Jesse Futia

Fin Ghost

Helping Real Estate Professionals build $1M brands on LinkedIn.

Co-Founder and Ghostwriter

Executive Equity Investing 

Helping busy professionals build generational wealth and retire comfortably through passively investing in real estate.

Chief Executive Officer

Wealth Science Podcast 

Interviewing the top real estate and financial experts in the World.

Host

Writer and Co-Founder @ CRE Digital | Copywriting & social media management for the world's most innovative real estate companies

Creating content on social media is digital leverage for real estate professionals. 

𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲. 

You now have two choices:

1. Create content

2. Be passed by those that do 

My story 👇

Broke college kid turned 7-figure real estate investor and writer. 

I help 7-figure real estate professionals grow their brands and drive qualified leads on LinkedIn. 

--

Hit the 🔔 and follow along each day for free tips.

Ready to grow your brand on LinkedIn to drive more qualified leads?

𝗛𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝘆 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝗲.

My last day in uniform was December 2025.

And I still don’t know how to put 9 years into a single post.

I joined the Army because of 9/11.

I’m born and raised in upstate New York, and I was a kid watching the world change in real time. 

I didn’t fully understand everything that day…

But I understood enough to know I wanted to serve.

Fast forward:
-> 50+ countries.
-> 9 years in uniform.
-> More early mornings than I can count.
-> More lessons than any classroom could ever teach.

I learned a lot in that time. A lot.

One of the biggest lessons:

Murphy’s Law is real.

Things will break. 
Plans will change. 
The unexpected shows up right on time.

And there are thousands of things in this world we can’t control.

But our preparation and our attitude are not two of them.

The reps. 
The discipline. 
The standard.

The ability to stay steady when everything gets chaotic.

People will ask what I’m doing next.
And yes—I’m excited about what’s ahead.

But I want to say this first:

The biggest blessing of my career isn’t a rank, a title, a deployment, or a bullet point on a résumé.

It’s getting to walk away with the respect and honor of the men and women I served with.

That’s the only “retirement package” that actually matters.

To every leader who bet on me.
To every soldier who carried the weight with me.
To every teammate who showed up when it was hard, and exhausting…

Thank you.

I’m proud of what we did.

And I’m even more proud of who I got to do it with.

I'll look for you on the next objective. 

---

I'm Jesse Futia - I help CRE professionals build digital brands online to drive more leads and revenue. Send me a DM to connect.

Co-Founder, CRE Digital | Capital Raising Engine for Commercial Real Estate Investors | $50M Raised with Digital Systems | DM me to learn more

Matthew McConaughey made $18,000,000 in a single year…

…and still chose the harder path.

Not because he needed more money.

Because he wanted more meaning.

At the peak of his rom-com run, Hollywood kept offering him the same role with a different script.

Same character.
Same story.
Same safe paycheck.

He could’ve stayed in that lane forever and nobody would’ve blamed him.
Instead, he said “no” — over and over — until the industry stopped calling.

He intentionally walked into a dry season.
Not because he was lost.

Because he was refusing to be used up.

And then the pivot happened.

The roles shifted.
The respect shifted.
The legacy shifted.

Here’s the part people miss:

That wasn’t luck.
That was identity.

He wasn’t chasing attention.
He was building alignment.

And I think that’s the real lesson for the rest of us:

If you keep saying yes to the version of you that pays well…

you eventually lose the version of you that’s meant to lead.

Sometimes the most profitable decision is the one that looks like a setback from the outside:
→ saying no to the “safe” path
→ taking the uncomfortable turn
→ betting on the work that actually feels like you

Because comfort doesn’t build legends.

Commitment does.

If you’re in a season where you’re being pulled to level up, but it’s scary…
Good.

That usually means you’re close.

What’s one “safe yes” you need to turn into a “hard no” this year?

The median American has just $8,000 in the bank.

Not $80,000.

Eight.

And this is why “the economy is fine” and “people are struggling” can both be true at the same time.

Because the average balance is way higher (it’s pulled up by high earners)… but the median is the reality for most households.

Now zoom out:

→ A meaningful chunk of Americans have zero emergency savings
→ Less than half can cover 3 months of expenses with savings
→ One surprise expense turns into credit cards missed payments

Here’s why I care about this as someone watching Commercial Real Estate:

When households are thin, rent collections become fragile.

Spending shifts fast. Tenants trade down. Delinquencies creep. Turnover rises.

So the CRE winners in 2026 won’t be the “sexiest” deals.

They’ll be the deals tied to durable demand:

→ workforce / attainable housing
→ necessity-based retail
→ medical / essential services
→ anything that people keep paying for even when life gets tight

If you’re underwriting deals right now, this is a reminder:

Don’t just underwrite the property.

Underwrite the consumer.

Curious what you’re seeing: are tenants getting tighter… or holding steady in your market?

$1,000,000,000,000 is sitting on the sidelines… 

watching Commercial Real Estate.

And most people are missing what that means.

The CRE narrative has been:

“Office is dead.”
“Rates killed deals.”
“Nothing pencils.”

Reality is more nuanced.

Here’s what I’m seeing heading into 2026:

1) CRE is splitting into winners and losers faster than ever
Not “CRE” vs “no CRE.”

It’s good deals vs bad sponsors + bad basis.

2) Capital is still available… but it’s pickier

The bar is higher:
→ cleaner rent rolls
→ real demand drivers
→ stronger operators
→ realistic exit assumptions

3) Distress isn’t everywhere — it’s concentrated

Some owners need liquidity.
Some need time.
Some need a partner.

That creates opportunity… if you can move fast and underwrite clean.

4) The “boring” stuff is winning

Every cycle rewards durability:
→ essential services
→ sticky tenants
→ functional layouts
→ demand you can actually explain in one sentence

The next 12–24 months will create more wealth in CRE than the last 3 years…

…but only for the people who stop chasing headlines and start tracking fundamentals.

If you’re in the trenches right now — what are you seeing?

Where do you think the best opportunities show up first in 2026?

You can work 70 hours a week…

And still fall behind someone who owns cash-flowing assets.

For years, I believed hustle was the answer:

→ Wake up earlier
→ Grind harder
→ Outwork everyone

But here’s the truth no one tells you:

Time-based income has a ceiling.
Asset-based income doesn’t.

I’ve shifted my entire focus from active hustle → to passive systems:

✅ Land that pays me every month through long-term leases
✅ Real estate that compounds in value while tenants pay down debt
✅ AI-driven outreach that brings in opportunities while I sleep

The goal isn’t to work harder.

It’s to build leverage.

Because if your income depends on you showing up every day…

You don’t own a business — you own a job.

Want real freedom?

Start buying back your time.

99% of entrepreneurs never make it past year 3.

Not because they aren’t smart.
But because they can’t take the silence.

→ The silence when no one clicks your offer. 
→ The silence when your big launch flops. 
→ The silence when you're building something great — and no one notices.

That silence? It kills more dreams than failure ever will.

Here’s the truth no one tells you: 

Your first 1,000 days are supposed to suck.

→ No revenue. 
→ No recognition. 
→ No validation.

Just relentless iteration. 
Just stubborn belief. Just proof of work stacking in silence.

Because real entrepreneurs don’t wait for signs they’re winning. 

They keep going until it’s undeniable.

The ones who break through? They all share this:

→ Proof of work. 
→ Clarity through consistency. 
→ A message that scales without them.

They build. They share. They outlast.

That’s how you go from overlooked to unavoidable.

Keep going.

Your breakthrough is waiting.

In 2026, AI will replace 80% of what most capital raisers do all day…

Not the relationship part.
The busywork part that kills momentum.

Most capital raising still looks like this:

-> A thousand tabs open.
-> A half-written follow-up email.
-> A spreadsheet nobody trusts.
-> A CRM that’s “mostly up to date.”

And a founder wondering why “warm” leads keep going cold.

That’s not a capital raising problem.
That’s a systems problem.

Here’s the shift happening right now:

The best operators are building AI-powered capital raising systems that run whether they’re “feeling motivated” or not.

Meaning:

AI becomes the machine.

You become the signal.

Here’s what that actually looks like in 2026:

→ Every inbound lead is instantly tagged, scored, and routed
→ Follow-ups go out based on behavior (opens, clicks, replies, site visits)
→ Investors automatically receive the right info at the right time (case studies, decks, webinars, FAQs)

→ Meetings are booked without you chasing anyone
→ Your pipeline stays clean without you touching it every day
→ Your updates get drafted for you, with your voice, from your deal data

And the biggest one:

You stop “raising capital.”
You start running an investor acquisition engine.

Because capital raising is not a personality contest.

It’s a throughput game.

The winners in 2026 won’t be the loudest on LinkedIn.

They’ll be the ones with:
→ the cleanest data
→ the fastest follow-up
→ the clearest narrative
→ and the strongest trust flywheel

AI doesn’t make you authentic.
It makes you consistent.

And consistency is what builds belief.

If you’re still doing capital raising manually in 2026…

you’re not behind on “tools.”

You’re behind on leverage.

What part of your capital raising process do you still do manually that you know should be automated?

$10M in CRE capital commitments came from just 16% of our investor database.

Most sponsors think more contacts = more capital.

Wrong.

The sponsors closing 8-figure raises aren't the ones with the biggest lists. 

They're the ones with the tightest systems.

After analyzing what actually moved investors from "interested" to "wired funds," here's what the data showed:

1. The drip campaign architecture

Your investors don't wake up ready to wire $100K. They need 7-12 touch points before they trust you with their money.

2. The CRM you actually use

I've seen sponsors with 500+ "investor relationships" in a spreadsheet they haven't opened in 6 months.

If you can't tell me which 20 investors to call for your next deal in under 60 seconds, your system is broken.

3. The content flywheel

-> One market update email becomes:
-> A LinkedIn post
-> A video for your investor portal
-> Content for 3 drip emails
-> Material for investor calls

Create once. Deploy everywhere.

The reality nobody talks about:

That 16% of their database? 

They received 3x more touchpoints than everyone else.

Not because we spammed them. Because we had a system that identified who was ready and kept them warm.

Trust compounds.
Systems compound. 
Relationships compound. 

Most sponsors are out here hunting. The best ones built farms.

What's your capital-raising system look like?

P.S. - If you're still manually tracking investor follow-ups in your notes app, we need to talk.

A kid starting college this month will spend $100,000+…

…training for a job that might not exist by the time they graduate.

That sounds dramatic.

But it’s already happening.

AI isn’t “coming.”
It’s here.

And it’s eating the middle of the workforce first:
→ entry-level analysts
→ basic marketing execution
→ customer support reps
→ paralegal/admin-heavy legal work
→ junior accountants/bookkeeping
→ simple coding / QA
→ recruiters doing manual sourcing

Not because those people aren’t smart.

Because those jobs are built on repeatable tasks.

And repeatable tasks get automated.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

College isn’t the problem.

Blindly picking a major without a leverage plan is.

If you’re 18 right now, the goal isn’t “get a degree.”
The goal is: build a stack that makes you hard to replace.

My simple rule for 2026:

Don’t become the person who does the task.
Become the person who owns the outcome.

That means:
→ learn how to use AI tools like a power user
→ build real-world proof (projects, offers, results)
→ practice communication + persuasion
→ learn basic business economics (how money moves)
→ get close to revenue (sales, partnerships, deal flow)
→ specialize in a domain AI can’t “understand” without you (industry context, relationships, judgment)

AI will replace skills.

It won’t replace agency.

It won’t replace a person who can:

see the problem → make a plan → execute → communicate → lead.

That’s the new degree.

What’s one job you think is getting automated faster than people realize?

23% of people quit their New Year’s goal this week.

And by the end of January, it’s closer to 48%.

So if you’re still in the fight right now…

You’re already ahead of most people.

Week 1 is where motivation dies.

Not because the goal was wrong.
Because the process wasn’t built.

Most people rely on a feeling.
Winners rely on a system.

A system looks like:

-> same time, same place, same trigger
-> smaller daily targets (so you can actually win)
-> a scoreboard (so progress is visible)
-> a reset plan for the days you fall off

Because falling off isn’t the problem.

Staying off is.

So yeah—congrats if you’re still here.

Now tighten the screws and stack another week.

Drop a comment with what you’re still committed to in 2026. I’ll reply to every one.

After driving over 100,000,000 impressions on LinkedIn 

Here's what every client wants to know:

Who you are.

Stop talking about returns.

I've watched 100s of sponsor pitches get ignored.

The ones that landed? 

They answered the questions LPs are actually asking:

"Can I trust you with my money for the next 5-7 years?"

Your 18% projected returns don't answer that.

Here's what does:

→ How you handled your worst deal 
→ Whether you return calls when things go sideways 
→ If you've ever taken less so your investors could take more 
→ What your previous investors say when you're not in the room

The best sponsors I know don't lead with their track record.

They lead with their values.

Because here's the truth most won't tell you:

LPs can find deals anywhere. 

They can find returns anywhere.

The sponsors crushing it right now are sharing:

-Stories about deals they walked away from 
-The mentor who shaped their investment philosophy 
-How they built their team and why culture matters 
-What they learned from their failures 

This isn't about being vulnerable for likes.
It's about being known.

What's the most important thing an LP should know about you that has nothing to do with your returns?

Helping Changemakers Build Wealth Like They Build Solutions: With Purpose | Ex-Apple Engineer

I'm the real estate sponsor who's actually built a building. A lot of them. 

So I don't outsource my due diligence. I am the due diligence.

For 20 years my engineering ensured buildings didn't fail, they thrived.

And 9 of those years I was Apple's most trusted building engineer leading the design of their global retail store portfolio. 300+ stores. 20+ countries. Award-winning buildings that millions of people visit daily. Before Apple, New York City skyscrapers and large scale renewable energy. In all, $10B+ in projects where failure wasn't an option.

Then I burned out building someone else's empire.

In 2023, I walked away from Apple stock options I could've retired on to build a future I controlled for people that trust me, not people who own me.

Type 1 diabetic for 30+ years. Father of 2 young kids. I know what it means when every day counts—and I build for people who want their time back—not another job disguised as passive income.

You won't hear me pitch forced appreciation through rent increases you can't control. That's not engineering. That's gambling.

I obsess over operations and building systems. That's where buildings make and lose money—and after 20 years of engineering for companies that refused to accept failure, I know where to look.

With global economic uncertainty, my thesis is double edged. I keep my capital close with private lending—short duration, high yield, high velocity. Capital ready to move for when the next downturn hits. Because cashflow pays the bills and capital is power.

But wealth isn't built short term. Real assets with long horizons should be the foundation you build to last generations. And resilience isn't "green," it's the only smart business that will protect your investment.

I invest for what matters: people. If you care about where your money goes and not just how much it makes then follow along.

Ready to build your real estate wealth? 
DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio together.

Weekly insights: dropsofchange.substack.com

Jon Weiskopf, P.E.

My dad died when I was 13.
I've counted time ever since.

He was 51.
Type 1 diabetic.
Same disease I've managed since age 11.

Watching him go taught me something
no business school ever could:

Time isn't renewable.

You don't get days back.
You don't get hours back.
You don't get moments with your kids back.

That's why I left Apple.

Not because the money was bad.
The money was great.
The stock options were life-changing.

But I was trading time for money.
And time was the thing I couldn't replace.

Now I build differently.

Private lending for cash flow—money that works without me.
Real assets for legacy—wealth that outlasts me.

Cashflow pays the bills.
Appreciation builds what I leave behind.

I need both.
Because I'm not just building a portfolio.
I'm building a life I actually get to live.

>> What would you build if you knew your time was limited?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

Build wealth before doubt builds nothing.

From the outside, Apple looks flawless.
Inside?

Apple wrestles with the same trade-offs every large operator does.

Reactive maintenance looks cheaper.
Until you measure the real cost.

Apple Retail had a policy to minimize capex.
Instead of proactively replacing HVAC systems,
The directive was to run equipment until failure.

That policy wasn’t driven by Facilities.
It was governed by Finance.

On a spreadsheet, it made sense.
Deferred spend looks like savings.

But here’s what never made the calculation:
The cost of avoidance.

When HVAC failed, stores closed.
Customer experience suffered.
Revenue disappeared — quietly and instantly.

Those costs never showed up in the capex model.

I see the exact same mistake in multifamily.

Owners say,
“I’ll just wait until it breaks.”

But when systems fail:
Maintenance tickets pile up.

Residents get frustrated.

Move-outs increase.

(And maintenance is the #1 reason residents leave.)

Yes, proactive upgrades cost money.
But reactive maintenance costs trust, stability, and NOI.

The real lesson:
If Finance optimizes in isolation, operations pay the price.

Great operators don’t just ask:
“What does this cost today?”

They ask:
“What does avoiding this cost us tomorrow?”

Because in real estate —
The most expensive problems are the ones you pretend don’t exist.

>> Are you modeling maintenance as an expense… or as a risk multiplier?

========
I’m Jon — Engineering passive income for you like I engineered Apple’s global retail store portfolio.

Find my Featured section to connect.

Short-duration debt + GP shares = aligned incentives.


We closed a loan and a multifamily acquisition at the same time.

That’s not an accident.
That’s structure.

The deal was a 152-unit Class C property in Kansas City — one of my favorite markets.
Off-market.
Strong value-add.
Targeting a ~40% valuation lift after capex.
Projected 10% cash-on-cash with a 3-year hold.

Here’s how we structured it:

We provided an EMD loan to an up-and-coming operator.
Short duration.
Clear execution plan.
And because alignment matters, we didn’t stop at the loan.

We received GP shares in the deal.

Why?
Because when capital participates on both sides of the stack, incentives change.

To further de-risk the loan, we also helped raise equity —
giving our investors exposure to both:
The acquisition upside, and
The ownership economics.

The results:
- Loan duration: 2.5 months
- Loan return: ~30% ARR
- Equity position: long-term upside through ownership

That’s how we support emerging operators and protect investor capital.

We don’t just wire money.
We help close deals.
We help structure wins.

Because the best capital isn’t passive.
It’s partnered.

>>> Are your investments structured for alignment — or just yield?

========
I’m Jon — Engineering passive income for you like I engineered Apple’s global retail store portfolio.

Find my Featured section to connect.

Apple demanded details no one sees.
That obsession stayed.

In Cupertino,
we would debate the radius of a corner.
The exact hue of an employee t-shirt.
The gap between wall panels measured in millimeters (3mm to be exact)

Details that 99% of customers never notice.

But Apple believed something:

Excellence isn't what people see.
It's about what you know is there.

That obsession 

Cost time.
It cost money.
It frustrated vendors who wanted "good enough."

But it built something:

Stores that feel different—
even if you can't explain why.

I brought that to real estate.

I notice the deferred caulking around windows.
The drainage slope that's 1% instead of 2%.
The HVAC duct that's undersized.

Details most sponsors never see.
Details that become expensive problems later.

Is it worth it?

Only if you believe the details compound.
I do.

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the building—down to the millimeter.

>> What details are hiding in your investments?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

Two loans funded and returned in under 2 weeks each.
Velocity by design.

When we launched the private debt fund,
I had one question:

How fast can capital cycle
Without sacrificing discipline?

The answer came quickly.

Loan 2: Closed in 2 days.
Loan 3: Closed in 13 days.

Not because we rushed.
Because we systematized.

Here's what made it possible:

→ Pre-defined underwriting criteria
→ Legal docs templated and ready
→ Borrower requirements non-negotiable
→ Decision authority clear

Most funds take 30-60 days to close.
We take 7-14.

That's not recklessness.
That's engineering applied to capital deployment.

Every day a loan sits in underwriting,
returns erode.
Every week of delay,
velocity dies.

Cashflow buys time.
Velocity multiplies it.

4 loans initiated in 60 days.
2 already repaid and recycled.

The system works.

>> How much return are you losing to slow deployment?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

My average loan lasts 4.3 months.
The average RE deal lasts 5 years. Which do you prefer?

Most investors still think wealth is built in years, not quarters.

That belief comes from traditional real estate thinking.
Buy.
Hold.
Wait.

Private credit works on a different clock.

Short duration reduces exposure.
Faster repayment increases control.
Capital velocity quietly compounds.

When capital returns in months instead of years, risk becomes measurable instead of theoretical.

You don’t need to predict markets.
You need to manage timelines.

This is why we obsess over structure.
Clear exits.
Defined milestones.
Borrowers with something to lose.

Quarterly cycles don’t feel exciting.
But they outperform quietly.

>>> Is your capital waiting—or working right now?

========
I’m Jon — Engineering passive income for you like I engineered Apple’s global retail store portfolio.

Find my Featured section to connect.

Recession fears are rising.
Is your portfolio stress-tested?

Headlines are getting louder:
"Economic uncertainty ahead."
"Prepare for downturn."
"Markets brace for impact."

Most investors read these headlines
and freeze.

Analysis paralysis sets in.
Capital sits on the sidelines.
Opportunities pass.

I take a different approach.

I stress-test.

→ What happens if vacancy hits 15%?
→ What happens if rates stay elevated?
→ What happens if rent growth goes flat?
→ Can this building survive 24 months of pressure?

If the answer is no,
I don't invest.

If the answer is yes,
I move—while others wait.

Recessions expose weakness.
They don't create it.

The weakness was always there.
Hidden by strong markets.
Masked by easy money.

Resilience isn't green.
It's risk management.

And risk management starts before you write the check—
not after the downturn hits.

>> Have you stress-tested your portfolio for what's coming?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

Zero investor losses on private loans.
Engineering, not luck.

14 loans.
$3.1M deployed.
0 losses.

Some people would call that lucky.

I call it engineered.

Here's what we do that most lenders don't:

→ LTV caps at 65-70% (room for error)
→ Borrower exit strategy verified (not assumed)
→ Collateral personally inspected (not outsourced)
→ Loan duration kept short (reduced exposure)

Luck is hoping the deal works.
Engineering is structuring so it doesn't have to be perfect.

Every loan assumes something will go wrong.
Then we build protection for it.

The borrower struggles? Collateral covers us.
The market softens? Short duration limits exposure.
The property has issues? We found them before funding.

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the downside.

Because zero losses isn't about avoiding risk.
It's about pricing it correctly.

>> Is your portfolio built on luck—or on engineering?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

3 loans in 60 days.
2 closed. $0 losses.

Here’s how…

That's not luck.
That's velocity by design.

Most private lenders take 30, 60 even 90 days to close a loan.
They screen for months.
Deploy for years.

We engineered a different system.

→ Strict underwriting criteria (before we ever see a deal)
→ Collateral requirements that protect downside

→ 48-hour decision timeline

The result?

Capital that moves.
Risk that's contained.

Returns that compound.

3 loans in our first 60 days of Our Debt Fund operating.
Not because we lowered standards.
Because we systematized them.

When your criteria are clear,
decisions get fast.
When decisions are fast,
capital works harder.

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the building—and the borrower's exit.

That's why we can move quickly
without moving recklessly.

>> Are your returns built on hope—or on engineered velocity?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

20 countries. 20 ways to build.
Same physics.

Tokyo contractors frame differently than London crews.
Dubai specifications look nothing like São Paulo standards.
Every culture has its own construction DNA.

But here's what I learned in 9 years engineering Apple's global retail:

The building doesn't care about culture.
It cares about water management.
It cares about thermal movement.
It cares about load paths.

Physics is the great equalizer.

I've watched brilliant teams in Munich, Chongqing, and Kyoto
solve the same problems
with completely different approaches.

Both worked.
Because both respected the fundamentals.

That's what I bring to real estate investing now.

Not opinions about markets.
Not theories about appreciation.

Just 20 years of understanding
what makes buildings stand—
and what makes them fail.

Different markets. Different deals.
Same engineering discipline.

>> What would change if you could see what the building sees?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

The dollar is weakening. Beware.
But land doesn't disappear.

Stock prices swing.

Currency fluctuates.
Bond yields shift with every Fed meeting.

But the units in my portfolio?
Still standing.
Still housing residents.
Still generating rent.

Real assets have a quality
that paper assets don't:

They exist.

When inflation erodes purchasing power,
real estate adjusts.
Rents move with the market.
Replacement costs rise.
The asset becomes worth more in nominal terms.

That's not speculation.
That's physics meeting economics.

I'm not predicting a recession.
I'm not betting on dollar collapse.

I'm positioning for resilience.

Private lending for short-term velocity.
Real assets for long-term wealth preservation.

Because when uncertainty rises,
I want to own things—
not promises about things.

Resilience isn't green.
It's risk management.

>> If the dollar drops 20% tomorrow, what happens to your portfolio?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

An investor asked why no promises.
I showed track record.

"What returns can you guarantee?"

I get this question a lot.
And I understand why.

People want certainty.
They want someone to tell them it's going to be okay.
They want promises.

I don't make promises.
I show data.

→ 11 private loans
→ $2.3M deployed
→ 0 losses
→ 50.3% average annualized return

That's not a guarantee.
That's a track record.

Guarantees are marketing.
Track records are evidence.

Any sponsor can promise you 15% returns.
Few can show you 15 deals with 0 losses.

I'd rather under-promise and over-deliver
than make commitments I can't control.

Because real estate has variables.
Markets shift.
Tenants leave.
Things break.

What I can control:
→ How I underwrite
→ How I manage risk
→ How I communicate

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the building—and my own track record.

>> Would you rather have promises or proof?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

We initiated 4 loans before most funds close one.


Traditional private lending works like this:

→ Source a deal (2-4 weeks)
→ Underwrite (4-6 weeks)
→ Legal review (1-2 weeks)
→ Close (1 week)

8-10 weeks for a single loan.
Then start over.

We built a different system:

→ Pre-qualified borrower network
→ Standardized underwriting criteria
→ Templated legal documents
→ 48-hour decision authority

The result?

4 loans initiated in 60 days.
While other funds were still closing their first.

This isn't about cutting corners.
It's about eliminating friction.

Every day of delay is return erosion.
Every week of process is velocity lost.

Cashflow buys time.
Velocity multiplies it.

When capital moves faster,
it works harder.
When it works harder,
returns compound.

Most investors are patient.
I'm impatient—by design.

>> How fast does your capital actually move?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

The horror of underestimated rehab costs…


Early in my days,
I budgeted my house rehab based on the contractor's estimate.

$157,000 rehab budget.
Seemed reasonable.
Numbers worked.

90 days in, we were at $196,000.
And not done.

Final cost: $213,000.

36% over budget.
Stress, anger.
Lesson learned.

Here's what I missed:

→ I underestimated hidden conditions
→ I assumed the contractor's timeline was realistic

Now every deal includes:

→ 20% contingency minimum
→ Timeline buffers that seem crazy

Mistakes are tuition.
But only if you change the system.

That deal taught me more about risk
than any spreadsheet ever could.

Because risk isn't in the numbers.
It's in the assumptions behind them.

>> What's the most expensive lesson you've learned in real estate?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

I don't buy inspection reports. 
I write them.

Most investors get a 40-page inspection report.
Skim the summary.
Check the "major concerns" section.
Move on.

They miss everything that matters.

Because inspection reports are written for liability—
not for investment decisions.

Here's what I do differently:

I walk the roof myself.
I check the HVAC units myself.
I look for water staining patterns myself.
I calculate remaining useful life myself.

Not because I don't trust inspectors.
Because I know what they're trained to see—
and what they're not.

20 years of engineering taught me:

The building speaks.
Most people just don't know the language.

A hairline crack in a foundation wall?
Could be settlement (normal).
Could be structural movement (expensive).

The difference is in the pattern.
And patterns take experience to read.

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the building.

>> Who's reading the buildings in your portfolio?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

Recessions expose deferred maintenance.
Here's how to spot it.

When markets are strong,
buildings hide their problems.

High occupancy masks deferred repairs.
Strong rent rolls cover up capital needs.
Cash flow papers over cracks—literally.

Then the downturn hits.

Suddenly that "stable" asset
Needs a new roof you didn't budget for.

The HVAC that was "fine" fails in July.
The foundation issue becomes a foundation crisis.

Here's what I look for before I invest $1:

→ Roof age and condition (the actual membrane)
→ Water intrusion patterns (staining tells stories)
→ Repeated repairs to the same unit (can kicked down the road)

→ HVAC remaining useful life (and replacement cost at today's prices)

Most investors read the pro forma.
I read the building.

Because the building tells you
what the spreadsheet is hiding.

20 years of engineering taught me:
Deferred maintenance doesn't disappear.
It compounds.

And recessions collect the bill.

>> Before your next investment, ask: What is this building hiding?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

Before I invest $1, I walk the roof.
Not everyone does.

Here's what most investors do:

Read the inspection report.
Check the "roof" section.
See "5-7 years remaining useful life."
Move on.

Here's what I do:

I go up there.

And I look for what the report doesn't say:

→ Ponding water patterns (drainage issues)
→ Soft spots reveal water beneath (future leak sources)
→ Flashing details at walls and curbs (water entry points)
→ HVAC unit placement and condition (roof loading and leaks)

→ Thermal imaging camera shows the hidden water damage below.

A roof replacement is $8-15/sq ft.
On a 50,000 sq ft building, that's $400,000-$750,000.

One missed assessment.
Returns destroyed.

20 years of engineering taught me:

The roof is the building's first defense.
And it's the first thing most investors ignore.

Most investors underwrite the spreadsheet.
I underwrite the building—starting from the top.

>> When's the last time you actually walked a roof before investing?

========
I'm Jon — Engineer. Builder. Now investor. I know where risk hides.

DM me "BUILD" and let's engineer your real estate portfolio.

taplio

The Battle

Jesse Futia

Jon Weiskopf, P.E.

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJesse Futia's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJon Weiskopf, P.E.'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Jesse Futia

Jon Weiskopf, P.E.

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Jesse Futia's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJon Weiskopf, P.E.'s LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJesse Futia's LinkedIn Performance