Justin Bateh, PhD, PMP

AI, Project Management & Leadership Expert & Founder | PhD, PMP | Award-Winning Professor & LinkedIn Learning Instructor | Helping operators lead projects, use AI effectively, and advance their careers.

Hi, I'm Justin 👋I teach leaders and operators how to execute in the AI era and advance their careers.20+ years of leading teams and making high-stakes decisions where failure wasn't an option. Along the way, I built repeatable execution and leadership systems that I've taught to thousands through top-rated courses, corporate training, and university programs.But execution skills alone won't protect your seat at the table anymore. Companies expect faster decisions, measurable impact, and AI as part of how you deliver it.That's what I share here. How to use AI as your superpower for execution and decision-making. Career growth advice for leaders who want to double down on the things AI can't replace. Execution frameworks that hold up under pressure. Leadership lessons learned the hard way so you don't have to.No fluff. No busywork. Everything here is real, tested, and battle-proven from someone still doing the work today.    *All views and opinions shared across my content are solely my own.

Founder

I teach Project & Operations professionals the skills to drive sustainable growth, change, and profitability using data-driven decision making, lean tools, six sigma methodologies, agile projects, and data analytics. I have worked with executives and managers from numerous organizations, including Walmart, Verizon, Amazon, Pearson, UPS, Wiley, Cengage, Medtronic, US Department of Health, CSX, USPS, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Crowley Maritime, US Air Force, US Navy, Novartis, FedEx, McKesson, and many others.

Justin Bateh, PhD

You're Not Having a Bad Day. You're in a Toxic Culture.

(don't blame yourself for system failure)

You think it's you.

Your attitude. Your performance. Your inability to handle stress.

It's not.

It's the culture slowly destroying you from the inside.

Here's how to tell:

1/ Sunday Night Feels Like a Death Sentence
→ Dread starts hitting around 4 PM
→ Your stomach physically knots thinking about Monday
→ Weekend recovery time keeps shrinking
→ The anxiety owns you now

2/ You Second-Guess Decisions You Used to Make Instantly
→ Choices that were automatic now paralyze you
→ You seek permission for things you're expert at
→ Your confidence got systematically dismantled
→ Expertise feels like pretending

3/ You're Bone-Deep Exhausted But Sleep Doesn't Touch It
→ 10 hours of sleep feels like 10 minutes
→ You wake up more tired than when you went to bed
→ Your nervous system never gets to rest
→ Exhaustion lives in your bones now

4/ Walking on Eggshells Became Your Permanent State
→ You rehearse basic conversations like speeches
→ Every interaction is a potential landmine
→ Your real personality died somewhere along the way
→ Being yourself became too dangerous

5/ You're Always Somehow the Problem
→ Every failure mysteriously traces back to you
→ Blame rolls downhill and parks at your desk
→ Your solutions get ignored, your mistakes magnified
→ You've started believing it's true

6/ Your Body is Staging a Revolt
→ Headaches that no medication can touch
→ Shoulder tension that's become part of your skeleton
→ Stomach problems that doctors can't explain
→ Your body is screaming what you won't admit

7/ Colleagues Became Survival Competitors
→ Small talk feels like intelligence gathering
→ Nobody trusts anybody anymore
→ Collaboration turned into self-protection
→ Isolation became safer than connection

8/ Criticism Flows Like Water, Support Never Comes
→ Your mistakes get documented immediately
→ Your wins disappear without acknowledgment
→ Every feedback session feels like an ambush
→ Development is punishment disguised as help

9/ Your Voice Got Surgically Removed
→ Questions get labeled as "attitude problems"
→ Ideas get dismissed before you finish speaking
→ Speaking up became career limiting
→ Silence became survival strategy

10/ Every Single Day is Fight-or-Flight Mode
→ You're constantly braced for the next attack
→ Planning past today feels impossible
→ Hope for change died months ago
→ You're running on fumes and fear

11/ You Don't Recognize Who You've Become
→ The person you were doesn't exist here anymore
→ Your values got compromised one compromise at a time
→ Optimism rotted into bitter cynicism
→ You became someone you wouldn't want to know

This isn't about your ability to handle pressure.

It's about a system engineered to crush human spirits.

Toxic cultures excel at making victims blame themselves for the poison being administered daily.

♻️ Repost if your network needs to see this.

AI, Leadership, and Career Growth | Chief Editor @ Tactical Memo | PhD, PMP | Award-Winning Professor & LinkedIn Learning Instructor | I teach leaders and operators how to execute in the AI era & advance their careers.

7 Ways You're Training Your Team to Lie to You

(What leaders do that kills honesty)

Your team isn't dishonest.

You made honesty unsafe.

Here's how:

1/ You Punish the Messenger
→ Bad news gets met with anger
→ Problems become personal attacks
→ Transparency feels like career risk
→ So they stop telling you

2/ You Ask "Why Didn't You Tell Me?" After Explosions
→ You weren't safe to tell before
→ Retrospective blame doesn't build trust
→ Hindsight judgment creates fear
→ Next time they'll hide it earlier

3/ You Treat Mistakes Like Character Flaws
→ Errors become moral failures
→ Learning gets replaced with shame
→ Experimentation dies completely
→ Perfection becomes survival strategy

4/ You Say You Want Feedback, Then Get Defensive
→ "I'm open to input" means nothing
→ If criticism triggers justification
→ Your reaction trains them
→ They'll stop being honest

5/ You Reward the Yes-People
→ Promotion goes to agreement
→ Visibility goes to compliance
→ Challenge gets career consequences
→ They learn the game fast

6/ You Overreact to Small Issues
→ Minor problems trigger major responses
→ Proportionality doesn't exist
→ They calculate disclosure risk constantly
→ Hiding becomes rational

7/ You Make Them Watch You Shoot Messengers
→ Public criticism of others
→ Throwing people under the bus
→ Example-setting through punishment
→ They're taking notes

Your team tells you what you can handle.

Not what's actually happening.

Want the truth?

Become someone who can receive it.

♻️ Repost and follow Justin Bateh, PhD for more.

The Power of Someone Believing in You

98% of successful people share one thing in common:

(Thanks Justin Wright for inspiring this analysis)

Someone believed in them before they "made it."

Think about that.

Behind every breakthrough is someone who saw potential when there was no proof.

Not credentials.
Not experience.
Not a perfect track record.

Just raw, unproven potential.

And they bet on it anyway.

Maybe it was:
- A manager who gave you a shot you weren't "qualified" for
- A mentor who invested time with no guarantee of return
- A colleague who vouched for you in a room you weren't in
- A friend who reminded you of your worth when you forgot

That belief becomes the foundation of confidence.

It says: "You're capable of more than you think."

And here's the beautiful part:

You can be that person for someone else.

Look around your workplace today.

Who has the right attitude but lacks the opportunity?
Who shows up ready to learn every single day?
Who just needs someone to take a chance on them?

Don't wait for them to be perfect.
Don't wait for guaranteed success.

Bet on their potential.

Because someone once bet on yours.

Your legacy isn't just what you achieve.

It's who you help become who they're meant to be.

Who believed in you before you made it? And who needs you to believe in them today?

♻️ Repost to inspire someone in your network.

Justin Bateh

I help you craft your social media strategies | Social Media Strategist & Consultant

I help you:

1. Get attention from your ideal clients
2. Clarity and direction - Have a clear plan to follow rather than feeling uncertain or overwhelmed
3. Consistency - Easy-to-follow plan that helps you without the struggle
4. Go after the quick wins

If this sounds good to you, send me a DM

Frank Velasquez

The ghostwriting agencies I've watched fail all had one thing in common. Their content was actually performing.

Their clients still left. Usually around month three or four.

Every workflow these agencies built was optimized for internal efficiency, not for making the client feel heard. It was all about getting new clients and plugging them into the system. And clients don't usually say that out loud when they decide to leave. They just don't renew.

Most of them blamed the writing anyway. Better hooks, more templates, more syncs, more efficiency. They were spending 90% of their energy acquiring new clients and 10% on the ones they already had.

No wonder they kept leaving.

3 places where I see this break down:

1. Onboarding that collects information but never asks what the client wants to be known for, for example.

2. Content calls that feel like data collection instead of actual conversations that might spark good, insightful ideas.

3. Reporting that tracks metrics but never checks for recognition, whether the relationship is healthy, or whether the content actually sounds like them.

The agencies keeping clients long-term are not just focused on adding efficiency. They're focused on retention too.

Consultant and Ghostwriter | Scale LinkedIn presence with strategy & systems. Helping other ghostwriters do the same.

Is a post less valuable if it was written by AI?

I've been watching 2 camps on LinkedIn: 

The first is AI-generated content. LinkedIn broetry style, 5th-grade level, hitting hundreds of likes, teaching something useful. 

The second is the warriors. People calling it out, listing all the AI-isms, counting the em dashes, the "it's not X, it's Y". That content is also getting numbers.

Here's the part that gets me. Most of the people sharing the warrior posts are probably liking AI posts without realizing it. The content probably helped them. They may have saved it, or even shared it. Then two posts later, they're nodding along to someone explaining how to spot the soulless AI content destroying LinkedIn.

So I genuinely want to know: If the content teaches you something real, does it matter how it got made?

Curious where people actually stand on this one.

In the last 12 months, our clients crossed 5M+ organic impressions on LinkedIn. Now we are giving you an insight into how we are doing it 👇

At the start of 2025, Hivemind Marketing had 2 clients and a few consulting gigs. At the same time this year, we are at 8 clients with expanded SOW, 2 new incoming, and several consulting partners.

Our clients are:

1. Walking into events and getting recognized for their content. 

2. They're having their own posts referred back to them mid-conversation. 

3. They're closing clients who came in already convinced.

For 3 days, Harry Phokou will be giving you an insight into how we've managed it all. Especially the content part, we believe there is a big gap to fill when it comes to sharing more stories, more wins, more insights on this platform.

If you or someone on your team wants to learn how we are helping our clients make the most of LinkedIn, join his free live event.

📅 March 6th, 7th & 8th
⏰ 5 PM CET
📍 Live on Zoom
🧑‍🎨 6 guest speakers
🔗 https://lnkd.in/evpgeQX5

Repost and help spread the word 🙏

I stopped writing value-add posts for my clients. Value-add content is almost always written for peers, not the people actually paying.

Adding value isn't bad. Big disclaimer lol

But often, the people you are targeting either already know it or are not the ones executing on it.

I had a conversation this week about a client in the event industry. The first instinct was to pack the posts with value - How to do venue selection, coordinating logistics, managing budgets, etc. 

Real, useful stuff. But the people reading those posts run events for a living. They've already dealt with venues that charge absurd amounts of fees and catering that costs more than the room. 

Writing a tutorial for them isn't valuable. It's noise. They are not starting an event business from scratch.

What actually gets a CEO/Exec to reach out is reading something and thinking:

- Wait, is he right about that?
- I've never heard it framed that way
- You articulated so well something I did not know how to put into words

Curiosity. Mild disagreement. Recognition of something they've felt but never said out loud.

So I shifted the question. 

Instead of "what can we teach the audience," it became "what would make someone in their world stop and feel something." 

That's a different brief. And it's produced a different kind of post.

The goal of executive content, imo, isn't always to be the most educational voice in the feed. It's to be the one that earns a second thought.

Three months into ghostwriting, I stopped building content plans around client personas and problem-solving topics. 

The logic made sense at the time. Upload the client's profile, find the problems their audience has, write posts about how to solve them. 

That's what you learn. Lead with the pain, deliver the solution. 

The issue is that most of our clients aren't in the business of teaching people how to do what they do. They're in the business of getting hired to do it themselves. Their audience isn't looking to execute, they're looking for someone they trust enough to hand it to.

The content that actually gets clients hired doesn't explain how to solve a problem. It says something their audience has felt but never put into words. An insight that makes someone stop and think "I've never heard it framed that way." 

That's what prompts a DM. Not a tutorial.

Once we understood that, the whole content process changed. We stopped looking for topics and started looking for the way our clients think.

I replaced a $100/month tool with one I built myself with Claude Code in about 3 days. It'll cost me under $5 to run.

I worked on a content system for a blog. Something that takes a topic and generates publish-ready articles optimized for both search and AI tools like ChatGPT. It handles the full pipeline: planning, generating, scoring the output, and publishing straight to Notion. 

I did it successfully with another tool last year, and it brought me a bunch of traffic and newsletter subscribers, but I didn't feel like paying the $100 monthly subscription. 

So I figured I'd just ask Claude...

Three days, I had something that did more than what I was paying for.

I'm sure there are gaps in it I haven't found yet. But it does make me wonder what other things I'm currently paying for that I can replace? 

Not saying I will. 

But it is nonetheless a fun thought process, as now, if I can explain it clearly, I can build it.

PS. I don't know if this will work. But I didn't know if it was going to work last year either. So if it doesnt I just spent some time. Claude gifted me $50 for Opus 4.6 and $5 for the API. So I'm still ahead on the saving money part.

The best content advice I give doesn't work on me.

I tell clients to build a story bank. Keep a running list. Mine your past, your decisions, your patterns. And it works - I've watched it work for people I coach and people I work with every day.

But sitting down to do that for myself, after a full day of delivery, is a different thing. My brain isn't there. I know the stories. But finding them on demand takes energy I usually don't have left.

So I stopped trying to mine stories reactively. 

Everything I know - the context, the examples, the patterns I've noticed - it all goes into a project. When I sit down to write, I just point at what's already there and can build from there.

It's made consistency feel like a different thing.

I realized why some of our clients' posts weren't landing correctly - they were talking about themselves instead of talking TO the reader. 

We were reviewing a post that had all the right information. But it just felt meh, very matter-of-fact. The whole post was "I did this, I learned that." 

Zero connection to what the reader was experiencing.

We rewrote it to address the reader. Instead of a "here's what happened to me," we changed it to "here's what you're probably going through."

Readers rarely care what happened to you. They care about their own problems and how you can solve them.

Now every post gets this test: 

Are we talking TO someone or about someone?

Most agency owners spend 90% of their time on content and 10% on their clients. Then wonder why clients leave after 3-4 months.

I've watched this play out enough times to know it's not a coincidence. Somewhere in the process, the client stops feeling like the priority.

The 10% looks like this in practice: bare minimum delivery, no check-ins, delegating the exact stuff clients hired you for. 

What people miss is that clients don't buy an agency. 

They buy the person whose name is on it. 

You don't have to be in every call. But you have to be present enough that they feel it. That's not a systems issue. That's a priorities issue.

The part that gets me is that most people think they're growing during this period. Sometimes they're not. They're replacing. Every new client covers someone who quietly left. At some point, the math stops working, and there's nowhere left to grow into.

Keeping a current client happy takes a fraction of what signing a new one costs. A check-in. Sitting in on a content call. Actually solving something when they bring it up. That's it.

Most agencies figure this out too late.

We spent 90 minutes extracting a founder's story. Then an hour realizing we hadn't actually written one.

We were reviewing a post a while ago, and it went through his life year by year. Dates, milestones, company names, funding rounds. 

All accurate. But completely boring...

There were no stakes. No problem that we were trying to solve. There was no journey. It was just facts. This happened, then this happened, and then this happened.  

It was basically a Wikipedia entry.

Here's what the draft said: "In 2003, my dad took out a $70,000 loan to fund my company."

Here's what it should have said: "In 2003, my parents put their house up as security. We went all in as a family."

Same fact. One reports it. The other makes you feel it.

Reporting answered: what happened?

Storytelling answered: what was at stake?

Reporting becomes the default because it's safe and fast. You're not inventing anything, you're just organizing what the client told you. But organized facts aren't stories. They're timelines.

The client's life has real stakes with real consequences and real moments where things could have gone wrong. Your job isn't to compress their career into bullet points; it's to find the part where the reader holds their breath.

That's the difference between a post someone skims and one they send to a friend.

The first few months I was ghostwriting, I was basically writing as myself with different topics.

I didn't notice it for a while. The posts were performing fine. Clients weren't complaining. But looking back at the drafts, everything had the same rhythm, the same sentence length, the same way of ending a thought. 

That was me, not them. 

I'd taken what they gave me and run it through my own filter so many times that nothing original was left.

The fix was just learning to be uncomfortable leaving sentences that felt slightly off to me but were exactly how the client spoke.

One of the easiest wins I've gotten from AI for content: a project that turns one winning post into 10 content angles. Here's what I mean:

I take a client's top posts from the last 9 months, sort by impressions, and drop them into a project I built. It identifies what type each post is, then generates follow-up questions covering angles we haven't touched yet.

The next time we have an interview, we explore those other angles.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝘁𝗼:

 1. Actionable 
 2. Emotional 
 3. Reflection  
 4. X vs Y 
 5. Contrarian
 6. Vulnerable
 7. Deep dive
 8. Educational
 9. Observational
10. Edutainment
11. Listicle

For example, if the post was 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 (a specific guide on how to do something), we can ask follow-up questions to make it a 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (lessons learned or mistakes made), or 𝗫 𝘃𝘀 𝗬 (we compare the first time they followed the guide vs what it looks like now).

A post that already performed proved the theme works with that audience. What we see now is how many ways we haven't told that story yet.

Most of the time, we're not running out of content. 

We're running out of angles on what already worked.

I spend more time on the hook than the entire post. If I nail it, the rest flows. If I don't, nothing else matters. Sometimes I realize it's already written.

After a post is done, I scan it again. 

I look for a line the client said, buried in the middle or at the end. It's usually the punchline, closing statement, or point of the post.

That's what I want to use as the hook, if possible.

Most people decide whether to keep reading in the first two lines. We used to save the strongest line for the end as a payoff for readers who finished the post. But if it's already specific, creates tension, and sounds like them, it does more work at the top.

We're now trying to lead with the point of the post. 

The hook needs to give people enough information to decide whether to keep reading. If they don't get that in the first two lines, nothing else matters.

We had this whole thing set up. Send the client a list of questions; they record voice notes on their own time, we get the material, and we write. It felt efficient and considerate of their schedule.

What we kept getting back was that because we were structuring the questions around specific posts we wanted to write, we were basically scripting their answers before they gave them. 

The content was basically written before they even answered.

We scrapped async entirely and moved to live interviews. No questions sent in advance. Just a call, us asking things we were genuinely curious about, and them just talking.

The difference was that in a real conversation, people stop performing. They stop trying to give the right answer and start just explaining what they think. They use their actual vocabulary. They go on tangents that end up being the best material. You can't manufacture that with a voice note prompt.

What we pull from those transcripts sounds like someone who just happened to sit down and write what they were thinking.

Now, by the time we open Notion, the hard part is already done.

taplio

The Battle

Justin Bateh, PhD

Frank Velasquez

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJustin Bateh, PhD's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFrank Velasquez's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Justin Bateh, PhD

Frank Velasquez

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Justin Bateh, PhD's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreFrank Velasquez's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJustin Bateh, PhD's LinkedIn Performance