Cosmin Rusu

Transforming Visions into AI MVPs & Products | Founder @Duty Ventures | Ex {Google, Apple and Amazon}

Hi, I’m Cosmin, the Founder and Lead Engineer of Duty Ventures. 

After some experience as a software developer in companies such as Google, Apple, and Amazon, I decided to launch my project.

With several former colleagues and college friends, we launched our own startup specializing in software development for entrepreneurs and customers needing software development services. 

Duty Ventures is all about developing software products from start to finish, thanks to the experiences we have all acquired in the past years.

One of our most successful services is aimed at entrepreneurs and early-stage founders, for whom we provide an MVP-builder service getting their product from 0 to 1 within weeks!

However, our services are not limited to that. The teams we create do much more than just create MVPs and are able to adapt to the different technologies requested, all of this in an agile way.

Our most recurrent services are the following:
- MVP creation
- Custom Software Development
- Blockchain Development
- Mobile Development
- Checkout pages
- E-Commerce

And our most used technologies are:
- Ruby on Rails
- React
- React Native
- Java
- NodeJS


If you want to learn more about how we can help you, head over to: https://dutyventures.com


Phone: (+1) 669 200 9568 / (+40) 754 973 314
Email: cosmin@dutyventures.com

Founder & Lead software engineer

I'm leading a software development agency focused on fast iterations. Most of our clients are shipping more features, responding faster to support tickets, and have accelerated growth because of us.

We focused on HealthCare a lot lately due to the accelerated digitalization in this industry. I am a strong believer that we can make healthcare more technically advanced via pure software. 

In terms of technologies, our previous projects involved Ruby on Rails, React, React Native, Scala, Java, Kubernetes, GCP, AWS (ECS, RDS, AKS), Stripe Connect, HIPAA compliance.

Some of our previous clients: 
- Spotify
- Colgate
- Go4Ellis (incl. HIPAA compliance)
- KindBody (+1 HIPAA)
- NXT Sports
- Noom (Healthcare)
- Mochila Fulfillment
- 3Step
- Mylk Guys (YCombinator)
- NLV Productions
- SH Technologies
- One Step Software (Techstars)
- Ergodic Labs
- Med Prep
- Testing Psych
- Abundance Digital
- Tookitaki

Everyone is cutting juniors.

AI writes code. AI reviews code. AI tests code.
So why would anyone hire a junior developer in 2026?

I'll tell you why. Because I do it. Every quarter.

Here's what the "AI replaces juniors" crowd doesn't understand:

AI doesn't build culture.
AI doesn't grow into your next team lead.
AI doesn't challenge your senior engineers with fresh perspectives.
AI doesn't stay loyal for 5 years because you gave them their first real shot.

The data says junior positions dropped 20-30% in some regions.
The industry says "juniors are obsolete."

I say that's short-sighted and dangerous.

If we stop training juniors today, who leads your engineering team in 2030?

We'll face a competence gap worse than any talent shortage.
A generation of engineers who never learned to think... because a machine did it for them.

At Duty Ventures, we pair every junior with a senior + AI tools.
They learn faster. Ship sooner. And they bring something no LLM ever will:

Hunger.

The companies cutting all junior roles to save money?
They're eating their seed corn.

Cosmin Ionut

AI-forward engineers. Embedded fast. Delivering from day one. | Founder @Duty Ventures | Ex {Google, Apple and Amazon}

Anthropic just played the smartest marketing move in AI.

While OpenAI announced ads are coming to ChatGPT, Anthropic did the opposite - they ran a Super Bowl ad saying Claude will stay ad-free.

But that's not even the best part.

They started sponsoring Google search results for developer error messages and stack traces that return zero results.

Think about it: you're debugging at 2 AM, you paste an error into Google, nothing comes up - and right there is Claude offering to help.

That's not advertising. That's solving a real problem at the exact moment of frustration.

The marketing lesson here is massive:

Don't interrupt people. Show up where they already need you.

Most companies spend millions trying to grab attention from people who don't care. Anthropic spent it reaching developers at their most desperate moment - when no other solution exists.

This is the difference between push marketing and pull marketing done right.

What's the smartest developer-targeted ad you've seen?

undefined undefined

Stop paying for ngrok. There's a better alternative.

Meet zrok - an open-source tunneling tool built on zero-trust networking principles.

Why I switched:

1. Free subdomains - no paying for stable URLs
2. Open source - self-host it or use their free SaaS tier
3. Built on OpenZiti - actual zero-trust security, not just marketing buzzwords
4. Supports public AND private shares
5. Auto HTTPS/TLS out of the box
6. Custom domains supported

If you're a developer who regularly needs to expose local services (demos, webhooks, testing) - ngrok's free tier feels increasingly restrictive.

zrok gives you what you actually need without hitting a paywall every 5 minutes.

The setup is straightforward. The docs are solid. And because it's open source, you can inspect every line of code handling your traffic.

In a world where we're tunneling more and more traffic for dev and testing, having a free and secure option matters.

Check it out:

zrok.io

Home - zrok by NetFoundry

Unpopular opinion: most people using AI to build apps have no business deploying anything to production.

A 20-year sysadmin just quit his job this week. Not burnout. Not pay. His company offered bonuses for the best "vibe coded" app and got a tsunami of shadow IT - unsecured apps, unvetted AI agents on corporate machines, and a team of THREE sysadmins drowning under "innovation" built by people who can't explain what their own code does. When he raised security concerns? Debated. Overruled. Approved anyway. Because a VP saw a demo and got excited.

Copying ChatGPT output into production doesn't make someone an engineer. It makes them a liability with a deployment pipeline. A CTO in the thread admitted his marketing team had secretly built 11 apps - one storing customer data in a public S3 bucket. Eleven apps. Zero reviews. This is where we are now.

The predictable response: "That's just gatekeeping. Engineers are afraid AI will replace them." No. Good engineers use AI daily. The difference is they can read it, debug it, secure it, and explain it to an auditor. AI didn't lower the barrier to building software. It lowered the barrier to building dangerous software. Most organizations can't tell the difference until something breaks, leaks, or lands on a regulator's desk.

That sysadmin isn't the problem. He's the canary. Companies will keep ignoring people like him until they're explaining to a regulator why customer data ended up on the open internet because Dave from accounting "had a great idea for an app."

Stop handing out innovation awards. Start asking who's going to maintain it, secure it, and answer for it when it fails.

Open article: From the sysadmin community on Reddit by reddit.com

A friend of mine had his first meeting with a potential client in Germany.

He didn't prepare a pitch deck. Didn't try to "understand the project." Didn't walk through his company's services.

Instead, he asked one question:

"If I fly from Romania to Germany on Friday, can we meet face to face?"

They said yes instantly.

That was 5 years ago. They're still working together.

Here's what most agencies get wrong: they lead with capabilities. "We do React, we do mobile, we do cloud."

Nobody cares.

What founders actually want to know is: will this person show up when it matters?

The best business relationships I've seen didn't start with a scope of work. They started with someone proving they gave a damn before the contract was signed.

If you're choosing between a partner with a perfect proposal and one who'll get on a plane for you — pick the plane.

Hot take on vibe coding:

If frontend is mostly about calling APIs, and those APIs should be secure by default - does vibe coding make the most sense on the frontend?

Think about it. The frontend is essentially a curl wrapper. A UI layer. Less security risk.

Here's where I think things are heading:

Senior engineers will migrate towards building secure backends. Modular, composable backend "components" that can easily interact with each other.

Open-source microservices you can plug and play.

Need auth? Spin up your own Auth0-like instance. Need user-generated content? Spin up a UGC microservice - posts, comments, likes, replies, threads. The same patterns we use on LinkedIn, Facebook, X.

You reuse what exists. Then you generate your own microservice for what's specific to your product.

And once you become big enough? You open source it.

The frontend becomes the place where AI can truly shine - generating UIs, connecting to secure APIs, iterating on design fast.

The backend stays the domain of engineers who understand security, data, and system design.

Vibe coding isn't replacing developers. It's splitting the role in two.

For years, I thought the best way to create more value for clients was to charge less.

Lower rate = more value for their money. Simple math, right?

Wrong.

Here's what actually happened when I charged less:

→ Clients treated the work as disposable
→ My team felt undervalued, so they gave B-level effort
→ I attracted price-shoppers who churned the fastest
→ We couldn't invest in better processes, tooling, or talent

The moment I started charging what the work was actually worth, everything changed.

Clients were more engaged. More committed. More respectful of timelines.

My team felt ownership because the stakes matched the effort.

And the clients who stayed? They became long-term partners, not one-off projects.

If you're a founder evaluating dev partners and your main filter is "who's cheapest" — you're optimizing for the wrong thing.

The most expensive mistake isn't paying too much. It's paying too little for a team that doesn't care enough to get it right.

Stop hiring 10 developers when 2 + Claudes can do the same job.

I know. Controversial. Especially coming from someone who runs a dev agency.

But here's what nobody in outsourcing wants to say out loud:

The old model is dying.

1. Junior positions in outsourcing dropped 20-30% last year
2. Clients are asking: "Why pay for 8 devs when 1 senior + AI does 80% of the work?"
3. McKinsey predicts a 20-30% reduction in the global outsourcing market by 2030

And yet... most agencies are still selling headcount.
Still billing by the hour.
Still pretending nothing changed.

Here's the uncomfortable truth from someone who runs an agency:

If your only value proposition is "cheap developers" - you're already dead.
You just don't know it yet.

At Duty Ventures, we made a decision 2 years ago:
Stop being a code factory. Start being a product partner.

Don't sell hours. Sell shipped features.
Don't sell headcount. Sell outcomes.

The agencies that survive 2026 won't be the cheapest.
They'll be the ones who embraced AI, specialized in complex domains, and aligned incentives with their clients.

The rest? They'll be replaced by prompts...

Heroku just entered "maintenance mode."

Except this time, it's not your app - it's the entire platform.

Salesforce announced Heroku is transitioning to a "sustaining engineering model." Translation: no new features, no new enterprise contracts, just keeping the lights on.

If you've been a developer long enough, you know what this means. Standing still in tech is the same as moving backward.

Here's the thing though - Heroku's ideas won.

Every git push deploy. Every platform that "just works." Vercel, Render, Railway, Fly - they all carry Heroku's DNA.

The lesson for anyone building software products:

Your product can pioneer a category and still lose if the parent company stops investing. Innovation without sustained commitment is just a head start for your competitors.

If you're still running on Heroku - your apps are fine for now. But start planning your next move.

The platform that taught us what great developer experience looks like deserved better stewardship.

"We spend $XX,XXX/month on LLMs" is the new "we hired 200 people in 6 months."

Both sound impressive until the board asks: what did we actually get for it?

The smartest teams I see aren't spending more on AI. They're spending less, and ACTUALLY shipping more.

Marc Andreessen on how to get people to join your 3-person startup:

You have exactly 2 tools - stock options and vision.

Stock options they'll tell you aren't worth anything. So it really comes down to vision.

The best founders can explain how the world is going to look in a way that's so compelling, people leave Google and Microsoft to build it with them.

It's essentially sales. Selling to employees.

But here's the part most founders miss:

Hiring is also a self-selection process. The best companies are polarizing on purpose. They give a stark picture of what they are and what they aren't.

"We work 18-hour days - if that's not you, don't come."
"We go home at 5 every day - if that frustrates you, don't come."
"We do yoga as a company - if that's weird to you, don't come."

The founders who try to be everything to everyone end up hiring people who leave in 3 months.

The ones who are radically honest about their culture? They attract true believers.

Running a staff augmentation agency, I see this daily. The clients who know exactly what culture they're building find the right talent 10x faster.

Hot take: If your outsourcing partner can't deliver the same result with fewer people... they're the WRONG partner.

Let me explain.

I've been on both sides of this.

As a founder of a dev agency, I've seen clients pay for:
- 6 developers sitting in standups for 3 hours/day
- 4 QA engineers manually testing what AI can do in minutes
- A project manager whose only job was "translating" between client and devs

That's not a team. That's a payroll.

The smartest clients I work with in 2026 don't ask:
"How many developers will you assign?"

They ask:
"How fast can you ship this feature, and what does it cost?"

That's the shift:

OLD MODEL: Pay per seat. Vendor profits when project takes longer.
NEW MODEL: Pay per outcome. Vendor profits when they ship faster.

We moved to milestone-based pricing at Duty Ventures years ago.
Result? Our incentives match the client's: ship fast, ship right, move on.

When AI makes a 3-person team as productive as a 10-person team was in 2023 - the billing model has to change.

If your vendor is still charging you by the hour in 2026, ask yourself:

Whose interest are they serving - yours or theirs?

The outsourcing industry is worth $618 billion.
Most of it is still billed by the hour.
That's a $618 billion misalignment of incentives.

So I guess Claude is OOO today

https://status.claude.com/

So if AI will write code, and we treat that as a commodity, and as a pure blackbox inputs / outputs type of thing - what's next? Maybe we fully automate QA? Maybe we fully automate a simulation on how that code would interact with actual users? So we "simulate" a real world usage of an app / a website over time to find bugs / issues? Then, what next?

There are two types of early-stage technical decisions:

Type A: Decisions that get your product in front of users.
Type B: Decisions that prepare for users you don't have yet.

Most founding teams spend 80% of their time on Type B.

Kubernetes, microservices, auto-scaling, blue-green deployments... all Type B.

A $10 VPS with your app deployed on it? Type A.

And here's the uncomfortable math:

3,000 users paying $30/mo = $1M ARR.

A single server handles that without breaking a sweat.

Every week you spend on Type B before you have paying users is a week you're not learning whether anyone even wants what you're building.

Ship boring infrastructure.
Build interesting products.

Someone replicated Monday.com's core features in 60 minutes using AI.

Cost: $15.

Monday's stock took a hit. People panicked.

But here's the thing nobody's talking about:

Code has been getting cheaper for 20 years. AI just made the trend impossible to ignore.

If your entire business defensibility is "we built an app," you were already vulnerable. AI just made it obvious.

The real moat was never the code. It's:

→ Deep understanding of a specific customer problem
→ Product decisions that reflect real usage, not assumptions
→ An architecture that actually scales when users show up
→ A team that iterates based on data, not vibes

I see founders still spending months planning features that an AI tool could scaffold in an afternoon. And I see Silicon Valley founders shipping AI-generated MVPs that fall apart the moment real users touch them.

Both are missing the point.

The winners will be the ones who combine fast tooling with sharp product thinking.

Code is a commodity. Product judgment is not.

monday.com

monday.com | Outpace everyone with the best AI work platform

2X Exits | Built $MM Businesses over 20 years | CEO Coach | Helping founders grow revenue, profit and valuation

2× Exit | Built 7-Figure Businesses | Creator of CEO Mastery | Helping Founders Grow Revenue and Valuation.

20 years ago, if someone had told me that I would run multiple, multi-million dollar companies, simultaneously, I would have laughed. But here I am.

Over the last 2 decades, I’ve built 2 multi-million-dollar ARR companies and led them to successful exits.

Was it easy? Hell, no.

My transition from an Engineer to an Entrepreneur was hard. 
Being good at our craft and good in business are 2 very different things.

Tejora Technologies was my flagship; I built it to over 200 employees and 30+ clients across the US, UAE, and India, and profitably exited in 2022.

Our systems and strategies enabled me to unlock its value when I was ready to exit. 
I could secure a full buyout and walk away in 3 months because it was built to be cash-rich and founder-free.

In 2007, while growing Tejora, launched Elixir Fitness, diving headfirst into the retail sector. Double the challenges and double the learning. 
 
Successfully exited Elixir Fitness in 2012 to focus fully on Tejora. 
Biggest takeaway? Building and selling a business is an art and a science.

Now, in my 3rd venture —I help founders do the same:

Build businesses that generate profit — and become buyer/investor-ready.

Wealth creation is at the center of everything I do.

Working together, we will: 
- Scale the business in ways that increase enterprise value
- Build a team that can run without you
- Create clarity that successors can trust, and buyers will pay for.

After all, businesses aren’t sold. They’re bought.

So —here are 4 ways I can help you build an Exit Ready business.

1) CEO Coaching & Advisory: 
Work with me 1:1 to increase revenue/profit, maximize valuation, and make your business attractive to buyers or successors.

Book a Free Clarity Call: https://topmate.io/surabhishenoy/1314664

2) Subscribe to My Newsletter — CEO Mastery
Every Thursday, I share actionable strategies on scaling and valuation. This is my best content — and it’s free.

Subscribe Now: https://surabhishenoy.com/newsletter-subscribe/

3) Take My Course — Founder’s Freedom Blueprint
The first condition of any exit? Your business must run without you.
FFB helps you get there — with systems, delegation, and founder freedom.

Get it here: learn.surabhishenoy.com

4) Follow me here on LinkedIn for tips throughout the week.

To know more about me and my story, please visit: https://surabhishenoy.com/from-engineer-to-ceo-to-ceo-coach/

Thank you for being here,

Best, 
Surabhi

Surabhi Shenoy

Two founders reached out in the same week.

Different businesses. Same goal: 10x.

I asked them one question.

10x of what?

- Revenue?
- Profit?
- Valuation?
- Freedom?

The definition was still forming.

A $10M company and a $100M company may want to grow at the same rate on paper.
But the underlying math will be very different.

10x is not intensity.
It is clarity about what you are multiplying.

In tomorrow’s 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺, I examine the thinking and execution required before you push for scale.

If 10x is on your mind, read this edition before you move.

Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝗮𝘁 𝟰 𝗣𝗠 𝗗𝘂𝗯𝗮𝗶 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲. 

2700+ ambitious Founders read it every week. 

Every Thursday, 1 sharp, actionable insight for founders who care about revenue, profit, and valuation.

🔗 Click "𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿" above 👆 
📲 Or scan the QR code 👇

#CEOMastery #FounderMentalModels #10xGrowth

Leadership insight from Surabhi Shenoy on the 10x growth mindset. It highlights the importance of defining the core metric—Revenue, Profit, Valuation, or Freedom—before pushing for scale. Includes a preview of the CEO Mastery newsletter and a QR code for 2,700+ founder-operators.

I keep receiving emails like this...
 
“Surabhi, I enjoy reading CEO Mastery.  
I want to start a newsletter for my own business.  
But I don’t know where to begin.”
 
So this week I decided to answer that question.
The real reason why CEO Mastery exists. 

It started with a simple realization:
 
In today’s world, 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲.
 
If your company shows up in a client’s inbox every week with useful thinking, something powerful happens:
 
You build trust before the sale.  
You build familiarity without chasing.  
And when their problem becomes urgent…
 
You are the first person they think of.
 
Inside this week’s letter I share:
 
• Why I started CEO Mastery  
• The leverage behind email lists  
• Why serious businesses need newsletters
• And how to start
 
If you run a business, this might change how you think about distribution.
 
𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 goes out tomorrow 4 pm Dubai time.

Subscribe today.

Click 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 above. 👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on using newsletters as a distribution leverage for businesses. It explores why building an email list creates trust before the sale and establishes authority without chasing leads. Includes a breakdown of how to start a business newsletter to build long-term familiarity and leverage.


If you're building a serious business, you already know this:
Reading helps.

But most founders don’t have time to read deeply.

And even when they do, turning ideas into real decisions isn’t easy.

Founders operate under constant pressure.
Decisions can’t wait. Execution comes first.

Still, the right idea at the right time can change how you hire, lead, price, and scale.

Over two decades of building and scaling companies, books have been one of my biggest strategic advantages.

They sharpened my thinking.
They helped me avoid mistakes I would've paid for.

Over time, I started documenting the ideas.
And how they actually show up inside a growing company.

That became 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱.

A private guide with 30 founder-focused articles.

Each connects a book to a strategic idea — and shows how it translates into real decisions.

If you’d like access to 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘓𝘦𝘢𝘥, subscribe to 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘺.

You’ll receive it as a welcome gift.

From there, every Thursday, I share one practical system or mental model drawn from building companies — and now supporting founders through similar decisions.

Click “View my newsletter” above to subscribe.

You lost the deal.

And for a few hours — maybe a few days — it feels personal.

That’s normal.

What you do next is the separator.

At the top, most founders are capable. 

The difference is how quickly they reset.

When an important deal falls through, notice your first reaction. 

- Do you spiral? 
- Doubt the team? 
- Blame the market? 
- Overcorrect your strategy?

Or do you step back and ask: 

- What actually happened? 
- What was within our control? 
- What do we refine before the next pitch?

This matters beyond a single deal.

Because, your reaction becomes culture.

If the founder panics, the team tightens.
If the leader rants, people start playing it safe.
If you treat every loss like catastrophe, the organization becomes cautious.

Great operators treat it differently.

Strong operators treat losses as data. 
They review them calmly and move forward with adjustments.

You won’t win every deal.
But you can build a system that improves after each one.

That’s the real shift from good to great.

Not brilliance. 
Recovery discipline.

--
Every Thursday, I write CEO Mastery newsletter for founders who want to think clearly and build high-value businesses.  

If that’s you, click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above and join 2700+ founders.
It’s free.

♻ Repost to help a fellow leader.
🔔 Follow Surabhi Shenoy for daily CEO insights.

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on 'Recovery Discipline' for business owners. It explains how to handle lost deals by treating them as data points rather than personal failures. The post highlights how a founder's reaction to loss directly shapes company culture and emphasizes the importance of a fast reset to maintain momentum and team ownership.

Nike took 18 years to “arrive.”

In 𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘨, Phil Knight’s memoir, the story begins in 1962.
It ends in 1980 — when Nike finally goes public.

Eighteen years.

Not eighteen months.
Not three funding rounds.
Not a viral launch.

For most of that time, the company was fragile.

- Cash was tight.
- Banks applied pressure.
- Shipments were delayed.
- Suppliers threatened control.

At one point, Phil Knight writes about smashing phones after brutal calls.

Breaking them. Replacing them. Breaking them again.

Until a repairman finally looked at him and said:
“This is not very mature.”

That line stayed with me.

𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘨 isn’t really about branding or strategy.

It’s about what prolonged uncertainty does to a founder’s psychology.

What it really teaches:

𝟭. 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆.
Big companies look stable. They rarely begin that way.

𝟮. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.
Pressure exposes your maturity.

𝟯. 𝗘𝗻𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.
Results often lag effort by years.

𝟰. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗶𝘁𝘆.
Growth without cash becomes stress on repeat.

𝟱. 𝗖𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗳 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆.
Doubt is constant. Commitment must be stronger.

𝟲. 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗴𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝘀.
Recognition comes late.

Nike didn’t become Nike because it was flawless.

It became Nike because it didn’t stop.

What most founders underestimate isn’t competition.
It’s psychological stamina.

📌 I’ve created a cheatsheet below:
Founder Endurance Under Fragility.

Lessons from 𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘨 that don’t show up in business summaries.

Save it for the weeks when the effort is high — and the progress feels invisible.

--

Every week, I write 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 for founders who want to think clearly and build high-value businesses.  

If that’s you, click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above the post and join 2700+ founders.

I meet two types of founders.

Both are optimizing the wrong metric.

- The “Unicorn” Founder.
Revenue may be rising, but it is largely one-time, expansion-led, or dependent on constant reinvention rather than predictable repeat flows.

- The “Service” Founder.
The business is profitable and stable, but delivery, sales, or key decisions still revolve heavily around the founder personally.

On the surface, both look successful.

But markets tend to reward something specific: 
𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 and 𝘍𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺.

High-quality revenue repeats.

Independent business survives when the founder steps back.

Try the 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘝𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘱 below.

Where a business sits on this map often determines how it is valued, funded, or acquired.

Two questions usually clarify the position.

1/ How much of the revenue is recurring versus one-time?
2/ How much of decision-making, delivery, or sales depends on the founder personally?

Plotted honestly, the quadrant becomes visible.

What to do next requires two additional filters.

I’ve written about both, and a few real-life examples, here:
https://lnkd.in/gKKWuJ4h

PS: Which quadrant does your business sit in?
--

If you enjoy this kind of depth, 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿. 

Every Thursday get 1 sharp, actionable system to scale Yourself and Your Business. 

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆

The Market Value Map by Surabhi Shenoy, a strategic quadrant for founder-operators. It plots Revenue Quality (Recurring vs. One-time) against Founder Dependency (Dependent vs. Independent). The map helps CEOs identify if they are in the 'Unicorn' trap, the 'Service' trap, or the High-Value Scalable zone.

I see this often with founders.

They know they should delegate more.

They’ve hired good people.
They want leaders around them.
They say they trust their teams.

Still… they find themselves pulled back in.

- Approving things they don’t need to.
- Joining meetings they're not needed in.
- Making decisions that someone else could.

This is rarely a delegation skill problem.

Something deeper is at play here.
And most of the founders miss it.

In tomorrow’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆, I unpack what’s really going on and how founders move past this stage.

You’ll understand:

- 5 psychological barriers behind delegation
- Why smart founders struggle to move past them
- How your role must evolve as the company grows
- How you can enable yourself and your team to delegate effortlessly

𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 goes out tomorrow at 4pm Dubai time.

Subscribe today.

Click 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 above. 👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on the psychological barriers to delegation for business owners. It explores why founders struggle to let go even after hiring capable leaders, focusing on the evolution of the founder's role as a company scales. Highlights 5 specific barriers and a framework for enabling teams to operate independently.

You don’t get paid for being busy.

You get paid for deciding well.

Today, people don’t struggle because they lack information or ideas.
They struggle because they don’t have a filter.

Without a filter, every trend looks urgent.
Every opportunity looks promising.
And even small doubt feels dangerous.

Charlie Munger had strong filters for evaluating businesses that would last.

If we reverse-engineer those filters, we can learn how to build companies that compound rather than collapse.

I wrote about this in CEO Mastery newsletter: 
𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲

Read it here: https://lnkd.in/gDwz_xpQ

Inside, you’ll learn:
– Why thinking independently keeps you differentiated
– How intellectual humility protects you from expensive mistakes
– What numbers truly deserve your attention
– Why preparation makes decisiveness easier
– How to adapt before the market forces you to

If you build without clear filters, you react.
If you build with them, you compound.

If you want to learn to make better decisions under pressure, read the article.

-
Every week, I write CEO Mastery for founders who want to think clearly and build high-value businesses.

If that’s you, click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above the post and join us.

Found this valuable? 
♻️ Repost to your network 
🔔 Follow Surabhi Shenoy for daily CEO insights

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on building decision filters for business growth. Inspired by Charlie Munger, the post explores independent thinking, intellectual humility, and identifying key metrics to ensure a business compounds rather than collapses. Designed to help founder-operators make high-stakes decisions with clarity.

One habit consistently separates average operators from strong leaders.

They think on purpose.

Not reacting immediately.
Not replying to everything.
Not forwarding emails all day.

Just thinking.

Ten minutes a day is enough.

Think back to yesterday for a moment.
Ask yourself:

- What decision am I avoiding?
- What assumption am I making?
- What is actually driving this problem?
- If I simplified this, what would I remove?

Effort is rarely the problem.
If you’re here reading this, you’re already working hard.

Businesses, careers, and lives stall when you don’t pause long enough to think clearly and make deliberate decisions.

Clear thinking compounds over time.

Ten minutes today saves ten hours next month.

If you’re leading anything — a team, a project, or a business — protect thinking time.

It is not a luxury.
It is part of the job.

—

If you value clear thinking like this, you’ll enjoy 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆.
Every week I share one sharp idea to help you think clearly and build a high-value business — without noise or fluff.
Subscribe if that’s your kind of thinking.
Click '𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿' above. 👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on the importance of "Thinking on Purpose" for business leaders. It outlines four critical questions for clear thinking: identifying avoided decisions, challenging assumptions, finding root causes, and simplifying systems. Emphasizes that protecting thinking time is a core operational requirement for scaling a high-value business.

You don’t hate sales. 

You hate the version of sales you’ve been told to copy.

I meet many founders who dislike sales.

Pitching.
Convincing.
Talking someone into buying.

For people who built their business by solving real problems, this feels like manipulation.

In practice, sales in a services or technology business often look very different.

It begins with clearly understanding the client’s problem.

Then explaining how your product/team solves that problem, and what outcome they should expect.

When that explanation is clear, the conversation changes.

The client is no longer evaluating a pitch.
They are evaluating whether you understand their situation well enough to help.

This is something Sajeed Ahmed explains well in his book 𝘚𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘜𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘥.

Coming from a deep technology background and years of selling complex tech solutions, he describes sales less as persuasion and more as translating problems into outcomes.

I pulled together a cheat sheet from a few ideas he shared.

𝟳 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗼 𝗛𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀.

You may find one or two that change how you approach your next client conversation.

Repost to help a founder who believes they “hate sales.”

--

If you enjoy this kind of depth, 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗹𝗹 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿. 

Every Thursday: 1 sharp, actionable system to grow your revenue and valuation. 

🔗 Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above 👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on reframing sales for technical founders. Inspired by Sajeed Ahmed’s 'Sales Unlearned,' the post describes sales as a process of translating complex problems into clear outcomes rather than using persuasion or pitching. It includes a 7-lesson cheat sheet for founders to improve client conversations and revenue growth.

You can build something powerful and still struggle to sell it.

People keep comparing it to the old way of doing things.

“That’s not how we work today.”
“Your system can’t do what we do manually.”
“The old way is good enough.”

Humans defend what already exists — even when it’s inefficient.

Jeff Bezos faced the same resistance when he launched Amazon.

People compared it to a physical bookstore.
“But you can’t have book signings.”
“Where’s the coffee?”
“A website will never replace a bookstore.”

Bezos didn’t defend the comparison.

He changed the frame.

Instead of trying to replicate bookstores, Amazon focused on what the new medium could do that bookstores never could.

That shift became a powerful founder mental model.

I wrote about it in the latest CEO Mastery edition:
𝗪𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝘂𝘀.
𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘰𝘯.𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘒𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦’𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴.

You can read it here: https://lnkd.in/g3cC68GG

Inside, I explain:
– Why defending your product against the past is a losing strategy
– How Bezos reframed Amazon instead of replicating bookstores
– The thinking behind Kindle’s design philosophy
– The question founders should ask when introducing something new

This mental model changes how you pitch, position, and differentiate your product.

If you’re building something new and facing resistance from the “old way,” read this one carefully.

—

Every week, I write CEO Mastery for founders who want to think clearly and build high-value businesses.

If that’s you, click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above and join 2800+ founders.

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on using the Bezos mental model to overcome market resistance. The post introduces the B.E.Z.O.S. Framework: Break the Comparison Lens, Expand What’s Possible, Zero-Friction Experience, Own a New Dimension, and Sell the Superpower. Aimed at founder-operators, it explains how to move beyond feature-defense and familiarity bias to turn objections into product adoption.

Every client says they want a custom solution.

They’re not wrong.

But over time, that belief can be the reason your business stops scaling.

SpaceX faced the same problem.

Clients expected mission-specific rockets every single time.

And for a long time, that was considered the only way to operate.

But SpaceX refused.

What they did instead helped them launch more rockets than the rest of the world combined, reduce costs dramatically, and scale faster than anyone expected.

Most founders don’t make this move.

Because customization feels like good service.
It feels like you’re doing the right thing for the client.

But it quickly adds complexity in places you don’t notice at first.
Until the business becomes harder to scale.

In this week’s 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter, I break down:

- Why customization quietly erodes margins
- The bold system shift SpaceX made
- What it changes in how your business runs

Drops tomorrow at 4 pm Dubai time.

Subscribe today.

Click 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 above. 👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on the 'Customization Trap' and how it prevents business scaling. Using SpaceX as a case study, the post explains how moving from mission-specific, custom solutions to standardized systems allows for dramatic cost reduction and faster growth. It highlights why founders must evolve their operating model to move past 'custom chaos' to build a high-value, scalable business.

Last year, I started writing down the thinking rules that help me stay clear as a founder.

Not management theory.
Just simple principles that prevent poor decisions.

I revisit them whenever a situation becomes unclear.

Here are 11 rules of clear thinking I rely on as a founder.

1. 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺
Most debates are people solving different problems.
Clarity starts with the right question.

2. 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿
Facts are what happened.
Interpretation is the story we attach to them.

3. 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲
Writing exposes weak thinking quickly.
If you cannot write it clearly, you do not understand it.

4. 𝗜𝗳 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴
Confusion is a signal.
It usually means your understanding is incomplete.

5. 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
Instead of asking how this succeeds, ask how it can fail.
Failure paths often reveal the real risks.

6. 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗔𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀
When behavior doesn’t make sense, follow the incentives.
People respond to what is rewarded.

6. 𝗭𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗢𝘂𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗭𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗜𝗻
Most problems look different at the system level.
Patterns appear when you step back.

8. 𝗦𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗗𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀
Speed helps execution.
Judgment needs space.

9. 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻
Your first answer is often bias.
Good thinking questions itself.

10. 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵
Bad decisions often look good early.
Time eventually exposes weak thinking.

11. 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀
Most advantages take years.
Short timelines distort judgment.

12. 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲.
Most people react.
Few people think.

Which rule helps you the most?

♻️ Found this valuable?
Repost to your network and follow Surabhi for more.

--

Want to learn how to make better decisions as a founder?

Subscribe to 𝗖𝗘𝗢 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘆 newsletter. 
2800+ founders read it every week.

Click “𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿” above.👆

Founder insight by Surabhi Shenoy on 11 rules of clear thinking for business leaders. The post covers critical decision-making principles including defining the real problem, separating facts from interpretation, and using writing to expose weak thinking. It also highlights strategic mental models like inversion, incentive analysis, and zooming out to a systems level to ensure long-term business value and clarity.

taplio

The Battle

Cosmin Rusu

Surabhi Shenoy

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreCosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSurabhi Shenoy's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Cosmin Rusu

Surabhi Shenoy

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Cosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreSurabhi Shenoy's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreCosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance