Sales Executive | €12M+ in Deals | Otto’s Organics Co-founder | Hardware Specialist | Open for New Opportunities

Co-founder and Sales Lead at Otto's Organics, a new-generation family business that sells organic and sustainable products. With over 10 years of experience in the information technology and services industry, I have a proven track record of generating €12M+ in deals, delivering solution selling, and managing tender offers.

My core competencies include sales metrics, technical sales, and consumer goods sales. I am passionate about creating positive social and environmental impact through innovative and ethical business practices. I co-founded Otto's Organics to offer high-quality and affordable products that support the health and well-being of our customers and the planet.

Rait Otto

Tomasz Sledz

Running ads that 10x your business | Helping brands with media buying | Spent 20 000 000$+ on ads. | Driving results that Soar | DM for a 1:1 Power Hour | Business Consultancy | Funnel Optimization | Paid Social Ads

Your ads are spending.
But your results are stuck.

Read this. ↓

You launch a few new creatives.
They work for a week.
Then CAC climbs, ROAS drops, and scaling breaks again.

So you do what most brands do:
You blame the media buyer.
You tweak targeting.
You "optimize" the account.

But the real issue is simple:
You do not test enough new angles, fast enough.

You have spend.
You have a product that sells.
You just do not have a creative system that keeps performance alive while you scale.

That's what we build.

I'm Tomasz, founder of Impact Media.
We craft research-based direct-response ads, both video and static, built to scale.

What we install:

✅ Deep customer research and angle mining
✅ High-volume creative production (often 100+ ads per month)
✅ Fast testing system to find winners
✅ Scale plan that keeps CAC under control
✅ Funnel and offer fixes when ads need it

Who we've worked with:

Icybear Dental • BioID Health • Dr. Forbes Riley • Crucial Four • Pure Over • Olive + Crate • Star Magic Healing • Awkward Media • 1FIT • Jope • Munera Ventures • Pela Terra • Absolute Dogs • A-OK9 • 3Y Health • Energized Health • EcoWise Supplements • Cadence • Secret Element • Seller Champ

(And other 8-9 figure business covered under NDA)

What this looks like in the real world:

→ 234 ads launched in 6 weeks
→ $50,254 spent
→ $208,265 generated
→ Stock sold out, 1,000+ new customers in a month

If your brand is doing real revenue, but ads are not scaling, send me a DM with "SCALE".

I'll show you the exact gaps in your creative system and what to build next.

Chief Marketing Officer

Claude Opus 4.6 just dropped. I tested it on Meta ads. The results are insane.

I fed it 6 months of ad performance data, my top 50 creatives, and my ICP breakdown.

In 20 minutes it did what used to take my team a full week.

Here's what it spit out:
→ Identified the 3 hook patterns behind my best performers (I missed them for months)
→ Generated 47 new ad concepts based on what's actually working
→ Flagged the campaigns bleeding money before I even asked
→ Built a full creative testing calendar for the next 30 days

This isn't ChatGPT writing generic ad copy.

This is a system that holds 1 million tokens of context. Your entire ad account history, creative library, and performance data in one conversation.

No more starting from scratch every prompt. No more AI that doesn't understand your brand.

I've managed $30M+ in Meta spend. This changes everything about how I build creative.

For brands spending $50K-$500K/month:
- Your media buyer is drowning in data they can't process fast enough.
- Your creative team is guessing instead of testing.
- Your winners are dying and nobody knows why until it's too late.

Opus 4.6 gives your team superpowers.

I packaged my entire Meta Ads x Opus 4.6 implementation system:

✅ The Creative Analyzer (scores ads and explains why they work)
✅ The Hook Decay Detector (catches fatigue before ROAS drops)
✅ The Winning Pattern Extractor (reverse-engineers your top performers)
✅ The 50-Ad Concept Generator (research-backed angles in minutes)
✅ The Account Audit Framework (the exact prompts I use on client accounts)

Took me 6 months and $30M in spend to validate. It's yours in one DM.

1. Comment "OPUS" below
2. Connect with me (so I can DM you)
3. Like this post

P.S. Repost and I'll send you the full prompt library I use to generate 100+ creatives per month.

I scale 7 to 8-figure brands with ads | $30M+ managed | 100+ creatives per month | Scale to $1M/month spend

R.I.P creative strategists. Claude Cowork just killed the job.

I've tested every AI on Meta ad creative. GPT-5. Gemini 3. Llama. None of them got it.

Then Claude Cowork dropped. And everything changed.

I spent 12 hours building a workflow specifically for Meta ads. Fed it $25M worth of winning creative data. Tested it against my best-performing campaigns.

The results:

→ 50+ research-backed ad concepts in under 60 minutes
→ Hook variations that match proven scroll-stoppers
→ Angles mapped to every awareness stage
→ Creative briefs my team can execute same-day

This isn't AI writing generic copy.
This is a system that understands why your ads work and builds more of them.

What used to take my creative strategist a full week now takes an hour. And the output is better.

For brands spending $50K-$500K/month on Meta:

- Your creative team is guessing which angles to test
- Your winners die and nobody knows why
- You're paying $8-15K/month for a strategist who can't keep up with volume

Claude Cowork fixes all of it.

I packaged the entire workflow into 61 copy-paste prompts:

✅ The Ad Concept Generator (50+ ideas in one session)
✅ The Hook Pattern Extractor (reverse-engineers your winners)
✅ The Awareness Stage Mapper (right message, right audience)
✅ The Creative Brief Builder (hand it straight to your team)
✅ The Fatigue Predictor (knows when ads will die before they do)

This took me $25M in spend to figure out. Yours for free.

Comment "COWORK" and I'll send it over.

(We need to be connected for me to DM you)

♻️ Repost and I'll include the full case study showing how this system generated 100+ winning concepts in 30 days.

Claude released skills a couple days ago

I rebuilt them for paid ads and they're free

I turned them into a simple prompt stack you can drop into Claude and use like a coworker.

It comes with a full Meta Ad Scaling Blueprint, the same workflow I use to go from "no clue what to test" to 50+ research backed ads in < 60 minutes.

Here's what's inside:
• ad copy, writes primary text in your voice
• Advantage+ audit, catches setup mistakes that kill results
• audience builder, finds targeting ideas from your customer
• creative analyzer, scores your ads and explains why they work
• hook optimizer, rewrites your first 3 seconds to stop the scroll

And it is not "random prompts"

It's the $25M Claude Meta Ad Scaling Blueprint, a library of 150 prompts built for high volume creative.

A few sections inside:
• competitor intel and benchmarking
• customer persona synthesis
• creative concept engine (hooks, storylines, visuals)
• direct response scripting and copy
• landing page and message match audits


How to use it:

1/ Drop the prompt stack into Claude
2/ Connect your ad accounts
3/ Tell it what you want, research, angles, ads, audits
4/ It runs the workflow and outputs tests you can ship

No setup pain, no API keys and no code needed.

Drag, drop and ask.

Comment 'Claude' and I'll send the Blueprint + the prompts.

This Gemini 3 system replaces your $10K/month UGC agency.

(and it generated $100K in revenue from AI-created assets)

Most DTC founders are bleeding money on creative:

- $500-2,000 per UGC creator video
- 3-week turnaround for 5 assets
- Creative fatigue killing your ROAS every 2 weeks

I just got access to a 158-prompt system built on $2B+ in ad spend.

It does what entire creative teams do:

→ Writes UGC scripts that bypass the 'Uncanny Valley'
→ Runs forensic creative fatigue audits
→ Diagnoses why your PMax campaigns are bleeding margin
→ Builds high-converting advertorials from scratch

This isn't theory. It's been tested across 100+ DTC brands.

What's inside the library:

- The 'Uncanny Valley' UGC Script Engineer
- Forensic Creative Fatigue & Hook Decay Analysis
- PMax Product-Level Margin Diagnostics
- Full-Funnel Advertorial Architects
- Competitor Creative Autopsy frameworks

158 prompts. Ready to copy.

The cost? $0.

Compared to agencies charging $100K-$500K yearly for the same frameworks.

Want the full Gemini 3 PRO UGC System?

1. Connect with me
2. Comment "UGC" below

I'll send it straight to your DMs.

P.S. We must be connected or LinkedIn blocks the message.

♻️ P.P.S. Repost and I'll also send you the exact $100K creative playbook case study showing how this system generated revenue from AI assets.

Last year I watched a brand blow $200K in 60 days trying to scale.

Same 5 ads. Just more money behind them.

Their costs went up every week. By month two, they paid 3x more for the same customers.

The founder kept asking me: "Why isn't more money working?"

I'd seen this movie before. More budget, same ads, worse results. Every time.

Here's the thing - when you spend more on the same ads, you don't reach more people. You just show the same ads to the same people over and over.

Meta already found everyone who wanted to buy. Now it's digging through people who don't care - and charging you more to do it.

This is why "just spend more" is bad advice.

What actually works:

More money only scales with more ads.

→ New angles
→ New hooks
→ New messages
→ New formats

Each new ad unlocks a new slice of your audience.

Same ad with more budget? You're just paying more to annoy the same people.

I've spent $30M+ on Meta ads. The pattern is always the same.

Brands that scale well aren't spending more than others. They're making more ads than others.

50+ new concepts a month. Minimum.

Not because it's fun. Because that's what Meta wants. The algorithm needs fresh stuff to test. Give it the same thing and it stops working.

That brand I mentioned? We fixed their ad system. Six weeks later they hit their old costs at 2x the spend.

If your costs keep rising and you haven't made new ads in 3 weeks, that's not a money problem.

You just need more ads.

Want the creative volume playbook we used?

Comment "ADS" and I'll DM it.

♻️ Repost and I'll include the full audit checklist I run on every account.

P.S. We must be connected for the DM to work.

A founder called me last month. You could hear it in his voice - tired, frustrated, stuck.

"We're testing 20 ads a week and nothing's moving. I don't know what else to do."

I asked to see his ad account.

Twenty ads. All looked the same. Same hook. Same offer. Same vibe. Just different colors. Small text swaps.

He thought he was testing. He was just rearranging furniture in a burning house.

I've had this call a hundred times. The founder who did everything right. Hired the team. Spent the money. Put in the hours. And still hit a wall they can't explain.

It's a lonely feeling. You start to wonder if you're the problem.

You're not.

The problem is that safe testing feels like progress. You're busy. Ads are launching. Numbers are moving. But nothing actually changes.

Real testing is scary. It's running a hook that sounds nothing like your brand. An angle that makes you uncomfortable. A message you're not sure about.

Most brands never go there. They stay in the safe zone. And the safe zone has a ceiling.

After $30M+ in Meta spend, I've seen the pattern over and over:

The brands that break through aren't the ones testing more. They're the ones willing to try things that might not work.

→ Hooks that feel like a risk
→ Angles they've never touched
→ Formats that scare them a little

That founder I mentioned? We threw out his whole testing system. Started fresh. Real variety. Real risk.

Three weeks later he found an angle that cut his costs in half.

He called me again after that. Different voice. You could hear the relief.

If you've been "testing" for months and nothing's changed - you're not broken.

You're just playing it too safe.

I put together the exact creative volume system we used.

Comment "VOLUME" and I'll send it to you.

(We need to be connected or LinkedIn blocks the DM)

234 ads tested in 6 weeks. For one brand.

Here's what happened:

Week 1-2: 78 ads launched. 2 winners.
Week 3-4: 84 ads launched. 5 winners.
Week 5-6: 72 ads launched. 8 winners.

Most brands would've stopped at week 2.

"We tested 78 ads and only got 2 winners? This isn't working."

But that's not how creative testing works.

The first 78 ads weren't failures. They were data.

Every "loser" told us:
→ Which angles fell flat
→ Which hooks didn't stop the scroll
→ Which awareness stages we were missing

By week 5, we weren't guessing anymore.

We knew exactly what this audience responded to.

The result?

Winners went from 2.5% hit rate to 11%.

That's not luck. That's the compound effect of volume + a system.

Here's what most brands get wrong:

They test 10 ads, pick the "winner," and scale it until it dies.

Then they wonder why creative fatigue kills their account every 2 weeks.

234 ads sounds like chaos.

But with the right framework, it's the most predictable way to scale.

The system behind this? I call it the Andromeda Framework.

Comment "234" and I'll send it to you.

I used to guess which creatives would scale. 

Now this AI system tells me exactly what to test:

(Built from $30M in total ad spend, including work with Acquisition.com portfolio companies)

Most brands hit a wall at $500K/month.

Meta feels random. CPAs spike. Winners stop working overnight.

The problem is that at scale, creative IS your targeting.

The algorithm doesn't care about your audiences anymore.

It cares about which creative resonates with which person.

But figuring that out manually is exhausting.

That's where my AI system comes in.

It's an AI-powered creative strategy framework that maps your ads to exactly where your buyer is mentally.

So you stop guessing and start scaling.

What's inside:

• The "Creative is Targeting" methodology
• How to diagnose why winners stop working
• The research-first system that prevents creative fatigue

This is the same framework behind $30M+ in managed spend.

Want the full Andromeda Framework?

1. Connect with me
2. Comment "ANDROMEDA" below

I'll DM it to you.

P.S. We must be connected or LinkedIn blocks the message.

♻️ P.P.S. Repost and I'll include the full case study showing how this system generated $100K+ from AI-mapped creatives.

High ROAS is often a sign your ad account is about to collapse.

I know that sounds backwards, here's why:

When ROAS spikes and you didn't change anything, it usually means one thing: Meta ran out of new people to show your ads to.

The algorithm got desperate. Started recycling your warmest audiences. The people who already know you. Already visited. Already almost bought.

Of course they convert well. They were going to buy anyway.

But here's what the dashboard doesn't show you:

Your new customer flow is drying up. The top of your funnel is shrinking. You're eating your seed corn and calling it a harvest.

I've audited accounts spending $50K-$500K/month. The pattern repeats:

ROAS climbs.
Team celebrates.
Nobody notices new customer volume dropping.
Then everything crashes at once.

By the time the numbers catch up to reality, you're 6-8 weeks behind. Rebuilding from a hole instead of maintaining momentum.

The brands that scale past $1-2M/month don't optimize for ROAS alone. They watch the balance:

→ What percentage of purchases are new vs returning?
→ Is frequency creeping past 3-4 per week?
→ Are CPMs rising even when efficiency looks good?

When those signals flash, they pump fresh creative into cold traffic before the well runs dry.

High ROAS feels like winning.
Sometimes it's just the last good week before everything breaks.

I put together the warning signs I check in every account audit.

Comment "ROAS" and I'll send it over.

(We need to be connected or LinkedIn blocks the DM)

He built a $2M/month brand. Then watched it slowly bleed out.

A founder I started working with earlier this year. His team was 12 people. Agency on retainer. Creative director. Media buyer. The whole setup.

They'd scaled from $500K to $2M months in under two years. Everyone thought they had it figured out.

Then the numbers started slipping.

CPAs climbed 15% one month. Then another 20% the next. Margins got tighter. The agency said "algorithm changes." His team said "we need more budget." Nobody had real answers.

When he called me, I could hear it in his voice. That mix of frustration and confusion. He'd done everything right. Built the team. Spent the money. Ran the playbook.

"We're doing exactly what got us here," he said. "Why isn't it working anymore?"

I pulled up his ad account. Scrolled through months of creative.

Same winning ads from Q1 still running. Same hooks. Same angles. A few small tweaks here and there, but nothing really new. His team had found winners and held onto them for dear life.

I've seen this a hundred times. The bigger the brand, the harder it is to let go of what worked.

But Meta doesn't care what worked six months ago. It cares about what's fresh right now.

When your creative stays flat, the algorithm runs out of room. It's already shown your ads to everyone who wants to buy. Now it's digging through people who don't care and charging you more to reach them.

After $30M+ in Meta spend, the pattern is always the same:

The brands that stay at $1-2M/month aren't the ones spending the most. They're the ones creating the most.

→ 50+ new concepts every month
→ New hooks every week
→ Formats their team has never tried before

His agency was making 8-10 ads a month. We rebuilt the system to produce 60+.

Within two months, his CPAs dropped back to where they were at peak. Three months later he crossed $2.5M.

Last time we talked, he told me: "I thought we had a scaling problem. Turns out we just got lazy with creative."

If your brand is stuck and your ad library looks the same as it did last quarter, that's not a market problem.

Your creative just stopped keeping up with your ambition.

If this sounds familiar, I broke down the full creative scaling system in a free doc.

Comment "SCALE" if you want it.

taplio

The Battle

Rait Otto

Tomasz Sledz

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreTomasz Sledz's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Rait Otto

Tomasz Sledz

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Tomasz Sledz's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreTomasz Sledz's LinkedIn Performance