Bjoern W. Schaefer

De-risking GTM Acceleration 📈 - B2B SaaS only

Most B2B SaaS & AI startups don’t fail because of the product. They fail at the exact moment they try to scale sales beyond the founder.

After working with 150+ startups between €1–10M ARR, I see the same four expensive phases again and again:

1️⃣ Fake Sales Teams
2–3 sellers hired. Tools everywhere.
But the founder still closes most deals.
That’s not a sales team. That’s revenue theatre.

2️⃣ Symbolic Sales Leadership
Great CV. Weak impact.
6–12 months lost. High burn. Frustrated team.


3️⃣ Premature Scaling
15 deals. 15 use cases.
No clear GTM motion. No repeatable value creation.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

If revenue still needs heroics, it has no rhythm.

That’s why I built Revenue Rhythm by Funky Flywheels.

Not as a framework.
Not as a course.
But as an operating standard for founders who want:
- predictable pipeline
- clean execution
- real retention & expansion
- and a GTM engine that works without them 

No hype.
No slide decks.
No growth theatre.

Only what actually works in the DACH reality between €1–10M ARR.

🎙️ Host of The Funky Flywheels Show
🚀 Working with founders who want systems, not heroics

If you ever want to pressure-test your own growth honestly: DM me for your personal 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝗥𝗵𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗺 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰

Founder | Chief Revenue Officer (CRO)

Scaling your B2B revenue organization is tough. We have been there multiple times. The good news is that we know exactly what it takes to master your upcoming challenges on your journey between Sees and Series B. We are thrilled to support B2B startups and scaleups with a holistic view on performance.

Björn W. Schäfer

Diese Nachricht hat mir heute den Sonntagmorgen versaut.

Vertrieb hat im deutschsprachigen Raum noch immer einen schlechten Ruf. Nachrichten wie diese erklären, warum.

Es gibt zwei Schulen.

Die eine lebt von Druck und Provokation. Laute Selbstdarsteller, die teure Statussymbole pflegen. Die dir erklären, dass dein Vertrieb es „nicht hinkriegt" - bevor sie auch nur eine einzige Frage gestellt haben. 

Die andere Schule ist leiser. Sie stellt Fragen, bevor sie Antworten liefert. Sie versteht das Geschäft des Kunden, bevor sie über ihr eigenes spricht. Sie begegnet dir auf Augenhöhe - nicht, weil das netter klingt, sondern weil es langfristig schlicht besser funktioniert.

Welches gute Vertriebserlebnis hattest du zuletzt – als Käufer:in oder Verkäufer:in?

Scaling beyond Founder Sales - with confidence & in control | Author Funky Flywheels | Co-Founder FUNKY bont

Bereits 2015 habe ich eine Firma mit 1 Mio. Umsatz aufgebaut - und nur einer Person im Vertrieb.

Danach haben wir sehr viel falsch gemacht.

Fast bis zur Insolvenz.

Diese Erfahrung prägt meine Arbeit bis heute.

Was ich damals nicht wusste: Das Problem war nicht die Teamgröße.

Das Problem war die Struktur.

Beschleunigt durch Claude Code arbeite ich hinter den Kulissen mit Gründer:innen und Geschäftsführer:innen an Setups, die ich 𝗛𝘆𝗽𝗲𝗿-𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗚𝗧𝗠 nenne.

Kein neues Buzzword, sondern hocheffiziente Vertriebs- und GTM-Organisationen mit minimalen Headcounts und mindestens 1 Mio. ARR pro Vertriebsmitarbeiter:in. 

Nicht weil die Teams so klein sein wollen, sondern weil die Systeme so gut geworden sind, dass ein Team von 3 wie ein Team von 12 operiert.

Großes Team gleich großes Wachstum.
Das war einmal.

Wie schaust Du auf Vertriebs- und GTM-Organisationen der Zukunft👇?

„Wir haben zwei AEs eingestellt. Beide haben nicht funktioniert. Jetzt mache ich wieder Founder Sales.“


Diese Sätze höre ich erstaunlich oft.

Fast immer stecken dahinter die falschen Profile zur falschen Zeit - und ein fehlendes System.


Ohne System passiert in Frühphasenunternehmen fast immer dasselbe:
👉 Der/ die AE erreicht die Quote nicht
👉 Das Hiring gilt als „Fehlbesetzung“
👉 Der Founder springt wieder in den Sales



Ein Blick auf Zahlen, Daten, Fakten (hyrise, 2025):

Junior AEs (1–2 Jahre Erfahrung) liegen in Deutschland bei etwa 💰 ~86k € OTE.

"Funktionieren" diese Einstellungen nicht, wird dies sehr teuer.

Nicht nur die Personalkosten.

Vor allem die verpassten Wachstumziele. Bei OTE-Multiples von 3-5x fehlen ganz schnell hohe sechsstellige Neukundenumsätze.

Von der Friktion in der gesamten Organisation ganz zu schweigen 🙄

---
Mit welchen "Tipps & Tricks" optimierst Du die Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit von AE-Einstellungen👇

39 Deals standen im "Forecast" - ❌ Die wenigsten kamen durch meine SPICED Qualification Scorecard

In meiner aktuellen Podcast-Folge analysiere ich eine reale "Pipeline".

Auf den ersten Blick: alles korrekt.

Qualifiziert nach SPICED, "sauber" im CRM dokumentiert.

Auf den zweiten Blick: nur wenig Substanz

Die von mir (und Claude) entwickelte 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗗 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗱 brachte Klarheit:
 → Durchschnittlicher Score: 16,3 von 50 Punkten
 → (Business) Impact: 0,9 von 10

Das eigentliche Problem? 

❌ Ausgefüllte CRM-Felder sind keine Qualifizierung.

Viele Teams implementieren Sales-Frameworks wie SPICED oder MEDDICC - und wundern sich trotzdem über unzuverlässige Salesprozesse und Wunsch-Forecasts.

Warum?
Weil Methoden dokumentiert, aber nicht operationalisiert werden.

In der neuen Folge der 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗸𝘆 𝗙𝗹𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 zeige ich:
👉 warum "bewährte" Sales-Frameworks in der Praxis scheitern
👉 wie du mit 2 Fragen pro SPICED-Element echte Klarheit bekommst
👉 die einfache Forecast-Readiness-Regel, die Fake-Deals aus Deiner Pipeline entfernt


🎙️ Neue Folge jetzt live — für alle, die SPICED, MEDDICC & Co. nutzen, aber noch keine steuerbaren Ergebnisse sehen.

"9 bewährte Sales Frameworks" - klingt hilfreich. Ist aber brandgefährlich ⚠️ 


Warum? Weil hier Äpfel mit Birnen verglichen werden – und das merken viele unerfahrene Founder und Sales Leader nicht - oder erst zu spät.

𝗕𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗺 𝘄𝗶𝗰𝗵𝘁𝗶𝗴𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗨𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗱:
MEDDIC/MEDDPICC ist kein "Framework" wie BANT oder SPIN.
MEDDIC - genauso wie SPICED und mein CUSTOM Framework strukturieren die gesamte Customer Journey und den Salesprozess mit unterschiedlichen Stages. Von der Discovery über Solution Validation bis hin zur Expansion. 

BANT? Qualifikationstechnik für High-Volume Inbound Leads. 
SPIN? Fragetechnik für Discovery. 
Challenger? Positioning-Ansatz.

Das eine ist dein GPS für die gesamte Revenue-Journey. Das andere sind Fahrtechniken für einzelne Kurven.

- - -
Und dann dieser "proven"-Stempel:
Proven für wen? 
Für welchen Context?

SPIN ist brilliant für eine Consultative Discovery – aber komplett ungeeignet, wenn du 200 Inbound-Leads pro Monat qualifizieren musst.

MEDDIC rockt bei Enterprise-Deals mit 6-12 Monaten Cycle – aber ist Overkill für SMB-Motion mit 30-Tage-Cycles.

Woche für Woche sehe ich Startups, die immer noch BANT implementieren. Weil's einfach klingt.  Und sich dann wundern, warum sie trotzdem ein schlechtes Pipeline-Management haben.

Oder sie nutzen SPIN in der Discovery, aber sie haben kein System, um Deals über 6 Monate und 4 Stakeholder zu managen.

- - -
Meine Perspektive und Erfahrung für Sales-led und Sales-assisted GTM Motions mit ACV über 10k: Du brauchst beides.

A) Ein ganzheitliches Framework (MEDDIC, SPICED, CUSTOM o.ä.) für das Management für die gesamte Customer Journey

B) Sales- und Kommunikationstechniken (SPIN, Challenger) für spezifische Phasen im Prozess und in der Gesprächsführung


👉  Meine Frage an Dich:
Welches "Framework" oder welche Technik nutzt ihr aktuell? 
Was funktioniert wirklich?


Photo Credit: Benjamin Douablin

Early-Stage Founder: "Im Sales sind wir gut aufgestellt." 

Fast jede Woche höre ich diese Selbsteinschätzung von Frühphasen-Gründer:innen.

Bis wir gemeinsam tiefer in den Salesprozess schauen.

In meiner aktuellen Podcast-Folge analysiere ich einen "Forecast“ mit 39 Deals - brav gepflegt im CRM und scheinbar qualifiziert.

Die detaillierte SPICED-Analyse mit Claude AI zeigte jedoch ein anderes Bild:
 ✅ Situation verstanden (7.6/10)
 🟠  Pain unklar (4.3/10)
 🔴 Business Impact fast nicht vorhanden (0.9/10)
 🔴 Keine echte Dringlichkeit (1.6/10)
 🔴 Entscheidungsprozess ungeklärt (1.9/10)

Oder anders gesagt:
Bei vielen Deals war nicht klar, warum der Kunde jetzt eine neue Lösung kaufen sollte.

Genau hier kippt die Planbarkeit und der Forecast wird zum Glücksspiel.

Diese Folge ist besonders relevant für Founder und Sales Leader, die verlässliche Umsatzplanung und echtes Enablement pro Deal und pro Rep etablieren möchten.

🎙️ 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗸𝘆 𝗙𝗹𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 - verfügbar auf allen bekannten Podcast-Plattformen.

Die 4 Phasen rund um Founder Sales - die gerne übersprungen werden möchten, aber nicht können 🤓 


Ich habe bereits über 150 B2B SaaS- & AI-Startups unter 10 Mio. ARR begleitet.

Hier die vier Phasen - und keine davon sollte übersprungen werden.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 0: 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺-𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻-𝗙𝗶𝘁 
Du baust. Du lernst. Du findest heraus, ob das Problem real ist. Kein System nötig. Noch nicht.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 1 : 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀
Du schließt die ersten Deals selbst ab. 
Dein Bauchgefühl ist das System.
Das ist gut so - für diese Phase.

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 2: 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿-𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀
Erste Mitarbeiter. Erste Strukturen.
Du wiederholst, was gut funktioniert.

⚠️ Hier passieren die meisten Fehler - häufig, ohne es direkt zu merken. 

𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 3: 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿-𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗧𝗠
Domain-Experts übernehmen die operative Verantwortung. Du orchestrierst das Zusammenspiel von Marketing, Sales, CS und Produkt - häufig mit 
neuen Segmenten und Internationalisierung.

Das klingt logisch. 
Das klingt einfach.
Ist es nicht.

Denn zwischen Phase 2 und Phase 3 liegt der teuerste Moment im Leben eines/ einer Gründer:in: Der Moment, wo Du aufhörst zu verkaufen - aber noch kein System hast, das es für Dich tut.

Genau hier kannst Du locker 6–12 Monate verlieren. 
Und richtig viel Geld.


In welcher Phase steckst du gerade?👇 
Und was macht Dich da so sicher 😉

Vier Phasen rund um Founder Sales.

Tag 1 unseres kleinen „Trainingslagers“ für Basel → Lyon im Juni 🚴‍♂️

Heute ging es über die Via Ciclista de Lanzarote.

Sonne.
Wind.
Ein paar ordentliche Anstiege.
Dazu viele gute Gespräche.

Was ich an solchen Tagen immer wieder merke: mein Kopf wird erst wirklich frei, wenn der Körper arbeitet.

Ein paar Stunden draußen, Bewegung, frische Luft - Entspannung pur und wohltuende Leere im Kopf.


👉 Wie kannst Du am besten abschalten?

Irgendwann zwischen 1 und 10 Mio. ARR hört Intuition auf zu skalieren.

Leider merken die meisten Founder dies erst im Post-Mortem.

Nächste Woche halte ich dazu einen Workshop: 

📍 START Summit in St. Gallen
🕙 19. März, 11.00 Uhr

Basierend auf über 150 B2B Startups teile ich zusammen mit Dennis Teichmann drei frühe Warnsignale. Und wie Du sie siehst, bevor es zu spät ist.

Wenn Du gerade zwischen 1 und 10 Mio. ARR bist, dann ist das ist Dein Workshop 🤓 

👉 Welche Warnsignale hättest Du rückblickend gerne früher gesehen?

Great Gatsby meets Berghain.
Mit FUNKY bont 🕺✨


Als Dominic Klingberg und Julius Göllner mir ihr „neuestes Baby“ gepitcht haben, war ziemlich schnell klar:
Da machen wir mit.
Mit einem eigenen Tisch.

Kein klassisches Networking.
Natürlich nicht in Berlin 😉


Die Tickets sind heiß begehrt, doch Dennis und ich haben noch einen Platz exklusiv reserviert - für Dich, DEN/ DIE Sales & GTM Leader:in aus DACH

👇Wenn Du jemanden kennst bzw. die Person bist, der/die perfekt passt:
Tag sie oder ihn. Oder schreib mir direkt.

Drei Worte. Ein Bildschirm. Leises Kribbeln im Bauch. 🤌

Vor einigen Tagen habe auch ich 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 aufgesetzt.


Die aktuelle Zeit finde ich „spooky" und faszinierend zugleich. 

Was mit Jimdo & Squarespace für Webseiten begann, mit lovable die App-Entwicklung erreichte, hat nun nochmal ein komplett neues Level erreicht.

Über Nacht wurden Milliarden an Firmenwerten etablierter Unternehmen an der Börse vernichtet.

---
Meine konkrete Frage: Was kann Claude Code für Sales- und GTM-Teams leisten?

Das wird meine ganz persönliche Forschungsreise in den nächsten Wochen und Monaten sein.

Denn, wenn ich das schaffe, dann können das fast alle Unternehmen 😉

Was hast Du bereits mit Claude Code umgesetzt?👇

Die meisten B2B-Startups skalieren die Intuition der Founder – bis sie es plötzlich nicht mehr können.

Dieser Moment kommt fast immer zwischen 1 und 10 Mio. ARR.

Founder-Sales funktioniert.
Deals kommen rein.
Das Team wächst.
Und irgendwann stellt sich eine unangenehme Frage:
Warum stagniert unser Wachstum plötzlich? 🤔 

Leider merken viele Founder das erst im Post-Mortem.

Genau darüber sprechen Dennis Teichmann und ich morgen beim START Summit in St. Gallen. 

Basierend auf der Arbeit mit über 150 B2B-Startups zeigen wir drei frühe Warnsignale - und wie man sie erkennt, bevor Wachstum ins Stocken gerät.

📍 START Summit, St. Gallen
 🕒 19. März, 11:00 Uhr
𝗕𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗲 12 𝗨𝗵𝗿 𝗸𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗗𝘂 𝗗𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻 - 𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗴𝗶𝗯𝘁 𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗽𝗹ä𝘁𝘇𝗲.

Großes Kompliment schon jetzt an das gesamte START Global Team, ganz besonders an Moris Ammann.

Freue mich auf spannende Gespräche und viele persönliche Wiedersehen.

P.S. Einige von Euch sehe ich ja bereits heute Abend 🤗

Ich werde oft gefragt, wie moderne Lead Generation aufgebaut sein sollte.

Dieses "Flywheel-Framework" von Lanny M. Heiz ✨ bringt es auf den Punkt👇

Das Problem ist selten das Tooling.
Das Problem ist, dass kein System existiert.

Das klassische Predictable Revenue-Modell ist faktisch tot:
 → Listen bauen
 → Sequenzen starten
 → auf Replies hoffen

Warum?
Weil heute (fast) jede:r innerhalb von Minuten:
Listen bauen kann
AI-personalisierte Mails verschickt
Outreach automatisiert
Der Wettbewerbsvorteil liegt nicht mehr im Outreach.
Er liegt im System dahinter.

Was ich an diesem Modell mag:
IDENTIFY → ENRICH → ENGAGE → CAPTURE → LOOP

Nicht als Funnel.
Sondern als lernender Kreislauf.
Als immer besser werdendes Schwungrad.

Die entscheidende Veränderung für 2026:
 👉 GTM ist kein Kampagnen-Problem mehr.
 👉 GTM ist ein Orchestrierungs-Problem.

Winning Teams:
tracken Signale statt Listen
orchestrieren Daten statt Leads
reagieren in Minuten statt Tagen
lassen ihr System lernen
Tools addieren sich nicht mehr.
Systeme multiplizieren.

Lanny, gute Visualisierung dessen, was viele Teams gerade erst verstehen. Ich verlinke Deinen Original-Post in den Kommentaren mit noch mehr Details.

Wie sieht euer GTM aktuell aus: Tool-Stack oder System? 👇

Die Zukunft von SaaS-Pricing – und warum 90 % Geld auf dem Tisch liegen lassen.

Die meisten B2B-SaaS-Unternehmen behandeln Pricing als Projekt.

Einmal festlegen.
Dann 2–3 Jahre ignorieren.
Vielleicht anpassen, wenn Investoren nachfragen.

In meiner aktuellen Podcast-Folge spreche ich mit Krzysztof Szyszkiewicz (Kris), Co-Founder von Valueships und einer der führenden Pricing-Experten Europas.

Sein Kernpunkt:
Pricing ist kein Bauchgefühl.
Pricing ist ein Prozess.

𝗪𝗮𝗿𝘂𝗺 90 % 𝗚𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻
Gerade in der Frühphase braucht Pricing drei Datenpunkte:
1️⃣ Cost-Plus: Deine Kosten + Zielmarge.

2️⃣ Competition-Based: Was akzeptiert der Markt?

3️⃣ Value-Based: Welchen Wert generierst du für deine Kunden?
 
Das Problem:
Die meisten Founder springen direkt zu Punkt 2.
Sie kopieren Wettbewerber, ohne ihre eigene Value Metric verstanden zu haben.

👉 Weitere Details zu Value Metrics und die Zukunft des SaaS-Pricings erfährst du in meiner neuen Folge der 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗸𝘆 𝗙𝗹𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 - verfügbar auf allen bekannten Podcast-Plattformen

Board-Meetings beginnen mit New ARR – über zwei Kennzahlen, die entscheiden, ob dieser Umsatz bleibt, spricht kaum jemand.

Dabei geben genau diese beiden Metriken die ehrlichste Antwort auf eine zentrale Frage: Wie viele Deiner heutigen Kunden werden in 12 Monaten noch da sein – und warum?

1️⃣ 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗟𝗜𝗥)
Ein messbares Kundenverhalten, das zeigt, ob ein Kunde echten Wert aus Deinem Produkt zieht.

Nicht:
• Logins
• NPS
• „gefühlte Zufriedenheit“

Sondern eine klare Formel:
P % deiner Kunden erreichen E Events in T Zeit.
Ja oder Nein.
Keine Interpretation.


2️⃣ 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 (𝗧𝗧𝗩)
Die entscheidende Folgefrage: Wie lange dauert es, bis ein Kunde diesen LIR erreicht?

Nicht als Einzelzahl.
Sondern als Kohortenentwicklung.
Wenn Deine Januar-Kohorte 12 Monate braucht und Deine Oktober-Kohorte nur noch 2, dann hast Du messbaren Product-Market-Fit.

---
Genau darüber spreche ich in meiner neuen Solo-Folge der 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗸𝘆 𝗙𝗹𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄: Warum Login-Rate und NPS keine Adoption-Metriken sind - und warum LIR und TTV an den Anfang jedes Board-Decks gehören.

🎙️ Jetzt auf allen bekannten Podcast-Plattformen verfügbar.
📘 Zusätzliche Details in meinem GTM-Bestseller 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗸𝘆 𝗙𝗹𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀

B2B-Startups in DACH können es sich nicht leisten, bis €5 Mio. ARR auf Wiederholbarkeit zu warten.

Viele US-Modelle suggerieren auch in 2026 noch: Erst Wachstum, dann Struktur.

Meine dringliche Empfehlung - bei meinen Kunden und Angel Investments:
Wiederholbarkeit muss viel früher beginnen.

Nicht akademisch mit wilden Revenue-Modellen. 

Noch nicht mit statistischer Belastbarkeit. 

Doch mit klaren Leitplanken.

Was starke Teams früher als bei €5 Mio. ARR tun:
 → Founder Success in einen strukturierten Sales- & GTM-Prozess übersetzen

 → Initiale Markttraktion in klaren Product-Segment-Fit überführen

 → Marketing, Sales und CS konsequent auf dieselben ICP-Segmente ausrichten

 → Sales Velocity, Time-to-Value und Expansion messbar machen


Meine Erfahrung:
Intuition skaliert nicht.
Systemen skalieren Wachstum.
Und meine Systeme stiften bereits signifikanten Mehrwert ab €1 Mio. ARR 🤓 

Aber hey, let's disagree👇 




Photo Credit: Tom van Os

Erste Traktion in Early-Stage-Startups entsteht selten durch nackte Zahlen. Diese drei Motivatoren sehe ich bei starken Champions👇

In meinen eigenen Startups habe ich zu Beginn viel zu rational verkauft.

Selten gab es am Anfang:
 • einen belastbaren Business Case mit starkem ROI
 • oder relevante Referenzen

Für den Verkauf an Early Customers braucht es deshalb "besondere" Champions (und Budget Holder).

Diese drei Motivatoren sehe ich dabei immer wieder:

1️⃣ 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗿𝗲𝘂𝗱𝗲
Neues früh auszuprobieren – bevor es zum Standard wird.

2️⃣ 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝘂𝘀 / 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗲
Als Treiber einer Initiative wahrgenommen zu werden – intern wie extern.

3️⃣ 𝗚𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗴𝘀𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲
Einfluss zu haben. Dinge aktiv zu verändern, statt sie nur zu verwalten.


Die entscheidende Frage für die ersten Deals ist deshalb nicht: Wie gut ist unser Business Case?

Sondern:
Verstehen wir wirklich, was unseren Champion antreibt - und sprechen wir genau diese Motive an?

- - -
Ergänzungen oder andere Erfahrungen? 👇

Alexander Estner

I help early-stage SaaS founders build & execute their Go-to-market foundation to grow from €0 to €1 million ARR 🚀

3 WAYS I CAN HELP YOU 👇
1️⃣ GTM Advisory - Work 1-on-1 with me in bi-weekly GTM sprints
2️⃣ GTM Audit - Get a 360° assessment of your current GTM status quo + custom action plan
3️⃣ GTM Content - Bi-weekly newsletter +  Daily LinkedIn posts + Free GTM Library

P.S. You will find the links to all 3 in the featured section.

Among other things, I help you with:
👉 Creating your early/ideal customer profile (ICP)
👉 Working on positioning, messaging & value proposition 
👉 Choosing the right pricing for your business (pricing model, value metric & packaging)
👉 Implementing the right sales strategy (sales-led vs. product-led)
👉 Mastering 2-3 growth channels to continuously generate new deals/trials
👉 Setting up the right tech stack in sales, marketing & customer success
👉 Building your commercial teams.

Send me a DM on LinkedIn or book a free 15-minute intro call to learn more about my offering.

Startup Consultant for B2B SaaS

As a freelance startup consultant, I help early-stage B2B SaaS Startups quickly grow their business with a powerful Growth Strategy 🚀


I work on both, strategic and operational, levels and help you with the following topics.

► For Founders (Launch to Seed Stage):
- Clarify, validate and stress test your business idea
- Win first paying customers and kickstart growth for your SaaS
- Develop and implement a powerful B2B SaaS Growth strategy
- Find product-market fit and close your first funding (business angels & seed)

► For Startups (Seed to Series A Stage):
- Accelerate your growth to 5M€+ ARR
- Review or implement a powerful B2B SaaS growth strategy
- Optimization of direct & indirect growth channels
- Create a growth team mentality, track the right KPIs, and set OKRs

► For more information:
- check out my website (www.alexestner.com)
- subscribe to my FREE weekly newsletter for founders & early-stage startups (https://startupbusinesstips.substack.com/)

► Interested?
- Send me a DM on Linkedin

Your ICP must define your daily GTM work.

If it doesn’t, you’re not enforcing your ICP.
You just have one on paper.

If the ICP is real, it shows up everywhere 👇

• Hero section of your website
• Customers you choose for case studies and logo carousels
• Your LinkedIn post themes
• Upcoming blog articles
• The dropdowns in your product onboarding
• Mandatory CRM fields that define ICP fit
• Filters you use for outbound list building
• Keywords you monitor on Reddit and LinkedIn
• Industry influencers you follow
• Events and conferences you participate in
• Which features you show first in a sales demo
• The examples you use in sales calls
• The objection handling scripts you prepare
• The integrations highlighted on your homepage
• The use cases shown in product screenshots
• The pricing page structure and plan names
• The success metrics you track post-onboarding
• The landing pages you build (or don’t build)
• The partners you co-market with
• The communities you spend time in

And that’s just the obvious layer.

👉 What else is defined by your ICP?

P.S. This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out mrrunlocked.com for all 6 and follow for tomorrow's post.

Helping SaaS & AI founders build and execute their GTM foundation to grow from €0 to €1 million ARR with less trial and error | ‘Hands-on’ GTM Advisor👇

You’ve defined your ICP, worked on positioning + messaging.
Now it’s time to show your work to buyers.

That means updating your:
- Website
- LinkedIn profile
- Ads
- Outbound messages

…and your sales deck.

Because here’s the uncomfortable truth I've found from working with 30+ startups over the last few years:

Most B2B SaaS decks are either…
- a feature dump, or
- a random collection of slides that don’t build conviction.

But a high-converting sales deck has one job:
Tell a buyer a story they can repeat internally.

In a nutshell, your deck should walk them through:
✅ how they currently handle [use case]
✅ what breaks / why it matters (limitations + cost of doing nothing)
✅ what changes with your product (new way)
✅ what they’ll achieve (results)
✅ why they can trust you (proof + “you’re not alone”)

I put together a slide-by-slide structure + a ready-to-use template built in Pitch.

If you want it, comment “sales deck” and I’ll DM you the link.

Most founders choose their positioning anchor randomly.

They don’t decide it. They drift into it.

And that’s dangerous.

Because your primary positioning anchor determines:

→ How buyers search
→ What they compare you against
→ Who owns the budget
→ What proof you need

Here’s the simplified breakdown of the 4 primary anchors:

1️⃣ Activity Positioning
“We help you do X.”
→ You’re replacing manual workflows
→ No category exists
→ Goal: Create awareness

2️⃣ Use Case Positioning
“We help you do X without Y.”
→ You’re fixing broken workflows
→ Category is emerging
→ Goal: Own the use case

3️⃣ Product Category Positioning
“We are a X.”
→ Buyers already compare vendors
→ Clear budget line exists
→ Goal: Win comparisons

4️⃣ Competitive Alternative Positioning
“We’re a [Leader] alternative.”
→ Market leader dominates
→ Budget already allocated
→ Goal: Steal demand

The mistake I see?

Founders choose Category positioning...
...when there is no defined category. So they invent 'new categories'.

Or they try Competitive positioning…
…without a strong enough wedge.

Positioning must match buyer awareness and market maturity.

Quick test:

When buyers evaluate you, are they:

A) Comparing vendors and search for specific categories?
B) Comparing you to a specific leader?
C) Describing what they want to achieve, even if they don’t know what type of software solves it?

Your answer tells you your anchor.

If you want the full guide (incl. the decision tree + worksheet), comment “positioning” and I’ll send it over.

---
P.S. Follow Anthony Pierri, Rob Kaminski, and April Dunford to dive deeper into positioning.

undefined undefined

Newsletter

Join 4500+ SaaS Leaders and get actionable content in your inbox: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/saas-gtm-foundation

GTM Foundation

Build your GTM foundation: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/saas-gtm-foundation

Listen to Podcast

Listen to the podcast episode on the 3 stages to 1€ million ARR: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s6e18-the-3-step-gtm-playbook-to-grow-your-saas-from/id1670431932?i=1000713247114

Sales Deck

Build your sales deck with my free sales deck template: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/high-converting-sales-deck

Vetted Tools

Vetted Partners

SaaS GTM Guides

https://www.alexestner.com/#Best-SaaS-GTM-Guides

14 actionable CRM tactics

SaaS Homepage

https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/saas-homepage-copywriting-guide

Founder Brand on LinkedIn

https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/founder-led-linkedin-guide

Customer Success into Referrals

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alexander-estner_how-moritz-weiss-turned-customer-success-activity-7327573567070420992-DkSk?

GTM Audit

https://alexander-estner.webflow.io/services/gtm-advisory#Pricing-Table

ECP to ICP Guide

https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/analyze-your-icp

SaaS Vetted Tools

👇GTM templates: https://www.alexestner.com/gtm-templates

360 GTM Audit

https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/360-saas-gtm-audit

SaaS Pricing Page Guide

Ultimate SaaS Pricing Page Guide: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/saas-pricing-page

Nocodefounders Newsletter

Read the full article on: https://nocodefounders.beehiiv.com/p/how-to-build-a-strong-gtm-foundation-0-to-1m-arr

6 founders sharing insights

Hear all 6 founders sharing their tips & mistakes: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/6-founders-insights

Experts Tips

📌 From 0 to €1M ARR: 17 Expert Tips Every Founder Should Know: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/17-experts-best-tips

MRRUnlocked Signup

Sign up on mrrunlocked.com to get all tips delivered in your inbox (+ 50+ GTM infographics for free).

LinkedIn Playbook

📌 Get the Founder + Team LinkedIn Playbook for free: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/founder-linkedin-playbook

6 GTM problems

📌 Full breakdown of the 6 GTM problems that keep repeating: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/the-6-gtm-problems

Homepage Teardown

📌 Homepage Teardown of 6 Top SaaS/AI companies: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/homepage-teardowns-what-6-top-saas

10 GTM actions

📌 Full breakdown of the 10 GTM actions that you can ship next week: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/10-quick-gtm-fixes

Positioning Guide

📌 Get access to the Ultimate SaaS Positioning Guide: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/the-ultimate-saas-positioning-guide

17 Clarity Questions

📌 Quick GTM Clarity Test: https://www.mrrunlocked.com/p/gtm-foundation-test

Digital Nudging: User Experience positiv beeinflussen

Climate Change, Risks and Challenges

Digital Advertising

The Complete Digital Marketing Course

'Hands-on’ GTM Advisor || I help SaaS founders build & execute their Go-to-market and go from €0 to €1 million ARR with less trial & error || Join 4000+ SaaS leaders & get my free SaaS GTM tactics in your inbox👇

I help early-stage SaaS founders build & execute their Go-to-market and quickly go from €0 to €1 million ARR 🚀

3 WAYS I CAN HELP YOU
1️⃣ GTM advisory - Work with me 1-on-1 in weekly or bi-weekly deep-dive working sessions to build and execute your powerful GTM strategy.
2️⃣ List of 90+ actionable SaaS Growth Tactics and Free SaaS Growth Strategy Worksheet (Links are in the Highlight section).
3️⃣ Free actionable SaaS growth tips: Daily on LinkedIn and bi-weekly in my newsletter (read by 2300+ SaaS leaders)

Bonus: Sponsor my newsletter & reach 2300+ early-stage SaaS founders/leaders/decision makers.

Among other things, I help you with:
- Creating your ideal customer profile (ICP)
- Working on positioning, messaging & value proposition 
- Choosing the right pricing for your business (pricing model, value metric & packaging)
- Implementing the right sales strategy (sales-led vs. product-led)
- Mastering 2-3 growth channels to continuously generate new deals or/and trials
- Setting up the right tech stack in sales, marketing & customer success
- Building your commercial teams.

Send me a DM on Linkedin or book a free 15min virtual coffee to learn more about my offering.

------------
ABOUT ME:

Hi, I'm Alexander Estner - but please just call me Alex.

I'm based in Munich, Germany 🇩🇪 and I've spent my whole career in the startup environment with now more than 10 years of experience in SaaS and marketplaces from being the first commercial employee of a fast-growing SaaS-enabled-marketplace to being a Co-founder of a SaaS startup and now supporting other early-stage founders on their journey from pre-revenue to the first €1 million ARR.

Over the last 2 years, I've helped 25+ SaaS companies grow their business faster with a powerful GTM strategy - as a growth advisor, consultant, or interim manager.

What I care about: 

- Brainstorming new business ideas 💡
- Sustainability, healthy food, and barista coffee ☕.
- Traveling, well-being, and all kinds of sports like skiing, beach volleyball, yoga, and fitness 🧘‍♂️
- Books & podcasts about startups, leadership, personal development, & positive mindset 📚

------------
💡 Currently getting inspired for a new startup

Go-to-market in 2024 is tough.

My best SaaS GTM Guides help you master GTM in 2024.

1️⃣ The Ultimate Ideal Customer Profile Framework
2️⃣ The Ultimate SaaS Messaging Framework
3️⃣ High-converting SaaS Homepage template
4️⃣ The perfect Sales Deck template
5️⃣ The Ultimate SaaS Pricing Guide
6️⃣ The Best Outbound Tech Stack for SaaS
7️⃣ The Ultimate Content Marketing Guide for SaaS

The 7 Best SaaS GTM Guides 2024

The free Workbook helped 3000+ SaaS leaders build their SaaS GTM Strategy.

The Ultimate SaaS GTM Strategy Workbook [Free]

Grow faster from 0€ to 3€ million ARR with 100+ actionable & proven SaaS Growth Tactics (helped 200+ SaaS leaders)

100+ actionable SaaS growth tactics

Get weekly 3 actionable SaaS GTM strategies and tactics to grow your B2B SaaS business from €0 to €1 million ARR 🚀.

MRR Unlocked 🚀 | Alexander Estner | Substack

RevGenius is a group of revenue-generating sales and marketing professionals brought together to learn, share, support, and grow with each other. You can consider us your alt work family!

The Mentoring Club is a pro bono platform where mentors and mentees meet and can schedule mentoring sessions. You can schedule a free mentoring session with me here: https://www.mentoring-club.com/the-mentors/alexander-estner

When I work with AI & SaaS founders, the GTM problem is rarely obvious at first.

On the surface, things look “busy”:
– Content is going out
– Demos are happening
– Tools are in place
– Pipeline exists

But momentum is missing.

When I audit the GTM, it almost always comes down to the same 6 things 👇

1️⃣ ICP exists, but isn’t enforced in decisions
2️⃣ Buyers don’t know what to compare the product against
3️⃣ Demos are feature tours, not a structured narrative
4️⃣ Every deal follows a different sales process
5️⃣ Website, decks, and case studies sound like everyone else
6️⃣ Content is vague and generic

None of this is a “talent” problem.
And it’s rarely a “more effort” problem.

It’s a foundation problem.

How we usually fix it:
– Make the ICP operational (not just a doc)
– Define positioning (what do we replace, how are we different)
– Design a demo structure that guides buyers, not just shows features
– Lock a default sales process with clear next steps
– Align assets around one positioning story

Especially in AI & SaaS, this matters.

Foundations first.
Everything else compounds on top of that.

👉 This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out mrrunlocked.com for all 6 and follow for tomorrow's post.

Your positioning statement gives your entire team clarity on why you exist.

When it’s missing, you see it immediately:

• Marketing talks about features
• Sales talks about benefits
• Product talks about roadmap
• Founders talk about vision

But no one tells the same story.

A real positioning statement answers:

• Who is your ICP?
• What core problem do they face?
• How do they solve it today?
• What limitations does that create?
• What did you build instead?
• Why are you meaningfully different?

Strong positioning is structured reasoning.

If your team can’t clearly articulate:

• Why you exist
• Why current solutions fall short
• Why you win

Your messaging will always feel inconsistent.

Below you find 4 templates for the different positioning anchors.

👇 Comment your positioning statement below. I will give feedback to every single one.

No alternative text description for this image

When I review early-stage GTM setups, I often see:

– 4 channels running “a bit”
– Positioning that tries to do everything
– No anti-ICP
– Demo calls that are product tours
– CRM data that no one reviews

And when things are not moving, founders ask:

“Should we try more channels?”
“Should we pivot positioning?”
“Should we hire outbound?”

Most of the time, it's not about doing more.
It's about focus and clarity on the foundation.

So before adding anything new, fix what's already there.

Here are 10 GTM fixes you can ship this week 👇

• Define your ICP + Anti-ICP in 5 bullets
• Pick ONE positioning anchor (category OR use case)
• Kill one weak channel
• Add proper attribution (“How did you hear about us?”)
• Push your best case studies everywhere
• Make your LinkedIn profile crystal clear
• Systematize referrals
• Track lost reasons (mandatory field)
• Define when a deal opens & closes
• Review your last 3 demos critically

Choose 2 for your next week.

👇 What's on your list?

If you can’t explain what you do in one sentence...

Your buyers won’t understand it either.

Here are the 4 clean templates 👇

1️⃣ Activity Positioning

Template:
We help [ICP] [manual activity they currently do] so they can [outcome].

Example:
We help B2B SaaS founders track all their customer information in one place so they never lose deal context.

2️⃣ Use Case Positioning

Template:
We help [ICP] [clear job-to-be-done] without [limitations of the status quo].

Example:
We help B2B SaaS founders manage their prospects without juggling spreadsheets and scattered notes.

3️⃣ Product Category Positioning

Template:
We are a [product category] for [ICP].
We are a [product category] with [unique differentiator].

Example:
We are a CRM software for early-stage SaaS founders.
We are a lightweight CRM built for startups.

4️⃣ Competitive Alternative Positioning

Template:
We are a [product category] alternative to [leader] built for [ICP] with [unique differentiator].

Example:
We are a CRM alternative to HubSpot built for early-stage SaaS founders with simpler setup.

👇 Let's drop yours in the comments.

P.S. If you want the full positioning guide + worksheet, send me a DM and I will send it over.

Whenever I start working with a new founder, I don’t start with tactics.

No growth hacks.
No outbound playbooks.
No content strategy.

Instead, I ask questions.

Because after working with 30+ SaaS startups, I’ve learned something:

Most growth problems are actually clarity problems.

Here are a few of the questions I ask early on.

Customers & ICP

• Who specifically is your product built for today?
• Who are your best-fit customers?
• Who should you not target right now?
• What triggers someone to start looking for a solution like yours?

Positioning

• What is your primary positioning anchor?
• What alternatives are customers using today?
• What makes you meaningfully different?

Messaging

• What’s the core message on your homepage hero?
• What objections do you hear all the time?
• What proof do you communicate?

GTM Execution

• What stage of GTM are you currently in?
• What is your primary acquisition channel?
• What sales motion fits your product best?

If founders struggle to answer several of these questions clearly...

We don’t optimize tactics.

We fix the GTM foundation first.

Because once the foundation becomes clear:

• messaging improves
• sales conversations get easier
• pipeline quality increases

GTM suddenly feels much simpler.

Curious:
Which of these questions would be hardest for you to answer today?

---
On Sunday, I published a new newsletter episode on mrrunlocked.com where we deep dive into all 17 questions.

If buyers don’t know what to compare you against, fix this first 👇

1. Decide your anchor

Category positioning (default)
Use-case positioning (if no category exists)

2. Write one clear sentence

We’re a [category] for [use case + ICP]

If you can’t say this cleanly, nothing downstream will work.

3. Name the real alternative you replace today
Not your dream competitor.

The status quo:
-Excel
-Manual workflows
-Agencies
-Internal hacks

4. Define 2–3 competitive buckets

-Status quo
-Incumbents
-Direct competitors

5. Differentiate with sharp contrasts

- Unlike incumbent tools, we...
-Unlike point solutions, we...
-Unlike the status quo, we…

This is GTM foundation work.
Get this wrong and everything slows down:
website, sales, outbound, demos, pricing.

Get it right, and buyers finally know:
“Ah, this is what I should compare you against.”

👉 What's part of your positioning?

P.S. This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out mrrunlocked.com for all 6 and follow for tomorrow's post.

Most founders don’t have a product problem.
They have a positioning problem.
Last month I had 8 intro calls.

More than half needed 3+ minutes to explain what they’re building.
If I can’t repeat it back in 30 seconds, your buyers won’t either.

So here’s the simple 3-step framework I use with early-stage SaaS founders:

Step 1: Choose your Primary Anchor (What are you?)

When buyers ask:
“What is your product?”

You must answer in one sentence.

You have 4 options:

1️⃣ Activity Positioning
“We help you do X”

2️⃣ Use Case Positioning
“We help you do X without Y”

3️⃣ Product Category Positioning
“We are a X”

4️⃣ Competitive Alternative
“We are a [Leader] alternative”

Choose based on how buyers think today, not how you want them to think.

Step 2: Add a Secondary Anchor (Why you?)

Inside that primary anchor, differentiate:

• Niche down
• Low-cost
• Premium
• Unique attribute
• Lite version

Max 2. Not 5.

Step 3: Combine both into a clear statement

Strong positioning =
Primary Anchor + Secondary Anchor

Example:

(Product Category + Lite + Niche)
“We are a lightweight CRM built for startups.”

Positioning is a bet.
But no positioning is worse than wrong positioning.

If I asked you right now:
“What are you?”

Could you answer in one sentence without rambling?

P.S. I've launched my new positioning guide on mrrunlocked.com You will find the link in the comments.

One GTM problem that keeps repeating:

The GTM assets don’t reflect the 'internal strategy'.

I often review a team’s ICP, positioning, and messaging docs and think:
“This is actually very good.”

Then I look at:

- the website
-the sales deck
-the demos
- the LinkedIn profiles
- the outbound messages

...and the clarity disappears.

What this looks like in practice:

--> ICP and messaging frameworks live in Notion or Miro only
--> Sales decks are 80% product features
--> Homepage copy is fuzzy or overly technical
--> LinkedIn profiles don’t explain what the product is and for whom
--> No clear callout of ICP, category, or status quo problem
--> Strong insights exist, but prospects never see them

This is painful because the thinking is usually solid.

It’s not a strategy problem.
It’s a translation problem.

👇 What's your take?

P.S. This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out mrrunlocked.com for all 6 and follow for tomorrow's post.

Most startups waste time on growth channels before they’ve even tightened the basics.

Here’s a simple rule: Before adding anything new, fix 2 things you already have. 

Here are 10 quick fixes you can ship this week:

✔ Write your ICP + Anti-ICP in 5 bullets
✔ Choose one positioning anchor
--> product category OR use case. Don’t mix.
✔ Pause your weakest channel
✔ Add "how did you hear about us?" in your signup & demo flow.
✔ Share your best case studies everywhere.
✔ Revamp your LinkedIn profile for ICP clarity
✔ Ask your customers for referrals/warm intros.
✔ Track lost reasons in CRM (mandatory) + review weekly.
✔ Set hard rules for when to open/close deals.
✔ Coach yourself: Review your last 3 demo calls

None of these requires a strategy or expensive experiments.
They just reduce noise, clarify motion, and accelerate pipeline.

Start by simplifying what you already do. Then expand.

👇 What’s that for you?

P.S. For me, long hikes are where most of my GTM simplifications happen.
Distance creates clarity.

Most founders think positioning is about being clever.

It’s not.

It’s about clarity and choosing the right anchor.

There are only 4 real types of positioning in B2B SaaS:
(credits to Anthony Pierri  and Rob Kaminski )

1️⃣ Activity Positioning

“We help you do X.”

You frame your product around a manual activity.

Example (Scheduling):
“Send emails back and forth to find a time.”

You’re replacing spreadsheets, Slack, email.

Best when:
• Market is early
• No clear software category exists
• Buyers still do it manually

GTM goal: Create awareness.

2️⃣ Use Case Positioning

“We help you do X without Y.”

You anchor around a clear job-to-be-done.

Example (Product Analytics):
“Understand how users behave inside your product.”

Buyers know the problem.
They may not think in category terms yet.

GTM goal: Own the use case.

3️⃣ Product Category Positioning

“We are a X.”

Example:
CRM software
Scheduling software
Product Analytics software

Buyers:
• Google the category
• Compare vendors
• Check G2

GTM goal: Win comparisons.

4️⃣ Competitive Alternative Positioning

“We are a [Leader] alternative.”

Example:
HubSpot alternative
Calendly alternative
Mixpanel alternative

Best when:
• A dominant leader exists
• Budget already exists
• You have a strong wedge

GTM goal: Steal demand.

Important:

The same product can be positioned in all 4 ways.
But only ONE anchor should lead your narrative.

Choose based on:

→ Buyer awareness
→ Market maturity
→ What they compare you against

Not based on what sounds cooler.

If you want the full positioning framework + worksheet, head over to mrrunlocked.com

B2B Homepage Positioning // I play 🎸 in the band Good Hangs

Co-Founder @ Fletch | Positioning & Messaging for B2B Startups

Quick test: Can you answer these 4 ICP questions?

Most GTM problems actually start with a bad ICP.

You rarely struggle with tactics.
You struggle with who you should actually target.

Many teams define their ICP like this:

❌ “Mid-sized companies”
❌ “HR teams”
❌ “Any company that wants to automate X”

Which usually means...
the ICP is still too broad.

Before optimizing messaging, content, or outbound, I ask founders four simple questions:

1️⃣ Who specifically is your product built for today?
Not your TAM.

Your actual ICP.

Can you clearly define it with 4–6 attributes like:

• firmographics
• technographics
• persona attributes
• use case

Early-stage startups usually need one segment and one use case.

2️⃣ Who are your best-fit customers?

Look at your existing customers.

Who has:

• the highest usage
• the lowest churn
• the fastest sales cycle

These signals often reveal your real ICP.

3️⃣ What type of customers should you not target right now?

Define your Anti-ICP.

Companies that:

• don’t value your product
• don’t have the pain you solve
• don’t fit strategically

GTM becomes repeatable once you narrow your focus.

4️⃣ What triggers someone to start looking for a solution like yours?

Every purchase has a trigger.

For example:

• a new hire
• a new regulation
• a broken tech stack

Understanding this moment is critical for messaging and demand generation.

Can you answer these four questions today?

Writing blog posts and LinkedIn posts, but still 0 Inbounds.

I call it: "Content is done, but without a strategy"

I mean, the content isn’t designed to support real sales conversations or capture existing demand. 

This usually means teams are creating a lot of TOFU blog posts and random LinkedIn posts.

Results are usually 0 Inbounds.

What this looks like in practice:

- Random LinkedIn posts (or disconnected from ICP pain points)
- No repeatable content format (every post is a different topic)
- No Inbound generating lead magnet
- TOFU blog posts that don’t attract buyers
- Content optimized for likes, not ICP engagements
- No measurement of pipeline influence

How to fix:

- Prioritize BOFU content
alternatives, comparisons, “best X for Y”, use-case pages

- Focus early on the 5% of buyers who are already *in the market*

- Build a content map based on ICP questions by awareness stage
from problem-unaware → problem aware —> solution aware —> product (category) aware —> purchase-decision

- Build a high-performing lead magnet

- Turn real sales objections into posts and articles

- Record customer calls and use insights for your content roadmap (objections, pains, desired outcomes...)

- Measure content by meetings influenced, not impressions
e.g. via self-reported attribution (How did you hear about us?)

👉 What's missing? 

P.S. This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out the other 5 on mrrunlocked.com and follow for tomorrows post.

graphical user interface, text, application

Whenever I ask founders to walk me through their sales process, this is where it breaks.

Sales is a set of calls, but not a designed journey.
They don’t guide prospects through a set of clearly defined steps.
 So they can’t describe what should happen after each step.

What this looks like in practice:

- Buyers decide on next steps at the end of the call
- 10 demos, 10 different next steps 'agreed'
- Unclear what the goal of each call is
- Deals are created without a clear definition
- Trials are offered without commitment or success criteria
- Deals stall because the next steps were never designed

The root cause. No 'designed' process. 
Meaning no repeatability.

And as it's not repeatable, it's also hard to measure and optimize.

So here's my recommendation: How to fix:

- Define a simple, explicit sales process 
 e.g., Disco → Demo → Trial/Pilot → Close
- Assign a clear goal and exit criteria to each stage
- Define when a trial is “earned” (qualification threshold)
- Create standard follow-ups for each stage (post-demo, trial kickoff, recap)
- Enforce pipeline hygiene: every deal needs a next step and a close date

Ofc, if you're advanced, implement a methodology like SPICED, SPIN, or MEDDIC.

👉 This post is part of a short LK series: 6 most common GTM problems I see working with early-stage founders. 
Check out the other 5 on mrrunlocked.com and follow for tomorrows post.

Most SaaS/AI positioning fails for one simple reason:

Buyers don’t know what you are.

So they also don't know what you replace.
They can't mentally classify you.

So your differentiation becomes useless.

When that happens:

• your messaging feels vague
• demos take too long to explain
• sales conversations become harder

So before improving messaging, I ask founders three positioning questions.

1️⃣ What is your primary positioning anchor?

How should buyers mentally classify your product?

Product category = CRM
Use case = We help you do X

2️⃣ What alternatives are customers using today?

Spreadsheets.
Manual processes.
Internal tools.
Other SaaS products/categories.

Every product replaces something.

3️⃣ What makes you meaningfully different?

Your differentiation needs to be:

clear, believable, and relevant.

Quick check: Could a new visitor understand what your product is in <30 seconds?

Most founders choose their positioning anchor based on opinion.

Here’s a better way:

Choose your primary anchor based on how buyers think today, not how you want them to think.

No strategy debates.
No branding workshops.
Just yes / no.

Use this simple decision tree 👇

Step 0: Leader Dominance Test (Check First)

Q0: Is there a dominant, well-known market leader that:

- Almost every buyer already knows?
- Owns most of the category mindshare?
- Is frequently referenced in conversations?
- Is the default comparison point?

If yes, and you have a clear wedge:
→ Consider Competitive Alternative Positioning

If no, continue below.
(If you choose Competitive Alternative, still validate Category Awareness below.)

Step 1: Category Awareness Test

Q1: When buyers start evaluating solutions, do they:

- Google a specific software category?
- Compare vendors on G2 or Capterra?
- Ask for demos of multiple vendors in the same category?

Examples:

- CRM software
- Scheduling software
- Product analytics software

If buyers already think in category terms:
✅ Yes → Product Category Positioning
❌ No → Go to Step 2

Step 2: Problem Articulation Test

Q2: Can buyers clearly describe what they want to achieve, even if they don’t know what type of software solves it?

Examples:

- “We need to schedule interviews faster.”
- “We need better onboarding walkthroughs.”
- “We need to coordinate approvals more easily.”

If they articulate the job, but not the category:
✅ Yes → Use Case Positioning
❌ No → Go to Step 3

Step 3: Manual Behavior Test

Q3: Is the dominant solution still manual? When you talk to potential customers, do most of them say:

- “We just use spreadsheets.”
- “We handle this in Slack/email.”
- “We don’t really have a tool for this.”

If yes:
✅ Activity Positioning
If no → Re-evaluate your market understanding.

That’s it.
Answer top to bottom.

If you want the full guide + worksheet, send me a DM and I will send it over

One thing I’ve learned working with 30+ early-stage SaaS founders:

Positioning debates don’t end after choosing the anchor.

That’s just the beginning.

Because you can choose the “right” anchor...

...and still lose buyers with the wrong level of specificity.

Here’s what I see all the time.

Founders avoid competition by inventing new categories.

“We’re a Revenue Intelligence platform.”
“We’re a Workflow Orchestration Engine.”

Sounds strategic.

But buyers don’t think that way.

Or they go too high-level on the use case:

“We help companies increase revenue.”
“We improve productivity.”

Technically true.
Practically useless.

Buyers don’t buy “increase revenue.”

They buy:

• Manage pipeline
• Schedule meetings
• Guide onboarding
• Understand user behavior

Clear jobs. Clear boxes.

The opposite mistake also happens:

Founders get so feature-driven that their positioning sounds like a Jira ticket.
That’s too narrow.

Strong positioning lives in the tension between:

Too vague → confusing
Too specific → limiting

When we fix positioning specificity in my GTM audit, something interesting happens:

• The homepage headline gets simpler
• Sales calls get shorter
• Prospects “get it” faster

Positioning isn’t about sounding sophisticated.

It’s about being understood.

If you want me to get your positioning right, send me a DM. I have 1 free spot available starting in April.

Last weekend my wife and I escaped to the Alps for a few days.
One of the first sunny spring weekends after a long winter.

Hiking, fresh air, no Slack notifications. 
Just mountains.

And somewhere between the trails and the views, I realized something again that I tend to forget during busy weeks.

I need these breaks.

Every few weeks.

Being a solopreneur means wearing a lot of hats.
And working very hands-on with founders on their GTM means being fully present, focused, and sharp.

Right now I’m working closely with 6 startups.
Positioning, messaging, content, outbound, go-to-market foundations.

Work I genuinely love.
But it also requires a lot of energy and attention.

These few days in the mountains reminded me that recharging isn’t a luxury.

It’s part of doing great work.

So one of my big focuses for 2026 is simple:
Finding the right balance between deep work and quality time.

Time with family.
Time with friends.
Time away from screens.

Because the goal isn’t just building a business.
It’s building a life that actually feels good to live.

That's the real challenge of solopreneurship.

taplio

The Battle

Björn W. Schäfer

Alexander Estner

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreBjörn W. Schäfer's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAlexander Estner's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Björn W. Schäfer

Alexander Estner

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Björn W. Schäfer's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreAlexander Estner's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreBjörn W. Schäfer's LinkedIn Performance