just generate code.
It understood the vision.

A few prompts:
→ "Create a landing page with Three.js background"
→ "Add smooth scroll interactions"
→ "Make it fully responsive"

And BOOM. 

Everything worked.

First try.

No debugging marathons.
No "why isn't this working?".

Just clean, production-ready code.

This is the moment I've been waiting for.

Not because AI replaces developers.

But because it amplifies us.

I spent 15 minutes on what could take me 3 days.

That means:
→ More time for clients
→ More time for strategy
→ More time for community

The future of web development isn't about writing every line of code.

It's about knowing what to build and how to use the right tools to build it faster.

Today Gemini 3 Pro just became part of my stack.

Thanks to Maksym for calling me out to finally try this.

Watch the full 1-minute build in the video below 👇

PS. Have you tried any AI coding tools yet?
→ Drop your experience below!

PPS. Want ready-to-use prompts to start building with AI?
→ Comment 'GEMINI' below.

___

Join 11k devs learning daily with → Sebastian Bimbi 🧩

___
#ai #gemini3 #google

Democratizing no-code ed. for 10K+ devs ␥ Webflow Growth Partner → Strategic retainer partnerships for scaling agencies ␥ Global Community Leader & MVP 2025 ␥ Speaker

Fernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM

C&S Cabinets

Full Stack Marketer

Concertina Team

CIIT College of Arts and Technology Inc.

Instructor

Netcore Cloud

Customer Success Manager

TL;DR Digital Marketing

President & CEO

Brand30

Member

BorderBuddy

MoEngage Inc.

Autogrow

Marketing Strategist

Growth Blazers

Full Stack Marketer | Digital Marketing Instructor | Speaker/Trainer

Over the last decade, I’ve worked across FinTech, E-commerce, and SaaS, helping businesses unlock the power of digital marketing and MarTech.

In 2020, I realized that the strategies and successes I’ve helped others achieve could be applied to my own ventures, allowing me to assist even more businesses in my own way.

I took action.

I joined masterminds and business groups, executed campaigns firsthand, and consulted as a marketing strategist and customer success expert. Through these experiences, I’ve built a growing community of professionals eager to learn and apply the strategies I’ve developed.

Now, I’m preparing to launch my newsletter, Future-Forward Marketing, where I’ll be sharing actionable insights that have fueled my success.

My mission: To help you master the complexities of MarTech and digital marketing, turning them into powerful growth engines.

My results:

→ 10+ years of experience driving growth in FinTech, E-commerce, and SaaS
→ Managed multimillion-dollar portfolios, ensuring high retention and growth
→ Educator at CIIT Philippines, empowering the next generation of digital marketers
→ Preparing to launch Future-Forward Marketing, a newsletter packed with actionable insights and strategies

If you’re looking to build a robust, data-driven marketing strategy, I’m here to help.

Fernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM, CSSWB

I’m happy to share that I’ve completed my Executive MBA at Asian Institute of Management!

Fernando Academia Jr, EMBA, CDMP, PCM

Marketing Technology and Digital Transformation Leader | Building SukiNomics | 15+ Years helping eCommerce/SaaS/FinTech scale with MarTech & Strategy

Last year, I watched an enterprise burn through a massive budget on a platform their organization couldn't digest.

The technology was perfect.
World-class vendor.
Proven at scale.
Executive champion.
Unlimited budget.
External consultants.
Everything textbooks say you need.

Six months later? Dead.

Not because the platform failed. Because the organization couldn't absorb it.

After 15 years implementing marketing technology across Southeast Asia, I've seen this pattern destroy more transformations than any technical failure:

Organizations have an absorption capacity. Exceed it, and everything fails.

Think of your organization as having a digestive system for change. Feed it too much, too fast, and it rejects everything. Even the good stuff.

I learned this lesson repeatedly across enterprises serving millions of customers.

Major platform implementations failed not because the technology was wrong. 

They failed because they required:
- Workflows that didn't exist
- Skills nobody had developed
- Cultural shifts nobody prepared for
- Integration patterns that weren't documented
- Governance models that weren't designed

This painful education led me to develop a MarTech Maturity Framework that measures absorption capacity across four dimensions:

*Integration Debt: How many manual handoffs exist between systems?
*Data Debt: How fragmented is your customer information?
*Process Debt: How many workflows still run on spreadsheets?
*Vendor Debt: How much overlap exists between tools?

The rule is simple: Score below 60% on any dimension, and new technology multiplies problems instead of solving them.

One client scored 85% on technical capability but 35% on process maturity. We spent six months fixing processes before touching technology. Result? 22x ROI improvement using mostly existing tools.

Vendors will never tell you this.
Consultants won't admit it.

But here's reality:
Most organizations can successfully absorb about 30% of what vendors promise.

Not because vendors lie.
Because organizations overestimate their readiness.

You wouldn't run a marathon without training. Yet companies attempt digital transformation without building organizational fitness first.

The solution isn't moving slower. It's building absorption capacity systematically. Strengthen your foundation before adding weight.

Your Absorption Reality Check:
- How many transformation initiatives has your organization "completed" versus actually adopted?
- What percentage of your tech stack features do teams actually use?
- How many platforms solved one problem but created three new ones?

If you're uncomfortable with the answers, you're not alone.

Want to dive deeper? I've just published below a comprehensive analysis combining insights from Oxford Saïd Business School's latest research with real-world implementation patterns across telecommunications, fintech, and digital platforms.

#DigitalTransformation #MarTech #AITransformation #ChangeManagement #OrganizationalChange

View newsletter: Future-Forward Marketing

Insights from Saïd Business School, University of Oxford's latest webinar on intelligent systems, validated through 15+ years implementing enterprise 

Open article: From Oxford to Operations: 10 Critical Lessons on Leading AI Transformation That Actually Works by Fernando Academia Jr, EMBA, CDMP, PCM • 9 min read

From Oxford to Operations: 10 Critical Lessons on Leading AI Transformation That Actually Works

Your marketing team has more tools than ever. They're using less than a third of them.

Every modern marketing organization runs on four foundational systems:

→ CDP (Customer Data Platform): Your single source of truth for customer data. Unifies profiles across every touchpoint.
→ DAM (Digital Asset Management): Your single source of truth for brand content. Eliminates hours wasted searching for the right assets.
→ MAP (Marketing Automation Platform): Your engine for scalable engagement. Delivers the right message at the right time.
→ CXM (Customer Experience Management): Your orchestration layer for the entire customer journey. Connects acquisition to advocacy.

Together these four markets exceed $50 billion.

The growth trajectory is strong. 
The utilization rate is not.

McKinsey found not one of 50+ senior marketing leaders could clearly articulate their martech ROI. The problem is not the technology. It is how we buy and deploy it.

Three insights that separate winners from laggards:

→ First-party data readiness is now a competitive moat. Those without unified customer data are scrambling as third-party cookies disappear.

→ AI integration is table stakes, not differentiation. The real advantage comes from AI working across all four pillars, not in isolated point solutions.

→ Fewer tools with deeper integration beats more tools with shallow adoption. Organizations with composable architectures deploy new capabilities 80% faster.

The winners in 2026 are not the ones with the biggest martech budgets. They are the ones who can actually measure what that budget delivers.

Full analysis with 2025 market data and strategic recommendations below:

TLDR The Core Four martech stack (CDP, DAM, MAP, CXM) now exceeds $50 billion in combined market value, with CXM and CDP showing the fastest growth th

Open article: The Core Four martech stack in 2025: A $50B+ ecosystem reshaping customer engagement by Fernando Academia Jr, EMBA, CDMP, PCM • 10 min read

The Core Four martech stack in 2025: A $50B+ ecosystem reshaping customer engagement

The expectations of executive leadership are shifting. In #digitaltransformation, the C-suite can no longer lead through decks, dashboards, and delegation alone.

I saw this firsthand during a week-long executive program at UCD Smurfit in Dublin. We analyzed why GE Digital failed while Airbnb succeeded. We visited Pinterest, HubSpot, and Google.

One pattern emerged across every case: the gap between technology capability and organizational capability. That gap closes only when executives get close to the work.

The Magazine Luiza transformation in Brazil shows what this looks like.

When Frederico Trajano became CEO in 2016, he faced a choice. Follow the Silicon Valley playbook of burning cash for growth, or find another way.

He chose neither separation nor delegation. He personally incubated a technology unit of 55 engineers, eventually growing to 850. He housed them in a secluded corner of headquarters with one instruction: build digital tools for both online and offline businesses with total focus on the end user.

The result was a 7,900% stock price increase over four years. The company transformed from a traditional retailer into a tech company.

The Thinkers50 Transformation Playbook captures the key insight. If a technology unit is left to fend for itself inside a larger organization, it will get rejected.

It needs to be separated and incubated by the CSuite, who should give it opportunities to get initial credibility through small wins.

This is why executive sponsorship is the connective tissue in digital transformation.

Harvard Business School research calls this the “use of self.” Leaders model future behaviors early in the process. They visibly tackle new challenges outside their comfort zone. This serves as a template for others to follow.

In #MarTech, the same principle applies. You cannot lead a CDP implementation from a quarterly business review. You cannot transform customer experience through filtered reports.

HubSpot  CEO Yamini Rangan  recently shared what works instead:

Do gemba walks. Sit with your team. Watch how the work happens. See where the friction is.

Triangulate feedback. Listen directly to customers, partners, and employees.

Experiment with #AI yourself. Write prompts. Share what you learn. You cannot #lead transformation if you are not learning the tools shaping it.

Communicate relentlessly. Share what is known, what is unknown, and how decisions are made.

As Rangan puts it, the best C-suite leaders today lead by doing. They provide clear direction and then protect the space for teams to execute.

Sources: 
- Thales Teixeira, Leandro Guissoni, and Frederico Trajano, An Unlikely Case of Successful Digital Transformation, The Transformation Playbook, Brightline Initiative/Thinkers50.
- Ryan L. Raffaelli, Leading Organizational Change, Harvard Business School Core Curriculum, 2017.
- UCD Michael Smurfit Graduate Business School Digital Transformation Executive Program, Dublin, 2025.

A candid, documentary-style photograph from the side of a conductor's podium. A single hand, cufflink visible on a suit sleeve, holds a baton steady in mid-air, commanding attention. The conductor’s body is partially visible but anonymous. The background orchestra is a wash of indistinct shapes and warm stage lights, representing diverse, fragmented elements waiting to be aligned. Shallow depth of field. The mood is authoritative and singular.

I spent years building marketing technology stacks.
→ Dashboards everywhere.
→ Attribution models running in parallel.
→ Customer data flowing into platforms that never talked to each other.

I thought more tools meant more insight. I was wrong.

Just wrapped the Customer-Centric Innovation, Disruption & Metrics program through FGV EAESP in São Paulo as part of the Global Network for Advanced Management SNOC.

Here is what shifted.

Most marketing teams obsess over firm-centric metrics.
• Cost per acquisition
• Campaign ROAS

These answer one question: What is best for us?

Customer-centric thinking asks: What is best for them?

𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐦-𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 uses Porter's value chain. It optimizes internal operations.

𝐂𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫-𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 uses the Customer Value Chain.

It maps what customers actually do:
→ realizing a need
→ comparing options
→ purchasing
→ using
→ disposing.

Some activities create value. Some erode it. Some capture it.

When you understand this chain, you see where competitors can decouple your relationship with customers.

Measurement has the same blind spot.

NPS captures a summary judgment at the end. But satisfaction fluctuates across the journey. If you measure only at the end, you miss where you win and where you lose.

Customer Lifetime Value is similar.

Most teams calculate one aggregate number. But Acquisition CLV and Existing Customer LTV require different data, different time horizons, different actions.

The question is not what does your data say. The question is what do your customers want that you are not giving them.

But here is the harder truth.
You cannot answer that question from inside your team.

The customer value chain cuts across every business unit. Product. Sales. Operations. Finance. IT.

Each team holds a piece of the picture.
None holds the whole thing.

This means more conversations have to happen.
Contexts have to be understood across teams that rarely sit in the same room.
Silos have to break.

Silos do not break by accident.
They break when someone decides to break them.
That takes audacity.

It takes audacity to walk into another team's meeting and say: I need your context because my data is incomplete without it.

It takes audacity to propose unified measurement when every team defends their own dashboards.

→ No CDP will force humans to share context.
→ Technology connects systems.
→ People connect meaning.

Three shifts I am taking back:

First, map the customer value chain before adding any new tool.

Second, measure satisfaction at each stage of the journey, not just at the end.

Third, initiate the conversations that are not happening. Break the silos with audacity, not just integration roadmaps.

Tools are means.
Customers are the end.
Courage is the bridge.

The work continues.

#MarTech #CustomerCentricity #DigitalTransformation #ExecutiveEducation #GrowthStrategy

I’ve watched the same pattern destroy implementations across fintech, government, ecommerce, healthtech, and SMEs—and it’s not what you think.

Over the past 15 years working with enterprise clients on martech implementations, member management systems, and #digitaltransformation projects, I’ve reviewed my notes and found one consistent thread:

80% of #martech implementations fail to deliver their promised value—and the failure point is almost never the technology.

𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐞𝐝.

The data backs this up:
• 97% of mid-sized enterprises reported a martech failure that negatively affected customer relationships in the last 12 months .
• 72% fail from lack of post-launch monitoring .

Across every sector I’ve worked in—from government agencies managing constituent data to healthtech companies orchestrating patient journeys—the pattern is identical.

The Core Four stack (CDP, DAM, MAP, CXM) gets approved at the executive level, then delegated to mid-level leaders who lack the authority to make it work.

Here’s what I’ve observed goes missing:
→ No one mandates data sharing between Sales and #Marketing.
→ No one resolves the turf war between Acquisition and Retention teams.
→ No one reallocates headcount from legacy system maintenance.
→ No one absorbs the political cost of standardizing processes across business units.
→ No one owns the compliance risk of unified customer data.
→ No one protects the 18-36 month transformation timeline against quarterly pressure.

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬—𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞-𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲.

When Gartner surveyed marketing leaders, they found that successful implementations have one thing in common: active C-suite involvement in vendor selection, change management, and continuous oversight.

This isn’t about blame.

It’s about recognizing that the Core Four requires a different kind of leadership engagement than traditional software purchases.

Read on below to understand what real executive sponsorship requires—and why the gap between leaders and laggards widens every quarter you wait.

The Core Four martech stack is not a technology decision. It is an organizational design decision. And that is why it keeps failing without executive 

Open article: The Core Four: Why your Martech Stack is an Organizational Problem by Fernando Academia Jr, EMBA, CDMP, PCM • 4 min read

The Core Four: Why your Martech Stack is an Organizational Problem

A vendor presented to a client recently.

• Impressive capabilities.
• Network analysis.
• Topic mapping.
• Video analysis at scale.
• Distribution intelligence most brands never see.

Then came the line that stayed with me:

"𝑊𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑛'𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑠 𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑠. 𝑊𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑠."

No capability transfer.
Every insight is paid work.
Baseline reports take weeks.
Crisis analysis is measured in days.

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐟𝐥𝐚𝐰. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥.

→ I've seen this pattern across enterprise clients.
→ They bring in specialists for critical capabilities.
→ The work is excellent.

But years later, the organization owns nothing. Every question still requires an external engagement.

The vendor isn't doing anything wrong. They built a business around expertise that's hard to replicate.

The question is whether that serves your long-term position.

There's a framework I keep coming back to:
Build, Borrow, or Buy.

Most organizations default to "borrow" without realizing it. Procurement treats it as a vendor decision. But it's actually a capability decision. And capability decisions compound over time.

I wrote a longer piece on this, including:
→ How the dependency pattern forms over 5 years
→ The Gartner data showing utilization dropped from 58% to 33%
→ A decision framework for when to rent vs. build vs. buy
→ Why the first question should be "do we already have this?"

Link in comments.

The capability question isn't about this vendor or that vendor. It's about whether your organization is accumulating strategic assets or just paying for access.

Worth asking before the next renewal.

#MarTech #MarketingTechnology #DigitalTransformation

Why "Build vs. Buy" is a strategic decision, not a procurement decision The Conversation That Keeps Repeating A vendor presented to a client recently.

Open article: The Capability Question Nobody Wants to Answer by Fernando Academia Jr, EMBA, CDMP, PCM • 5 min read

The Capability Question Nobody Wants to Answer

taplio

The Battle

Sebastian Bimbi 🧩

Fernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM, CSSWB

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreSebastian Bimbi 🧩's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM, CSSWB's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Sebastian Bimbi 🧩

Fernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM, CSSWB

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Sebastian Bimbi 🧩's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFernando Academia Jr., CDMP, PCM, CSSWB's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreSebastian Bimbi 🧩's LinkedIn Performance