Most managers in scaling tech companies (100–1,000 FTEs) hit the same wall:
Your team doesn’t take real ownership – not consistently, and not at the level you need. Decisions escalate to your inbox that shouldn’t. Meetings multiply just to clarify what should already be clear. You spend your week refereeing instead of leading.

You know something in how your team operates is broken. You just don’t have the time, or headspace, to diagnose it.

The Real Cost
This isn’t a motivation or personality issue.
It’s an infrastructure gap.
Without clear decision architecture, ownership frameworks, and feedback loops, even strong teams default to:
- Vague commitments that create rework
- Decisions escalating instead of resolving downstream
- Hard conversations avoided until they reach you

The math adds up quickly: 10-15 hours per week lost to preventable escalations and clarification meetings, plus the strategic work that slips because you’re stuck in reactive mode.

This is the growth alignment tax.

Why I Built This Work
I’ve spent 20+ years designing execution systems, first as Manager of Worldwide Training at Apple, then with 200+ tech companies across SaaS, healthcare, and enterprise software.

My background includes computer science (RPI), technical communications (Drexel), and executive education (Wharton). More importantly, I’ve lived these problems firsthand: leading teams through scale, navigating M&A transitions, and watching decision bottlenecks derail critical initiatives.

I built these systems because I needed them first.
Leadership without systems requires constant heroics.
Leadership with systems produces repeatable results.

Where Is Your System Breaking?
I built an 8‑minute diagnostic that shows exactly where leadership alignment is leaking time and leverage:
Decision Placement: Are decisions happening at the right level?
Ownership Architecture: Do commitments translate into execution?
Feedback Effectiveness: Does behavior actually change?
Strategic Bandwidth: Are you reactive or proactive?
Alignment Quality: Does the team know what matters most now?

Nearly 100 tech managers have taken it. The pattern is consistent:
> Below 65/100 on Strategic Bandwidth, leaders are drowning.
> Above 80, teams scale with far less friction.

Take the Executive Escalation Assessment
 → 8 minutes
 → Personalized peer benchmarks
 → Your top 2 systemic gaps
 → Immediate results
 https://learnwell.com/eea-leader

Ready to pilot with 3–5 managers? I can install the decision, ownership, and feedback systems that eliminate constant escalation – typically within 90 days.

Bill Ringle

The founder who couldn't leave.

Greg ran a 200-person systems integration company. Strong product, solid relationships, real revenue, a team he trusted.

But here's the catch, he hadn't taken a full week off in nearly 4 years.

We dug into his calendar before our first session. What stood out?
👉 14 hours that week in what I call escalation triage, meetings where managers needed him to be the tiebreaker. They should have owned those decisions.
👉 2.5 hours on actual strategy

This isn't a management problem. It's an infrastructure problem.

His managers didn't share a common decision framework. Every ambiguous call routed straight to him.

That's the CEO's fault. The architecture isn't there.

So, we built one. Over 12 weeks, we installed a shared operating system across his management layer.

One framework for execution. One for priorities. One for accountability. Same language. All 8 managers aligned.

By Week 8, his calendar looked different. By Week 12, he recovered 10 hours a week.

He planned and took a real vacation. His spouse still sends me Christmas cards, which beat KPIs for validatation that the changes persisted.

This is what happens when you fix the system, not just the people.

I'm hosting a Q&A on March 12 for founders at this stage, the ones buried in meetings they should delete.

Check the comments for a first step I recommend, whether or not you can make it Thursday.

Stop managing chaos. Start building infrastructure that works.

--- 
Bill Ringle here, helping overwhelmed tech managers evolve into admired leaders. 💪♟️⚡ 
 
Follow me for more insights. Click the 🔔 on my profile.

Your managers are capable, yet they still route decisions to you. | Leadership OS for scaling tech (50–250) | Former Apple, Wharton | New Management bootcamp with AI tools: 8–12 hrs/week recovered in 90 days

Your company scaled. Your management system didn't.

I've seen this pattern in over 4,000 coaching sessions. It shows up in 9 out of 10 companies between 50 and 200 people. And it always manifests in three symptoms:

1. Decisions that should stay at the manager level keep getting pushed upward. Not because managers can't decide. Because there's no shared framework for what they own.

2. Your strategic time has shrunk to almost nothing. Two, maybe three hours a week if you're lucky. The rest is triage. No surprise: the direction drifts, anxiety spikes. You're stuck operating in an environment where you can't make your best impact.

3. Cross-functional handoffs? You're involved routinely, not occasionally. That's the same root cause, no clear system for accountability.

This is the Growth Infrastructure Gap, the GIG.

It's not a talent problem. Your managers are smart, well-hired (more than 90% of the time). It's a systems problem.

When six managers operate on six different frameworks, every ambiguous call ends up with you because you have the context across all of them.

The gap between your company's scale and your management system? It's measurable. It's fixable.

Not with individual coaching. With one shared operating system for your entire management layer.

Want to see where your company stands? The Executive Escalation Audit takes 8 minutes. Link in comments.

Quit Wasting Time & Money On LinkedIn| Known as "The Old Dog With New Tricks" | Using LinkedIn Teaching, Training, Mentoring, Coaching & Post Parties to increase post exposure

"Why do 98% of LinkedIn users get it all wrong? I used to be one of them."

I had 9,000 connections, but I was invisible—posting sporadically, getting a few hundred views, and no leads. 

Then I stumbled upon a proven system that changed everything.
 
My first attempt? Over 4,000 views on my post. People started reaching out. My business turned around.

Since August 2020, I’ve helped over 8,500 professionals make LinkedIn work for them, through teaching, coaching, systems, and strategy.

One core principle that is central to my life and how I do business, is making sure I have time for my family. 

While the results I created building my first company were impressive, my family life was not. It took my wife and kids leaving me for me to wake up and ‘smell the coffee’,  as they say.

Devastated by what I saw about myself, I radically changed my perspective and the way I worked and won my family back. I’ve now been married for 53  years and have great relationships with my wife, children and grandchildren. 

Results I also want for my clients if that's important to them.! 

If you’re a coach, consultant, or solopreneur, here’s how I can help:

•	Visibility: Get seen by the right people.

•	Engagement: Turn views into real conversations.

•	Growth: Leverage LinkedIn as a powerful lead-generation machine.

You don’t have to figure this out alone. I’ve done the hard work for you.

Want to join the 2% of LinkedIn users who get results?

👉 Book your Complimentary LinkedIn ROI Advisory Call now using the link at the top of my profile.

Alternately you can send me a connection request or message and we can review how things can improve for you.

Schedule a call with me: https://improvedconnect.com/meeting

Jon Keel

The 2026 LinkedIn Influencer Summit Is Over...

Now the LinkedIn work begins.

Joe Apfelbaum and Estie Starr did it again on Thursday the 18th with the 8th annual event.

I went as a guest last year and was invited to present this year, where I shared several quick LinkedIn hacks and "Social Selling Success On Linked In In the 360 Brew Era."  I ended up taking over 4 pages of notes from the other 7 presenters, and I thought I knew a lot about LinkedIn.

Goes to show that even the Old Dog can learn new tricks. And I did.

And so can you.

I'm already implementing several things I learned.

2026 is, in my view, a game changing opportunity for you if you'll take advantage of it by learning and executing. And to do it right doesn't take all that much time.

You can still get the event recordings by reaching out to Joe and Estie directly. Can't wait until I get my copy early next week.

𝗽.𝘀. 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻?

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
 • 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝗗𝗠 𝗺𝗲 • 
𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

James "JON" Keel

Join the 2% of Effective LinkedIn Users | LinkedIn ROI Specialist | Complimentary LinkedIn Growth Strategy Call | See my Featured Section below

Are You Using LinkedIn Comments In The Right Way?

Everything's changed with the new AI powered LinkedIn.

Until the LinkedIn change in November, I considered my thoughtful comments to be engagement.

Not so today.

𝗧𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘂𝗺𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲," 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿. 

Your comments along with your profile and posts are the three pieces of content the LinkedIn AI uses to judge how you think, what you really know and understand, and to whom your posts should be exposed.

𝗗𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀?

The old days of "weanie comments" like "nice post" are over and done with.

Comments today are a strategy you can and should use to show your authority, not in a braggadocio way, but with confidence. 

One last point - my goal is to generate five insightful comments a day to maintain consistency in my LinkedIn strategy.

𝗽.𝘀. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆? 

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

Are You Confusing LinkedIn?

Not consistently clear?  The answer is probably "YES."

With the incorporation last November of LinkedIn's three new AI systems, many users have been struggling with the reach of their content.

Understandable once you realize you won't be rewarded on LinkedIn the way you used to be.

Today the platform rewards 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 in addition to 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆. 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆.

The 𝗟𝗟𝗮𝗠𝗔-𝟯 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹.

It reads 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 and says, “𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀”  and "𝗪𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿?”  

And it does it continuously. 

𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 confidently matches you with the right people

If you're unclear (not focused) and inconsistent, you're confusing LinkedIn.

Your profile, posts, and comments need to be semantically aligned, which gives you authority.  When this happens all your content is telling "the same story.  This makes it much easier for LinkedIn and reach becomes predictable and sustainable.

To me this is the big shift in LinkedIn in 2026...from no longer chasing algorithms to building recognizable authority.

𝗘𝗮𝘀𝘆? 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆, 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝘆 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆.

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝗗𝗠 𝗺𝗲 
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

Is Your LinkedIn Engagement Really Engagement?

Or are you fooling yourself?

With 360 Brew, 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗹.

For years I focused only on the volume of comments, paying little attention to the quality and who commented.

Part of that was due to the quality of my network. Over almost 20 years, I accepted connection requests from just about anybody and everybody.

Made a big shift early last year to sending connection invites only to people in my ICP. Of the over 3,500 new connections I added last year, almost all are in my ICP, people either I can help or can help me.

That helps the "who" issue.

In terms of the comment depth issue, I've found that my profile, the quality of my post and my comments makes a big difference. Like Beowulf having to go the bottom of the swamp to kill Grendel's mother, going past the surface level and asking thoughtful questions increases the odds of a thoughful response.

And that's what leads to further conversation and a deepening relationship, what I call true engagement.

This is a continual improvement process for me with the advent of 360 Brew. 

𝗽.𝘀. 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗵𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟯𝟲𝟬 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝘄 𝗲𝗿𝗮?

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝗗𝗠 𝗺𝗲. 
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼w 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

Join Us At The 2026 LinkedIn Influencer Summit

When Joe Apfelbaum invited me to present at this upcoming event, I was honored and also excited about being able to share content attendees can immediately use to up their 2026 LinkedIn game.

You won't waste your most valuable asset, your time, by registering and attending. Hope you can join us.

LinkedIn® & Sales Navigator™ Expert | Build Sales Pipeline & Brand Awareness | Courses & Resources for B2B Entrepreneurs & Corporate Sales & Marketing Teams | Breast Cancer Survivor 💖 | Mum to 3 Neurodivergent Teens 🧠

BREAKING News!!!! LinkedIn Influencer Summit 2026 📣

Over 1000 people will be in attendance for FREE, I have been announced as a speaker and it's going to be EPIC 🥳

Register your FREE spot here 👇

Clear your calendar for 18th Feb 2pm-6pm EST (7-10pm UK time). 

An amazing 3 hours of talks and presentations from 8 speakers and special guests, plus Q&A after party. 

I met with the speakers last week, and I already learned something AMAZING that will BLOW YOUR MIND!

WHAT A LINE UP!!!! Who is speaking?

Estie Starr and Joe Apfelbaum are hosting their 8th summit!!

Chris Donnelly will be coming to share how he gained over 1 million followers on LinkedIn and what you can do to grow your business on this platform.

Nat Berman will be joining to to discuss Linkedin strategies for business generation.

Me, yours truly talking about Sales navigator and how to add human touch.

Rhonda Sher will be sharing how to turn relationships into revenue, and how to read a prospect on a call, just from their facial expressions.

James "JON" Keel will be sharing some incredible profile hacks..

Joshua B. Lee is going to be sharing tips about AEO and Linkedin, this is cutting edge stuff that is driving him real business.

There will be special guests coming to talk about how to go viral, how to post and get engagement and how to get people on the phone.

Each Linkedin influencer has a very big important audience and incredible strategies. You can watch us live on Feb 18th at the Linkedin Influencer Summit.

I am SOOOOOOO excited to have been hand-picked to speak at this event!

I first connected with Joe on Clubhouse when that was a thing, and we reconnected last year. The power of connections, relationship building and networking prevails again.

What's LinkedIn Really Looking For?

The advent of 360 Brew has changed everything.

The old pre LInkedIn AI days of striving for likes and comments and posting at just the right time are over.

Today LinkedIn reads 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 and says, “𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀.”   All your content needs to be semantically aligned with clarity and consistency.

360 Brew and the two other AI systems consider "whose feed should this post even be considered for?”

Do you tell 𝗮 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝙨𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙘 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 about what you do and who you help?”  

Does your profile say one thing and your posts and comments another? 

Oops.
  
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲? The one thing you’re known for (or want to be known for (your niche)?

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝟮-𝟰 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵e (your pillars)?

Here's an easy test for you to evaluate yourself:  If someone reads your last 10 posts, would they clearly understand your niche and pillars? 

If not, you’re too scattered - you're not clear and consistent - you'll confuse the AI (at your peril).

To me this takes more and deeper thought on your part. 

𝗽.𝘀. 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁? 𝗛𝗼𝘄'𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂?

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? 𝗗𝗠 𝗺𝗲 
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

Are You Struggling With LinkedIn Visibility?

360 Brew has changed the visibility game big time.

The old days of generating loads of likes and comments to increase visibility are over.

𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 ✦𝗔𝗜-𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀:  𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗼 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿

You're interacting with:

• 𝗟𝗟𝗮𝗠𝗔-𝟯, which powers more intelligent Feed Retrieval
  
• 𝟯𝟲𝟬 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝘄, 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 decides:
  •How high does your post appear 
  •How long should it keep getting impressions  
  •How often you’re shown as “someone worth listening to”

•  𝗔𝗜-𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵, which takes on the question, “Someone who has…” (the new people search feature)

The AI recognizes the semantic alignment of your profile, posts, and comments to develop your authority.  Think of it as a bucket into which your profile, posts, and comments get dumped and then are analyzed.

On the "low" side, is your content generic or unclear as to your professional identity, little to no semantic alignment, and overall low trust signals? 𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻; 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘂𝘂𝗺.

On the "high" side, you have clear niche positioning, your content consistently delivers value, original thinking, and actionable steps people can take. 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸.
  
𝗽.𝘀. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘃𝗲?

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

What's All This About Semantics on LinkedIn?

LinkedIn's three new AI systems are closely tied to semantics.

I've recently discovered 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀.

From Google, "Semantics is simply 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲, 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀, 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗮𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. It explains how we understand "run" as a verb (to move quickly) versus a noun (a tear in stockings) or why "destination" and "last stop" have slightly different feelings, even if they mean similar things."

Bottom line is 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 (𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 "𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁") 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱.  

The LLaMA-3 AI reads 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 and says, “This person is about these topics, these problems, and serves these audiences”, i.e., "Whose feed should this post even be considered for?”   

𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 in your content confidently matches you with the right people.

I'm finding this is not necessarily easy; it takes deeper thinking on my part (and definitely more time than a year ago).

My (and your) choice is to disregard this or play by the new rules. 

I know my choice. What about you?

𝗜’𝗺 𝗝𝗼𝗻 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹, “𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝘀" 
• 𝗦𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁. 
• 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁.
• 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟵𝟴% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝟮% 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆
• 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁; 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 
• 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁? 𝗥𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗲, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘀 ("𝗝𝗢𝗡") 𝗞𝗲𝗲𝗹

taplio

The Battle

Bill Ringle

Jon Keel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreBill Ringle's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJon Keel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Bill Ringle

Jon Keel

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Bill Ringle's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreJon Keel's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreBill Ringle's LinkedIn Performance