Mirco Gluch 🐽

Most brands aren't maximizing their social media potential.
→ We change that. With our Social Media Accelerator and expert consulting, we transform your channels into measurable growth across Organic, Paid and Influencer Marketing. 🐽

ABOUT ME
I'm Mirco Gluch, founder of Piggyback. I've worked with some of the fastest growing companies like Zalando, Trade Republic, N26, Maniko Nails, foodspring and CLARK. 
But honestly, I'm just as passionate about helping ambitious startups and SMEs that want to actually move the needle on social media.

WHAT WE DO
We build your social channels from zero or level up what's already working. With solid strategies, real channel knowledge and social-first content production (video, statics, carousels).

WHAT SETS US APART
We roll up our sleeves from day one and make ourselves obsolete. After 6-18 months, your social media works smoothly without us. We think like your audience, test relentlessly, and your team is set up for success.

OUR SERVICES
🐽 Social Media Accelerator (6-18 months intensive partnership)
Full hands-on execution across Organic, Paid & Influencer Marketing. Content creation, social management, community building and analytics - everything you need to scale.
Brands like Maniko Nails, foodspring, Wholey and Academy Bikes transformed their social growth with us.

🐽 Social Media Strategy & Customer Research
We build strategies that actually work for your brand. Deep research through real follower interviews, audience mapping and competitive analysis. Foundation for everything else.

🐽 Expert Consulting
Need help with specific challenges? Internationalization, team restructuring, AI implementation, C-level strategy. We jump in and figure it out with you.

🐽 Workshops & Mentoring
Upskill your team on what actually matters: AI, channel strategy (e.g. for Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube), content workflows, how to think like social first.

🐽 Inhousing & Team Building
Recruiting support, workflow setup and ongoing mentoring so your team can run social independently. The natural next step after the Accelerator.

READY TO START?
⚡️ DM me with "CALL" — let's talk about what's possible for your brand. 🐽

Agency Founder - Social Media Advisor, Consultant, Workshop Host, and Interim Head of Social Media

- Building team structures, strategies, and workflows for successful marketing and social media management
- Optimization of content output, engagements, reach and follower numbers through tried and tested tactics
Selected clients: Zalando, Trade Republic, N26, foodspring, Getsafe and many smaller brands

Mirco Gluch

Berlin used to be the startup capital of Europe.
What happened?

I applied for a €50.000 government innovation grant in January 2024.
The Investitionsbank Berlin (IBB) GründungsBONUS. 
Berlin's flagship program to fund innovative startups.

I just received my answer: Rejected!
In March 2026.
Over two years later!

My business plan described building AI-powered operating systems for marketing teams.

Early 2024. Before any of this was mainstream.
I had already done workshops on this topic for RTL, Peek&Cloppenburg and ImmoScout24.
Real clients showed real interest.

The IBB's verdict: not innovative enough because I would be using existing tools.
The plan was to build these workflow systems with Make, Zapier, AirTable and Buffer.
(Keep in mind, that was over two years ago, so well ahead of the time.)

Here is what I did to earn that rejection:
Wrote a business plan from scratch. 
That was 15 hours of work.
Got asked to rewrite it. 
I did that too.
Uploaded a dozen documents into their outdated portal.
Wrote dozens of emails back and forth with their team.
Kept my hopes up the entire time.
26 months of that. 
For a rejection that could have come in week two.

Meanwhile the rest of the world spent those two years proving why that my approach IS the future.
Claude Cowork. Lovable. n8n. Vibe Coding.

I would assume a committee that rejected my business plan from two years ago this week would be aware of that.

Even the most innovative AI-companies in the Silicon Valley and in China today build on top of existing tech infrastructures.
Because that is how innovation move the fastest.

Here is the part that hurts most.
€50.000 is not even enough to build your own AI tool from scratch.
But it is absolutely enough to build something remarkable on top of existing tools.

They rejected the exact approach the entire industry has since adopted.
Then took 26 months to deliver that verdict.

Germany has brilliant AI companies. 
Munich is booming. 
Hamburg is moving.
But Berlin? 
The city that was supposed to lead?
Not a whole lot of AI-companies are coming from here.

It is being held back by programs that bureaucratize innovation to death.

I filed a formal objection. 
I don't really expect too much. 
But I do believe someone has to say it out loud. 
That's also why I'm writing this post here.

If you are a Berlin founder who has been through this, I want to hear your most frustrating bureaucrac(z)y story.

Social Media Accelerator & Expert Consulting for Startups & Scale-ups ⚡️ Instant growth via Organic, Paid & Influencer | Interim Team Extension, Strategy, Workshops & Speaker 🐽

Piggyback is now a team of 12!

(With a few missing from this photo.)

Last week we welcomed Laura Pfaffel, Social Media Consultant, and Jonas Fehrentz, Jr. Social Media Consultant, to the team, pictured front and centre!

Laura brings several years of agency experience and is the first team member with an agency background to join the Piggyback team, alongside Jonas. She has worked with a wide range of clients at both Charles and Charlotte and Ressourcenmangel.

Before Piggyback, Jonas already ran his own social media and influencer agency, built personal TikTok and Instagram accounts with over 500,000 followers, and even launched his own focus and performance drink startup, Ryn.

Welcome to Piggyback, we’re so happy to have you both on the team!

One of the most talented social media agencies I know is opening one new project slot from May onwards.
(Luckily, I know them pretty well 😉)

At Piggyback, we’re making room to help one more brand completely overhaul their social presence through our accelerator program.

Been thinking about turning your content chaos into a clear, high-performing social strategy that actually drives engagement?

Then this might be your chance to stop talking about it and finally do something about it.

We only take on a handful of projects like this each year, so when a spot opens up, it doesn’t stay open for long.

You know what you should do.

Instagram in an actually useful update shocker.

Did you know that Instagram is now rolling out a ‘Shared Access’ feature that allows you to share your account with up to 3 other people, without giving them the password?

That means when people accept the invitation, they can post, like, and comment from the profile. 

You can also manage their controls, such as choosing who has access to your DMs or who can post on your story.

Super cool!

And of course, if they leave your company, you can remove their access super easily, instead of the usual “what’s the password?” situation 3 months later.

Do you have this feature? And if so, have you used it yet? 👇

This is one of the best indicators of whether someone is truly successful:

If they’re a genuinely nice person.

I recently read something from Scott Galloway where he said that when he meets successful people, they’re usually really nice.

They’re not overconfident, rude, or just… an assh*le.

Why? Because if you’re successful, it’s rarely because you’ve done it all on your own.

There are always people along the way you’ve had to ask for help, whether that’s mentors, colleagues, or friends, and you have to be humble enough to ask for favours and accept guidance.

It’s also worth saying that 'success' doesn’t always equal money. 

There are plenty of people with wealth who aren’t fulfilled, and plenty of fulfilled people who would never call themselves rich.

Everyone needs their own definition of success, whether that’s impact, freedom, relationships, or simply just doing work they care about.

This is something I always try to keep at the forefront of my mind.

I really believe in the law of attraction and try to lead from the heart, with my team and colleagues, through kindness, humility, and friendliness.

Because I think that that energy always finds its way back to you.

(Maybe along the way, when some people get too successful, they forget that part…)

Tell me: are most of the successful people you’ve met nice? Yes or no?

You’re absolutely fooling yourself if you think organic social can just exist on its own.
It never will.

Successful organic social should sit inside a wider ecosystem made up of paid social, influencer marketing, events, and CRM, with each touchpoint strengthening the others.

Organic is where people understand you brand's POV and decide whether they trust you.

Influencer marketing builds on that trust by letting familiar faces carry it further.

Paid is how that recognition reaches more of the right people and showcases your products or services.

Events give those shared relationships a place to show up and create moments together.

CRM is where those relationships are nurtured and turned into conversions.

The brands getting it right today are the ones doing it this way.

(And the ones thinking about it but only have one social media manager to execute it all, we see you.)

Did I miss any channel?

If I won the lottery, I would buy LinkedIn.

First platform update: type “Here’s what I learned” = instant block and app uninstall.

Let’s see how many people we’d have left.

(I reckon we’d be down to 12 users by lunch – including me, obviously.)

Why do so many brands get in their own way on social?

I recently joined Luke Costley-White on The Growth Dojo podcast to talk about exactly that.

(And, in case you’re worried, I do also answer the "why" questions in this one... not just ask them non-stop 😉)

In the episode, we talked about my design thinking approach to social strategy, why interviewing followers matters, how to balance posting quantity and quality, and so much more.

Thanks again to Luke and DOJO AI for the invite and the great conversation!

Check out the episode now on Spotify.

Did we just invent my new favourite meeting format?
"Roast our channel"

The whole Piggyback team roasted one of our clients. 
In the best way imaginable.

We’re 12 people now.
Of course not everyone is super deep in every channel anymore. 

So we tried a format where the whole team reviews one channel with fresh eyes.

Our first “victim”: wowtamins

A children’s supplement brand we’ve been live with on social for about 2 months now.

Kathi, Ayce and Victor are the core team on the project. 
Everyone else prepared in advance.
We then blocked one hour to go through the whole channel... really properly:

Instagram, TikTok, bio, handle, highlights, captions, community management, content, faces, hooks, CTAs.
Everything.

At the start, we set one rule: 
Just take the feedback, don’t get defensive.

The session was ridiculously valuable.

We even ended with school grades for the channels and content, just to be honest about where we stand. 
We landed somewhere between a B- and a C.

So yes, still a lot of room to improve. 
And now we know exactly what to fix.

Big thanks to the whole Piggyback team for preparing so well, and to Kathi, Ayce and Victor for taking it so "sportlich" and professional.

Would you let us roast your brand's channel?

We’re doing the (sometimes) impossible at our consultancy: 

Keeping both our team and partners happy at the same time.

Right now, our client satisfaction scores 9.7/10, and our team satisfaction is a perfect 10/10.

As our work ramps up, and our team and partner base continues to grow, I’m so proud that we’ve managed to do something that, while it seems simple, is actually quite challenging:

Balancing team and client satisfaction.

How did we manage it?

I could create a carousel full of slides to explain everything, but simply, it comes down to this:

We never sacrifice our team’s wellbeing for our partners success. 

Because when our team’s thriving, our partners win.

If you can guess the agency from the feed, that’s a problem.
Here’s how we avoid that.

At Piggyback, we’re currently working with:

a beauty brand
a kids’ bike brand
a supplements brand
and a medical brand

Each one comes with a completely different audience, industry, and set of expectations. Every brand also starts from a different place because of it.

That’s why we invest heavily in creative exploration.

We prototype content early, produce it properly, and publish it to see what actually works. This helps us to find real proof of content rather than relying on assumptions, which we can then build on across channels.

At the same time, we develop each brand’s look and feel in close collaboration with in-house teams or external designers.

To make sure nothing feels generic or copy-and-paste, we also bring in different external perspectives, from videographers to designers, depending on what the brand actually needs.

The result is feeds that feel unmistakably them, not us. 

Check them all out below ⬇️

Piggyback – Project Partner Feeds

There’s a word I’ll never use to describe the brands we work with.
And it’s a pretty common one.

'Clients.'

Since I started working with brands, I’ve made a conscious effort to call them project partners instead.

Why?

Maybe it’s just me, but 'client' has always felt a bit hierarchical.

I feel like it creates an unnecessary sense of us and them, and that’s never how I want our relationships to feel, on either side.

By calling them 'project partners' instead of clients at Piggyback, we set the tone from day one for an equal collaboration, where both sides are trusted, respected, and listened to.

Even though it might seem like a small thing, I genuinely believe that these small things have a real impact on the bigger picture.

Do you think the same about the word clients? Or have you never even given it a second thought?

Marketing teams: 2026 is the year where AI won’t be optional anymore – but most teams aren’t prepared for what that actually means.

The question is: who will adapt? And who will fall behind?

With many companies kickstarting pilots of AI tools last year, I think 2026 will be the true test, and where we’ll see which companies can keep up and which will fall behind.

In my article with Springer Professional, I explore where AI is headed for marketing teams in 2026, including why many AI initiatives fail, how effective shadowing can drive usage and adoption, and why introducing a continuous learning system with AI is critical for long-term success.

Check it out below!

We generate 200K views a month from a weekly content production session that takes just 30 minutes.

Here’s how:

Every Wednesday, when the whole team is in the office, we block out half an hour to create content for Piggyback’s owned social channels.

In that time, we shoot videos based on ideas we’ve already planned, mostly fun content about agency life and social media.

Are we exploding in followers?
No. We've got about 500 across both platforms combined, despite the views.

Are we getting new clients from it?
No. We've never had a lead from it, but that's what LinkedIn's for.

Are we attracting great talent from it?
Absolutely. Our Piggyback channels have become an employer branding goldmine and have been so helpful in hiring new team members.

Most of our applicants are Gen Z, and instead of checking our website before applying, they go straight to our socials.

We've now hired multiple people who have mentioned  our socials during the hiring process.

One said: "I only applied because of your Instagram."

Another walked into her interview and said to one of the team: "I know you from TikTok."

The response from applicants has really encouraged us to stay consistent with the channels.

After all, if this is what 30+ minutes (more with scheduling!) of work a week gets us, we're happy to keep doing it.

Do you have anything low effort that is secretly a goldmine for you?

What do all of these brands have in common?
Vogue
Brammibals Donuts
BMW
cosnova
Freenow
Nikon
Zalando
Kaufland
GQ
foodspring

Our team worked with every one of them before joining Piggyback.

Want to join this growing list of brands our team has helped build and scale?

Then you’re in luck.

We’ve opened one new slot starting in May for a brand that wants to overhaul its social presence from the ground up through our accelerator program.

You can grab the spot now…

And work with top-tier talent who have the kind of experience you’d expect from a Champions League-level team.

Or spend another year with underwhelming socials.

Your choice.

Writes and creates an entire 30-page project case study carousel.

Schedules the post.

Goes back to “View Scheduled Post” 10+ times just to admire how well-designed and insightful it is.

Thinks about how great you are and how well it’s going to perform.

It goes live.

Immediately lists all the reasons why it didn’t do well.

The end.

(It was nice while it lasted.)

Can anyone else relate?

Helping B2B Teams win more clients in less time by growing an email list of buyers. Join my free workshop. Seats are limited, so apply now!

Most Business Leaders know how to deliver.

Very few know how to stay visible long enough for ideal clients to discover them.I help fix that.

I help B2B and recruitment leaders build an authority engine that increases visibility, drives warm conversations, and fills their pipeline with clients who already trust their expertise.

The system is simple: CLARITY → AUTHORITY → CONVERSATIONS (The CAC System)

1. Clarity - We nail your positioning, messaging, niche, and signature frameworks so buyers instantly understand your value.

2. Authority - I build your visibility tower — daily content, insights, stories, and a strategic narrative that positions you as the go-to expert in your market.

3. Conversations - Warm engagement, optimised profile touchpoints, and simple outreach loops that turn attention into booked client calls.

This creates for you.
⬆️ More visibility
⬆️ Better clients
⬆️ Consistent inbound
⬆️ Higher perceived value
⬆️ An easier sales cycle

Results my clients have got
✔️ 60k+ impressions in a single post 
✔️ Multiple warm client conversations booked within 30 days
✔️ £500k+ deal closed from visibility built using this system 
✔️ More replies, more reach, more opportunities, without constant grinding

Jonny Umoru

Here is a quick tip for every business owner who wants more monthly revenue.

Record your calls.
All of them.

Not for compliance.
Not for content.

For truth.
When you listen back, two things happen fast.

You see exactly where you’re strong.
You see exactly where you leak value.

Early 2024 forced me to dive deep into my meetings.
As I was booking them consistently.
But clients weren’t converting.

My first assumption was the obvious one.
“I must be bad on calls.”
Wrong.

The real issue was more subtle and more damaging.

I was allowing my prospects to treat the meeting like an open advice line.
Which is helpful, generous but also super unfocused.

There's no clear structure.
There's no solid boundaries.
There's no actual clear commercial direction.

Once I fixed that, conversions followed.

Same calls.
Same experience.
Different outcome.

Recording calls doesn’t just improve sales.
It improves your judgement.

And when you’re running a business, judgment is the real leverage.
More data always beats more opinions.

Client Acquisition Systems for Recruitment Directors

No alternative text description for this image

When a recruitment CEO tells me,
“I’m just lazy on LinkedIn.”

They’re usually wrong.

And it’s rarely laziness, it’s friction.

Most CEOs I speak to don’t lack opinions, insight or experience.

What they lack is a system.

They post once.
Then delivery gets busy.
Then BD takes priority.
Then a big assignment lands.
Then visibility disappears for six weeks.

Not because they don’t care.
But because it’s not embedded.

Consistency that relies on willpower will always lose to revenue pressure.

Honestly, why would you choose to be more visible over finding candidates for an active role?

That’s the real reason most leadership visibility fails.

It’s not a confidence issue.
It’s not an intelligence issue.
It’s not even a time issue.

It’s a workflow issue.

If showing up online depends on.
- Remembering to post
- Writing from scratch
- Chasing approvals
- Logging in manually

It will collapse the moment the business gets busy.
And recruitment businesses are always busy.

The firms that make it work don’t “try harder.”

They install a repeatable system
→ Capture
→ Creation
→ Approval
→ Distribution

Once it’s embedded, it runs alongside the business instead of competing with it for attention.

That’s when visibility starts compounding.
And that’s when founder dependency begins to reduce.

If you’re a CEO who knows you should be more visible, but it keeps slipping…

It’s probably not laziness.
It’s architecture.

DM “SYSTEM”, and I’ll send you the monthly capture structure we use inside 10 – 50 head recruitment firms.

Katie is a consultancy client of mine who was sitting at £10–15K per month and blaming the inconsistency in the market for unpredictable revenue.

The real issue wasn’t the market.
It was the absence of infrastructure.

Revenue depended on effort.
When outbound slowed down, so did growth.
There was no acquisition engine behind the business.

So we built one.

1️⃣ We installed a structured cold email system that put her in front of thousands of relevant prospects consistently.

2️⃣ We tightened her positioning so the right people moved forward instead of circling.

3️⃣ We implemented follow-up that didn’t rely on willpower or reminders.

And within 90 days, she generated an additional £25K in revenue from a £2K investment, with an average deal size of around £5K.

Nothing about the industry changed.

What changed was structure.

Most founders don’t have a lead problem.
They have a discipline problem disguised as a strategy problem.

When acquisition becomes infrastructure instead of effort, revenue stops being emotional and starts being predictable.

A strange thing happens in a lot of recruitment agencies.
They dislike doing outreach.
But they still double down on it.

And avoid creating content completely.
On the surface, that makes no sense.

But the reasoning is actually simple.

Outreach feels closer to revenue.
Send messages → start conversations → win clients.

Content feels uncertain.
Post something → hope someone sees it.

So recruiters stick with what feels more controllable.

Even if they don’t enjoy it.

The problem is that outreach works very differently when people already recognise you.

When your market has seen your thinking before.
When your name already feels familiar.

Suddenly, replies increase.
Conversations start more easily.

Because you are no longer just another recruiter appearing in their inbox.

Content doesn’t replace outreach.
It makes outreach work far better.

That’s the part many agencies miss.

Something has quietly changed in how companies choose recruitment partners.

Ten years ago, winning a client often came down to 3 things.
• Who you knew
• Who called first
• Who had the candidate

Today, something else happens before the conversation even starts.
And that is hiring managers actually look you up.

They look at.
→ Your LinkedIn profile
→ What you talk about publicly
→ Whether you seem to understand their market
→ Whether you look credible in your niche

It is a silent evaluation.
And it happens before they reply to your message.

This is why two recruiters can send similar outreach and get completely different responses.

One looks like every other recruiter.
The other looks like someone who understands the hiring problem.

That difference matters more than many agencies realise.

Because client acquisition is no longer just about who reaches out.

It is about who looks credible when they do.

The recruitment firms that win consistently tend to have three things working together.
1️⃣ Visible expertise in their niche
2️⃣ Consistent outreach to the right companies
3️⃣ Regular insight shared with their market

When those things combine, conversations become easier to start.

Because the market already understands how you think.
And that changes how people respond.

P.S. How are you standing out as a recruiter?

One of my clients wanted more replies and more meetings from email.

I told him to focus on five things.

The next month, his replies tripled.

If you want more responses to your emails, read this carefully.

1️⃣ Accept that not everyone is ready
→ Some people will never buy, and that is fine.
→ Email is not about convincing everyone.
→ It is about finding the ones already leaning forward.

2️⃣ Make sending emails normal
→ Sending when you “feel like it” will never build momentum.
→ Sending emails should feel like brushing your teeth.
→ More volume creates more surface area for replies.

3️⃣ Stop hunting for the perfect template
→ There is no magic framework.
→ Connection principles matter more than scripts.
→ Optimise the inputs, not the ego metrics.

4️⃣ Most people obsess over meetings booked.
→ Track: Open rate, click-through rate and reply rate.
→ Positive response percentage is your North Star.
→ If the inputs improve, the outcomes follow.

5️⃣ Always send yourself a test email
→ Broken links can make you look bad.
→ Formatting errors and spelling mistakes.
→ Small mistakes quietly kill credibility.

Email is not complicated.

But it does require emotional maturity, consistency, and attention to detail.

Most people are missing at least one of those.

I help exec search and recruitment firms build authority that turns into client calls

Most recruitment businesses focus on the company.

The logo.
The website.
The awards.
The job posts.

But clients don’t buy logos.

They buy your experience and judgement.

This is where most agencies quietly dilute their authority.

The business posts.
The page shares updates.
The reposts.

The marketing manager schedules content.

But the senior leadership team are silent.
Or just inconsistent.
Or posting randomly without alignment.

Everyone is going in different directions.
From the outside, it creates noise.
From the inside, it feels like “we’re doing marketing.”

But authority doesn’t compound at company level in recruitment.
It compounds at the individual level.

Clients don’t say.
“I chose that firm because of their banner.”

They say:
“I’ve seen what he writes.”
“I’ve followed her insights.”
“I trust how they think.”

When five leaders show up with different messages, different tones, different positioning…

You don’t get leverage.
You get fragmentation.

The firms that scale properly align leadership around one north star.

Different voices.
- Same direction.
- Same positioning.
- Same commercial narrative.

That’s when visibility turns into leverage.
And that’s when founder dependency starts to reduce.

If your brand is visible but your leaders aren’t…
You’re missing the multiplier.

DM “SYSTEM”, and I’ll send you the monthly capture structure we use inside 10 – 50 head recruitment firms.

Too many recruitment businesses focus on the whole instead of the individual.

Their online presence tells people more about the company and its accolades than the people actually driving the revenue.

But there’s still a problem.

What about the individuals who want to bill more?

If you don’t show up for your audience as yourself, you get forgotten.

This is something I see many recruitment directors and top billers go through.

At first, they think showing up online is pointless.

Then they realise they should be visible, but convince themselves they don’t have the time.

Then they get trapped in the cold-calling cycle.

Where the only way to grow revenue is to cold call all day, and each year the returns get smaller.

It’s time to shift the focus.

Encourage individuals to build their own authority online.

It benefits the company.
It benefits the individual.

The uncomfortable truth is this.

Many recruitment businesses don’t encourage personal brands because they’re afraid of losing control.

But if your top biller can only win because of the logo, you don’t have leverage.

You have a fragile business where revenue walks out the door the moment someone leaves.

And if your growth depends on keeping people small, you don’t have a scalable model. You have control disguised as strategy.

For years, most agency owners relied on three things.
Referrals, LinkedIn posts, and outbound.

But the game has changed.
The algorithms changed.
The buying process changed.
The attention span changed.

And the founders who keep waiting for inbound luck instead of building inbound systems are getting left behind.

Here’s what the best founders I’ve been speaking to are now doing differently:

1️⃣ They’re building assets, not chasing leads.
Every conversation starts with a lead magnet
→ Something that earns trust before asking for time.

2️⃣ They’re creating content with a funnel, not just a feeling.
Each post points somewhere: a magnet, a scorecard, or a conversation
→ Not just a like.

3️⃣ They’re automating nurture, not losing warm leads.
They’re turning every download, every click, every open
→ Into a tracked, re-engageable prospect.

4️⃣ They’re seeing marketing as a system, not a person.
Because systems scale
→ People burn out.

If you’re still relying on hope.
You’ll always be behind the ones relying on process.

This next wave of recruitment founders are marketers as much as they are recruiters and that’s exactly why they’re winning.

If you want to see what this kind of system looks like inside a recruitment agency.
DM me the word SYSTEM and I’ll send you the visual map.

If you think sales is just about how much effort you put in.
You are wrong.

You can work all day on sales and get none because you are doing the wrong things.

More calls with the wrong people.
More follow-ups that focus on the wrong part of the funnel.
More posts that talk about the wrong topics.
These things lead to more stress.

But if deals only move when you are actively forcing them forward.
That is not a motivation issue and it is not a market issue.

It is a system issue.
Fix the leak by slowing down and understanding the race youare actually in.

A lot of recruitment founders say they want more inbound.

What they actually want is less pressure.

Less pressure to chase.
Less pressure to always be “on.”
Less pressure to be the only one bringing revenue in.

Because here’s the uncomfortable truth.

Most agencies don’t have a lead generation problem.

They have a dependency problem.

One person drives most of the new business.
One person has the strongest relationships.
One person is visible.
One person carries the commercial weight.

And when that person gets busy…

Pipeline slows.

That’s not a marketing issue.
That’s a structural issue.

I’m not interested in helping recruitment agencies “post more.”

I’m interested in helping them remove that single point of failure.

When 2–3 leaders in a firm are visible.
When outbound is structured instead of reactive.
When there’s an owned email list compounding quietly in the background.

Revenue stops feeling fragile.

You don’t notice it at first.

But the pressure drops.

And that changes how you run the business.

Most founders think they need more leads.

What they actually need is a system that doesn’t rely on them.

Take 30 days away from new business development.

No new outreach at all.

What happens to your client pipeline?
How many new hiring conversations appear next month?

From the system itself.

For many recruitment agencies, that question exposes a quiet risk.

Because their pipeline still leans heavily on the founder.

The director is still the one.
• Sending outbound
• Warming up relationships
• Posting when there’s time
• Stepping in when meetings slow down

It works.
Until delivery gets busy.

Then three things quietly happen.
1️⃣ Outreach slows
2️⃣ Visibility drops
3️⃣ New conversations dry up

Growth starts to stall again.

The agencies that stabilise their pipeline install three simple engines.

Authority
Sharing insight so the market understands how you think before you ever reach out.

Acquisition
Consistent outbound that starts new conversations every week.

Nurture
Staying visible to prospects who are not hiring today but will be soon.

Recruitment firms rarely struggle because they cannot deliver.

They struggle because their pipeline still depends on effort instead of infrastructure.

And effort eventually runs out of hours.
Whereas infrastructure doesn’t.

Most recruitment agencies are stuck in the same cycle.

Delivery → panic → outreach → new client → delivery → panic again.

I had a few conversations with recruiters this week, and the pattern is always the same.

They know they need more clients.
But they are buried with outreach and delivery.

Which gives them the illusion that they are doing the right thing.

Then the project finishes.
The pipeline dries up.
And suddenly they have to start “doing marketing” again.

That is not a business.
That is survival mode.

If you run a recruitment agency, there are only three things that actually matter.

Everything else is noise.

Outreach
I’m actually getting annoyed hearing people say they do not do outreach like it is something to be proud of. It is not. You just sound scared of rejection.

Marketing
If no one knows you exist, no one will buy from you. It does not matter how good you are at recruiting.

Delivery
If the service is poor, clients will not come back, and they will not refer you. Eventually, the business dies.

I see so many agencies only focus on one or two of these.
Then they wonder why revenue never really grows.

And most of the time, the thing being ignored is marketing.

Which is why they stay trapped in the cycle.
Delivery → panic → outreach → new client → delivery → panic again.

If you run a recruitment agency and want to fix this.
I’m offering a free trial to help you start building the marketing and distribution system that most agencies are missing.

Message me TRIAL, and I’ll send the details.

If you stopped doing BD for 60 days, what would actually happen in your business?

Not hypothetically but realistically.

If most of your highest-value assignments originate from you…

Then you don’t just have a scaling problem.
You have a revenue risk problem.

This is something I see constantly in 10 – 30 head recruitment businesses.

They’re doing strong numbers.
£150k months, £200k months, £300k months...

But scratch beneath the surface, and growth still runs through one or two people.
- The founder who can't let go of responsibility.
- The top biller who can sell ice to an eskimo.
- The rainmaker with all the great relationships.

When they’re busy, the pipeline slows.
When they’re on holiday, activity dips.
When they’re deep in delivery, visibility disappears.

And you can’t blame the market.
Because it's a structural problem embedded in the business.

Most firms rely on brute-force outbound.
And cold calling works.

But it resets to zero every week.

Authority compounds over months and years.

When senior leadership consistently shows up in their niche, conversations warm up before outreach even happens.

Mandates come in with context.

Trust builds before the first call.

Dependency reduces.

You don’t need to remove outbound activity.
You need to reduce how much your business relies on it.

And that changes the business's ceiling.

If stepping back for 60 days would slow your firm down dramatically…

That’s the real bottleneck.

DM “LEVERAGE” if you want to see how we diagnose and fix that inside founder-led recruitment firms.

If you’re a recruitment director and your marketing “isn’t working,”

It might not be your marketing team.
It might be you.

Before that triggers you, just consider this.

Have you clearly defined?
• The niche you dominate
• The type of client you avoid
• The hiring philosophy you believe in
• What makes your approach different

Or did you hire someone and say?

“Smash the phones and bring us jobs.”

Marketing can’t create clarity.
It can only amplify it.

Most recruitment agencies have a positioning problem.

So the marketing team posts generic updates.
The website sounds like everyone else.
Outbound feels cold every time.

And the director concludes.
“Marketing doesn’t work in recruitment.”

But it does.
But only when it’s built on a clear point of view and a system.

Otherwise, it’s just activity and is doomed to fail.

Recruitment directors know they need to be posting on LinkedIn.
Especially when they’re trying to break into a new market.

But the week usually looks like this.

Monday
A client needs CVs urgently.

Tuesday
A candidate drops out.

Wednesday
You’re chasing feedback.

Thursday
Another role lands.

Friday
You finally get a minute to breathe.

That LinkedIn post idea you had on Sunday…
…never happens.

So what happens instead?
You prioritise the work right in front of you.

Which feels smart in the moment.

But the trade-off is this.
Every time delivery gets busy, marketing stops.

And when the roles finish…
You suddenly need exposure again.

So the cycle becomes.
→ Delivery
→ Silence
→ No visibility
→ Outreach again
→ New roles
→ Delivery again.

Which is why breaking into a new industry feels so difficult.
You’re constantly restarting your visibility from zero.

The agencies that break into new markets fastest do something differently.

They keep their authority in that niche visible even when the desk gets busy.

So when companies start hiring in that space…
They already recognise the recruiter who understands the market.

You have a choice right now, which is to be prepared and put things in place or scramble when you have no jobs.

So ask yourself, are you actually being efficient in your business, or are you making it up as you go?

❤️ PS - DM me for your Recruitment GTM Monthly Plan

Something has quietly changed in how companies choose recruitment partners.

Before replying to your message, many hiring managers check first.

They look at:
• Your LinkedIn profile
• What you talk about publicly
• Whether you understand their market
• Whether you look credible in your niche

It is a silent evaluation.

And it happens before the conversation even starts.

This is why two recruiters can send similar outreach and get completely different responses.

One looks like just another recruiter.

The other looks like someone who understands the hiring problem.

That difference matters.

Client acquisition is no longer just about who reaches out.

It is about who looks credible when they do.

This mistake slows down most agencies.

They only focus on business development when the pipeline starts to feel thin.

So the pattern looks like this.
Pipeline strong → delivery busy → outreach stops.

A few months later, the pipeline weakens again.

Then outreach restarts.
This cycle repeats in many agencies.

Not because the team lacks effort.

But because business development is still treated like an activity, not part of the operating system.

The firms with more stable pipelines do something different.

Outreach continues even when delivery is busy.
Visibility continues even when roles are being filled.
Follow-ups continue even when revenue feels comfortable.

Over time, this creates something most recruitment agencies never quite achieve.

A pipeline that keeps moving, even when the team is focused on delivery.

Most recruitment owners aren’t invisible because they post too little.
They’re invisible because they sound like everyone else.

Scroll through LinkedIn on any day, and you’ll see job ads, team selfies, and generic “we’re hiring” posts.

Different agencies.
Same message.
Same tone.

Here’s the truth.
Clients don’t buy from the agency that posts the most.
They buy from the agency that feels different.

The one that sounds human.
The one who understands their pain better than they can describe it.
The one that stands for something beyond “we fill jobs fast.”

When you finally stop blending in, people start saying.
“I’ve seen your stuff everywhere.”
“I like how you talk about hiring.”
“Can we have a chat next week?”

That’s not luck, it’s clarity.
👉 Right person.
👉 Right message.
👉 Right conversation.

That’s what turns content into clients for businesses.

So this week, ask yourself.
Would your ideal client recognise your voice?
Even if your name was removed from the post?

I looked at 50 recruitment agencies trying to build authority on LinkedIn this month.
And I noticed something uncomfortable.

Most of them are accidentally killing their consultants’ authority.

Not intentionally.
But structurally.

The good things I see.
→ Strong branding
→ Clear company positioning
→ Many support great charitable causes

On the surface, everything looks professional.

But when you actually analyse the posts, the problem becomes obvious.

The content is built for the whole company, not the consultant and not the audience.

So what happens?

Consultants share perfectly branded posts that.
→ Say nothing interesting
→ Get almost no engagement
→ Create zero inbound conversations

It becomes a compliance exercise.
“Marketing told us to post this.”

Here’s the uncomfortable truth most agencies avoid.

Clients don’t hire logos.
They hire people who understand their problems.

And the fastest way for a consultant to prove that on LinkedIn is through.
- Opinion
- Insight
- Real market perspective

But most agency content strips that out completely.

Which means the company gets “brand exposure”.
And the consultant gets silence.

If recruitment agencies want more top-of-funnel exposure from potential clients, the shift is simple.

Stop treating LinkedIn like a company newsletter.
Start building consultant authority.

That’s what actually drives conversations.

If this is happening inside your agency and you want to fix it.
DM me and we can look at how to turn your consultants’ LinkedIn into a real client acquisition channel.

taplio

The Battle

Mirco Gluch

Jonny Umoru

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreMirco Gluch's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJonny Umoru's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Mirco Gluch

Jonny Umoru

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Mirco Gluch's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJonny Umoru's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreMirco Gluch's LinkedIn Performance