Follow for insights on personal growth • Thomson Reuters ranked Super Lawyer 2012-2024 (top 5% in Southern California) • Click the link below and join my newsletter

I'm Jim, and I'm a lawyer.

But I don't write about legal topics.

I write about leadership and personal growth.

Why learn from me?

I bring an expertise you won’t find anywhere else online.

Besides leading teams in multiple law firms for years...

And starting two law practices from scratch...

In 2017 I branched out … I co-founded a telehealth website where we helped people overcome excess drinking through medication-assisted treatment and personal development coaching.

What’s the link to lawyering?

As a lawyer, I defend against injury cases that require a deep understanding of medicine and psychology. 

I’ve deposed over 300 doctors and mental health providers, diving into medical and psychological concepts at their level.

I transferred that skill set, along with years of solving problems for clients, into the wellness and personal growth space.

I applied my analytical skills, the same I use to dissect real-world, complex legal cases, to pick apart the science behind personal development.

I crafted not just medical solutions (through the doctors we contracted with) but also systemized, actionable, personal growth training for our patients.

And we didn’t just aim to restore patients to an average level of health...

We transformed their lives through growth-focused skills ⚡

Here are a few testimonials we received from patients that went through our program:

✅ “This program didn’t just change my habits - it gave me the confidence and clarity to control my life in ways I never thought possible."

✅ “Your support and coaching is invaluable. I’m so lucky to have you and Alcure. It has helped immensely.”

✅ “I especially wanted you to know that your videos alone were worth the first month. You do great work!”

✅ "Loved your videos on Life Hacks, Minimalism, and Gratitude.”

✅ “My future looks so much brighter! Thank you. I was skeptical, but now I’m proof that this approach works. I can’t wait to see where I go from here.”

After helping 400+ people (many during the pandemic) and generating over $500,000 in revenue, we wrapped up the project in 2023.

Now I’m onto new ventures.

Some more about me:

✅ Made over $500,000 in revenue with a telehealth website while maintaining a full-time law practice

✅ Thomson Reuters ranked Super Lawyer (2012-2025), top 5% in Southern California

✅ Invited speaker

⭐ Follow me and tap the 🔔 for my daily posts on clarity, growth and leadership 🔥

👁️ For deeper insights, sign up for my weekly newsletter, essential frameworks, below ⤵

Learn to lead yourself.
Learn to lead others.

James Kamanski

Don’t judge someone’s future by their current circumstances.

It’s an easy mistake to make.

From the outside, it can look like nothing is moving.

+ A quiet season.
+ A role that doesn’t reflect potential.
+ Progress that isn’t visible yet.

But time tells a different story.

Pressure doesn’t erase value.
It refines it.

What becomes impressive rarely starts that way.

Real growth happens quietly, through:
+ consistency, patience, and staying committed 

Many of the strongest leaders were underestimated early on.

- Diamonds don’t reveal themselves at the beginning.
- Pressure without patience breaks people.
- Pressure with time creates mastery.

So pause before judging someone’s path.

What looks like coal today may be brilliance in progress.

And if this season feels heavy, don’t quit.

Time is still working.

Credits: Nick Lalonde

Repost now with others
Follow James Kamanski for more

Helping professionals master clarity, growth and leadership • Created a research-backed personal development course that helped 400+ people transform their health, wealth and relationships • Follow me for daily insights

You can fit in everywhere and still feel wrong inside.

Because fitting in and belonging are two very different things.

Fitting in is external.

- It’s learning the rules.
- Matching the tone.
- Adjusting yourself to be accepted.

Belonging is internal.

+ It’s alignment.
+ It’s ease.
+ It’s not having to edit who you are to stay.

Here’s how to tell the difference ↓

→ Fitting in feels performative
→ Belonging feels natural

→ Fitting in requires constant effort
→ Belonging creates steadiness

→ Fitting in asks you to mute parts of yourself
→ Belonging welcomes your full voice

If you leave rooms feeling drained, cautious, or smaller than you arrived,
pay attention.

That discomfort is feedback.

Not every place you fit is a place you should stay.
The right environment doesn’t just include you.
It supports who you are becoming.

Repost now with others
Follow James Kamanski for more

You can earn more money.
But you can’t earn more time.

Time is the only currency with no balance check and no refunds.

Once it’s spent - it’s gone.

So spend it like it matters:
→ On people who uplift you
→ On work that energizes you
→ On goals that actually excite you

Don’t waste it proving your worth.
Or chasing things you don’t even want.

Time doesn’t pause.
Use it on purpose.

♻️ Repost this to remind someone that their time is valuable.
Follow James Kamanski for more content like this.

Why do talented people stay?
It’s rarely just the salary.
Yes, pay matters.

But the best people don’t stay where they feel invisible.

They stay where they feel valued and where they keep growing.

Here’s what keeps strong performers from leaving:

1/ Fair compensation
They’re paid well enough to focus on the work, not the gap.

2/ Recognition
A simple “thank you” from leadership goes further than many realize.

3/ Their ideas are heard
They’re not just employees. They’re contributors.

4/ Growth inside the company
New roles and challenges appear without needing to leave.

5/ A voice in decisions
They help shape the direction, not just execute it.

6/ Mentorship and learning
Someone invests in their development.

7/ Work that stretches them
Not overwhelming. But never stagnant.

Talented people don’t just look for jobs.

They look for environments where their effort actually matters.

And when they find one, they stay.

Repost now with others.
Follow James Kamanski for more

Overthinking is the art of creating problems that weren’t even there.

It doesn’t protect you.
It paralyzes you.

Here’s how to stop overthinking and start moving 👇

1/ Decide faster
Perfection is an illusion.
A good decision today beats a perfect one next month.

2/ Take smaller steps
Big leaps feel risky.
Break them into tiny, low-risk actions.

3/ Focus on what you can control
Most of what you worry about never happens.
Act where you have power.

4/ Limit the loop
Set a timer for decisions.
When time’s up, commit and move forward.

5/ Trust yourself
You’ve solved problems before.
You’ll solve the next ones too.

Because here’s the truth:
Overthinking won’t give you clarity.
Action will.

♻ Repost to help others
Follow James Kamanski for more

I Help Corporate Professionals Gain Career Clarity & Fulfillment | Founder @Amplify Your Home | Global AI Tax Copilot Strategist @EY

Don't be fooled by my appearance. Quiet, Asian, tiny girl.

In the last decade, I've...

Successfully navigated the corporate giants: Goldman Sachs, PwC, Deloitte and EY.

Built communities, tax and financial models, and automations. (Excel wizard here)

Empowered employees to own their damn careers,

Challenge their norms to do something special.

That's when Problems become Opportunities,

Strategies into Actions.

You are not Alone.

Ready to redefine your career? Let's make it happen.

Mary Fung

Something quiet is happening inside Big 4 consulting.

They’re not just “adding AI.”
They’re changing who they hire, who they promote, and who they quietly stop needing.

For decades, consulting ran on leverage:
armies of smart doers grinding slides, models, and research.

AI just ate that layer.

Now firms want fewer doers
and more people who can:
• frame the problem
• judge tradeoffs
• tell the story
• own the recommendation

Which sounds empowering… until you realize what it means.

If your value was execution,
AI just made you optional.

If your value is judgment, synthesis, and client trust,
you just became more valuable than ever.

That’s the uncomfortable shift most consultants haven’t internalized yet.

The firms will adapt. They always do.
The question is whether the people inside them will.

AI isn’t coming for “jobs.”
It’s coming for roles built on repetition and polish.

And the people who don’t move up the value chain
won’t get a second warning.

This isn’t a future-of-work thought experiment.
It’s already showing up in who gets staffed — and who doesn’t.

Own Your Damn Career | Founder @Amplify Your Home | Head of Synthetic Data & Simulations @EY

The 'AI wrapper' startups are dying. The market is finally figuring it out.

In 2023-2024, you could raise millions by putting a nice UI on top of GPT-4 and calling it a product. Those days are over.

OpenAI keeps shipping features that kill wrapper startups overnight.

Custom GPTs? Dead.

ChatGPT plugins? Dead.

The integrations announced last week? Another wave of startups just became features.

The surviving AI companies all have something the wrappers didn't:
- Proprietary data moats
- Deep workflow integration
- Vertical-specific fine-tuning
- Or actual ML teams building differentiated models

'We make ChatGPT easier to use' was never a defensible business. It just took 2 years for the market to figure that out.

RIP to the AI wrappers. 2023-2025. You will not be missed.

TCS just paid $700M for Coastal Cloud, a Salesforce consultancy. Becoming a top-5 Salesforce partner globally.

Why should you care about a consulting M&A deal?

Because it signals where the big players think enterprise AI is actually going.

TCS COO said the quiet part out loud: 'advancing our AI-led transformation agenda' through Salesforce expertise.

Not building custom AI. Not launching a foundation model. Embedding AI into the platforms enterprises already use.

This is the enterprise AI playbook that actually works:

1. Meet customers where they are (existing platforms like Salesforce)
2. Integrate AI into workflows that already exist
3. Don't ask enterprises to rip and replace - enhance what they have

The AI startups trying to replace Salesforce should be nervous. The big consultancies are betting that AI's value comes from integration, not disruption.

$700M is a lot of conviction in that thesis.

The consultant's dilemma: build vs. advise.

I've been on both sides.

As an advisor:
• You recommend the best solution
• The client nods enthusiastically
• You leave with a fat invoice
• The recommendation dies in a drawer
• You're hired again next year to 'refresh the strategy'

As a builder:
• You recommend the best solution
• Then you have to make it work
• Every shortcut comes back to haunt you
• Success is measured in production, not slides
• If it fails, you own it

The industry has an advice surplus and an execution deficit.

Every company has a strategy deck. Very few have working AI in production.

The consultants who win long-term are the ones who cross the line. Who stay for implementation. Who put their name on outcomes, not just recommendations.

'We advised them' is worthless if nothing shipped.

The market is figuring this out. Clients are tired of paying for slides. They want results. The firms that adapt will thrive. The ones that don't will wonder why revenue is flat.

My advice to consultants: learn to build. Not just 'understand' technology. Actually build things. Your credibility depends on it.

People ask why I’m okay sharing my “secrets.”

Why I teach everything I know.
Give away resources.
Tools.
Playbooks.

Because you can copy the output but
you can’t copy the process.

You won’t have my judgment.
My taste.
My reps.
My scars.

If sharing makes you afraid,
you were never the edge.

What Big 4 AI people know that tech companies desperately need.

I've worked with both worlds. Here's what Big 4 people have that tech often lacks:

1. Governance fluency. We know how to get AI approved, not just built. Tech companies build amazing products that die in procurement. We know the 47 stakeholders who can say no.

2. The 'no' navigation skill. Every enterprise has blockers. Legal. Compliance. Risk. Security. IT. We've learned to map them, sequence them, and neutralize them one by one.

3. Executive translation. We can explain transformer architecture to a CFO without their eyes glazing over. We speak business value, not technical capability.

4. Scope discipline. Tech wants to boil the ocean. We've learned that shipping a smaller thing that works beats a bigger thing that never launches.

5. Documentation-as-strategy. Tech sees docs as a chore. We see them as the approval pathway. Good documentation is how you scale without being in every room.

6. Political patience. Enterprise deals take 18 months. We know how to keep momentum through leadership changes, budget cycles, and priority shifts.

The best AI teams in 2026 won't be pure tech or pure consulting. They'll be hybrids who can build AND navigate.

Prompt engineering is just Googling with extra steps. It's not a career.

Hear me out. In 2024, we created job titles around 'prompt engineering' like it was some mystical new discipline.

Every time a new technology emerges, we create artificial scarcity around basic skills. Remember when 'social media manager' was exotic? Or when knowing HTML made you a 'webmaster'?

Prompt engineering is the same pattern. Within 2 years, it'll be assumed competency - like knowing how to use a search engine. The people building careers around it are standing on melting ice.

The real skill isn't writing prompts. It's knowing what problems to solve and having the domain expertise to evaluate the outputs. That's not prompt engineering. That's just being good at your actual job.

The “AI experiment” phase is over.

New data out of Wharton shows 75% of companies already see positive ROI from AI.

Less than 5% see negative returns.
Nearly half of business leaders use AI daily themselves.

That matches what we see on the ground.

This isn’t about prompts anymore.
It’s not “improve this email” or “summarize this doc.”

That was Phase 1.

Phase 2 has started and it’s bigger:
• “Solve this customer’s problem”
• “Handle this contract end-to-end”
• “Optimize CSAT”
• “Run this workflow”

AI is moving from accelerating steps to owning processes.

And that’s when productivity actually compounds.

The companies still stuck debating pilots and guardrails are about to feel very behind, not because AI is new, but because process always beats tools.

We’re just exiting the first act.
The second one is about systems, not shortcuts.

And once AI is embedded in how work flows - not how tasks are typed - there’s no going back.

What a time to be alive!

AI isn’t failing because it’s complicated.
It’s failing because no one owns it.

McKinsey’s data says it all -
most companies have no dedicated AI teams, no incentives, no feedback loops, no accountability.

Everyone wants the upside of AI.
No one wants to take responsibility when it breaks.

This is the corporate paradox:
You can’t automate what you refuse to own.

Until enterprises stop treating AI like an experiment and start treating it like infrastructure,
95% of “pilots” will keep dying in PowerPoint.

What Executives Get Wrong About GenAI:

> They think it's plug and play. 'Just add AI to our existing processes.' That's like adding a jet engine to a bicycle and wondering why it doesn't fly.

> They underestimate the data problem. Your AI is only as good as your data. And your data has been accumulated across 47 systems with no consistent formatting for 15 years.

> They expect immediate ROI. GenAI is infrastructure, not a feature. You don't ask 'what's the ROI on electricity?' You ask 'what can we build now that we have power?'

> They compare themselves to tech companies. Google has 10,000 ML engineers. You have Dave who took a Coursera course. Calibrate expectations accordingly.

> They skip the change management. The AI works. Your employees are terrified it will replace them. Guess which problem kills your project?

> They buy platforms before defining problems. 'We need an AI strategy' leads to expensive enterprise licenses collecting dust. Start with 'we waste 400 hours/month on X.'

Why does every job posting say 'AI experience required' now?

I've been watching job boards. Finance roles want 'AI skills.' Marketing wants 'AI experience.' HR wants 'familiarity with AI tools.' Even admin assistant postings are asking for it.

But 90% of these roles don't actually need AI skills. They need people who can think critically about when NOT to use AI.

What's actually happening:
- Recruiters are adding 'AI' because everyone else is
- Hiring managers don't know what AI skills actually means
- Companies want to signal they're 'modern'
- Nobody has defined what 'AI experience' looks like

My advice to job seekers: Don't panic. 'AI experience' usually means 'can use ChatGPT without supervision.' That bar is not high.

My advice to hiring managers: Stop adding buzzwords you can't evaluate. If you can't test for it in an interview, don't put it in the job posting.

I wish I could ask Copilot about a meeting I forgot to record.

Here's the trap:

> Option 1: 'Only during the meeting' - Copilot uses temporary speech-to-text. Meeting ends, data deleted. You can't ask questions later.

> Option 2: 'During and after' - Requires saving the full transcript. Now you have retention, compliance, and legal implications.

There's no middle ground.

Missed the meeting? Too bad. Forgot to enable transcription? Too bad. Your organization restricts transcript storage for compliance? Too bad.

What I wish existed:

> A 24-hour summary window. Copilot gives you the highlights, then the raw data is deleted.

> Personal-only transcripts that don't create discoverable records.

> Retroactive summary requests. 'I was in a meeting at 2pm, can you recap?' should work.

> Graceful degradation. If full transcript isn't allowed, at least give me action items.

The 'catch up on meetings I missed' use case - the one Microsoft demos constantly - only works if someone remembered to hit record.

That's not AI. That's a tape recorder with extra steps.

taplio

The Battle

James Kamanski

Mary Fung

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJames Kamanski's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMary Fung's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

James Kamanski

Mary Fung

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}James Kamanski's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMary Fung's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJames Kamanski's LinkedIn Performance