Bernardo Mendes Almeida

Growth Consulting For 100+ Businesses | Private Capital Advisory For Early/Mid Market Funds | CEO & Founder at Avalanche Capital

As an entrepreneur within the growth consulting and private capital advisory verticals, I have a passion for helping businesses scale and innovate in the digital economy. I have founded and still lead two successful ventures: Avalanche Consulting and Avalanche Capital.

Avalanche Consulting is a growth consulting firm that helps established service-based businesses to grow consistently and predictably by implementing infallible client acquisition infrastructures. We have partnered with over 100 businesses across various niches and geographies, delivering guaranteed results and exceptional value.

Avalanche Capital is a private capital advisory firm that offers a new and innovative fundraising methodology that minimises time commitment and costs, expedites fund allocation process, and builds an investor pool that aligns with the vision of early and mid-market funds. We leverage our marketing expertise, proprietary technology and vast network of investors to create a new type of investment vehicle that expands beyond the confines of traditional fundraising methodologies.

I have a strong educational background in business administration and management, with a Bachelor of Arts degree from Warwick Business School and a Fintech and Blockchain Programme from Saïd Business School, University of Oxford. I also have a keen interest in emerging technologies, markets, and trends, and I enjoy learning and sharing my insights with others.

Founder & Managing Partner

Avalanche Capital offers a new and innovative fundraising methodology that minimises time commitment and costs, expedites fund allocation process and builds an investor pool that aligns with your vision.

385 London-based Family Offices, actively deploying.

Segmented by:

- Stage;
- Industry.

Pulled directly from the Fundraisr database, verified, and ready to use.

To get access:

1. Connect with me;
2. Comment "family". 

And I'll send it to your inbox.

On a mission to make fundraising smarter, faster and fairer | Founder & CEO @Fundraisr

752 family offices from the world's most stable financial hubs.

Switzerland. Singapore. Luxembourg.

When markets get messy, knowing where capital actually sits matters more than knowing who to pitch.

Segmented by:

- Geography
- Investment stage
- Sector preferences

Pulled from the Fundraisr database. Verified. Ready to use.

To get access:

1. Connect with me;
2. Comment "stable".

I'll send it to your inbox.

694 Middle Eastern LPs and asset managers actively deploying capital.

Segmented by:

- Geography (UAE, Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain);
- Strategy (VC, PE, real estate, infrastructure);
- Investor type.

Pulled directly from the Fundraisr database, verified, and ready to use.

To get access:

1. Connect with me
2. Comment "MENA"

I'll send it to your inbox.

241 US-based tech investors looking for Series A, B and C deals.

Segmented by:

- Investor type (VC, Syndicate, Angel);
- Stage;
- Sector.

Pulled from the Fundraisr database, verified and ready to use.

To get access:

1. Connect with me;
2. Comment "tech".

And I'll send you the link.

I'm in a unique position at Fundraisr.

We've helped funds raise capital.

We've helped startups raise capital.

And now we're raising capital ourselves.

That puts me on both sides of the table, and helped me understand that:

You can bring the perfect investor to the perfect deal with the perfect setup - and it still won't close if the founder doesn't want it badly enough.

Same as sales.

Some deals close themselves.

Others require the closer to chase down, push through objections, and refuse to  let the lead go cold.

Capital raising isn't a passive process: it's very much a sales game at the end of the day.

368 US-based corporate VCs writing Series A+ cheques.

Segmented by:

- Stage;
- Sector focus;
- HQ location.

Pulled from the Fundraisr database. Verified. Ready to use.

To get it:

1. Connect with me
2. Comment "strategic"

I'll send it to your inbox.

Maybe I shouldn't talk about this since I raise capital for a living...

but Cal AI just got acquired for $100M+. Bootstrapped.

This isn't a one-off, and it's an important market shift.

AI has made it trivial to build products that used to require teams of 20 engineers.

Social platforms have made it trivial to distribute them without spending a dollar on ads.

Which means the traditional moats - funding, tech complexity, first-mover advantage - matter less and less.

You can raise a Series A, hire 30 people, and build cutting-edge infrastructure.

And someone can replicate your core product in 6 months with 3 people working in their mum's basement.

The only moat that's harder to replicate now is brand.

If people know you, trust you, and associate you with the problem you solve - you're defensible.

If they don't, you're just another feature someone can copy and ship faster.

Fundraising early doesn't protect you anymore.

Tech sophistication doesn't protect you anymore.

Brand does.

Build it first. Build it fast.

Everything else is replaceable.

Personalised outreach is a guaranteed way to generate more investor replies.

But if you've tried it, you know how time consuming it is.

To make your life easier, I'm sharing the actual prompt we use inside the Fundraisr backend to personalise cold emails at scale.

If you'd like access to the Google Doc:

1. Connect with me;
2. Comment "prompt". 

And I'll send it to your inbox.

It costs $200k to employ a 2-person investor relations team in the US for a year.

That's: $60k salary × 2 people × 1.15 (payroll taxes + benefits) = $138k

Then add CRMs, PitchBook, misc. subscriptions... $15k/quarter.

It'll take 4 - 6 months before they even know what they're doing.

At which point you hire a senior at $85k to manage them.

You're now looking at multi 6 figures/year just to hit the ground - before any performance.

Most funds, IBs, placement firms and let's not even mention startups - could put that money to use elsewhere.

That's why Fundraisr exists.

You get a full fundraising suite which can make your current team 3x more productive.

COMPLETELY automated and personalised investor outreach - in 34s

1. Select investor targeting - 12s
2. Set up campaign - 5s
3. Choose & refine type of pitch - 17s

Fundraisr has the data, the outreach infrastructure, and the AI capabilities.

No need to use any other tools for raising capital anymore.

It really is an A-Z fundraising suite.

You can reject feedback from friends/family - and even your team even.

But never from the market.

After speaking with hundreds of companies raising capital this year, we learned something important:

Some things in our industry can't be changed - and shouldn't be.

We initially saw Fundraisr as a way to replace warm introductions and investor relations entirely.

We were wrong.

Warm intros and IR teams will always be valuable: but that doesn't make Fundraisr irrelevant.

It just means we've been solving the wrong problem.

But the real insight: cold outreach works. We've proven it at scale.

The issue is that most IR teams, funds, IBs, and placement agencies don't 
believe it does - so they don't do it systematically.

Fundraisr doesn't replace warm intros - it amplifies them.

Your IR team keeps building relationships and expanding networks.

But now they can also pitch directly - at scale, with precision, without burning 
their reputation on bad targeting.

For funds, cold LP outreach has always been difficult.

For IBs and placement agencies, same problem.

Fundraisr solves it.

We're not replacing the human element.

We're removing the excuse not to go direct.

LinkedIn X Fundraisr connection.

You can now:

1. Sync your LinkedIn account directly with Fundraisr;

2. Instantly scour your connections to see best-fit investors for your raise;

3. Use our advanced filters to get more granular with your targeting;

4. Darft a personalised outeach angle in seconds.

Interested in seeing how Fundraisr may be a fit for your investor relations team?

DM me to book a call today.

Raising capital is a pay to play game.

If you don't pay with a dollar amount, you'll pay with time.

And the downside of paying with time may be that you actually never raise at all.

When you look at it through these lens, paying $15k, $50k - even $150k for a large raise...

is irrelevant.

If the firm, platform or team you're putting in place has a high chance of getting you closer to your fundraising goal, it's a no brainer.

That said, use Fundraisr.ai

Get Leads From Your LinkedIn On Autopilot | Founder @ Hat Tip

If you:

→ Make social content
→ Want to make social content
→ Tried making social content but were unsuccessful

… you’re in the right place.

Truth is, publishing content you’re proud of on a consistent basis is tough.

You get busy. Things come up.

And for most founders, content takes a backseat to whatever fire they’re putting out at their company that day.

That said, its 2025.

Content is king — and the benefits for B2B founders are clear:

→ Drive low-cost brand awareness
→ Generate inbound leads from a new lead source
→ Become a “thought leader” in your space (even though you may hate that word)

And after meeting tons of founders while working in influencer marketing, starting Hat Tip felt like a no-brainer.

You can still benefit from publishing high-quality social content — without worrying about blocking out time to write, being inconsistent, or if you’re making content the “right way”.

Hat Tip handles that for you—while maintaining your voice—through:

→ Bi-weekly content interviews
→ Product and industry-specific thought-starters
→ The will to edit and revise until you’re proud of the content being published

If high-quality, consistent social content sounds like something you’re interested in, DM me or visit the link in my profile to book a call.

Thanks 👋

Christian

📧 christian@hattipagency.com
🐤 Twitter @dibratto

Christian Di Bratto

I'm trying to find the best writers who haven't defaulted to one-shotting posts with ChatGPT. Every time I go to one's profile, I find myself subconsciously looking for these things:

(1) Are they posting their own content?

This doesn't matter as much for other verticals, but being that I'm hiring for writers in B2B social, I want to see what I'm working with. Accounts actively posting automatically "win points" with me.

(1a) If posting, is the content good?

Like it or not, the work displayed on a writer's account often dictates how they're perceived. 

- Is the content well-written, or clearly a ChatGPT export? 
- How well are thoughts formulated?
- How does the writing sound, look, and feel?

(2) Personality.

I want to intentionally curate a culture of people who love working together. As such, I find myself gravitating to people who show a bit of their personality, both in their writing and on their profile (I actually think I am guilty of not doing this as well as I should).

(3) Constant job hopping.

I totally get that everyone has to look out for themselves, but I do hesitate to favor candidates who are in a new job every six to eight months based off their LinkedIn profile.

For what it's worth, I'm sure there are hiring managers and founders that disagree with me on all points, but these are what I've noted about how I subconsciously screen in my own search. 

Figured it might be valuable to writers looking for work.

Founder @ Hat Tip. Founder Brand for startups.

I've gone down the AI rabbit hole and cannot come out. 4 non-writing AI use cases founders/marketers should use to generate pipeline from social (no coding required):

1. Scraping all of your past posts and feeding the dataset to Opus 4.6 for analysis on what themes, topics, hook formats, and media choices correlate with better performance (comment if you want the master prompt).

2. Scraping your 3-5 closest competitors' posts to draw conclusions on what lands and doesn't land with decision-makers in your space (comment if you want the master prompt here, too).

3. Gathering ICP likers/commenters from your post automatically.

4. Automatically aggregating most recent industry news for commentary-style posts (we used this to crack 100k impressions for 2 different clients this week).

Comment if you want a video breaking down each of these if you're interested. There's no excuse not to be running each of these - none of it costs more than $20/mo and there's massive upside here (source: we do this for all clients now).

Prediction: PayPal's "Head of CEO" content role paying up to $235k/year is just the start. Soon, we'll see a startup post a much more interesting role:

"Head of Exec Content", "Head of Leadership Content", or something along those lines.

Why?

PayPal and others have figured out the importance and upside of using their CEO's social as a marketing and distribution channel. It's the most personal and relatable way to *truly* connect with your customers.

The next step is to build the motion out across your leadership base, to amplify the company's presence across the platform. If you want to see what this looks like in practice, check out ClickUp, ElevenLabs, and Clay. It feels like they're everywhere on social.

Companies that want to replicate this in-house will hire for a role with the following characteristics:

- $250K+ salary
- 40 hours/week
- Responsible for 5-7 SMEs' content
- Held to social and pipeline metrics

This will work as follows:

- Person in role will interview each SME bi-weekly
- They'll write 3-5 posts per week for each SME
- They'll work with each SME to refine posts perfectly
- They'll post and manage engagement on each post
- They'll report on social metrics weekly

They'll be solely responsible for building the company's presence on social, not through the brand account, but instead their execs.

I know some of these hires have already happened, and you can expect more of the same soon.

Head of Marketing: We finally got our CEO to start posting on LinkedIn. It's a disaster.

Me: What happened?

Head of Marketing: The content isn't working. We've been at it for 3 weeks and nothing's happening.

Me: Alright. Walk me through the process. How much time is your CEO spending on content review each week?

Head of Marketing: Maybe 15 minutes total? He's super busy.

Me: Got it. And when you send him draft posts, what's he approving versus rejecting?

Head of Marketing: Well...he rejects anything that might be even slightly controversial. Like, we had a great post about how most founders waste money on branding too early. He killed it.

Me: What did he say?

Head of Marketing: That he didn't want to offend anyone in our network.

Me: So what's he approving?

Head of Marketing: Generic stuff - tips on productivity, leadership lessons, safe content.

Me: When did he start asking where the results are?

Head of Marketing: Last week.

Me: Two weeks in.

Head of Marketing: Yeah.

Me: Let me guess. He's wondering why there are no demo requests yet.

Head of Marketing: Exactly. He keeps asking if LinkedIn actually works.

Me: So your CEO won't post anything with an actual opinion, allocates 15 minutes a week to review, and expected pipeline in 14 days.

Head of Marketing: When you say it like that...

Me: The problem isn't that you convinced your CEO to post. The problem is nobody convinced him to actually commit to it.

Head of Marketing: What do you mean?

Me: Building pipeline from LinkedIn takes time. Budget for 3 months - and that's if you're posting strong content consistently.

Head of Marketing: So what do we do?

Me: Have a different conversation with him. Either he commits 30 minutes a week for review, approves posts with a real point of view, and sets realistic timeline expectations, or you shut it down until he's ready.

Head of Marketing: He's not going to like that.

Me: He doesn't like the current situation either.

TechCrunch: 3M followers, less than 10 likes/post.
Forbes: 18M followers, less than 100 likes/post.
Microsoft: 28M followers, less than 100 likes/post.

(Btw, Microsoft owns this platform).

People just don't resonate with brand accounts anymore. There's no reason to follow or favor them, and these pages' stats are the best indicator of that.

On the other hand, Satya Nadella (CEO, Microsoft) has less than half the following of Microsoft's brand page, but (literally) gets 100x the engagement (sometimes more).

It's clear where the puck is going, and smart companies have already leaned in.

They're not totally ditching brand account, CNBC appearances, and traditional PR, but they're supporting those channels with thought leadership from founder/exec social channels.

Through this, they're able to tell their company's story in a much more personal way that actually resonates (while being in full control of the narrative they present!).

For your reference, here are a few CEOs/execs executing on this well and consistently:

Ryan Petersen, CEO at Flexport
Harley Finkelstein, President at Shopify
Peep Laja, CEO at Wynter

These people were early. Hell, we're still early. But time is ticking, and CEOs who start building their presences now will undoubtedly have a leg up on competition when they start.

- Signed, an agency owner whose entire life is building these presences for CEOs.

I sat on my couch and told myself I couldn't get up until I built a working tool. 2 hours later, I solved a massive content headache for my agency.

For context, we often clip our clients' podcast appearances at Hat Tip. Before, we'd to download 1-2hour-long .mp4s, cut the 1-minute clip from it, then delete the file. Not anymore.

Partially out of curiosity and frustration from past failed attempts, I wanted to prove to myself that I could build something useful (imagine the least technical person you know - that's me).

This felt like a problem ripe to be solved with an internal tool.

I wanted to be able to:

1. Feed it a YouTube URL.

2. Let me clip what I want without downloading the whole file.

3. Download only my clipped version.

My stubbornness paid off. With ChatGPT on the left side of my screen telling me what to do, and Codex on the right actually doing it, I built a tool that solved the problem.

I'm also ~90% sure deploying publicly is against YouTube ToS, but comment if you want the tool anyway and I can figure out how to deploy.

(video recorded a couple of weeks ago - I believe there have been two model updates since then)

PS - will be in Austin for the next few days…let me know if you’re around.

Watch me build an AI agent that Slack's me a Sheet of everyone who commented on my LinkedIn posts this week (in 8 minutes):

Below, I build an agent that, every week:

- Searches my posts from the week
- Finds all comments not left by me
- Grabs all the commenter's info
- Sorts it into a Google Sheet
- Slacks me the finished product

...and does it without logging into my account.

CONTEXT

Last weekend, I went down an AI agent rabbit hole and ended up here. By "rabbit hole" I mean binging Jacob Bank and Relay.app's YouTube channel.

I am by no means an expert, but know people who follow me will find this valuable.

WHY:

Everyone's obsessed with outbound signals. LinkedIn engagement (comments/likes) is among the best, but figuring it out manually sucks.

This solves that problem.

Below, I build the entire thing in 8 minutes. If you want me to set this up for you, comment or DM me.

If I were in charge of generating pipeline for Vanta's founder brand starting from 0, here's exactly what I'd do by end of Q1:

(FWIW - an agency is not exactly required here. Sarah (Kollmorgen) Cottone or Jessica Munday could run this internally if needed):

1. Pick LinkedIn as the platform. Master one channel before expanding. Commit to 5 posts per week (3 minimum if handling yourself).

2. Assign Christina Cacioppo as the SME. Assumption: she's busy and can't allocate 10+ hours weekly. We'll build a system requiring less than 1 hour per week (45-min bi-weekly interview + 15-min weekly review).

3. Send Christina an onboarding form covering company understanding, messaging, ICP definition, content preferences, POV definition, and success criteria.

4. Define the POV. Clarify who Vanta counter-positions against, how the product differs specifically, and what makes Christina unique as a founder.

5. Research Vanta's competitors making founder-led content. Identify what's working, what's failing, and where the white space exists.

6. Map content buckets to each funnel stage:

TOF: Building Vanta stories, culture/team-building, general founder takes
MOF: Compliance education, competitive advantage angles, pro tips, horror stories, step-by-step processes
BOF: Customer stories, FAQ answers, objection handling, product updates

7. Write 10-12 content prompts mapping to these buckets (4-5 TOF, 4-5 MOF, 2-3 BOF) for the first interview. I have 400+ of these in a database if you want them.

8. Record the bi-weekly call on Riverside. Ask prompts like a podcast conversation. Let Christina elaborate naturally.

9. Draft 5 posts weekly from the transcript, linking exact timestamps for transparency. Pair each post with high-converting media based on internal data.

10. Share posts via Notion calendar. Christina reviews for 15 minutes. Log all feedback to reduce future edits.

11, Post approved content and reply to early comments to maintain engagement momentum.

12. Pull 1,000 ICP decision-makers using Sales Navigator (CISOs, VPs of Security, CTOs at Series A/B companies). Manually connect with 100 weekly. Once they accept, Christina's content starts appearing in their feed.

13. Weekly, pull ICP profile viewers from Sales Navigator. Share this "warm" list with Vanta's sales team for targeted outreach.

14. Report every Monday via Slack: impressions (WoW), followers (WoW), profile visits (WoW), saves (WoW), best post link, tracking sheet link.

15. Repeat the cycle, optimizing for winning topics, angles, formats, and media choices each iteration.

Next 5 years of B2B social predictions:

(1) We see an AI tool/workflow that founders can use to make content that actually* works to make incredible content. No, this does not exist yet.

(2) The middle ground for brand accounts dies. You either NAIL it, or waste your time completely.

(3) LinkedIn's push for video fails. I love certain videos on this platform. But it isn't YouTube, and shouldn't act like it.

(4) Video storytelling becomes the "meta". LinkedIn won't become YouTube, but B2B companies using video storytelling as a differentiator will win (see: Air).

(5) X comes "back". It never left for some founders, but LinkedIn seems to be the default for founders trying to build a presence. We'll see founders find their community there just like they have here. 

(6) Attribution from social gets good. Really good. This isn't a solved problem yet (I WISH it was), but I think it will get done properly soon.

(7) IRL -> URL explodes. AI is driving the cost of content creation to literal $0. Similar to my point about video, companies will lean into in-person events that they can be extremely loud about after the fact on social (Clay, Andreessen Horowitz, and Ramp are already doing solid jobs of this).

(8) 90% of "AI writing tools" fizzle out. I can name 10 of these that are Claude wrappers with a half-decent system prompt and OK UI. There's not much value there. Models are getting so good anyway that I do not see the point in using these.

(9) Both brands and founders lean into Content Series 10x more than they have prior. These are repeatable and can be largely systematized. Varun Anand's in-office interview series is a great example.

(10) We'll see an explosion of visuals like we never have before. Gen AI tools are making it easier and easier to make half-decent graphics for social. Soon, we'll see marketers show off their creativity with never-before-possible graphics to go with the simplest of posts.

(11) On-site, highly-produced video case studies become the norm.

(12) The "Mr. Beast" of B2B emerges.

(13) Someone builds a startup launch / fundraise announcement agency to $5M ARR. They'll own the launch video, corresponding copy, seeded engagement, and gifting to influencers beforehand.

Agree/disagree?

I was extremely close to not posting this.

I compiled over 100 of my favorite LinkedIn hooks from my swipe file, and templatized them. Then I got my graphics guy to make them look pretty in a carousel.

And the hooks are great - there's a reason they're in my swipe file.

But I do want to caution: Using any 1 of these 101 LinkedIn hooks is not going to be the reason you build the presence you want, generate millions in pipeline, or anything else.

You'll get that from:

1. Committing to building your social presence for 3-months minimum.

2. Not treating social like an afterthought.

3. Play the game the way it's intended: Without automating anything away, outsourcing writing to an LLM with no oversight, or anything else like that.

With all of that said, enjoy the hooks.

Linkedin Hooks

Coinbase's marketing is way more founder-led than they get credit for. Recently, though, this got them in some hot water.

The company's X account posted Brian Armstrong explaining their earnings, split-screened with Subway Surfers gameplay (retention hack from the short-form video world).

People hated it.

There was tons of negative commentary around how "unprofessional" this was, and how this is terrible for building trust.

All I saw was a Coinbase marketing team that "gets it", a founder willing to play along, and 3,000,000 views as their reward.

I'd estimate the raw earnings call video without the brainrot overlay would get less than 1% of this viewership.

Credit to all involved.

taplio

The Battle

Bernardo Mendes Almeida

Christian Di Bratto

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreBernardo Mendes Almeida's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreChristian Di Bratto's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Bernardo Mendes Almeida

Christian Di Bratto

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Bernardo Mendes Almeida's LinkedIn Performance

Performance ScoreChristian Di Bratto's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreBernardo Mendes Almeida's LinkedIn Performance