Building Marketing Waiting Rooms™ - Join the community 🦄 | Content | Demand-Gen | Inbound

I practice the art of staying top of mind 🧠 This means I help brands clarify their message and bring it to life in unforgettable social content and ads.

Justyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan

When I was a marketing intern I’d drink beers with our sales director and write ad copy on the back of a napkin.


Those napkin scribbles outperformed 80% of the campaigns I agonised over with the marketing team.

I honestly got along better with sales than my marketing colleagues.

Their world just made more sense to me LOL.
The sales floor was my church.

I'd lurk in the hallways, eavesdropping on reps pacing back and forth with their headsets on, totally in their flow.

I got to hear bizarre customer objections they handled.
I got to observe them close a deal everyone else had pronounced dead.
I got to know our customers so much better thanks to them.

And I think it’s beautiful 🫠

No grand revelation today. 

Just this:
Go grab a drink with your sales team.

They'll make you a better marketer.

What's the best thing you've learnt from your sales colleagues?

Justyna Ciecierska, MSc

Founder @ Marketing Waiting Room - Messaging & creative strategy

I stopped dumping detailed buyer personas docs into ChatGPT. I replaced it with 3 sentences. Content gets DRAMATICALLY better.


When you vomit a 20-page document into AI, it doesn't magically cherry-pick the most important things.

It sees 47 different directions it could take, and it tries to lump it all together into one generic, illogical content sludge.

If you want AI to generate HYPER-RELEVANT content that attracts your IDEAL buyers, you need to strip your targeting down to its essence.

You only need three elements.
Three short sentences.
That's it.

1. DREAM OUTCOME: What are they trying to achieve?

2. PROBLEM: What's getting in their way while chasing that dream?

3. PSYCHOGRAPHICS AND BEHAVIOUR: How are they wired? What makes their situation unique?

So for example:

Imagine you are a business coach helping people get their first customers.

Here's your audience:

DREAM: "They want to start their own business or are in the early stages."

PROBLEM: "Terrified of losing stability and wasting lifetime savings."

PSYCHOGRAPHICS AND BEHAVIOUR: "Perfectionists. Not business-savvy. Overwhelmed. Overthinkers. They think they have to have a perfect product before selling."

Now here’s the thing:

Two people can have the same dream, and even the same problem.
But if one is business-savvy and the other is an overthinker paralysed by perfectionism, they will be interested in different content.

See the difference:

Overwhelmed perfectionist: "How do you know your offer is good enough before you start selling?"

Business-savvy doer: "Here’s the fastest way to sell your offer so you can find out if it's good enough."

See the nuance?

AI needs explicit, non-ambiguous guardrails to know exactly who it's writing for.

And yeah, I know, stripping everything down to its core is annoying, uncomfortable work.

But trust me - once you do it AI content gets waaaaay better and you stop prompt-wrestling.

This is literally what I do when I set up an AI Content Brain for my clients:
I turn their messy targeting and messaging into something AI can easily use.

Want me to do the same for you?

Go to: marketingwaitingroom.com and book your intro!

Founder @ Marketing Waiting Room - Messaging consultancy

How this truck salesman uses a BIZZARE playbook to hijack your brain in 120 seconds.


You might think this sh*t is chaotic, super random and silly.
But it’s actually well thought-out.
Masterclass in attention and memory encoding.
Let me explain

1/ CURIOSITY GAP
The video starts with a man telling a woman:
“Lean back. Don’t worry. I’ll catch you.”
You immediately want to see how this ends so you keep watching.

Attention? Check.

______

2/ SHOCK AND PATTERN INTERRUPT

→ He lets her fall.
You feel shock. Confusion. Surprise. This breaks your expectation. Your brain is now more receptive to the message that follows. 

→ That's when he delivers a life lesson: “Don't trust anybody.”
Your brain assigns him authority and credibility. Then he adds: "Except when buying trucks - trust me". That’s his bridge to the product.

(btw notice how he uses that gigantic comb for no good reason to keep your attention).

______

3/ SHOWMANSHIP + NOVELTY BIAS

The guy doesn’t list features.
He PERFORMS the features.

→ He measures the truck’s length by doing mid-air splits
→ He pretends to be a doctor while “diagnosing” engine power

You might think it’s silly but it’s actually genius for two reasons:
1) The weirdness keeps attention high
2) The showmanship bypasses sales resistance

When people realise they’re being sold to, they instinctively put up mental defences and stop processing the message.

By wrapping the pitch in weird, entertaining behaviour, he prevents your brain from labelling it as “advertising,” so those defences never activate

______

4. MEMORY HOOKS

While you’re entertained, he casually encodes the USPs in your brain:
→ Engine power
→ Cargo box size
→ Comfortable interior

He uses memory hooks to ensure you remember the most important things:
→ The brand name
→ The product and its USPs

Dude keeps saying:
“Jerry… Jerry… Jerry…”
Jerry is the company name.
He repeats it so often that it burns into memory.

And the weird acts (doctor, splits, comb) act as memory glue.
Your brain links:
Jerry → weird doctor → powerful engine
Jerry → splits → long cargo box
Jerry → comfort → funny guy

After watching the video, your memory is left with the most important keywords:

Jerry
Chinese
Great trucks

NOW CHECK THIS:
Next time you need a truck, your brain will remember these keywords, and you will Google the,m and you will find them.

The reason AI content sounds generic has nothing to do with AI.

It's you.

You're dumping 20 pages of audience research and 47 pages of transcripts into ChatGPT hoping it will do the hard work of figuring out whom you're actually talking to.

It won't. That's your job.

AI doesn't need all that information.

It needs clarity.

Three sentences.

If you can't explain your audience in three sentences, your problem is not generic content.

Your problem is targeting.

Clarity in, clarity out.

Want me to ruthlessly clarify your targeting and messaging and set up an AI content assistant that writes hyper-relevant content?

Go to marketingwaitingroom.com and book your intro.

The term “long-term marketing” is misleading. It suggests that results take years to appear, but that’s not true.


We praise direct response marketing for its quick and measurable results:

> Show an ad
> Customer clicks
> Customer takes action

But there’s another part of marketing that feels more ambiguous.

It’s often labelled as “long-term,” “brand awareness,” or “brand marketing.”

But not many people understand its mechanics.

A good way to think about it is indirect-response marketing.

(Or how I like to call it - Marketing Waiting Room™) 

It works differently.

The purpose is to build something deeper: memory structures in the buyer’s mind that can be retrieved when a buying trigger hits.

These memory structures are what drive people to come directly to you or make your direct-response marketing efforts perform better.

This type of marketing is often lumped into the “long-term” category, making it seem vague and uncertain in its ROI.

The real issue is that many marketers don’t fully grasp how to make it work.

It requires a different set of skills, thinking, and approach.

It’s about creating a resilient and valuable asset.

One that lasts beyond any specific channel or campaign and doesn’t show up neatly on a dashboard.

But that doesn’t mean it takes years to see results.

If someone is exposed to marketing your assets that build memory structures and then experiences a buying trigger just days later, that memory will activate, driving action.

Over time, this memory structure gets stronger, and these effects become even more visible.

I’ve built an AI content system that doesn’t just generate content, it follows your strategy. And OMG, it works ridiculously well!

If you’ve followed my work, you know I’m annoyingly picky about content.

I care about relevance, nuance, originality, and quality.

So I’m not interested in cranking out more AI slop.

For me, it’s all about using messaging, targeting, content strategy and internal expertise to create on-brand, original content across channels.

I pre-package and pre-chew it for AI.
I call it the “AI Content Brain” and it works like a charm!

Why?

Because I strip down the strategy to its essentials and structure it in a way that AI knows how to use it when creating content.

To be clear, it’s not something I whipped up quickly overnight.

I've been obsessing over this since 2022.

Testing, breaking, refining.
Figuring out exactly how to make AI finally *get it*.

I’ve been offering this as a productised service for a few months now, and I'm opening new slots today!

In 3 weeks, you get:

→ Your positioning, messaging, targeting, and content strategy defined and compressed into a clear doc AI can follow, no 20-page-long pdfs

→ Your internal expertise, product info, opinions, stories, and IP extracted and structured so it can be easily reused across content

→ A Content Brain that gives AI the exact context it needs to stay on strategy and stop hallucinating

→ AI content assistants that turn any raw input, ideas, notes, transcripts, conversations into on-brand, high-quality content across channels

All set up for you in a tool of your choice: Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude - you name it.

So if you want to scale your content creation without losing your soul and substance, I would LOVE to build this for you!

Head to marketingwaitingroom. com and book your intro.

The future of AI content creation is: 'interview me until something worth posting comes out.’

Let me explain:

I worked with 7 clients last year.

I helped them define their positioning, messaging and content strategy and built an AI content system that creates on-brand content across channels.

But there was something I didn't expect…

These people are incredibly smart.
Brilliant at what they do.

They'd tell me stories that made me go "Wait THAT'S a post."

And yet they kept struggling with content creation.

How’s that possible?!

They had the expertise. They had the stories.
So what was missing?

It became clear when they tried the "Interviewer" feature I built into their content system.

An AI assistant that:
- Understands their audience and strategy
- Asks targeted questions
- Pulls out stories, opinions, anecdotes
- Surfaces angles they didn't know they had

THEY LOVED THAT FEATURE THE MOST!

That’s when I realised they didn't have a content creation problem.
They had an insight extraction problem.

All they needed was buried deep in their minds.
And they couldn't access it on demand.

The Interviewer changed that.

They kept telling me that this made them think in a completely different way.

It sparked ideas they wouldn't have had otherwise.

Opened doors they didn't know were there.

THAT’S WHAT MAKES CONTENT INTERESTING!

That's when I understood what content operations should actually look like:

→ LAYER 1: Extract insights from experts through a natural conversation with an interviewer AI assistant 

→ LAYER 2: Process it through an “AI Content Brain” trained on positioning, messaging, and audience 

→ LAYER 3: Remix into different formats and channels.

The expert's job is to think and talk. 
AI’s job is to turn that into original, on-brand content assets.

So if you want your expert team to create content stop asking them to write LinkedIn posts.

Start building systems that pull the best of what they know and then let the “AI Content Brain” do the rest.

Would you like me to create such a system for you?
Book an intro via the link in my bio!

B2B marketing has a technical addiction


Growth hackers
GTM engineers
Frameworks
Automations
Ratios


We treat marketing like an engineering challenge.
And we don’t want to admit that it’s mostly a communication challenge.

I came across this quote lately:

“The truth isn’t the truth until people believe you, 
and they can’t believe you if they don’t know what you’re saying, 
and they can’t know what you’re saying if they don’t listen to you, 
and they won’t listen to you if you’re not interesting, 
and you won’t be interesting unless you say things imaginatively, originally, freshly.”

Bill Bernbach figured this out decades ago, but somehow we convinced ourselves that B2B marketing works differently.

We’re excused from clarifying our message and allergic to a little art.

Is it because we think our products speak for themselves?
Or is it because we don’t feel like doing the difficult work?
Or is it because martech has led us to believe that we don’t need clarity and creativity if we have a good tech stack?

I don’t know.

But I do know this: clarity and creativity in marketing aren’t optional.

They’re THE job.

POV: LinkedIn Ads perform at Got Talent...

I wish more B2B marketers and founders knew that…


1. Brand is your silent salesperson

2. Having no competitors is usually a bad sign

3. Signing up to a newsletter doesn’t mean someone is in "consideration stage"

4. Building brand awareness means building mental availability (buyer memory)

5. A marketer’s job is to make the brand easy to recall and easy to buy

6. You shouldn’t “scale marketing” before you’ve decided on positioning and messaging

7. Good advertising kills bad products

8. Creativity in marketing isn’t optional. It’s THE JOB

Couldn’t come up with 10. Help? 😅

My content workflow lately: I talk out loud to my “AI Content Brain” for 15 minutes on Monday mornings. Then it remixes my answers into endless posts.


That’s it.

Since I built my AI Content Brain in Claude, my content workflow got 

SO.
MUCH. 
EASIER.

And weirdly, way more fun.

Here's what I do now:

STEP 1: I start with the "interviewer mode"

Claude asks me questions as if it were my ideal buyer.
I just answer out loud (I use WisprFlow)
Casually. No writing. No pressure.
You would not believe what comes out of your brain when you're not trying to "write."


STEP 2: Claude remixes my answers into endless content pieces

It doesn't just summarise. 
No, no.
It does something more sophisticated.

It filters my rambling through my specific Targeting, Messaging & Positioning rules.

This means it knows what I sell, my unique PoV and what my target audience is interested in.

The Result:
→ 15 minutes of talking = 5-10 high-quality LinkedIn posts.
→ It’s not "AI-generated." It’s "AI-extracted."
→ The thoughts are 100% mine. The typing is 0%.

So here’s my advice to you:

Stop trying to create content from scratch.
Start having conversations and let AI do the remixing.

Want me to build your AI Content Brain for you?

Go to: marketingwaitingroom (dot) com and book your intro.

How to deal with messaging and content in an emerging vs. a mature market
TLDR: 

- Emerging market: your goal is to make your brand name = category. Which means your messaging and content should be category-focused. Not differentiation-focused

- Mature market: your goal is to communicate why your solution is better than the default. Which means your messaging and content should be differentiation-focused. Not category-focused.


EMERGING MARKETS:

Context:

→ Few competitors and no clear category leader yet
→ The real race isn’t differentiation. It’s becoming the obvious choice for the category
→ Low and uneven buyer awareness: many don’t know the category exists or don’t understand it
→ Buyers feel the problem but lack the language to describe it 


Messaging & content goals:

→ Create category awareness
→ Associate your brand with the category
→ Establish shared language: Frame and name the problem and the solution
→ Proprietary naming helps create associations (e.g. GTM engineering, Clay tables)

MATURE MARKETS

Context:

→ Many competitors and a clearly defined category
→ Buyers understand the problem and the available solutions
→ One or more strong leaders already exist
→ The game is differentiation

Messaging & content goals:

→ Clearly articulate how you are meaningfully different from the default options
→ Justify switching
→ Question what the category has normalised, or what is outdated etc. (e.g. Basecamp's calm work philosophy)

If I were Head of Marketing with a $300K+ budget, the first thing I'd do is:


Decide what our brand should be known for.

Don't forget this:

You're not investing $300K+ in channels.
You're investing in spreading a message.

TAKE THAT SERIOUSLY.

It's what makes your big girl budget deliver big girl results.

Pretty please, don't reduce yourself to 

a traffic factory 
a leads generator 
an ROI calculator

You're the architect of the big idea.

The thing people remember. 
Repeat. 
Talk about at dinner. 
Mention to their boss in every Monday check-in.

You're here to create something people are impressed by. 
Inspired by. 
Attracted to.

That's your real job.
The clicks and leads will come... wait, scratch that... they'll POUR in as a result of that.

Brands people can't stop talking about stand for something and own it:

→ Basecamp: "It doesn't have to be crazy at work" 
→ Gong: "Sales call reality over opinions" 
→ Intercom: "Marketing is conversational" 
→ Miro: "Where teams think together" 
→ Lovable: "Build something lovable"

So tell me - what's the one thing you want living rent-free in your buyer's brain when they finally have the problem you solve?

Why your “TOFU” or “demand” or “brand” campaigns are not working.


Because you’re trying to run them before you’re clear on what they’re meant to do.

Not many people realise that these campaigns are supposed to achieve mental availability.

Which simply means that your brand is top of mind when buyers realise they have specific needs and wants.

Like: When I need to decorate my house and I want it to be stylish, but also functional I think IKEA.

Or: When I need to improve how my sales team performs and I want clear, objective insight into what actually closes deals, I think GONG

This should be your starting point.

If you don’t define the needs and wants that your brand satisfies in one sentence like above, you don’t have the foundation for demand gen.

You end up with Frankenstein ads communicating everything and nothing.

They are hard to understand.
And therefore are hard to remember.
And therefore they will not work.

This gets especially painful in B2B software companies that kept adding features, use cases, integrations, and personas…

…until nobody can explain in one sentence when someone should think of them.

When this happens, the smartest thing to do is to hire an expert to help you boil it down to one simple message.

Otherwise you’re setting your marketing budget on fire.

Ferenc Fekete

Helping non-tech Founders transform Ideas into SaaS products @ VeryCreatives | Product Agency, SaaS & MVP Development | Startups

I've watched many startup founders fail at the same exact point: turning their validated idea into actual software.

They waste months (or even years):
→ Trying to hire the right developers
→ Burning cash on poor planning and execution
→ Second-guessing every technical decision along the way

Meanwhile, competitors move faster, investors demand traction, and the pressure to deliver keeps building more and more.

After watching this pattern destroy countless promising startups, we built VeryCreatives to fix it.

But here's what makes us different:

We don't just build your MVP and disappear. We're product people who think like founders, not just developers who code to spec.

👉 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻-𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵: We start by pressure-testing your assumptions before writing a single line of code. If the market doesn't want it, we'll tell you straight.

👉 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗲: We build like it's our own startup, obsessing over user experience, scalability, and investor readiness from the first sprint.

👉 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱: Whether you're at napkin sketch or Series B, we've been there. We've helped founders go from zero to acquisition, and we stick around for the entire journey.

For the past 14 years, we've built products for venture-backed startups, fast-growing scale-ups, and globally recognized brands like Red Bull, Nestlé, and Philips.

The startups we work with have:
✅ Launched investor-ready MVPs in under 90 days
✅ Secured funding from top-tier investors and VCs
✅ Scaled from first users to thousands of paying customers
✅ Successfully exited to strategic acquirers

Got a SaaS idea that's been sitting in your head for months? 
Let's map out your 90-day path to launch → https://verycreatives.com/book-a-call

Co-Founder

At VeryCreatives, we are a team of expert developers who create powerful SaaS apps that solve problems and drive growth for founders with initial funding. We believe in empowering our clients with innovative software that helps them achieve their goals and stand out in their industry.

Our audience consists of driven and ambitious founders who have just received initial funding for their startup. They are looking for a software development partner who understands their vision, can help bring their ideas to life, and deliver results that will help them achieve their business goals.

Founders with initial funding have a pressing need to build their product quickly and efficiently to maximize their chances of success. At VeryCreatives, we understand this need and are dedicated to creating high-quality SaaS apps that not only meet their requirements but also exceed their expectations. We are committed to delivering value and results that help our clients succeed.

VeryCreatives stands out in the market for our ability to deliver high-quality, innovative solutions that meet the needs of our clients. Our unique approach to software development, coupled with our expertise and commitment to excellence, is what drives us to provide outstanding results to our clients.

Industries our clients operate in, using the SaaS products we've built: 
- Digital marketing, Event marketing & Influencer marketing SaaS
- Foodtech & Delivery 
- Fintech, Banking & Investments
- 2-sided marketplace platforms
- Agriculture & Livestock management
- Packaging compliance & Waste

Markets we cover: UAE, EU, UK, US.

Your product isn't the problem. Your budget split is.

I've built countless SaaS products and apps over the past decade for some of the biggest brands in the world. Here's the biggest mistake I see first-time SaaS founders make that kills their product:

They map out their entire product budget... and allocate 100% of it to development.

They're planning to build the full product, launch it, then HOPE customers show up.

But the problem is, a good product is only 50% of the equation. The other half is getting it in front of the right people (which costs a lot of money too).

Especially in B2B, you'll need to spend some cash to speed up your learning curve and learn:

👉 Which channels work
👉 What messages resonate
👉 What makes your ideal customers actually convert

Some founders ignore this until it's too late. And by that time, they've burned through their development budget and launched something that MIGHT be great without anyone actually knowing it exists.

That's why whenever we work with clients, we often help them adjust the product scope before building anything out. Because we want to free up budget for marketing, user acquisition, and proper positioning so they can actually get customers and scale the business.

You could have the best product in the world. But if nobody knows it exists, it won't mean a thing.

Before you finalize your budget, ask yourself:

What's my plan to get 100 people to see this?

Helping startup founders & innovation labs validate and scale ideas into exit-ready products @ VeryCreatives | 🔥 Two decades in tech

You created your own bad developers.

I have seen this pattern too many times.

Founder says:

"My devs are slow"
"They do not get it"

Then we look closer.

And see a decision vacuum the team is trying to survive.

There are three calls only you can make as the founder.

If you dodge them, even a strong team will look useless:


👉 Decision 1: Who is our primary user right now?

One founder I worked with tried to serve agencies and tiny solo founders at the same time.

Sales promised custom features to big accounts, product built self serve onboarding for tiny ones, devs got whiplash.

Nine months of work, nobody truly happy.


👉 Decision 2: What is the next business outcome we are willing to bet on?

MRR from a segment, activation rate, expansion from existing customers.

If this is not written down, every feature feels urgent.

You ship a lot of stuff and still cannot answer why revenue or usage is flat.


👉 Decision 3: What constraints are non negotiable?

Time, budget, compliance, integrations.

If these move every week, scope will quietly double and your v1 will arrive six months late.


Which of these three have you been dodging?

Most failed software projects don't fail at the finish line.

They fail in week 2, when the team realizes the core feature can't actually be built.

That's why one of the smartest things you can do as a SaaS founder, before writing a single line of code, is build a proof of concept.

Not a full product or MVP. Just enough to answer one question: "Can we actually build this thing?"

We've gone through this exact process hundreds of times for both our clients and our own internal tools.

Here's how it works:

👉 Proof of Concept (PoC): Does this work technically?

This is where you test your riskiest assumption. Can it even be built the way you imagine? It's not going to be pretty, and it's not public-facing. But it's real.

Skip this, and you're three months into development before realizing your AI feature needs data you can't legally access.

👉 Prototype: What will it look and feel like?

Map the user flow, add just enough UI to walk someone through it, and start shaping the product experience.

Skip this, and your dev team builds something technically correct that no user can figure out how to use.

👉 MVP: Will people actually use and pay for it?

Now you're testing the market. You've built something lean and functional to prove there's demand and that your positioning makes sense.

Skip this, and you spend 18 months perfecting a product nobody asked for.

A good proof of concept helps you spot technical roadblocks early and gives stakeholders the confidence that your idea is real.

It's faster (and cheaper) to find the cracks now than to rebuild everything later.

What's the riskiest technical assumption you've had to validate before building?

Your first 10 customers are friends.

Your next 100 are stress tests.

Most MVPs crack right there.

And it's rarely the thing you're watching for.

Not because of one big bug.

Because of 4 invisible gaps almost every founder forgets:


1. Role and permission basics

A single login is fine at the very start.

Then a bigger account asks "Can my team have different access levels?"

If the answer is no, that deal quietly dies.

👉 By month 6, if you don't have this, you'll start losing deals you never knew you lost.


2. Bulk actions for power users

Clicking one by one feels fine with 10 records.

At 1,000, people hate your product.

They will export to Excel and never come back.

👉 By month 6, if you don't have bulk edit or export, your power users are already halfway out the door.


3. Password reset that does not melt support

In the early days, you just "help people manually."

At 150 accounts, your inbox turns into "I cannot log in" hell.

👉 By month 3, if you don't have a clean self-service reset flow, your support load will bury your roadmap.


4. An internal admin tool

If every tiny change needs a developer, your roadmap will stall.

You cannot build new features and play support at the same time.

👉 By month 9, if you don't have a simple internal panel, your engineers are stuck doing data cleanup instead of shipping.


Audit your stack against this list. What's missing?

I Spent 6 Months Building a Product Nobody Wanted. Then Buffer Launched for $5.

Around 2010, we worked at a media agency.

We saw the chaos every day: social media posts bouncing between marketing, legal, and clients. Approvals lost in email threads. Deadlines missed.

So we decided to build the solution ourselves.

We went all in:

• Multi-tenant account management
• Multi-platform posting (Facebook, Twitter)
• Custom approval workflows
• Notifications, previews, media library
• Analytics dashboard
• Unified posting interface

Six months of nights and weekends. Thousands of lines of code.

We never talked to a single customer.

We thought we knew exactly what agencies needed. We worked in one. We lived the problem.

That was the trap.

While we were perfecting our approval flow logic, Buffer launched with a single post scheduler and a $5 beta signup.

They validated demand before building anything else.

We validated nothing. We just built.

Here's what I learned the hard way:

👉 Working in an industry doesn't mean you understand the market

Your experience is one data point. Not a business case.

👉 Features don't prove demand

Nobody cares about your feature list if they never asked for it.

👉 Skipping customer development is not a shortcut

It's the longest, most expensive path to failure.

The product died quietly. No dramatic crash. Just silence.

If you're building something right now, ask yourself:

Have I talked to 10 people who would pay for this?

If the answer is no, close your IDE and pick up the phone.

taplio

The Battle

Justyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan

Ferenc Fekete

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJustyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFerenc Fekete's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Justyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan

Ferenc Fekete

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Justyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFerenc Fekete's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJustyna Ciecierska-Göçeryan's LinkedIn Performance