JoulesLabs

As CEO of JoulesLabs, I lead a team dedicated to building and scaling SaaS products for startups and enterprises. From architecture and development to cloud deployment, we ensure seamless execution and growth.

Our recent SaaS projects include FundedNext, DeedSign, Crowdfundly, ReviewXpo, and more designed for performance, scalability, and exceptional user experience.

If you're looking for a dedicated SaaS development team, let’s connect! 🚀

Chief Executive Officer

Hello! This is Naim, CEO of JoulesLabs. We are a SaaS development agency. 

I’ve been in SaaS for 8 years now. What we started with a few passionate developers is now a 30+ product team. 

Today, JoulesLabs is the dev team I wish I had in my early days. Lean, smart, and obsessed with production grade builds. A team that builds SaaS like it’s their own product. 


Here are some notable products we have build: 
• eSignature SaaS — a lean, fast DocuSign alternative with secure flows and enterprise-grade UX
• Global Trading Platform — built end-to-end for 110,000+ funded traders
• Regional Payment Gateway — blockchain-enabled, SME-friendly payment infrastructure
• EV Fleet Logistics Backend — real-time tracking, IoT integration, and admin tooling
• Creator Monetization Suite — fundraising + eCommerce in one dashboard for 500+ creators
• UGC platform— customizable automation tools used by 1,000+ eCommerce stores 
• Creator Commerce Profile — personal storefront with digital goods, donations, and perks

We’ve built everything from MVPs to full-scale enterprise grade SaaS, used by thousands around the world.

We are the team that you would want to build yourself. Feel free to dm/ reach out at naim@jouleslabs.com

Thanks.

Arifur Rahman Naim

We just signed a new agreement with Moar, the pioneer of co-working in Bangladesh, serving the community for more than a decade.

This partnership means a lot to us.
Moar has a bold vision for the future of shared workspaces, and we’re excited to support that vision and help digitize the co-working experience in Bangladesh.

A heartfelt thanks to Nabila Nowrin Apu for trusting us with this journey.

Looking forward to building something meaningful together, InShaAllah. 🤝

CEO @ JoulesLabs (SaaS/AI Dev Agency) | Helping founders & agencies ship faster, scale smarter

This week attended the Growth Summit 2025 by HubSpot & HubXpert - Accredited Hubspot Partner. Such a wonderful event.  Great job by Ratul Rahman bhai and the whole team for putting this together 👏.

Really enjoyed the networking, the knowledge sharing, and the knowing more about of HubSpot.

Always good to see the ecosystem growing and people trying to push things forward in Bangladesh. 🚀

We just closed our first web app deal through ChatGPT 🤝

The client is a Dubai-based doctor working on medical research, education, and related initiatives. We’re grateful for the opportunity to help digitize part of that journey.

Interestingly, we haven’t done any LLM optimization or SEO experiments yet. The client found us from a shortlist of companies, resonated with our work, and reached out.

Moments like this remind me that discovery, trust, and clarity matter just as much as tactics.

It’s also a good reminder that we should probably take content and LLM-facing writing more seriously.

Grateful for the journey so far. Onward.

SaaS pricing questions founders keep asking us 👇
LTD, MRR, ARR.
Discounts.
Country-wise pricing.

Pricing is where most early SaaS teams get stuck.
We’ve seen founders run LTD too early, then struggle with support and expectations.

We’ve also seen teams avoid LTD completely… and run out of cash before learning anything.

LTD can help early on, mostly for validation and feedback.
But only if you’re very clear about limits. Otherwise, it quietly becomes a long-term burden.

MRR is what teaches the business.
ARR is what looks good on slides.
Early on, I’d care more about one than the other.

Discounts are fine.
But if every sale needs a discount, something else is off, usually positioning, not pricing.

Country-wise pricing?
Not about being cheap. About being realistic.

Once real MRR starts coming in, LTD becomes much harder to justify, especially if infra or AI costs are involved.

Pricing isn’t math.
It’s a series of uncomfortable decisions.

Founder and CEO of Acquire.com. Acquire.com has helped 1000s of startups get acquired and facilitated $500m+ in closed deals.

The “get shit done” founder beats the “perfect plan” founder.

Every every single time.

Because startups reward speed and momentum.

Overthinking rarely helps in startups.

So if you're not sure, just ship it anyway and get feedback.

You got this. Keep going.

MVP asked.
Version 1 delivered (in requirements). 😄

Seen this one many times.

Vibe Code and Copilot each serve their own purpose. A good read with clear pros and cons.

Co-Founder & CTO - JoulesLabs, Open Source Enthusiast, Application Artisan, System Architect and Code Believer

People keep mixing up vibe-coding and Coding-assistant(Copilot, Tabnine).

They are not the same thing.
They solve very different problems.

Vibe-coding is great when the goal is speed, not depth.

I see it working well for:

🔸 Prototypes for investor or stakeholder demos
🔸 Project initial bootstrapping
🔸 Very early MVPs with minimal risk
🔸 Hobby or side projects
🔸 Frontend-heavy or static sites
🔸 Docs, user manuals, internal tools
🔸 Non-tech, marketing, or C-level audiences

It’s useful for bootstrapping an idea fast, even without technical knowledge.

But vibe-coding has real limits.

The moment the project grows:

🔸 Nobody truly knows how the app works
🔸 Refactoring becomes painful
🔸 Adding features breaks old ones
🔸 Debugging is hard
🔸 Context slowly gets lost by AI
🔸 The project becomes messy fast

Coding-assistant is a different story.

It’s not replacing developers.
It’s assisting them.

Coding-asistant helps with:

🔸 Code autocomplete & suggestion 
🔸 Understanding existing codebases
🔸 Partial feature development
🔸 Repetitive or boring tasks

The developer stays in control.

That’s why the upside is strong:

🔸 Faster delivery
🔸 Easier debugging
🔸 Cleaner refactoring
🔸 Better overall efficiency
🔸 No compromise on code quality
🔸 Lower development cost
🔸 Developers understand how code works

There are downsides, though.

If you’re not careful:

🔸 Devs think less
🔸 Dependency increases
🔸 Big-picture thinking slowly drops

So here’s my simple take.

Coding-assistant(Copilot, Tabnine) is best when you care about quality, scale, and cost control.

Vibe-coding is best for early validation, internal tools, and the right audience with the right scope.

Quick question for folks who’ve worked seriously on topic clustering & content strategy. 

We’re starting to invest more time into building proper topic clusters (not just random blog posts), especially around SaaS, AI, and developer-focused content.

I’m looking for good resources, blogs, frameworks, videos, tools, or even people to follow, that actually explain topic clustering practically, not just in theory.

If you’ve come across something that genuinely helped you, I’d really appreciate a recommendation.

Thanks in advance 🙏

Riseup Labs

Product Manager

Fauree

Project Manager

💼 Product Manager with 3.5+ years of technical project management experience.
🧠 Expertise in e-commerce (Shopify app development) and SaaS.

taplio

The Battle

Arifur Rahman Naim

Ahoteshanul Haque Shah

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreArifur Rahman Naim's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Arifur Rahman Naim

Ahoteshanul Haque Shah

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Arifur Rahman Naim's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreArifur Rahman Naim's LinkedIn Performance