Safety Products Global

B2B Marketing

Ethics in Marketing

Creator and Host

Slice, Inc.

VP of Marketing

Marketing Director

I focus on building and executing marketing strategies. Over 15 years in marketing, I’ve used the majority of channels and tactics, both in B2B and B2C.

My broad experience includes business development for international markets and running Slice’s US sales team for 15 months. I always keep overall business goals in mind. The right team is crucial for success, and I believe that internal alignment is vital.

I have an analytical mind and love to work with data.

Love long-term thinking.

Areas of Expertise: 
+ Marketing Strategy
+ Demand Generation
+ Go-To-Market Strategy
+ Marketing Operations
+ Analytics
+ Digital Marketing
+ Customer Acquisition

Mikhail Myzgin

Dr. Luiza Jarovsky is the co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy and one of the world's most influential voices in AI governance.
Her newsletter, with over 90,000 subscribers, is a leading publication on the legal, ethical, and social challenges of AI, and her pioneering AI Governance Training, with more than 1,400 participants to date, empowers the next generation of leaders in the field.
She is frequently cited by worldwide media outlets for her insights on AI policy and regulation.
Dr. Jarovsky was named a Top Voice in AI by LinkedIn, received a Westin Scholar Award from the IAPP, and was honored with the President's Scholarship for Excellence in Science and Innovation by the President of Israel for her Ph.D. research.
She holds a law degree from the University of São Paulo and earned her Master’s and Ph.D. from Tel Aviv University. A speaker of English, Portuguese, French, Spanish, Italian, German, and Hebrew, she is also a proud mother of three.

Relevant links and contact form: www.luizajarovsky.com

Luiza Jarovsky

🚨 This paper will transform how copyright law is applied to AI, and the paragraph below will be cited in every single lawsuit:

"LLMs memorize portions of their training data, these memorized data are encoded in the model’s weights, and, as we show here, it can be feasible to extract large quantities of in-copyright training data from production LLMs."

Download the paper below.

Luiza Jarovsky, PhD

Co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy (1,400+ participants), Author of Luiza’s Newsletter (89,000+ subscribers), Mother of 3

Most people haven't realized it, but AI-led reputational harm is on the rise.

Unlike search engines (where you can create an alert for your name), there is no way to control how AI will summarize or make up information about you.

That's what unregulated AI looks like...

Co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy (1,400+ participants), Author of Luiza’s Newsletter (88,000+ subscribers), Mother of 3

🚨 BREAKING: The first legal settlement involving AI chatbot-related teen suicide is out.

This and the other ongoing lawsuits against CharacterAI and OpenAI over suicide, murder-suicide, and mental health harm are going to shape the field of AI liability.

So far, it is unclear to what extent AI companies are responsible for the harm (and have to compensate victims and their families), in cases involving emotional interactions with AI chatbots.

As I've written a few times in my newsletter, regardless of how people use AI systems, there should be built-in guardrails, warnings, and design elements to prevent harm.

Especially when children are involved and when it's a relatively new technology. AI literacy levels are still low and people are starting to learn to navigate the new risks. I'm adding below my recent essay on AI liability.

The terms of this settlement have not yet been disclosed.

I'll keep you posted.

-

👉 To receive my updates on AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 88,600+ subscribers (link below).

Co-founder of the AI, Tech & Privacy Academy (1,300+ participants), Author of Luiza’s Newsletter (88,000+ subscribers), Mother of 3

🚨 Anthropic is advancing legally questionable theories of AI personality to support an exceptionalist system for AI and WEAKER accountability frameworks for AI companies:

Three days ago, Anthropic launched Claude's new constitution. I did not even know Claude had an old constitution, so I checked it out.

While reading it, I was shocked at first.

Anthropic soaked the document in heavy doses of anthropomorphism and presented a pretentious, controversial, and legally inaccurate approach to the nature and social role of an AI model.

This did not seem to match the company's ambition to appear aligned with responsible AI principles and the mainstream AI governance discourse, as well as its interest in reigning over enterprise AI.

I was also surprised that this version of Claude's constitution received internal approval from the legal and PR teams for publication.

As I have written before, Anthropic has avoided social media drama and unproductive controversies. It has also seemed interested in legal compliance and ethical alignment. This has made them the favorite AI company of many lawyers and AI governance professionals I know.

Why would they risk their reputation publishing a document that will stir ‘AGI’ and ‘superintelligence’ rumors and provoke passionate negative reactions with sentences such as “Anthropic genuinely cares about Claude’s wellbeing”?

There is an AI race underway, and the people at Anthropic are very smart, so there must be a strategic reason to publish this document.

After thinking it through and watching the internet’s reaction to Claude’s new constitution (including some of the reactions to my teaser), I understood what is going on.

In a few words, under the guise of ‘full transparency,’ the company is advancing new, unpopular, and legally questionable theories of AI personality to support a parallel, weaker accountability framework for AI companies.

These theories of AI personality and the way Anthropic is framing them in Claude’s constitution fail to account for human rights, values, and societies, and they are being built into the company's AI model.

Strangely, their goal seems to be to create a higher-status, exceptionalist system for AI models and AI companies.

I do not think this is a good idea from an AI governance perspective, and I think it will backfire for Anthropic.

Let me explain to you how they are doing it: (...continues...)

👉 Continue reading my article and join 89,500+ subscribers using the link below.

Anthropic is advancing legally questionable theories of AI personality to support an exceptionalist system for AI and weaker accountability frameworks

Open article: Claude's Strange Constitution by Luiza Jarovsky, PhD • 3 min read

taplio

The Battle

Mikhail Myzgin

Luiza Jarovsky

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreLuiza Jarovsky's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Mikhail Myzgin

Luiza Jarovsky

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Luiza Jarovsky's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreLuiza Jarovsky's LinkedIn Performance