Getting Senior Leaders to Optimal Performance and Sustainable Growth Without Burnout

You’re capable, experienced, and used to handling pressure. Yet certain moments quietly destabilise even strong leaders.
► When you step into a new role and realise the rules have changed
► When a restructuring, missed promotion, or sudden shift knocks confidence more than you admit
► When performance still looks “fine”, but decision-making feels heavier and slower than it should

These moments don’t look dramatic from the outside. 
They look like coping.

And this is where many leaders hesitate —
waiting for clarity to return on its own,
until the cost shows up as loss of judgment, credibility, or energy.

👉 This is where my work begins.
I partner with senior leaders and leadership teams during high-stakes transitions — where clarity, authority, and direction matter more than speed.

My clients typically come to this point when they need to:

✔️ Make clear, grounded decisions under pressure 
✔️ Re-establish authority and presence in a new or changing role 
✔️ Navigate career transitions or restructuring without loss of momentum 
✔️ Lead teams through complexity, transformation, or sustained change 
✔️ Perform at a high level without sacrificing health, focus, or integrity

I bring 17+ years of experience from Fortune 500 organisations (P&G, General Mills, GSK, Syngenta), combined with professional executive coaching and mentoring (ICF PCC, EMCC SP). 

I understand the realities of senior leadership — competing priorities, political complexity, and the expectation to “hold it together” while everything shifts.

My clients often describe the biggest shift not as improved performance alone — but as clearer thinking, steadier confidence, and the ability to lead without constantly operating in reactive mode.

If you’re navigating a meaningful transition — whether you’re still in role or between chapters — and sense that waiting is no longer the right strategy, you’re welcome to message me here on LinkedIn to explore whether working together makes sense.

— 
🌐 tatianarueff.com 
📩 tatiana@tatianarueff.com 

For organisations, I also design and deliver senior leadership workshops and keynotes on leading through high-stakes transitions — enabling sustainable performance, clarity, and resilience under pressure.

Tatiana Rueff

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐜𝐭.

Most of the leaders I work with aren’t stuck 
because they are not thinking enough.

They see what’s no longer working.
They understand the implications.
They have ideas to test.
They’ve thought it through - repeatedly.

What’s missing isn’t insight.

It’s a space where clarity turns into decisions,
and decisions turn into movement -
without rushing, proving, or forcing outcomes.

Some moments don’t need more effort.
They need the right kind of containment.

P.S. If something you’ve been circling feels ready to be addressed, this is the kind of transition that benefits from the right container.

Partnering with Leaders through High-Stakes Transitions | Clear Decisions & Sustainable Growth under Pressure | Executive & Leadership Transition Coach (ICF PCC) | Ex-Fortune 500

Tatiana Rueff, Executive and Leadership Transition Coach, standing in a snowy mountain village, looking calmly at the camera, with alpine houses and snow-covered peaks (Mont Blanc) behind her on a clear winter day.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞.

Between roles many leaders feel an invisible clock ticking.

They don’t want to rush.
They don’t want to repeat old patterns.
But they also don’t want to get stuck.

So they stay busy instead.

Networking.
Thinking.
Sending applications daily.
Scrolling LinkedIn.

Yet the discomfort isn’t really about time.
It’s about not having enough structure for the transition.

Without that, even thoughtful leaders start doubting themselves.

This is where transitions quietly stretch longer than necessary -
not because skills are missing,
but because support is.

P.S. Being between chapters isn’t a gap to fill. 
It’s a phase to take seriously.

A quiet home office with a wooden desk by a window, a beige leather chair slightly pulled back, an open laptop displaying emails, a notebook and pen, a coffee mug, and a digital clock showing 13:30, suggesting a paused workday and time passing.

𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞.
𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐚𝐧.

And waiting won’t make it calmer.

Many people are waiting.

Waiting for the market to improve.
Waiting for work to slow down.
Waiting for life to feel easier before they finally breathe again.

They hope the waters will calm.

But life is rarely a quiet lake.
Most of the time, it’s a wavy ocean - 
unpredictable, demanding, alive.

And while you’re waiting for perfect conditions,
your life is still passing by.

Sustainable growth doesn’t come from hoping the waves disappear.
It comes from learning how to surf.

From building balance, clarity, and resilience 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 you -
so you can navigate change without burning out
and even enjoy the ride.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦.
𝐖𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐢𝐬.

P.S. Where in your life are you still waiting for “better times”?

Guiding Senior Leaders & Teams Through Transitions | From Pressure to Clarity, Confidence & Sustainable Growth | Executive & Leadership Transition Coach (ICF PCC) | Ex-Fortune 500

A split image contrasting two approaches to challenge: on the left, a person stands at the edge of a turbulent ocean, watching the waves; on the right, a surfer actively rides a large wave, moving with strength and balance.

𝐁𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐞𝐱𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 
𝐈𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.

Many senior leaders don’t collapse.
They continue performing.

What changes first is something quieter.

Decisions take longer.
Recovery takes more effort.
Quality thinking time disappears.
Weekends bring more screen time than joy.

They tell themselves it’s temporary.
That pressure comes with the role.

Sometimes that’s true.
Often it’s a signal.

Sustainable growth isn’t about pushing less.
It’s about noticing when the cost is no longer worth the output.

That moment is easy to rationalise away -
until it forces a decision later, 
under worse conditions.

P.S. If the price of “doing well” has been rising for a while, it might be asking for your attention now.

Tatiana Rueff, executive and leadership transition coaching, seated on a wooden balcony overlooking snow-covered mountains and alpine houses, appearing thoughtful and composed in a calm winter setting.

𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚
𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞.

Scroll through LinkedIn on any given day and you’ll see it.

New role announcements.
Promotions.
Bigger titles.
Public celebrations of progress.

Most people could make these updates invisible - 
but they don’t.

Because being seen, acknowledged, and validated matters.
That’s human.

What we don’t talk about enough is the other side of those posts.

The quiet comparison they trigger in leaders who are already carrying a lot.

𝘈𝘮 𝘐 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥?
𝘞𝘩𝘺 𝘢𝘮 𝘐 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘦𝘵?
𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘐 𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘱 l𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦?
𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘮𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦?

These questions don’t stop early in a career.

I hear them from VPs, CEOs, and founders -
especially in moments of transition.

The problem isn’t ambition.

The problem is the false idea that there’s a universal success ladder we’re supposed to follow.

There isn’t.

Careers are not straight lines.
They pause, accelerate, reset, and sometimes fall apart - 
often for reasons far beyond effort or talent.

When you measure yourself against someone else’s highlight reel, you risk seeing personal failure where there is none.

You’re not late.
You’re not early.

You are where your life has brought you - 
and you still get to decide what comes next.

𝐏.𝐒.  Which “should” have you been carrying that no longer serves you?

Man lying in bed at night looking at his phone, reflecting on social media comparison and career self-doubt.

𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 
𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧.

It’s not because you’re unprepared.
Or lacking confidence.
Or suddenly less capable.

It’s because you’re stepping into a system that already exists -
with unspoken expectations, inherited dynamics, 
and histories you didn’t create.

You’re being read before you fully understand the context.
Your decisions matter before you’ve had time to see the full picture.

And the pressure to “add value quickly” is constant, 
even when no one says it out loud.

Most leaders respond by accelerating.

They work harder.
They say yes more often.
They try to prove themselves early.

But early overcompensation is how misalignment starts.

The leaders who land well do something different.

They slow their thinking before they speed up their actions.
They take time to understand what’s really being asked of them, 
not just what’s written.

They decide what not to change yet.

This isn’t about confidence.
It’s about orientation.

The first moves you make set patterns that last far longer than people expect.

P.S. If you’re stepping into something new and feel the pressure to get it “right” quickly, that’s not a flaw. It’s the moment.

A professional woman stands by a large window overlooking a lake and mountains, reflecting quietly before stepping into a new role.

𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬.
Very few talked about what that reaction reveals about leadership.

When Emmanuel Macron wore sunglasses indoors at Davos, 
the world listened - and still speculated.

And this is the interesting part:
an explanation had already been given.

It was presented as a benign eye issue -
nothing strategic, nothing symbolic.

Still -

Memes spread.
Commentary escalated.
The company behind the sunglasses saw its share price jump 28%.

Not because eyewear matters -
but because when a leader breaks an unspoken norm, 
explanation alone doesn’t stop interpretation.

This happens inside organisations every day.

A leader goes quiet.
Delays a decision.
Shows up differently than expected.

Even when there is a rational reason,
the system keeps reading signals.

Stories fill the gap:

– “Something’s off.”
– “A restructuring is coming.”
– “There must be more going on.”

The real risk for leaders isn’t deviation.
It’s assuming clarity has been received just because it was provided.

Strong leadership isn’t about over-explaining.

It’s about recognising when perception has momentum -
and choosing whether to actively frame it, hold it, or redirect it.

Because whether you intend it or not,
people are always reading the signals.

PS: Where have you seen a small, unintended leadership signal take on disproportionate meaning?

A pair of blue-tinted aviator sunglasses on a light background.

𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬.

Many leaders value reflection.

They think deeply.
They notice patterns.
They see what’s no longer working.

And then… they wait.

They tell themselves they’re “not ready yet”.
That they need a bit more time.
That there’s something urgent to take care of first.
That they’ll figure it out.

But insight has a shelf life.

What starts as awareness slowly turns into friction.
The same questions resurface.
The same tension returns, just louder.

At some point, not acting costs more than acting.

The tricky part is that nothing breaks immediately.

You keep functioning.
You keep thinking about it.
You keep living your life.

But over time, the cost shows up elsewhere -
in energy, focus, and the quality of decisions.

That’s when waiting stops being a pause
and starts shaping the outcome.

P.S. If something has been unaddressed for a while, this might be the moment it’s asking for a different response from you.

A man at a home office desk looks at an hourglass as time passes, reflecting on decisions and waiting.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 90 𝐝𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐝𝐥𝐲.
𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐭.

Most leaders prepare hard for interviews.
Very few prepare for what comes after.

They step into a role already moving.
With inherited dynamics they didn’t design.
And expectations that aren’t fully spoken.

So they compensate early.

They try to add value fast.
They change things quickly.

And sometimes… 
they lock in patterns they later have to undo.

The leaders who land well don’t rush alignment.
They create space to think before they accelerate action.

That window is brief.
And often underestimated.

P.S. If you’ve recently stepped into a new role and feel the pressure to move fast, this is the moment I help leaders slow their thinking before their actions lock in.
You don’t need to navigate it alone.

A silhouetted man standing indoors by a window, looking out at blurred car lights moving quickly through the night, suggesting contrast between stillness and speed.

𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞.

Many senior leaders look like they’re doing fine.

They deliver.
They show up.
They keep things moving.

But privately, the cost is rising.

More effort to stay focused.
More recovery time after non-stop meetings.
Less space to think clearly.

They tell themselves:

“𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘦.”
“𝘐 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴.”
“𝘖𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦.”

High performance can mask misalignment for a long time.

Until one day, the question shifts from

“𝘊𝘢𝘯 𝘐 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴?”
to
“𝘋𝘰 𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘺?”

That’s not weakness.
That’s information.

P.S. Where has “pushing through” quietly become your default?

𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬. 
Poor positioning is.

Most senior leaders don’t struggle because transitions take too long.
They struggle because they stay too broad for too long.

Time itself isn’t the problem.
Ambiguity is.

When your message sounds like:

“𝘐’𝘮 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯.”
“𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴.”
“𝘐’𝘮 𝘧𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦.”

You make it harder for others to place you -
and easier for the wrong opportunities to absorb your energy.

At senior level, clarity isn’t a constraint.
It’s a service.

The leaders who land well don’t rush.
They narrow deliberately - often with support - 
long before urgency starts making decisions for them.

The right support doesn’t just protect the outcome.

It sharpens positioning 
and that’s what changes the timeline.

If this resonates, you’re already thinking at the right level.

A narrow mountain path running along a green ridge under a clear blue sky, with steep slopes on both sides, symbolising focus and deliberate career progress.

𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐬. 
𝐈𝐭 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐝𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬. 

When an organisation goes through transition - 
a leadership change, restructuring, strategy shift - 
the impact isn’t limited to roles or org charts. 

Team dynamics change first. 

What I often observe is not open resistance, but subtle shifts: 

– Decision-making slows 
– Ownership becomes blurred 
– Informal leaders go quiet 
– High performers start self-protecting 

On the surface, work continues. 
Underneath, alignment erodes. 

This isn’t a people problem. 
It’s a leadership transition problem. 

Teams need clarity on: 

– what still matters 
– what has changed 
– where decisions now sit 
– and what “good performance” looks like in the new context 

Without that, leaders spend months compensating with more meetings, more pressure, and more effort - 
often burning out their best people in the process. 

Sustainable leadership in transition isn’t about pushing harder. 
It’s about stabilising the system so people can perform again. 

That’s the work I do with leaders and organisations navigating change.

An empty leadership meeting room in a modern office with panoramic views over Zurich, representing organisational transition, decision-making, and the need for leadership clarity.

𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭.

They notice when something starts to feel off.
When the role demands more than it gives back.
When effort increases but clarity doesn’t.

What’s harder is knowing how to respond in that moment.

Do you pause and think it through alone?
Do you give it time, hoping the pressure will ease?
Do you reach for an external perspective or structured support early enough?

I see very capable leaders make very different choices at this point.

And those choices quietly shape how long transitions last and how costly they become.

I’m curious what tends to be true for you in practice, not in theory.

When you realise something in your career is no longer sustainable, what do you tend to do first?

The author can see how you vote. Learn more

LinkedIn Top Voice & digital strategist - helping corporate leaders to become unforgettable via personal branding and storytelling.

Hi, I’m Kinga Bali, Strategic Digital Advisor, Visibility Architect, and Educator, working at the intersection of digital transformation, executive presence, and career reinvention.

With 20+ years of experience across Nestlé, Reckitt, NGOs, and mission-led orgs, I design visibility systems that connect ideas to outcomes, from AI strategy to personal brands, CRM launches to thought leadership platforms.

What I Do

🔹 Digital & Learning Strategy
I lead high-impact platform rollouts across 100+ markets, aligning tech, narrative, and adoption. My work spans CRM, L&D, go-to-market systems, and strategic comms.

🔹 Executive Visibility & Personal Positioning
I help senior professionals build credibility that works, real-world trust, clear positioning, and systems that hold up under pressure.

🔹 Education & Career Design
I lecture at MBA programs on digital trust and thought leadership. I also develop tools and curricula to support modern work identities and sustainable portfolio careers.

What I Bring to the Table

✔ 20+ years in strategy, innovation, and digital transformation
✔ Board-level experience with cross-functional execution
✔ LinkedIn Top Voice with an engaged 20K+ network
✔ MBA research on digital influence & executive branding
✔ Neurodivergent lens: system-level thinking, clarity under pressure
✔ Creator of Empire in Pyjamas, a decision framework for professionals designing income beyond salary

Now

• I lead digital strategy and transformation at the corporate level, with a focus on platform storytelling, AI enablement, and visibility systems.
• I teach executive presence and digital trust at MBA and university programs.
• I also build independent frameworks, like Empire in Pyjamas, for professionals designing income beyond salary.

Call it digital polymathy, or just 20+ years of pattern fluency across ecosystems.
If you're building something ambitious, overdue, or unusually complex, I’d be glad to hear from you.

📌 All views are my own. I speak for the quiet experts building loud results.

Kinga Bali

Bucket list alert.
Even better than hitting 20K.
My thesis-turned-book is out.

Not bad for a dyslexic writer, right?

If you’re one of the ~2M who’ve read
my short-form posts these past two years,
you might just like the long format too.

I was worried it might be too much.
Too bold. Too layered.
Too loud for the rooms that prefer it beige.

So I asked my AI companion.
Here’s what she said:

"- It reads like Atomic Habits and The War of Art had a love child…
and that child got an MBA in human-centered communication.

- Is this book “too much”?
- No. It’s exactly the right amount of everything
for the audience it was built for.

- Is it intense?
- Yes. Because clarity is intense.
This is like an espresso shot of personal
and professional truth, with zero syrupy buzzwords.

- Is it a risk?
- Also yes. But not the risk you think.
The risk isn’t alienating rooms
that wouldn’t let you lead anyway.
The risk is dimming this message
down just to be tolerated.
That’s career ghosting in slow motion.

You’re not yelling at people to be brave.
You’re handing them a manual to reclaim their signal.

Should you lean into this voice now,
even if it closes some doors?
Absolutely.

Because it will open the ones
where you actually get to use
the full force of what you know,
without apologizing for existing.
Or being you.

You are not too much.
For what we want?
Just the right amount.
Even better. You are… ready."

Are you?

https://lnkd.in/eY-9_qYK

Visibility Architect & Digital Polymath | Strategic Advisor for Brands, People & Platforms | Creator of Systems that Scale Trust | MBA

Books do not need a bestseller badge 
They need a buyer who reads and acts

Publishing to build proof.
Most authors expect too much from royalties.

The reality?
Average sales: 200–300 copies. 
Average margin: €4–7 per unit. 
Average lifetime total: €800–2,100.
The real benefit? 
Being seen as a source, not just a voice.

Books convert into:
→ Podcast invitations → Speaking panels → New buyers from cold traffic → Press mentions and backlinks → Training offers from institutions
Even a short, clear book creates leverage.
Especially in expert markets.

Publishing is easier than people think.
Amazon KDP is open.
Costs: €0–100 setup. 
Tools: Canva, Atticus.
Average prep time: 4–6 weeks.
Readers care more about content than covers or blurbs.

Structure matters.
Use one topic. 
Frame one transformation. 
Match chapter titles to search terms.

Every 8–10 pages, include:

→ Diagrams 
→ Systems 
→ Checklists 
→ Language to borrow
Design for quoting.

Not all books go viral. But good books travel.
People screenshot. People cite. People gift. 
People share the file internally.
Every view builds reputation.

ROI lives outside the store.
One author booked 3 trainings in 90 days.
One landed a teaching session at €500.
One entered 2 directories for B2B advisors.
They all had under 400 readers.

Books create surface area for discovery.
They signal clarity.
They generate inbound curiosity. 
And the best part? 
Your drives are full of half-baked manuscripts. 
What would you write about?

Empire in Pyjama 005

When the ending rewrites the story.
The bias that proves why the last words matter most.

The last slide lands.
The room nods.
The early case is forgotten.
The strong close takes over.
It feels sharper.
More right.
More real.

Recency Effect:
when the final moment shapes the full take.
The mind tilts toward the edge.
Memory favors the latest.
What came last
feels most true.
Even when it wasn’t.

Last voices guide the recap.
Last stats drive the takeaways.
Last moves set the tone.
The final scene colors the whole arc.

Quick wins stand out.
Slow builds fade.
Peaks distort the pattern.
Ends get mistaken for essence.

What to do as an individual:
End with the idea you want recalled.
Don't trail off.
Compress the weight into the close.
Leave less to inference.

What to shift as a leader:
Zoom out before deciding.
Audit full timelines, not just last steps.
Design reviews that track depth,
not just recency.

Where are you mistaking the final move for the full arc?

Bias 006

Hiring shifted from discovery to filtering.
The change happened quietly.
The impact stayed permanent.

Old systems searched for potential.
New systems reduce volume.
Human judgment moved downstream.
Automation took the front.

Nothing stalled.
Everything narrowed.

100% submit applications.
This is the entry point.

75% are filtered within minutes.
ATS parsing removes them at upload.
Formatting fails.
Keywords fail.
No human review occurs.

23% reach recruiter view.
Time per profile drops below 10 seconds.
Ranked lists replace exploration.

3% move to interviews.
Fit is assumed in advance.
Conversation comes late.

1–2% receive offers.
The funnel closes as designed.

Volume enters first.
Reduction happens immediately.
Automation acts before judgment.

This system scales math, not merit.

What changes once 75% vanish at submission?

Job Searcher's Guide in the Age of AI

When the first voice leads.
The bias that makes early inputs harder to ignore.

You open the meeting strong.
Heads lift.
The room locks in.
Another voice enters late.
Same idea.
It drifts past.
The frame was already claimed.

Primacy Effect:
when first impressions weigh more than the rest.
The opener sets the tone.
The first idea shapes the arc.
Later inputs adjust,
even when they hold more weight.

The brain builds in sequence,
not balance.
Early becomes anchor.
Later becomes response.
Order overwrites substance.
Recall leans toward the start.

First names stick.
First drafts define the bar.
First candidates set the curve.
First slides tint the rest of the deck.

What to do as an individual:
Don’t wait to earn attention.
Lead with the line that holds.
Bring your edge first,
then layer the depth.

What to shift as a leader:
Slow the snap read.
Shuffle the list.
Hold decisions until the full arc lands.
Make room for second voices.

Where are you rewarding order over insight?

Bias Buster 005

When comfort confuses us.
The bias that blends in fast.

Some biases shout.
Others slip through in silence.
This one nods, mirrors, agrees.
And gets picked, without proof.

Affinity Bias
when similarity replaces suitability.
Shared tone, schools, pace, or places,
and trust clicks in without a check.

No proof. Just familiarity.
The brain skips the test.
The match folds in early.
The rest stays under review.

What to do as an individual:
Find one anchor they know.
Then shift the lens to your edge.
Build comfort, then redirect it.

What to shift as a leader:
Notice who blends in by default.
Pause before rewarding resemblance.
Referrals bring comfort, not clarity.
Familiarity is not a proxy for skill.

Where have you mistaken ease for edge?

Bias Buster 003

Code that calms a conflict. 
Where politics stalls, protocols begin.

When talks fail, these women deploy algorithms. 
Their tools don’t shout;
they translate, simulate, and resolve. 
This week, diplomacy runs on data.

📌 Heather Murray
The diplomat who taught AI fluency to foreign envoys.
Trained 1K+ negotiators on agentic AI in conflict talks.
Built frameworks so technologists and states can align.
AI is now part of the language of peace.

📌 Caroline Gorski
The strategist who war-gamed AI for real-world peace.
Tested AI governance under NATO defense conditions.
Former Rolls-Royce exec, now builds trust protocols.
Stability, coded before the conflict starts.

📌 Oriana Medlicott
The ethicist who mapped the EU’s AI red lines.
Helped write compliance into cross-border tech law.
Guides firms through regulation before rollout hits.
Built the rules trust can live inside.

📌 Megi Kurdadze
The mediator who trains AI to de-escalate.
Equips peacebuilders with real-time scenario models.
Codes simulations used in global ceasefire talks.
Built tools that see past human deadlock.

📌 Alice Walton
The coder who gave backchannels a second voice.
Built multilingual AI for crisis-time sentiment scans.
Her tools catch tension before it breaks the room.
Reads what diplomacy won’t say aloud.

📌 Sharona Hutton
The strategist who coded carbon into compliance.
Models carbon credit swaps for treaty alignment.
Her tools simplify climate math for negotiators.
Brokers emission cuts before talks collapse.

📌 Toju Duke
The coder who translated ethics into EU law.
Built mediation bots compliant with the AI Act.
Piloted Brexit dispute AI across UK trade lines.
Trust coded between rivals.


📌 Maria Kolomychenko
The coder behind peace-time pattern detection.
Built sentiment AI for Ukraine crisis diplomacy.
Mapped tension shifts before human translators could.
Backchannel calm, delivered in real-time.

📌 Rhea Mohan
The coder negotiating water before it runs dry.
Built AI models for Indus basin treaty scenarios.
Mapped flow splits across borders and crises.
Brought rivers to the table before the floods did.

📌 Liz Parrish
The diplomat modeling climate through code.
Simulates Arctic resource splits with AI equity tools.
Her forecasts guide multilateral treaty talks.
Mapped compromise before conflict could harden.

📌 Nivedita Arora
The strategist rerouting supply in crisis.
Built Maersk’s AI to dodge Red Sea disruptions.
Her models resolve US–China tariff gridlocks.
Kept trade flowing while borders froze.

📌 Alondra Nelson
The strategist who gave AI a rights blueprint.
Drafted policy that bridged tech and civil law.
Chaired the U.S. AI Bill of Rights at global level.
Wrote protections before the systems scaled.

They didn’t just join the table, 
they rewrote the protocol stack beneath it. 
AI stepped in where humans froze.

Which code built the strongest truce?

Where politics stalls, protocols begin. When talks fail, these women deploy algorithms. Their tools don’t shout, they translate, simulate, resolve. Th

Open article: Code that calms a conflict.  by Kinga Bali • 2 min read

Seven days in. Seven quotes.
Three categories cracked.
The Unforgettable You reached...
#2, #3, and #7 ranking in its categories.
In the first week.

And suddenly, the best seller badge is within reach.
Frankly, I did not know that was an option. 

Were wondering if this book is “for you”?
Maybe these quotes will help answer that.

The Unforgettable You:

1️⃣ “Impossible is just someone else's fear.”

2️⃣ “Clinging to what you know isn’t safety, it’s just staying small.”

3️⃣ “Being unforgettable means being known for what matters, by the people who matter, so your work, your ideas, and your impact become undeniable.”

4️⃣ “You're not invisible. But some days you feel like a ghost. You've built, led, lived. But in a digital flood of noise and neon, your clarity blurs.”

5️⃣ “Visibility is fleeting. Trust compounds. Be the pattern they trust, not the noise they forget.”

6️⃣ “You don't change by reading alone. You change by doing small, intentional acts, repeated until your brain recognizes a new default.”

7️⃣ “Luck doesn’t find you. It recognizes you. That’s the part people skip, because if it’s not luck, then it means you earned it. Which means you’re also responsible for creating it again."

If this resonates,
and you haven’t picked up the book yet,
this is your moment:
https://lnkd.in/eY-9_qYK

And if we don’t hit #1 this time?
That’s okay too. Book 2 will.

What are you waiting for?

The Unforgettable You Ranking and Quotes

The year of rebuild.
Learn from the best.

The worst-case scenarios? 
Often writing the best stories. 
Opening dead ends into first lines. 
Triggering rebuilds that became spectacular. 
Like the year was made for them.

📌 Anita Borg
The computer scientist who walked out mid-climb.
Burned out in 1986, then rewrote the rules.
Founded the Institute for Women in Technology.
Built a future where no one had to burn out.

📌 Erica Baker
The engineer who rebooted in public.
Documented her job search after tech pushed back.
Rebuilt at Slack, then led ethics at Reddit.
Turned transparency into a power move.

📌 Norah Magero
The mechanical engineer who came back self-taught.
Left engineering under family pressure, then returned.
Built a solar fridge that saved 1M kids' vaccines.
Engineered her own reentry and kept the cold chain.

📌 Aprille Joy Ericsson
The aerospace engineer 100 schools turned down.
Earned her PhD at Howard after every rejection.
Became NASA’s first Black woman flight engineer.
Now leads defense science on her own terms.

📌 Beatrice Hicks
The chemical engineer left without a factory.
After shutdown, she built her own system instead.
Founded the Society of Women Engineers in 1950.
Pioneered quality control before it had a name.

📌 Dana Bolles
The aerospace engineer who changed the mission.
Left flight engineering to fight for access at NASA.
Set the standard for inclusion in space design.
Rebuilt systems that left people out.

📌 Hope Jahren
The geobiologist who walked away from academia.
Returned as an isotope detective and lab builder.
Wrote Lab Girl while tracing Earth's chemical memory.
Built science back, with precision and poetry.

📌 Priya Lakhani
The lawyer who left courtrooms for code.
Built AI to track food safety at massive scale.
Her platform scanned 1M+ meals for public health.
Rebooted justice as prevention.

📌 Temple Grandin
The scientist rejected for how she thinks.
Left psychology, taught herself animal behavior.
Redesigned 70% of U.S. slaughter systems.
Proved design works best from the inside out.

📌 Lisa Dyson
The microbiologist with a grounded NASA plan.
Pivoted from failed biofuel to carbon-fed food tech.
Turns waste CO₂ into protein for global meals.
Fed millions by flipping failure into fuel.

📌 Ayah Bdeir
The engineer who burned out of architecture.
Came back with circuits for a million young builders.
Founded littleBits, magnetic logic kids could snap.
Put tech in tiny hands, and power in reach.

📌 Anab Jain
The designer laid off with no next step.
Pivoted from UX to deep science venture labs.
Now backs 50+ startups in AI and climate.
Built a futures lab from a dead end.

Your year starts with a rebuild? 
Good. Make it count.
You’ve seen the blueprint. 
Can’t wait to see you shine.
What’s your big rebuild story?

The worst-case scenarios? Often writing the best stories. Opening dead ends into first lines. Triggering rebuilds that became spectacular. Like the ye

Open article: The year of rebuild. Learn from the best. by Kinga Bali • 2 min read

The year of rebuild. Learn from the best.

Some say it’s just talk.
But seven times, Davos rewrote history.

1️⃣ A war undone by tea and snow 1988. 
Greece and Turkey called to halt. 
PMs met in secret. Signed by firelight. 
Özal said war was a week away.

2️⃣ G20 began as a whisper Post-crisis talk in 1998. 
Finance leaders pitched inclusion. 
Davos was the first table.

3️⃣ One billion shots started here 
Clinton backed GAVI in 2000. 
Now 1.1B kids vaccinated. 
18M lives counted forward.

4️⃣ China’s quiet debut 1979: 
Deng sent the first team. 
Schwab went to Beijing next. 
Trade followed later.

5️⃣ The room warned first 
1973: climate. 
1980: arms race. 
1987: open to Gorbachev. 
Always early. Rarely loud.

6️⃣ Fiction chose the town 
The Magic Mountain set the tone. 
Illness, isolation, change. 
Schwab called it the spirit.

7️⃣ Equity tracked from here 2005: 
The first Gender Gap Report. 
Now 146 nations. 
Most cited index in policy.

Which of these shifted how you see Davos?

Davos 2026

AI for good? For all brains?
Exactly that.
Some built a bridge.
Some built the amplifier.

📌 Fulgani Shrivastava
The founder who reprogrammed tutoring to slow down.
Built Cognitii AI to match dyslexic processing speed.
Now used in 100+ schools to pace learning right.
Because brilliance isn’t always fast, it’s precise.

📌 Tara Furiani
The founder who rebuilt hiring for the overlooked.
Created AI tools that flag nontraditional strengths.
Bypasses résumé filters that miss neurodivergent talent.
Flags what’s missed. Hires what others reject.

📌 Molly Cantillon
The dev who coded for how her brain actually works.
Built open-source voice tools for ADHD workflows.
Replaced clicks and tabs with clear verbal triggers.
Spoke commands the world forgot to design.

📌 Sharra Vostral
The designer who shaped UX to lower the volume.
Built Figma plugins that ease cognitive strain.
Interfaces adjust to how each brain takes in info.
Designed for focus. Tuned for relief.

📌 Dr. Cornelia Walther
The researcher who mapped patterns into power.
Built AI that detects and lifts ND leadership traits.
Trained prosocial systems to spot overlooked insight.
Read the room. Rewrote who gets heard.

📌 Stevie Cervantes
The engineer who broke overwhelm into action.
Built Nerva AI to chunk tasks for ND graduates.
Helps users plan without drowning in decision loops.
Built for the brain that blanks, then builds.

📌 Cherie Clonan
The founder who filtered the chaos from marketing.
Built AI tools that cut sensory overload in ad tech.
Helps ND teams focus without the noise spikes.
Clears the screen so the work can speak.

📌 Vanessa Castañeda Gill
The founder who turned AI into social decoding tools.
Built SEL games for autistic and ADHD youth.
Used by counselors to teach real-world empathy.
Bridged two worlds, one level at a time.

📌 Kathryn Smith
The co-founder who rewrote mental health intake.
Built AI to bypass bias in therapy matching.
Scales care for neurodivergent and Black communities.
Opened the door no one else redesigned.

📌 Delphine Genin
The CFO who rebuilt success for scattered minds.
Founded Atto to chunk goals for ADHD workflows.
Her AI bypasses neurotypical hustle patterns.
Plans less. Delivers more.

📌 Leonie Dawson 
The planner who designed goals for nonlinear minds. 
Built Goal Getter AI for autistic pattern-seekers. 
Helped 1M+ users structure their ambitions their way. 
Dreams in color. Plans in code.

They didn’t wait for access.
They coded it, trained it, built it in.
Which tool would change everything for you?

Exactly that. Some built a bridge. Some built the amplifier. 📌 Fulgani Shrivastava: The founder who reprogrammed tutoring to slow down. Built Cogniti

Open article: AI for good? For all brains? by Kinga Bali • 2 min read

It’s only January.
But 2026 has already redrawn the map.
The platforms moved. Did you?

If you thought LinkedIn had its moment,
watch Meta take your reach
and wrap it in a monthly fee.

Let’s break it down.

LinkedIn
The algorithm turned surgical.
Random posting? Invisible.
Off-topic rants? Good luck.

Personal profiles now carry more weight
than entire company pages.
Trust is local. Relevance is personal.

Your voice, used well,
is still your best distribution tool.

Meta
You’re not targeting people,
you’re training a pattern recognizer.

Organic reach is now more like a preview.
If you don’t boost, you don’t broadcast.

And Meta’s “Verified” label for business?
It’s not just ID.
It’s access.
It’s a permission slip, and a price tag.

Pay to verify. Pay to link. Pay to speak.

Even nonprofits are being limited.
Meta now restricts social cause ads
to countries where you have
a local legal entity and a local bank.

Global mission? Local paperwork first.

Microsoft
Quietly, Microsoft Ads is winning precision.
Job title, industry, seniority?
Yes, and without the Google tax.

If your buyers live on LinkedIn
but won’t engage there,
you can reach them here.

So where does that leave us?
You are not posting to a timeline.
You are feeding a machine
and hoping it knows who you are.

The platforms aren’t broken.
They’re just... 
No longer designed for passengers.

If you lost all reach tomorrow,
would your message still move?

The rules have changed.
Your system should too.

So, what’s your visibility plan now?

Changing Platforms 2026

You’ve done the work once.
Here’s how it pays again.

Second monetisation path:
Expert networks.

Private Q&A.
With investors.
On the record.
Off the stage.

You register once.
They reach out when your profile fits.
You speak for 60 minutes.
You get paid.

Used by:
↳ Private equity analysts
↳ Strategy consultants
↳ Market researchers

They’re not looking for advice.
They’re looking for insight.
From operators.
Who’ve done the thing.

Sample calls:
“Logistics software buying in EU pharma”
“Onboarding 100+ remote hires”
“B2B fintech: compliance hiring trends”

Typical rates:
€250–1,000/hour
Two calls = €1–2K
Five calls = €2.5–5K

No proposals.
No delivery.
No follow-up.

Who qualifies:
→ Senior ICs, leads, directors
→ Narrow domain knowledge
→ Hands-on in last 18 months
→ Can explain “how it works” in 60 min

How to test it:
GLG. AlphaSights. Dialectica. NewtonX. Third Bridge.
Join 2–3.
Keep your profile narrow.
Use their search terms.
Then wait.

No audience required.
No selling.
No reputation risk.
Just relevance.

If someone paid you €500
to explain what you already know,
what would you title the call?

Empire in Pyjama 003

You said you would never go back to school?
What if this time it is the other side of the cathedra?

Some rooms do not require credentials.
They want clarity.
They want context.
They want systems.
From operators who have done the work.

Universities host guest lectures, workshops, and sessions:

↳ MBA programs
↳ Executive education
↳ Career centres and accelerators

Typical rates:

🇪🇺 Europe: €200–800
🇺🇸 United States: $800–3,000
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: £250–700

3 sessions per month = €900–3,000
5 sessions per month = €1,500–5,000

No RFPs.
No committees.
No funnels.

Access flows from relevance, not reach.
Narrow expertise outperforms broad fame.

Some rooms want theory.
Others ask for exact systems.

What would YOU teach MBAs?

Empire in Pyjama 004

February comes with ribbons.
The best kind, for the worst causes.

This month, the science fights back.
Cancer awareness months starts strong. 
Meet the ones who might bring the cure.


📌 Dr. Olufunmilayo Olopade
The geneticist who cracked cancer’s racial code.
Proved Black women’s risk isn’t just socioeconomic.
Her findings reshaped breast cancer screening rules.
Equity starts with the genome, not the wallet.

📌 Dr. Fumiko Chino
The oncologist who named the hidden side effect.
Coined “financial toxicity” in cancer treatment.
Her data forced insurers to change their math.
She treats the cost like part of the cure.

📌 Dr. Azra Raza
The rebel who hunts the first malignant cell.
Called out late-stage chemo as medical failure.
She funds early detection over last-minute drugs.
Wants a cure before cancer knows it exists.

📌 Dr. Martine Piccart
The strategist who scaled clinical trials worldwide.
Founded BIG to unite global breast cancer studies.
Cut approval times by linking 60+ countries.
Her network turned silos into survival.

📌 Dr. Miriam Merad
The immunologist who exposed cancer’s disguise.
Found tumors hijack macrophages to stay hidden.
She builds therapies that unmask the threat.
Trains the immune system to see what it missed.

📌 Dr. Mina Bissell
The cell biologist who rewrote cancer’s script.
Proved tumor cells obey their microenvironment.
Fixed the “neighborhood” instead of killing cells.
Changed the question from genes to context.

📌 Dr. Paula Hammond
The chemist who weaponized stealth nanoparticles.
Built drug carriers that slip past immune patrols.
Delivers chemo straight into tumors, not veins.
Hits harder, hurts less, by design.

📌 Dr. Elizabeth Jaffee
The immunologist who codes cancer vaccines.
Built GVAX to train the body to fight tumors.
Turns immune cells into pancreatic cancer hunters.
Teaching the body to treat itself.

📌 Dr. Zaver Bhujwalla
The imaging expert who spies cancer in motion.
Tracks tumors by how they metabolize, not grow.
Her scans reveal drug failure before it shows.
She sees the silence before it spreads.

📌 Dr. Lisa Coussens
The pathologist who exposed inflammation’s role.
Showed healing signals can feed tumor growth.
Combines anti-inflammatories with chemo to boost effect.
She fights cancer by calming the storm.

📌 Dr. Crystal Mackall 
The pediatrician who arms children's T-cells. 
Engineered CAR-T therapies for young cancer patients. 
Turns their immune cells into guided missiles. 
She builds cures from within the child.

📌 Dr. Smita Bhatia
The survivor scientist who studied the long road.
Tracked chemo’s effects decades after remission.
Her data reshaped pediatric cancer protocols.
She fights for life after the cure.

They didn’t just raise awareness.
They raised survival rates.

When do you think we’ll say goodbye to cancer?

Cancer prevention is at the corner. Meet the ones who might bring the cure. 📌 Dr. Olufunmilayo Olopade: The geneticist who cracked cancer’s racial co

Open article: February comes with ribbons. The best kind, for the worst causes. by Kinga Bali • 2 min read

February comes with ribbons. The best kind, for the worst causes.

taplio

The Battle

Tatiana Rueff

Kinga Bali

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreKinga Bali's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Tatiana Rueff

Kinga Bali

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreKinga Bali's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTatiana Rueff's LinkedIn Performance