Jake Huber

Scaled 3 unicorns🦄 & teams from 0→250+ | 125+ founders read my newsletter to scale their teams smarter 📈🧠

At Uber, I scaled my team from 0→50 people <1yr.

Now I help Seed & Series A+ startup founders scale their teams. Here's how ↓

I learned how to scale teams the hard way.

At Uber, I grew our team from 0→50 in under a year. 

At Industrious, we launched 10 locations and I built a 30-person team. 

At Veho, we 4×’d headcount (70→285) and increased weekly inbound applicants +495% in 6 months. 

Those wins all had one thing in common: a great recruiter embedded with the team—and simple, repeatable systems.

Before that, my first startup failed. I didn’t know how to hire, train, or manage yet. If I could go back, I’d tell “Past Jake” to stop duct-taping recruiting and bring in real help—without signing up for agency commissions or a full-time hire too early.

That’s why I built Venture Scaler.

🚀 Venture Scaler = A Startup-Friendly Way to Hire

We place an expert, senior recruiter (ex-Uber/Dropbox/Spotify, etc.) directly on your team—fractionally. Hourly. Month-to-month. No commissions. No long-term contracts. We run the full search like your in-house recruiter so you can stay focused on building product and talking to customers.

How It Works (It’s simple on purpose):

1. Perfect-Fit Profile Guarantee: We align on 5–10 candidate profiles before outreach so we don’t waste cycles.

2. End-to-End Execution: Sourcing, screening, coordination, and candidate experience handled.

3. Tight Comms: Weekly check-ins + async updates so you always know pipeline, blockers, and next steps.

4. Flex Up/Down: Add hours when you’re sprinting; pause when you’re not hiring.

Why founders pick us:

4× Faster to Hire: UpSmith’s first sales hire closed in 5 weeks after a 5-month stall.

~90% Cost Savings vs Agencies: Honey Homes saved ~$230k in two months of hiring.

Scale at Speed: At Veho we 4×’d the team and built an engine for inbound talent.

If you’re Seed or Series A, need to make a few critical hires, and don’t want to overbuild headcount or pay 25% fees, this model was built for you.

💬 Hiring right now? DM me here or visit venturescaler.com. I’m happy to share my hiring playbooks (the same ones we used at Uber/Veho) or dig into your roles and recommend a plan.

Learn more: https://venturescaler.com

=====

P.S. Outside of work and scaling startups:
👯‍♀️ I’m a girl dad x2
🏕 A backpacker/camper
🎭 Trained at UCB in improv comedy
💍 Secretly proposed to my wife using Uber: https://youtu.be/uRi_B5CxWZ8

Startup Mentor

“Jake is an incredible sounding board that provides tactical tips, resources and introductions to help navigate crisis’ and challenges. He has an innate ability to level with you on any subject. During my three months with Jake I looked forward to every call as we hashed through 5-10 topics at a time spanning from affiliate & growth strategies to recruiting and mindset.”

~April Dominguez, CEO & Founder of Handsome

First Round Fast Track by First Round Capital matches seasoned startup leaders with early-stage founders and team members within a unique mentorship community. First Round Capital is a seed-stage venture capital firm focused on building a community of technology entrepreneurs and companies.

I wasted 3 weeks interviewing a candidate only to have them reject my offer over salary 🤦

And it wasn’t even a small amount. We were worlds apart.

I never made that mistake again.

Here's how you can avoid it:

Have the compensation conversation EARLY.

I'm talking first call with the recruiter or hiring manager. Get it out of the way upfront.

Why this works:

- Saves everyone's time if there's a huge mismatch
- Shows candidates you value transparency
- Allows you to gauge interest/excitement level
- Gives you time to get creative on comp if needed

My go-to script:

"I like to have an open conversation about compensation expectations early on. What I'd hate is to go through this whole process only to realize we're worlds apart on comp. So what are your expectations in terms of base salary?"

Then be prepared to share your budgeted range as well.

Pro tip: Frame it as "aligning expectations" rather than "negotiating." You're just making sure you're in the same ballpark.

What's your take - should comp be discussed early or saved for the offer stage?

Drop a comment with your view. Curious to hear different perspectives on this!

___

🤝 Need hiring help? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

Scaled teams from 0→250+ at 3 unicorns🦄 | Early Uber | Startup Founder & Operator

Recruiting agencies are bleeding startups dry.

Most charge 25% of first-year salary as commission.

Hire 4 people at $100K each? That’s $100K in fees.

Congrats—you just gave away Employee #5's salary to an agency.

Founders at Seed and Series A can’t afford that kind of burn. And you also don’t need a full-time recruiter yet.

That’s where a fractional recruiter comes in to save your runway.

Here’s why our model at 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 works better for early-stage teams:

1. A-player recruiters hire A-players
↳ Our team comes from Uber, Dropbox, Spotify. You’re not just renting offshore juniors, you’re renting experts with playbooks.

2. Keep your runway
↳ We helped our client (Honey Homes) hire 13 people in 2 months and saved them $230K vs agencies. That’s basically 2-3 hires “for free.”

3. Flex with your needs
↳ Ramp up during a hiring sprint, scale down when roles are filled. Our model is month-to-month and low risk.

4. Pay for time, not commissions
↳ Hourly recruiting means you only pay for the hours worked. No hidden fees.

Pro tip: Every dollar you don’t spend on recruiter commissions is a dollar you can reinvest into growth.

At your current stage, does paying 25% per hire actually make sense?

👉 DM me if you want to explore the “anti-agency” way of hiring.

“We kept losing our top candidates right before the finish line.”

That’s how a founder started our first call.

They were running a 6-round interview process.

Each candidate met seven different people across three weeks. By the end, the team was exhausted, and the best candidates had already accepted other offers.

Classic startup trap: thinking more interviews = better hiring decisions.

It’s actually the opposite.

Our fractional recruiter stepped in and ran a quick audit.

We realized every stage overlapped and half the interviews asked the same questions.

Here’s what we changed:

1. Consolidated six rounds into three, each with a clear focus area.

2. Built an interview scorecard so decisions were based on evidence, not “gut feel.”

3. Trained the team on closing tactics—how to sell the opportunity throughout the process, not just at the end.

The next three offers? All accepted.
Same team. Same talent market. Completely different results.

The founder told me afterward:

“I can’t believe we made hiring feel like a second full-time job—for the candidates.”

That’s the difference structure makes. A fractional recruiter turns chaos into momentum.

How long is your interview process right now?

DM me and I’ll tell you exactly where most startups lose candidates before they even realize it.

“Our People team is literally just me... and I’m drowning.”

That’s what a Series A Head of People told us on our intro call.

She was managing everything: recruiting, onboarding, payroll, benefits... everything.

Oh, and she still had five open roles to fill across engineering, ops, and GTM.

Her calendar looked like a Tetris game that never ended.

Every founder’s dream—“we’ll hire HR early”—had turned into one person juggling 12 jobs.

So we plugged in a fractional recruiter to take the hiring load off her plate.

Here’s what happened next:

Week 1: We built a sourcing plan for all five roles, complete with target company lists and outreach templates.

Week 2: We handled all outbound sourcing, first-round screens, and scheduling—freeing her to focus on onboarding and culture work.

Week 3: We delivered qualified candidate slates for every role and prepped hiring managers for final interviews.

By the end of the first month, two offers were out, one already accepted, and (most importantly) she finally got her calendar back.

When we wrapped, she told me:

“I finally got to do the strategic part of my job instead of living in my inbox.”

That’s the power of a fractional recruiting team—you don’t need to scale your HR headcount to scale your hiring.

If your People team is wearing every hat right now, you don’t need another HR generalist.

You need backup.

DM me and I’ll show you how we give teams like yours their time (and sanity) back in week one.

Recruiting agencies are terrible for startups.

🤩 What startups want:
→ Interviews with high-fit talent
→ Flexible month-to-month plans
→ Transparent, affordable pricing
→ Expert recruiters with startup exp.

😿 What startups get:
→ Most candidates are poor fit
→ Exclusivity, binding contracts
→ Expensive commissions per head
→ Offshore recruiters with low exp.

That's why we created Venture Scaler—the exact recruiting service that we, as founders, would actually want to work with.

Our recruiters worked at high-growth startups like Uber, Dropbox, Lime & Spotify

We've hired hundreds of people for dozens of clients.

Our recruiting team all has a median 7+ years of experience.

Whether you're hiring for the first time or trying to scale your team—we can help.
___

👉 Need help with hiring? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

graphical user interface, text, application, chat or text message

Is it just me, or does hiring feels like a second job when you already have a FT job, lol?

If you’re a department leader, you know the loop:

- You’re trying to hit goals.
- Unblock your team.
- Ship product.
- Close deals.

And now you’re also expected to be a recruiter, coordinator, and full time inbox monitor.

I’ve been there.

Earlier in my career, I owned hiring while running a team and it was exhausting.

Not because I didn’t care.

Because recruiting expands to fill every empty crack in your day.

Here’s what the “hiring manager black hole” looks like from the inside:

- You finally get a slate of candidates.
- Then your calendar explodes.
- You tell yourself you’ll send feedback tonight.
- Tonight turns into tomorrow.
- Tomorrow turns into “can we push to next week?”

Meanwhile the candidate thinks you’re not interested, or the company is disorganized.

...And they move on.

The painful part: you didn’t lose them because you’re a bad leader.

You lost them because nobody owned the process end to end.

A simple fix that respects your time:

1. Set a 24 hour feedback rule: Not because it’s fun, because it keeps momentum.

2. Batch interviews into 2-3 days a week, or a specific block each day: No constant context switching.

3. Schedule debriefs in advance and assign an owner: Decision time should not be a scavenger hunt.

4. Give one person full ownership of scheduling, follow ups, and pipeline hygiene: So you can focus on evaluating and closing.

This is exactly where a fractional recruiter helps.

At Venture Scaler, we run the machine so hiring managers can stay in their lane: leading their team and making great decisions, not chasing calendars.

If you’re a hiring manager, what part feels most like the second job: scheduling, feedback, or selling the role?

DM me if you want to take this recruiting work off your team's plate.

We helped Veho scale their team 4X from 70→285 people & increase their applicant pipeline by 500% in 6 months.

When we started working with Ita, they were already at 70 people and didn’t have any internal recruiters. Not even a HR/People Ops person.

(Honestly, they should have had one like 40 people ago)

We placed two of our expert recruiters to work with his team to hire across multiple depts including Ops, Eng & Product.

One of our recruiters worked directly with their Head of Driver team, and the other worked directly with their CTO.

It was like they were part of their team, acting like the in-house recruiters they needed so badly.

And the Veho team loved it.

This is the origin story of the “rent-a-recruiter” model we use today.

But the thing I’m most proud of is this:

We were able to help Veho “replace” us. 

We hired their VP of People Ops and multiple full-time internal recruiters.

I’m so proud that we got to be a small part of their growth story during those early years.

___

👉 Need help with hiring? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

Does your growing startup need a r̶e̶c̶r̶u̶i̶t̶e̶r̶ Erin?

The founders who work with us—they get it.

They get how we’re different and a better fit for them:

- Startup-friendly flexible terms
- Expert recruiters (like Erin)
- Zero commissions

Our client results speak for themselves:

- 6x more applicants
- 90% cost savings
- 4x faster hires

And not only that, they talk about us with their founder friends.

Fun fact: Marisa came from a referral from another one of our clients!

___

👉 Need help with hiring? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

graphical user interface, text, application

Have you felt this pain before? Needing somebody in the seat so badly, but not finding the right hire after months of searching.

Maybe you're in a similar situation as Wyatt?

He was getting good intros from his investors and network.

But Wyatt was still struggling to find the right person for his first sales hire.

He wasn’t getting the right fit.

And he had a small team without an internal recruiter to support him.

And that's where Venture Scaler came in...

We matched Wyatt up with an expert recruiter and got tight on exactly the right profile for the person he needed in the role.

We started scouting and outbound sourcing immediately (which they weren’t able to do much of before) and started setting up interviews within the week.

We helped Wyatt find his “dream hire” in less than 6 weeks.

👉 Struggling to find the right candidates? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

“I’m doing payroll at night... and recruiting during lunch.”

That’s what a Series A People lead told me on a call recently.

She was the People team of one.

Hiring. Onboarding. Benefits. Payroll changes. Manager questions. Policy stuff.
Plus six open roles that the business needed yesterday.

And the scary part wasn't the open reqs.

It was the slow creep toward burnout.

Because when your only People leader is spread that thin, two things happen:

1. Hiring becomes reactive.
2. And retention becomes an afterthought.

So we plugged in one of our fractional recruiters to take sourcing and screening completely off her plate.

Here’s what we did in the first two weeks:

1️⃣ Built role scorecards with each hiring manager so everyone agreed on the persona up front.

2️⃣ Created targeted sourcing lists per role, not “spray and pray.”

3️⃣ Ran all outbound outreach, first-round screens, and candidate comms.

4️⃣ Delivered weekly shortlists with clear signal, not resume piles.

Suddenly she wasn’t living in her inbox trying to keep candidates warm.

She was back doing the work that actually protects the company:
Onboarding, manager coaching, culture, and keeping great people from leaving.

Her message after Week 2:

“I forgot what it felt like to close my laptop at 5.”

That’s the point of fractional recruiting.

You don’t need to hire a full-time recruiter to get full-time recruiting coverage.
You just need the right support at the right moment.

If your People leader is drowning right now, what’s it costing you?

DM me and I’ll show you how we plug in fast without adding long-term headcount.

I've wasted $300k on bad hires. Here are 5 red flags I now look for:

1. Frequent job changes without growth 

Occasional moves are fine (esp with all the layoffs the last 2yrs), but a pattern of short stints is concerning. It often signals performance issues or missing quotas in sales roles.

2. Misalignment with company stage

Someone who's only worked at large enterprises may struggle in an early-stage startup environment. Look for relevant experience.

3. Lack of preparation

Did they research your company? Do they have thoughtful questions? Preparation shows genuine interest and initiative.

4. Rudeness or poor communication

How candidates treat everyone in the process, from recruiters to interviewers, is telling. Rudeness is a major red flag.

5. Misalignment with mission/values

Can they articulate why they want to join your company specifically? Passionate, aligned candidates will stand out.

What other red flags do you look for when hiring? Share your thoughts in the comments!

🤝 Need hiring help? DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

Forget signing bonuses - here's how we got 95% of candidates to say "Yes"

Simple: We celebrated the job offer (don't sleep on this).

It's the final push that cements a candidate's decision to join your startup.

3 ways to do it right:

1. Personal emails from the interview team

Have everyone who interviewed the candidate send a quick note saying how excited they are. Shows the candidate is already part of the team.

2. Virtual meet & greet

Set up a casual video call for the candidate to meet more of the team. Builds excitement and connection before day 1.

3. Personalized welcome package

Send company swag, a handwritten note, or small gift to their home. Makes them feel valued from the start.

The goal? Create so much excitement that backing out becomes unthinkable.

Remember: Your job isn't done when they accept the offer. Keep the momentum going until their first day.

What creative ways have you celebrated new hires? Share yours below!
___

👉 Need help with hiring? Let's chat! DM me or check out 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗥 in my bio to learn more.

Venture Studio Architect - I help you design, launch, and grow your company creation studio.

Most innovation programs fail not because of lack of ideas, but because they lack a system for venture creation.

I help innovation leaders in corporations, universities, and economic development organizations build venture studios that scale and deliver. Backed by data, frameworks, and insights from studying over 500 venture studios globally.

As Senior Director of Research & Data at the Venture Studio Forum, I'm building the empirical backbone of the venture studio asset class. VSF is a 501(c)(6) trade association representing 1,500+ members who have built 650+ companies, 11 unicorns, and $48 billion in enterprise value.

My work establishes venture studios as a formal asset class through:

-Asset Class Analysis in partnership with MIT and Harvard, delivering the first institutionally credible research for LPs and institutional investors
-The Venture Studio Index (VSI) — the first open standard and formal definition for venture studios
-Studio Data Platform (2026) providing structured datasets and benchmarks for researchers and operators
-State of the Studio Report (2026) tracking trends, performance, and sector segmentation
-Policy recommendations for state and federal innovation agencies

Concurrently, as Partner and Head of Insights at 9point8 Collective, I translate this research into practice. We've designed and launched 25+ venture studios. Our approach builds clarity, alignment, and momentum at the intersection of innovation, capital, and impact.

I've spent 20+ years at the intersection of innovation, strategy, and venture building. I launched NCR's first internal accelerator (generating $90M from its first cohort), secured 27+ patents across AI and fintech, and developed investment frameworks that institutional investors now use to allocate capital into the studio model.

Speaking & Workshops: I deliver keynotes and workshops on designing high-performing venture studios, the future of venture creation ecosystems, and turning knowledge engines into commercial engines.

🎤 Book me to speak: VentureStudioForum.org/speaking
 📊 Learn from our research: newsletter.venturestudioforum.org
 🌍 Join the community: venturestudioforum.org
 💼 Work with us: 9point8collective.com

Matthew Burris

Venture Studios have a 100x advantage over accelerators and venture funds.

Studios vs. accelerators vs. VC vs. incubators

One of the simplest ways to compare them? Hands-on support.

Venture capital: maybe 30 minutes per week.

Accelerators: 1–2 hours a week. Mostly group sessions and some limited 1:1.

Incubators: slightly less. Some education, co-working space, network access. But very little operational involvement.

Venture studio: 20 to 100+ hours a week of hands-on execution.
Real operators. Half a person to an entire team building the business with you.

The range of support isn't even close.

P.S. Follow for more venture studio insights

I help innovation leaders build venture studios | Senior Director, Research & Data @ Venture Studio Forum | Partner, Head of Insights @ 9point8 Collective | Keynote Speaker | Trusted by 500+ Studios

Model Comparison.pdf

Venture studios aren’t VC

So why should we try to fit them inside VC frameworks?

The carousel below explains why this is the case (and breaks down an alternative model for venture studios instead).

For more on studio structures, capital efficiency, and the case for new frameworks for venture studios… 

DM/Comment “VSF” to join the venture studio forum (a community for the venture studio ecosystem)

Venture Studios Aren’t  VC Funds.pdf

I've been quiet for about a month. Claude code got me. I had to stop talking and start building.

For the last several weeks, our team at 9point8 has gone deep into Claude Code. Not as a curiosity. Not as an experiment. As a serious exploration of what AI automation can do for venture studio research, operations, and ecosystem development.

I'll be honest. I came into this with a healthy skepticism. I've spent enough time in manufacturing, engineering, and with machine learning to know that most technology hype collapses the moment it meets operational reality. The antidote to hype is always the same: test the claim against what it actually costs, what it actually produces, and whether the economics survive contact with the real world.

So we tested it.

What we found changed how I think about what's possible for this industry. Not in the vague, hand-wavy "AI will change everything" sense. In the specific, measurable, "here is what it produced and here is what it cost" sense.

Over the coming weeks, I'm going to share what we've been building, what worked, what didn't, and what it means for venture studios, for the 9point8 Collective, for the Venture Studio Forum, and for anyone trying to make informed decisions in this space.

The fundamental challenge for venture studios has always been a data problem. The people making decisions about studios, whether they're operators, investors, universities, corporates, or economic development organizations, don't have the evidence base they need. The data is scattered, incomplete, and inconsistent. 

We think we've found a way to start fixing that. At a speed and cost that would have been inconceivable six months ago.

More soon.

What does claude code mean for venture studios?

Corporate Venture Studios are surprisingly common in major corporations. 

Around a third of corporations with Corporate Venture Capital also have a Venture Studio.

Both serve different purposes, and they're distinct operationally, strategically, and financially.

Corporate VC is about gaining strategic access to an external startup, one that the corporation might one day acquire, partner with, or monitor closely.

A Venture Studio works differently, Instead of buying in, you’re building from the ground up.

Usually in a category where the corporation already has deep industry knowledge.

Two powerful tools, but useful for very different parts of the corporate growth strategy.

For more in depth comparison, check the carousel below

P.S. Follow for more venture studio insights

CVS vs. CVC.pdf

6 Common venture studio design mistakes

1. Incorporating Fund Too Soon
2. Picking the Wrong Follow-on Capital
3. Picking the Wrong Founder Archetype
4. Raising Capital Too Early
5. Designing Something Too Fancy
6. Pitching the Model Instead of Yourself

For more in depth breakdown, check the carousel below

The more focused you are early, the better your odds.

P.S. Follow for more venture studio insights

6 Common Mistakes Venture Studios Make Too Early.pdf

I'll be moderating at the Virtual VC Conf on March 31. Topic: “The Cap Table Problem: Do Venture Studios Make Startups Uninvestable for VCs?”  Join me and register free here:  https://vcconf.com?32

9Point8 Collective's Matt Burris moderates a venture studio panel on the cap table problem

We're hosting a live Venture Studio 101 with open AMA.

If you've ever confused a studio with an accelerator, incubator, or VC fund — this is the session that fixes that.

I'm sitting down with JT Benton for the kickoff of the Venture Studio Forum's University Speaker Series to break down:

→ The formal definition of a venture studio and the three roles every studio must play 
→ How studios actually differ from accelerators, incubators, and funds 
→ Why definitional clarity is make-or-break for institutions evaluating or building studios 
→ What organizations get wrong when they try to adopt the model

45 minutes. Interview, open Q&A, real discussion. Come with questions.
📅 Thursday, March 19 · 12:00 PM ET 📍 Circle - Link in comments

Session 1 of 5, running monthly March through July.

taplio

The Battle

Jake Huber

Matthew Burris

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreJake Huber's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMatthew Burris's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Jake Huber

Matthew Burris

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Jake Huber's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreMatthew Burris's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreJake Huber's LinkedIn Performance