Quaker Wealth Management

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™

Wealth Mgt Mixtape Podcast

Host

WNC Capital Corp

Regional Vice President

LEAF Financial Corporation

Certified Financial Planner™ @ Quaker Wealth Management | Investment Strategies

As a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ at Quaker Wealth Management, I help clients achieve their financial goals and dreams through personalized and comprehensive financial planning and investment advisory services. I have more than 12 years of experience in the wealth management industry, working with individuals, families, and businesses across various stages of life and financial situations.

In addition to my role as a financial advisor, I am also the host of Wealth Mgt Mixtape Podcast, a platform where I share my insights, perspectives, and stories on topics related to investing, financial planning, and human behavior. I am passionate about educating and empowering people to make informed and confident financial decisions, and to enjoy the journey of wealth creation and management.

Jake Heisler, CFP®

Ritholtz Wealth Management

Chief Operating Officer

Data Scientist

Cornerstone Research

Senior Analytics Consultant

Analytics Consultant

Senior Analyst

Provide financial and economic analysis for commercial litigation matters.  Support experts in preparing for deposition and trial testimony.

Analyst

Federal Reserve Board (Banking Supervision and Regulation)

Risk Policy Intern

Stanford University

Research Assistant for Program on Energy and Sustainable Development

Acumen LLC

Quantitative Research Analyst Intern

Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR)

Research Assistant

Nick Maggiulli

I can't stand AI-assisted writing anymore. It’s all over Substack. It’s in my LinkedIn replies. It’s everywhere. Like a disease slowly infecting our literary consciousness.

My latest on the rise of AI writing and why cognition will always be an edge:

https://lnkd.in/esAjhX7q

NY Times Bestselling Author | COO at Ritholtz

My wife and I never fight about money. Why? Because of the system we use.

I call it the "Separate + Joint Method" and here's how it works:

All of our income flows into one joint account. All of our shared expenses come out of the same account. Any excess gets split equally into our separate accounts each quarter.

The key rule: Whatever one person withdraws from the joint account, the other can too. If I take $1,000 out to buy myself a nice guitar, my wife gets to withdraw $1,000 to spend as she sees fit as well.

This works regardless of who earns more and it provides financial independence to both parties. More importantly, if one partner steps back from paid work, they aren't financially punished for it.

I wrote more about it here: https://lnkd.in/ehBHncQW

Your career is an asset class.

If you work in tech, you shouldn't own a lot of tech stocks. If you're a real estate agent, you shouldn't invest in a bunch of rental properties. Why?

Because you are inadvertently doubling down on the same set of risk factors.

Most people think of their career and their portfolio as distinct buckets. Your career is your income and your portfolio is your wealth.

But they are deeply connected.

If you're an engineer at Google and tech sells off, you risk losing your job and the portion of your wealth linked to technology stocks. If you're a real estate agent and the housing market slows, you risk losing commissions and rental income.

I work at a wealth management firm whose revenue is directly tied to the stock market. Do you think my personal exposure to financial assets should be the same as someone working in fashion or retail? Should we both just buy the S&P 500 and call it a day?

I don't think so.

Your career is an asset class. Hedge it accordingly.

Lump sum investing beats dollar cost averaging 70%-80% of the time over the next year.

This was true across nearly every asset class. It was true in bear markets. It was true in bull markets. It was true whether you were near an all-time high or not.

Why is this the case? Because most assets tend to appreciate over time. Whether from inflation or real growth in value.

Bottom line: When it comes to investing, it usually pays NOT to wait.

I find it ironic that many of the people who advocate "retiring early" seem to work more than those with traditional jobs. 

Podcasts, blogs, consulting, speaking. Their plates are often fuller than many with a 9-5. I have nothing against this, but why call it early retirement then?

While you have retired from being a W2 employee, you haven't stopped working. You've just traded one type of work for another. That's not a problem, but call it what it is—career transition, becoming a freelancer, or running your own business.

I fully support this lifestyle, but it's not early retirement.

JSESSIONID

li_at

You can't budget your way to $10 million. You can't coupon your way to financial freedom.

There's a mathematical limit to how much you can cut your expenses (it approaches zero). Even the top 20% of earners have to spend something on their necessities (see chart).

But there's no limit to how much you can increase your income.

There's a reason why those with the highest incomes also have the highest savings rates—they have far more than they need.

Stop trying to reduce your budget by 10% and start trying to increase your income by 50%.

No alternative text description for this image

The ideal level of wealth (in the U.S.) is $2M-$5M.

Most people will say that the ideal level of wealth is "enough to live life on your own terms." But that advice is too vague to be useful.

So I ran the numbers on what a comfortable lifestyle costs and how much wealth you'd need to support it.

Turns out there are a few ways to get there. And some are much easier than others.

Find out more:

ofdollarsanddata.com

The Ideal Level of Wealth

There are two types of risk in life: Fast Risk and Slow Risk.

Fast Risk is the stuff that makes headlines. It’s the things that we are warned about everyday:

"Don’t drive without a seatbelt."
"Don’t cheat on your spouse."
"Don’t use too much leverage."

The reason for this is simple—the consequences of Fast Risk are immediate and usually devastating. You get severely injured. You get divorced. You go broke. There’s a clear line between how your life was before and after the risk materialized.

But then there’s Slow Risk. 

Slow Risk is the accumulation of bad decisions that eventually leads to an unwanted outcome:

It’s developing heart disease after decades of improper eating. 
It’s getting divorced after neglecting your spouse for years. 
It’s sitting in cash while you wait to buy the dip.

With slow risk, there’s no single event that you can point to and say, “Here’s where I went wrong.” No. It’s the cumulative effect of your improper decision-making that leads you astray.

Everyone thinks about Fast Risk, but intelligent investors focus on Slow Risk too.

Most wealthy people needed a little luck, not a lot, to succeed.

Their real skill wasn't having more good fortune, but not wasting any blessings life threw their way. After all, many people receive big career breaks, sizable inheritances, and windfalls from investments they barely understood. But what do they do next? 

Do they treat that newfound money as permission to spend more? Or do they see it as the foundation for something bigger? Do they take on more risk? Or do they protect what they've built?

The wealthy people who stay wealthy understand something that most others don't—you only need to get rich once. 

After that, the game changes from accumulation to preservation.

This is why lottery winners and professional athletes often go broke and why inheritance can disappear within a generation.

It's not that they didn't get lucky. They definitely did. But they didn't have the discipline to hold onto it.

Wealth can be built through luck, but it's kept through skill.

Return on Hassle > Return on Investment

Focus on maximizing sleep, not maximizing returns.

If you know, you know.

When was the last time you got called in the middle of the night about your index fund?

One of the biggest myths I hear in finance is that property investing gives ‘passive income’.

In reality, property/real estate is one of the least passive investments there is.

This graph from Nick Maggiulli illustrates it well.

Property can be a great investment - there are plenty of benefits that come with it.

But it’s not passive. 

You aren’t going to get a call in the middle of the night about your index fund.

You might get one about your rental property.

Make sure the extra return is worth the extra hassle.

The worst investments I've ever owned all share one thing in common—I couldn't sell them.

My latest on the high price of illiquidity and how I learned this lesson the hard way: https://lnkd.in/eai8tggt

I think I've found the mortgage-backed security (MBS) of our era. It's called conduit debt financing and it might be how the AI bubble eventually pops.

My latest on the obscure financial structure that could trigger the next crisis:

https://lnkd.in/epB_-n8Q

This is the nicest book I’ve ever owned. 

It’s the Pathless Path by Paul Millerd. Incredible book and an even better design. Very cool that he sent it to me. Feels like art.

taplio

The Battle

Jake Heisler, CFP®

Nick Maggiulli

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreNick Maggiulli's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Jake Heisler, CFP®

Nick Maggiulli

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Nick Maggiulli's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreNick Maggiulli's LinkedIn Performance