Cosmin Rusu

Transforming Visions into AI MVPs & Products | Founder @Duty Ventures | Ex {Google, Apple and Amazon}

Hi, I’m Cosmin, the Founder and Lead Engineer of Duty Ventures. 

After some experience as a software developer in companies such as Google, Apple, and Amazon, I decided to launch my project.

With several former colleagues and college friends, we launched our own startup specializing in software development for entrepreneurs and customers needing software development services. 

Duty Ventures is all about developing software products from start to finish, thanks to the experiences we have all acquired in the past years.

One of our most successful services is aimed at entrepreneurs and early-stage founders, for whom we provide an MVP-builder service getting their product from 0 to 1 within weeks!

However, our services are not limited to that. The teams we create do much more than just create MVPs and are able to adapt to the different technologies requested, all of this in an agile way.

Our most recurrent services are the following:
- MVP creation
- Custom Software Development
- Blockchain Development
- Mobile Development
- Checkout pages
- E-Commerce

And our most used technologies are:
- Ruby on Rails
- React
- React Native
- Java
- NodeJS


If you want to learn more about how we can help you, head over to: https://dutyventures.com


Phone: (+1) 669 200 9568 / (+40) 754 973 314
Email: cosmin@dutyventures.com

Founder & Lead software engineer

I'm leading a software development agency focused on fast iterations. Most of our clients are shipping more features, responding faster to support tickets, and have accelerated growth because of us.

We focused on HealthCare a lot lately due to the accelerated digitalization in this industry. I am a strong believer that we can make healthcare more technically advanced via pure software. 

In terms of technologies, our previous projects involved Ruby on Rails, React, React Native, Scala, Java, Kubernetes, GCP, AWS (ECS, RDS, AKS), Stripe Connect, HIPAA compliance.

Some of our previous clients: 
- Spotify
- Colgate
- Go4Ellis (incl. HIPAA compliance)
- KindBody (+1 HIPAA)
- NXT Sports
- Noom (Healthcare)
- Mochila Fulfillment
- 3Step
- Mylk Guys (YCombinator)
- NLV Productions
- SH Technologies
- One Step Software (Techstars)
- Ergodic Labs
- Med Prep
- Testing Psych
- Abundance Digital
- Tookitaki

Everyone is cutting juniors.

AI writes code. AI reviews code. AI tests code.
So why would anyone hire a junior developer in 2026?

I'll tell you why. Because I do it. Every quarter.

Here's what the "AI replaces juniors" crowd doesn't understand:

AI doesn't build culture.
AI doesn't grow into your next team lead.
AI doesn't challenge your senior engineers with fresh perspectives.
AI doesn't stay loyal for 5 years because you gave them their first real shot.

The data says junior positions dropped 20-30% in some regions.
The industry says "juniors are obsolete."

I say that's short-sighted and dangerous.

If we stop training juniors today, who leads your engineering team in 2030?

We'll face a competence gap worse than any talent shortage.
A generation of engineers who never learned to think... because a machine did it for them.

At Duty Ventures, we pair every junior with a senior + AI tools.
They learn faster. Ship sooner. And they bring something no LLM ever will:

Hunger.

The companies cutting all junior roles to save money?
They're eating their seed corn.

Cosmin Ionut

AI-forward engineers. Embedded fast. Delivering from day one. | Founder @Duty Ventures | Ex {Google, Apple and Amazon}

Anthropic just played the smartest marketing move in AI.

While OpenAI announced ads are coming to ChatGPT, Anthropic did the opposite - they ran a Super Bowl ad saying Claude will stay ad-free.

But that's not even the best part.

They started sponsoring Google search results for developer error messages and stack traces that return zero results.

Think about it: you're debugging at 2 AM, you paste an error into Google, nothing comes up - and right there is Claude offering to help.

That's not advertising. That's solving a real problem at the exact moment of frustration.

The marketing lesson here is massive:

Don't interrupt people. Show up where they already need you.

Most companies spend millions trying to grab attention from people who don't care. Anthropic spent it reaching developers at their most desperate moment - when no other solution exists.

This is the difference between push marketing and pull marketing done right.

What's the smartest developer-targeted ad you've seen?

undefined undefined

Stop paying for ngrok. There's a better alternative.

Meet zrok - an open-source tunneling tool built on zero-trust networking principles.

Why I switched:

1. Free subdomains - no paying for stable URLs
2. Open source - self-host it or use their free SaaS tier
3. Built on OpenZiti - actual zero-trust security, not just marketing buzzwords
4. Supports public AND private shares
5. Auto HTTPS/TLS out of the box
6. Custom domains supported

If you're a developer who regularly needs to expose local services (demos, webhooks, testing) - ngrok's free tier feels increasingly restrictive.

zrok gives you what you actually need without hitting a paywall every 5 minutes.

The setup is straightforward. The docs are solid. And because it's open source, you can inspect every line of code handling your traffic.

In a world where we're tunneling more and more traffic for dev and testing, having a free and secure option matters.

Check it out:

zrok.io

Home - zrok by NetFoundry

Unpopular opinion: most people using AI to build apps have no business deploying anything to production.

A 20-year sysadmin just quit his job this week. Not burnout. Not pay. His company offered bonuses for the best "vibe coded" app and got a tsunami of shadow IT - unsecured apps, unvetted AI agents on corporate machines, and a team of THREE sysadmins drowning under "innovation" built by people who can't explain what their own code does. When he raised security concerns? Debated. Overruled. Approved anyway. Because a VP saw a demo and got excited.

Copying ChatGPT output into production doesn't make someone an engineer. It makes them a liability with a deployment pipeline. A CTO in the thread admitted his marketing team had secretly built 11 apps - one storing customer data in a public S3 bucket. Eleven apps. Zero reviews. This is where we are now.

The predictable response: "That's just gatekeeping. Engineers are afraid AI will replace them." No. Good engineers use AI daily. The difference is they can read it, debug it, secure it, and explain it to an auditor. AI didn't lower the barrier to building software. It lowered the barrier to building dangerous software. Most organizations can't tell the difference until something breaks, leaks, or lands on a regulator's desk.

That sysadmin isn't the problem. He's the canary. Companies will keep ignoring people like him until they're explaining to a regulator why customer data ended up on the open internet because Dave from accounting "had a great idea for an app."

Stop handing out innovation awards. Start asking who's going to maintain it, secure it, and answer for it when it fails.

Open article: From the sysadmin community on Reddit by reddit.com

A friend of mine had his first meeting with a potential client in Germany.

He didn't prepare a pitch deck. Didn't try to "understand the project." Didn't walk through his company's services.

Instead, he asked one question:

"If I fly from Romania to Germany on Friday, can we meet face to face?"

They said yes instantly.

That was 5 years ago. They're still working together.

Here's what most agencies get wrong: they lead with capabilities. "We do React, we do mobile, we do cloud."

Nobody cares.

What founders actually want to know is: will this person show up when it matters?

The best business relationships I've seen didn't start with a scope of work. They started with someone proving they gave a damn before the contract was signed.

If you're choosing between a partner with a perfect proposal and one who'll get on a plane for you — pick the plane.

Hot take on vibe coding:

If frontend is mostly about calling APIs, and those APIs should be secure by default - does vibe coding make the most sense on the frontend?

Think about it. The frontend is essentially a curl wrapper. A UI layer. Less security risk.

Here's where I think things are heading:

Senior engineers will migrate towards building secure backends. Modular, composable backend "components" that can easily interact with each other.

Open-source microservices you can plug and play.

Need auth? Spin up your own Auth0-like instance. Need user-generated content? Spin up a UGC microservice - posts, comments, likes, replies, threads. The same patterns we use on LinkedIn, Facebook, X.

You reuse what exists. Then you generate your own microservice for what's specific to your product.

And once you become big enough? You open source it.

The frontend becomes the place where AI can truly shine - generating UIs, connecting to secure APIs, iterating on design fast.

The backend stays the domain of engineers who understand security, data, and system design.

Vibe coding isn't replacing developers. It's splitting the role in two.

For years, I thought the best way to create more value for clients was to charge less.

Lower rate = more value for their money. Simple math, right?

Wrong.

Here's what actually happened when I charged less:

→ Clients treated the work as disposable
→ My team felt undervalued, so they gave B-level effort
→ I attracted price-shoppers who churned the fastest
→ We couldn't invest in better processes, tooling, or talent

The moment I started charging what the work was actually worth, everything changed.

Clients were more engaged. More committed. More respectful of timelines.

My team felt ownership because the stakes matched the effort.

And the clients who stayed? They became long-term partners, not one-off projects.

If you're a founder evaluating dev partners and your main filter is "who's cheapest" — you're optimizing for the wrong thing.

The most expensive mistake isn't paying too much. It's paying too little for a team that doesn't care enough to get it right.

Stop hiring 10 developers when 2 + Claudes can do the same job.

I know. Controversial. Especially coming from someone who runs a dev agency.

But here's what nobody in outsourcing wants to say out loud:

The old model is dying.

1. Junior positions in outsourcing dropped 20-30% last year
2. Clients are asking: "Why pay for 8 devs when 1 senior + AI does 80% of the work?"
3. McKinsey predicts a 20-30% reduction in the global outsourcing market by 2030

And yet... most agencies are still selling headcount.
Still billing by the hour.
Still pretending nothing changed.

Here's the uncomfortable truth from someone who runs an agency:

If your only value proposition is "cheap developers" - you're already dead.
You just don't know it yet.

At Duty Ventures, we made a decision 2 years ago:
Stop being a code factory. Start being a product partner.

Don't sell hours. Sell shipped features.
Don't sell headcount. Sell outcomes.

The agencies that survive 2026 won't be the cheapest.
They'll be the ones who embraced AI, specialized in complex domains, and aligned incentives with their clients.

The rest? They'll be replaced by prompts...

Heroku just entered "maintenance mode."

Except this time, it's not your app - it's the entire platform.

Salesforce announced Heroku is transitioning to a "sustaining engineering model." Translation: no new features, no new enterprise contracts, just keeping the lights on.

If you've been a developer long enough, you know what this means. Standing still in tech is the same as moving backward.

Here's the thing though - Heroku's ideas won.

Every git push deploy. Every platform that "just works." Vercel, Render, Railway, Fly - they all carry Heroku's DNA.

The lesson for anyone building software products:

Your product can pioneer a category and still lose if the parent company stops investing. Innovation without sustained commitment is just a head start for your competitors.

If you're still running on Heroku - your apps are fine for now. But start planning your next move.

The platform that taught us what great developer experience looks like deserved better stewardship.

"We spend $XX,XXX/month on LLMs" is the new "we hired 200 people in 6 months."

Both sound impressive until the board asks: what did we actually get for it?

The smartest teams I see aren't spending more on AI. They're spending less, and ACTUALLY shipping more.

Marc Andreessen on how to get people to join your 3-person startup:

You have exactly 2 tools - stock options and vision.

Stock options they'll tell you aren't worth anything. So it really comes down to vision.

The best founders can explain how the world is going to look in a way that's so compelling, people leave Google and Microsoft to build it with them.

It's essentially sales. Selling to employees.

But here's the part most founders miss:

Hiring is also a self-selection process. The best companies are polarizing on purpose. They give a stark picture of what they are and what they aren't.

"We work 18-hour days - if that's not you, don't come."
"We go home at 5 every day - if that frustrates you, don't come."
"We do yoga as a company - if that's weird to you, don't come."

The founders who try to be everything to everyone end up hiring people who leave in 3 months.

The ones who are radically honest about their culture? They attract true believers.

Running a staff augmentation agency, I see this daily. The clients who know exactly what culture they're building find the right talent 10x faster.

Hot take: If your outsourcing partner can't deliver the same result with fewer people... they're the WRONG partner.

Let me explain.

I've been on both sides of this.

As a founder of a dev agency, I've seen clients pay for:
- 6 developers sitting in standups for 3 hours/day
- 4 QA engineers manually testing what AI can do in minutes
- A project manager whose only job was "translating" between client and devs

That's not a team. That's a payroll.

The smartest clients I work with in 2026 don't ask:
"How many developers will you assign?"

They ask:
"How fast can you ship this feature, and what does it cost?"

That's the shift:

OLD MODEL: Pay per seat. Vendor profits when project takes longer.
NEW MODEL: Pay per outcome. Vendor profits when they ship faster.

We moved to milestone-based pricing at Duty Ventures years ago.
Result? Our incentives match the client's: ship fast, ship right, move on.

When AI makes a 3-person team as productive as a 10-person team was in 2023 - the billing model has to change.

If your vendor is still charging you by the hour in 2026, ask yourself:

Whose interest are they serving - yours or theirs?

The outsourcing industry is worth $618 billion.
Most of it is still billed by the hour.
That's a $618 billion misalignment of incentives.

So I guess Claude is OOO today

https://status.claude.com/

So if AI will write code, and we treat that as a commodity, and as a pure blackbox inputs / outputs type of thing - what's next? Maybe we fully automate QA? Maybe we fully automate a simulation on how that code would interact with actual users? So we "simulate" a real world usage of an app / a website over time to find bugs / issues? Then, what next?

There are two types of early-stage technical decisions:

Type A: Decisions that get your product in front of users.
Type B: Decisions that prepare for users you don't have yet.

Most founding teams spend 80% of their time on Type B.

Kubernetes, microservices, auto-scaling, blue-green deployments... all Type B.

A $10 VPS with your app deployed on it? Type A.

And here's the uncomfortable math:

3,000 users paying $30/mo = $1M ARR.

A single server handles that without breaking a sweat.

Every week you spend on Type B before you have paying users is a week you're not learning whether anyone even wants what you're building.

Ship boring infrastructure.
Build interesting products.

Someone replicated Monday.com's core features in 60 minutes using AI.

Cost: $15.

Monday's stock took a hit. People panicked.

But here's the thing nobody's talking about:

Code has been getting cheaper for 20 years. AI just made the trend impossible to ignore.

If your entire business defensibility is "we built an app," you were already vulnerable. AI just made it obvious.

The real moat was never the code. It's:

→ Deep understanding of a specific customer problem
→ Product decisions that reflect real usage, not assumptions
→ An architecture that actually scales when users show up
→ A team that iterates based on data, not vibes

I see founders still spending months planning features that an AI tool could scaffold in an afternoon. And I see Silicon Valley founders shipping AI-generated MVPs that fall apart the moment real users touch them.

Both are missing the point.

The winners will be the ones who combine fast tooling with sharp product thinking.

Code is a commodity. Product judgment is not.

monday.com

monday.com | Outpace everyone with the best AI work platform

Founders use my LinkedIn System to sign 1-2 clients EVERY single month.     Most founders I talk to struggle with:    - Posting content consistently that builds trust.   - Outreach that books consistent sales calls.   - Relying on referrals to grow their business.    My LinkedIn System helps them solve that:&nbsp;&nbsp;    STEP 1: Turn your LinkedIn profile into a landing page to book sales calls.   STEP 2: Post authentic content that builds trust with their ideal clients. &nbsp;   STEP 3: Master outreach that will help you sign 1-2 clients a month.     It’s the exact system that helped:&nbsp;     📌 Abhijit: Book 10+ sales calls in 30 days.   📌 Steve: Close a 120k USD deal in 27 days.&nbsp;   📌 Mark: Close a 4.5 million USD deal in 2 weeks.     My system DOES work. &nbsp;     If you’re committed to signing clients consistently on LinkedIn…    Click “Book an Appointment” to see if I’m the right person to help you.

Omkar Rane

My life in 2025: Family business, successful on paper, depressed. 

My life in 2026: Laptop, freedom, work I enjoy.

One decision changed everything.

1 year ago: 

- Running a family business I didn't choose.
- Dealing with government politics.
- Meetings that drained my soul.
- No time for my hobbies.
- Exhausted after work.

The worst part?

My life looked perfect on paper. 

Because I was handed an ENTIRE business on a silver platter. 

The kind of security most people my age dream about. 

My friends thought I was crazy to walk away. 

But I knew one thing..

I didn't want to spend my life running a business that drained me.

So I quit. 

Built my freelance business on LinkedIn from nothing.

Today? 

- Getting paid for work I enjoy
- Working with clients I genuinely like
- Setting my own work hours everyday.
- Helping founders sign clients on LinkedIn.
- Working from my laptop, anywhere I want.

Most people my age are settling into their 9-5s.

Some are going abroad for their masters degree's. 

I don't blame them.

Because we were all taught the same thing growing up:

Go to college. Get a stable job. Work for 40 years. Retire at 65.

That's what a "good life" is supposed to look like.

But nobody really questions it. 
Society hands it to you and expects you to be grateful.

I was handed even more than that - a whole business.

And I still walked away.

Because the only life worth living is the one I actually chose.

P.S - What’s one decision that completely changed your life?

Founders use my LinkedIn System to sign 1-2 clients EVERY single month

I work with MILLIONAIRE founders TWICE my age. 

None of them have it figured out. 

I used to put successful people on a pedestal.

Then I started working with them. 

Same doubts. Same fears. Same questions about life.

They're just....normal people.

Working with them has taught me things my college degree never could. 

Not theory. Real life lessons.

Here are 5 things I've learned from the founders I've worked with:

1. Get a mentor early. 

One of my clients rejected mentors early on. He says it cost him years of growth. That hit me hard. I've spent $3K on a mentor for my own business.

2. Be grateful for the AI tools you have.

They built everything without AI. Without the fancy tools we have today. 
And still outworked my generation which tells me I need to work a lot harder.

3. Your network will outlast your title.

The relationships you build will take you further than any title or certificate. 
Find good people and keep them close. That's what compounds over time.

4. Read EVERY single contract.

One client didn't read his contract. Lost $1 million overnight. One signature. Everything gone. Always know what you're signing.

5. Start your business early. 

One client spent 22 years building someone else's dream. 
He started his own business 2 years ago. His only regret? Not starting sooner.

Most people my age spend $100K on an MBA.

I get to learn from people who’ve already built the companies.

Their wins. Their mistakes. Their hard lessons.

I didn't go to a fancy school.

But I have something better - real lessons from people who actually did it.

That's not just an opportunity.

That's a head start.

Founders I talk to make $1M-$5M a year in revenue.

Their LinkedIn pipeline? 

ZERO. 

Here's what was broken:

1. Their profile looked like an outdated resume. 

- They have no clear offer.
- Buyers land and leave confused.

2. Their content builds no trust with their target audience. 

- Posting without a strategy.
- They get likes from peers but not buyers.

3. Their outreach was spammy.

- Pitch in their first message and get ghosted.
- Send 100 DM's, get 2 replies and 0 clients. 

Then they blame LinkedIn.

The platform was never the problem. Their approach was.

And here's what they don't realize:

The founders signing clients on LinkedIn right now aren't using some hack. 

They just have a SYSTEM in place:

- Profile that positions them as an authority.
- Content that builds trust with their ideal clients. 
- Outreach that starts real conversations and books sales calls. 

That's it. 

That's the whole secret.

Build the system. Book sales calls. Sign clients. Bring in revenue.

Read this if you want to sign 1-2 clients per month on LinkedIn.

Most founders skip the basics.

Then wonder why nothing works.

Here's what actually does:

1. A Strong Profile. 

Your profile is your landing page. Treat it like one.

- Banner shows the biggest outcome you deliver
- Headline says exactly who you help and how
- About section reads like an elevator pitch
- Featured section has case studies, a CTA, and social proof

2. Content Strategy 

Stop posting for likes. Post for your ideal client.

- Personal stories build trust. 
- Educational content shows you know your stuff.
- Conversion content makes them want to reach out. 
- Post 3-5x a week and do this consistently

3. Outreach System.

This is where most founders give up too early.

- Send 20 connection requests a day to your ICP through Sales Navigator. 
- Follow up with 5-10 personalized DMs every single day. 
- No copy paste templates - make it personal every time 
- Aim for 3-5 sales calls per week.

End result?

You sign 1-2 clients per month. Consistently.

Most founders are looking for a secret funnel or fancy hack. 

There is no secret. There is no magic.

You just need to do the basics.

Because the founders signing clients on LinkedIn aren't smarter than you.

They just have a SYSTEM in place.

Founders spend $5,000 on an agency sign ZERO clients. 

Then think LinkedIn doesn’t work.

I hear it every single week.

"I had a bad experience with an agency so I'm done with LinkedIn" 

But that’s like saying "I had a bad relationship so I'm never dating again”

LinkedIn didn't fail you. The agency you hired did.

Here's what that agency actually did:

- Posted AI-written content nobody asked for.
- Zero personalization and strategy for clients. 
- Blast 1,000 cold DM's a day to anyone with a pulse.
- Ran a playbook from 3 years ago and call it a service

Spray and pray. 

Then hand you a $5,000 invoice.

One of my clients learned this the hard way.

He spent $8,000 working with another agency and signed ZERO clients. 

We started working together 2 months ago.

Last week he closed a $120K deal.

Nothing changed except the SYSTEM I built for him:

1. Profile that turns the right visitors into booked calls
2. Content that builds trust before you ever send a message.
3. Outreach that feels personal so people actually respond. 

Simple? Yes. Easy? No. 

Here’s what you don’t realize:

Every month you wait is a month of revenue you handed to a competitor.

So don't let one bad agency experience stop you from posting on LinkedIn.

Because LinkedIn didn't fail you.

Your last partner did.

My clients post THREE times a week on LinkedIn

They still sign 1-2 clients EVERY month.

Here's the exact content system I build for them:

1. Personal Content (Top of Funnel)

Make them feel like they know you before they ever need you.

- Personal stories and experiences
- Your values, beliefs and opinions.
- Show who you are outside work.

2. Educational Content (Middle of Funnel)

Give them a clear solution and become the expert they remember.

- Checklists they can apply immediately.
- Step-by-step frameworks and processes.
- How to solve a specific problem in your niche.

3. Conversion content (Bottom of Funnel)

Make them trust YOU as the person to solve it.

- Client case studies and results.
- Testimonials and social proof.
- Before and after transformations.

That’s it. 

Three posts. Three jobs. One system that actually works.

Most founders post whenever they feel like it. 

But the ones signing clients consistently? 
They know exactly what each post is supposed to do.

Because it's not about posting more.

It's about posting with a SYSTEM.

Save this post. 

Build your content around it. 

Thank me later.

My morning routine would make EVERY productivity guru angry.

It still DOUBLED my 9-5 salary in 6 months. 

No 5 AM alarms. No cold showers. No Andrew Huberman protocol.

One thing changed everything...

I stopped copying routines that worked for other people. 

And built one that worked for me.

My REAL morning routine? 

- Wake up at 10 AM. 
- Go to Coffee Shop.
- Order the same coffee everyday.
- 4-5 hours of deep work.
- Laptop closed before 8 PM.

Instagram-worthy? Not even close. 

Effective? Absolutely.

And in 6 months of following this "terrible" routine, I have:

- Doubled my old 9-5 salary 
- Started my freelance business.
- Working from anywhere I want. 
- Helping founders sign clients on LinkedIn. 

Before, I used to try every productivity hack.

7 AM wake-up. 10K run. Cold Shower. Full optimization stack.

But I was also completely BROKE the entire time.

Here’s what I finally realized:

Some people do their best work at 5 AM.  

I do mine at 12 PM.

Neither is wrong.

So I stopped copying other people’s routines. 
And built one I could repeat EVERY day.

Because you don't get rewarded for having the perfect routine.

You get rewarded for being consistent. 

PS - What does your REAL morning routine actually look like?

2 VIRAL posts. 5 sales calls booked. $1.2M deal in negotiation.

My client achieved this in 60 days.

Before working with me he had:

Zero sales calls. Zero clients. Zero revenue. 

Every post was about his product. 

He was chasing likes and followers.

But bringing ZERO revenue through LinkedIn

So we stopped optimizing for likes and followers.

And started optimizing for one thing - signing more clients.

Here's what we changed:

- A optimized profile that books more sales calls.
- A content strategy to build trust with his exact ICP 
- A DM framework to start conversations, not pitch them.

60 days later?

- 516 targeted new followers 
- 5 qualified sales calls booked 
- 1.2 million USD deal currently in negotiation

Most founders treat LinkedIn like a numbers game.

Post more. Engage more. DM more.

But the founders signing clients right now aren't posting the most.

They're the ones posting with a SYSTEM.

Volume gets you followers. 

A SYSTEM gets you clients.

PS - If you’re a B2B founder who wants to sign clients on LinkedIn and bring in more revenue, DM me SYSTEM” or book a free call from above

My client's posts crossed 40,000+ impressions in a SINGLE week. 

He has less than 2,000 followers. 

He posts 3x a week. 

And the best part? 

He spends less than 10 mins a day on LinkedIn.

Just replying to comments and DMs.

For context…

- He has less than 2,000 followers.
- He trusts me to come up with the ideas.
- He does NOT pay for likes or engagement.
- He posts with a strategy. Not viral clickbait.

The result?

Just THREE of his posts have crossed 40,000+ impressions.

Here's what my client wants you to know:

- You do NOT have to post 7x a week to get good reach.
- You do NOT have to do everything yourself.
- You need to hire an expert and TRUST them.

Most founders try to figure it out alone.

My client didn’t.

He decided to work with me and now signs new clients consistently.

Because the founders winning on LinkedIn aren't doing it alone.

They just found the right person and trusted them.

PS - If you’re a B2B founder who wants to sign clients on LinkedIn and bring in more revenue, DM me SYSTEM” or book a free call from above

taplio

The Battle

Cosmin Rusu

Omkar Rane

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreCosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreOmkar Rane's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Cosmin Rusu

Omkar Rane

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Cosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreOmkar Rane's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreCosmin Rusu's LinkedIn Performance