Adriano Herdman

Move

Scale hiring without lowering the bar.

For People & Talent leaders, sharper sourcing, stronger recruiters, and processes that stick.Three services built for speed, quality, and lasting impact

✅ Embedded recruiters backed by playbooks, RecOps, and governance
✅ Sourcing engine with TAM analysis + outbound that cuts through
✅ Consultancy that builds structure, consistency, and TA enablement

Co-Founder

Monese

Talent Advisor via MOVE

LaunchDarkly

SeedLegals

Farewill

RMIT University

English Teacher

NAKAMA

Senior Consultant User Experience

Aquent

recruitment consultant - user experience

Harvey Nash

recruiter - software development vertical - freelance

recruitment consultant - software development

Scale hiring without lowering the bar.

For People & Talent leaders, sharper sourcing, stronger recruiters, and processes that stick.

Three services built for speed, quality, and lasting impact

✅ Embedded recruiters backed by playbooks, RecOps, and governance

✅ Sourcing engine with TAM analysis + outbound that cuts through

✅ Consultancy that builds structure, consistency, and TA enablement 

Move deploys expert in-house talent acquisition squads to fast scaling companies. Our embedded talent service aligns us with your growth targets, giving you control and flexibility. Our talent acquisition specialists absorb your culture and refine your recruitment process. We’ve driven down cost-per-hire by 46% for the likes of Microsoft, Monese, Farewill, Travelex, SeedLegals, Spryker, Collibra, LaunchDarkly, Percent, Framestore

In case you're hiring a recruiter from a startup...

Do not judge them solely by their time-to-fill metrics or number of hires made 

Startup recruiting is more challenging and nuanced than hiring for established companies with strong employer brands 

🧭 Here's what they have likely had to navigate:

1. No employer brand – they could not rely on name recognition to attract candidates

2. Low quality inbound – every hire required proactive sourcing

3. Unclear or ever-changing hiring needs

4. Leadership with unrealistic expectations 

5. Hiring managers often lack hiring experience

6. No structured hiring process – they had to build it themselves

7. Unproven product or business model – they had to convince candidates to take a risk

Only a small percentage of startup recruiters consistently meet hiring targets. (The ones that do are 🔥, don't get me wrong)

If you're hiring a recruiter from a startup, look beyond the surface numbers and evaluate:

- How they adapted to challenges
- How they built or improved hiring processes
- Their ability to sell opportunities to candidates
- Their resilience in highly-ambiguous environments

Anything you'd add?

Talent Solutions for Technology businesses

Resource drop: 2026 Workforce & Capacity Planning Playbook for Talent Acquisition and People Leaders ⚖️

Practical, straightforward, and designed to help teams get from 0→1 or validate the foundations they already have. 

It was shaped with input and feedback from Heads of People and Talent who’ve stress-tested this stuff in the real world.

It includes:
- A clear recruiter capacity dashboard
- Simple skill-gap and capability assessments
- Easy quarterly load templates
- Role planning templates

Why it’s useful:
 - Helps you spot resourcing gaps before they turn into hiring emergencies
 - Gives you a simple, data-led view of what your team can actually deliver

Nothing over-engineered, just tools you can plug in quickly to get a cleaner, more predictable workforce plan.

👉 Want the playbook? 

Comment “Workforce plan” and I’ll share ✌️

We analysed Talent Acquisition capacity data across 70 companies.

The results are clear:

1. No dedicated Sourcing is the #1 bottleneck, the lowest-scoring area by far.
2. Hiring manager engagement consistently drag recruiter productivity.
3. Even strong teams carry 2–3 significant gaps that limit their ability to scale.

On the flip side, companies that excel in process efficiency, time allocation, and role complexity management operate much closer to best practice.

The outer edge of the chart = full maturity (score of 5).

Most teams are sitting somewhere in the middle.

The takeaway?

If you want to unlock recruiter capacity, don’t just throw headcount at the problem.
Fix the systemic gaps: sourcing infrastructure, hiring manager alignment, and specialisation.

That’s where the real leverage is.

RESOURCE DROP: We created over 360 interview questions to form scorecards & question banks for 63 key roles in tech. 

🥖 Updated with 27 new roles for 2026

❓Question creation follows Mike Murphy's principles highlighted in 'Hiring for attitude' 

They’re yours. 

Use them to; 
- ensure a fairer hiring process 
- make better hiring decisions 
- stop shooting from the hip 🤠 

Here’s how you can get access to the notion page; 

↳ Comment 'scorecards' on this post

Being great at filling roles won’t get you the Head of TA job. 

If you’re a TA Lead or Manager aiming up, what matters is proving you can scale recruiters and systems.

Marc Baselga recently wrote a great post about the leap from IC to Director interviews in Product.

The same is true in Talent Acquisition.

Most underestimate how different these interviews are. 

It’s no longer about how strong you are as a recruiter, it’s about whether you can make other recruiters better, and build a function that scales.

Here’s what hiring execs are really testing in Head/Director of TA interviews:

1/ Frameworks, not one-offs
Not hero stories, but repeatable systems like scorecards, intake processes, enablement playbooks.

2/ Real complexity
Expect questions on headcount planning trade-offs, exec pushback in a hiring freeze, or redesigning a team after hypergrowth.

3/ People leadership depth
Who have you promoted? How do you handle underperformance? Can you grow recruiters into business partners?

4/ Cultural leadership
The job isn’t “delivering reqs.” It’s shifting TA from service provider to strategic partner with hiring managers and C-levels.

5/ Strategic communication
How do you build trust at the top table? What’s your operating rhythm for planning, reporting, and risk management?

6/ Vision + systems thinking
Directors don’t just run today’s hiring. They architect tomorrow’s. What’s your vision for TA in 2 years, and what systems will scale it?

The shift is this:
Director-level interviews aren’t about proving you’re the best recruiter.
They’re about proving you can build the best recruiting function.

🥖 New projects fresh in at Move  

We’ve got three new projects kicking off, all starting immediately and running for 3–6 months and we’re looking for Talent Partners

- GTM Talent Partner – London - SaaS / Data Intelligence platform

- Senior Tech Talent Partner – Hybrid London – AdTech scale-up

- Senior Talent Partner (G&A focus) – London – FinTech

We’re looking for experienced recruiters who can plug in fast and own delivery from day one.

If you’re available (or know someone great who is), please share or tag them below,  links to apply are in the comments.

Thanks in advance for any shares or intros 🙏

Old school sourcing 💾 vs Sourcing 2.0 🤖

Old school sourcing = Trial and error, no plan

Sourcing 2.0 = TAM-first, precision results

Most recruiters are still doing this 👇

↳ Hit LinkedIn each morning, fire off 30 messages to those that look like a fit
↳ Check messages each day, hope for replies
↳ No idea of TAM size → recalibration comes late
↳ Reactive: fill one req, move on, no lasting intel
↳ Messaging is guesswork → not tested, so positioning never improves

Do it differently 👇

↳ Start with a Total addressable market (TAM) to size the market
↳ Spot bottlenecks and set expectations with hiring managers upfront
↳ Plan first → then go fast and accurate
↳ Build pipelines while also filling today’s req
↳ Test messaging systematically → refine positioning every week
↳ Capture talent intelligence as a reusable asset

Why it works:
TAM-first sourcing turns guesswork into clarity. Recruiters save hours, hiring managers trust the data, and every search sharpens the next.

Example:
Old Way: 1 week wasted before realising the skillset barely exists.
New Way: 60 minutes to map the TAM → then source with precision.

Old way = reactive.
New way = strategic.

The gap is growing.

👉 What would change if every search started with a TAM?

Recruiters, help you hiring managers become better interviewers!

👉 Interviewing cheat sheet for hiring managers

Share this with your HMs for a light-touch guide before they run interviews.

Poor interviews don’t just miss great people, hey slow down hiring and hurt your brand. 

📄 Here’s a quick checklist to keep things focused, fair, and effective:

- Structure the flow
Balance assessing, pitching, and giving space for candidate questions.

- Set expectations early
Let the candidate know what to expect—structure, timing, and who's in the room.

- Stick to consistent criteria
Use the scorecard. Focus on role-relevant scenarios and behaviours—not gut feel.

- Go beyond the CV
Ask how they’ve solved problems similar to the ones they’ll face here.

- Pitch with intent
Tailor your pitch to what motivates them. The best candidates are assessing you too.

- Test your setup
Check your Zoom / Meet link, screen share, and any tools you’ll use.

♻️ Pass it on if you know an HM that could use a quick refresher

No alternative text description for this image

Talent Acquisition has to own a number.

It doesn’t need to be a revenue target.

It doesn’t need to be cost-per-hire

Don’t worry this isn’t another quality of hire post either, don’t want to upset anyone 😉 

But it does need to tie to something the business actually cares about.

Spitballing, here’s three that might make the most sense that aren’t the usual suspects:

- Speed to productivity:  how quickly new hires reach meaningful output.

- Hiring velocity: the predictability of delivering roles inside agreed windows.

- Manager confidence: a simple 60-day signal showing whether a hire is on track.

These connect hiring to impact: output, product velocity, capacity, and consistency.

And they don’t overlap with ownership of retention, engagement, or long-term performance.

Recruiting is an interesting function.

The impact is big, teams feel it immediately when the right hire lands.

But the access is somewhat limited: you influence the front of the funnel and moments in the process, then hand off to the manager and the business.

Because of that, it’s tempting to position recruiting as purely about “finding great people.” (Which it also is) 

But the reality is that delivery sits at the core of the function, and these metrics help anchor that delivery to what matters commercially.

A strong hire can shift a team’s trajectory, unblock execution, or accelerate output. That’s meaningful impact, even if the work to get there is operational and hands-on.

Thoughts?

For Recruiters. Intake meeting one-pager to cut time-to-alignment by up to 40%.

World-class recruiters don’t wait for HMs to come prepared.

They make it easy. Structure the intake, guide the discussion, and lock in alignment from the start.

This one-pager keeps your intakes sharp, consistent, and outcome-driven.

Inside you’ll find:

✅ Objectives to hit every time
✅ Key phases (pre, in, and post-session)
✅ Outcomes & deliverables to walk away with
✅ Metrics to track so you know it’s working

Built from hundreds of real intake meetings, it’s designed to:

Get hiring managers aligned faster
Avoid “role drift” mid-search
Launch searches with a crystal-clear, agreed profile

📄 Free to use, adapt, and share with your team.

graphical user interface, text, application, email

Most talent teams are winging messaging, and it shows 

Talent acquisition teams are operating with no structured messaging system.
Every recruiter writes outreach in their own voice.

There’s no central narrative, no testing, no iteration.

And in competitive markets (AI, engineering, senior GTM), generic outreach gets instantly ignored.
“This is the role, salary, location,  want a call?”

That isn’t good messaging. It’s a broadcast. And top talent filters it out.

What does work is borrowing frameworks from modern go-to-market teams.

We’ve been applying a few in particular:

1. Jobs-to-Be-Done (JTBD) Candidate Interviews
Speaking directly with people in the role you’re hiring for to understand their drivers, and using their exact language to anchor the message.
Not what the company thinks the role is… 

2. Voice-of-Customer (VoC) Message Mining
Extracting the emotional language, themes, and triggers that show up repeatedly in interviews and weaving them into structured messaging pillars for the role.

3. Centralised Messaging Matrices
Building consistent narratives around pain, progress, motivation, and differentiation, so every recruiter has a framework for high-quality story telling, rather than 10 versions of the job spec.

4. Proven GTM Messaging Frameworks
Using lightweight structures like RVC, Trigger-Based Hooks, and Firmographic Personalisation to shape messages that feel relevant, human and high-signal, instead of role dumps.

5. Continuous Testing & Iteration
Outbound is treated like a product.
Test → measure → refine → roll out.
Not “set it and forget it” job ads and InMails.

The reality:
Most TA messaging sucks because it has no framework.

When you bring GTM discipline into talent attraction, grounded in real candidate language, outreach stops sounding like recruitment automation and starts sounding like it actually understands the person you’re speaking to.

Thoughts ?

Most recruiters are great at reviewing CVs… and terrible at writing their own.

We’ve reviewed thousands of recruiter CVs. I’ll share the biggest mistake we keep seeing and how to fix it👇

Context:
There are two CV tests you have to pass

1 - The scan
Your CV is one of 100–300 (if you’re lucky).

At this stage, the recruiter is only asking: “Is this person roughly aligned to this role?”

They’re skimming for:
- Keywords
- Domain / market
- Seniorit
- Rough hiring profile match

If you pass that, then comes…

2 - The read

Now they actually look at your experience in detail.
But most recruiters never get this far, because their CV fails ‘the scan.’

The pattern is the same:
>Job title
>Company name (that no one recognises)
>A bunch of generic bullets:
e.g. “Improved hiring efficiency by 52%”
>“Implemented ATS changes”
>“Aligned interview questions to company values”

That might be great work.
But with zero context, it’s just noise.

If I don’t know what the company does or what you actually hired… I might move on.

💡3 steps on How to fix it 

- before any fluffy bullets, add a short “context block”.
- Literally right under the job title.

STEP 1
- Set the scene (company + stage)
- Add 1–2 lines or bullets:
- What the company does (in simple language)

‘B2B / B2C / SaaS / Marketplace / etc’

‘Stage + rough headcount while you were there’

STEP 2
– Spell out what you actually hired
Very high-level, but concrete:
(Eng / Product / GTM / G&A etc)
- Typical level (IC / Senior / Lead / Exec)
- Rough number of hires per year / quarter

STEP 3
– Name your stakeholders
Show who trusted you:
“Partnered with: VP Engineering, Head of Product, CFO”

STEP 4
– Then add your impact bullets
Now your “improved time-to-hire” or “rebuilt the ATS” actually means something,
because I can see where you did it and for whom.

👀A quick example

Instead of this❌

‘Senior Talent Partner – XYZ Ltd
Improved hiring efficiency by 52%
Implemented new ATS workflows
Ensured interview questions aligned to company values

Do this ✅ :
Senior Talent Partner – XYZ Ltd
SaaS platform for mid-market retailers | Series B | ~180 people
Roles: Product, Eng, data (IC → Lead) – ~35 hires/year
- Stakeholders: VP Eng, Head of Product, CTO
- Reduced average time-to-hire from 68 → 42 days
- Rebuilt ATS workflows and hiring stages across 3 product squads
- Introduced role scorecards and bank of behavioural questions

Same person. Same work. Completely different signal.

Bottom lome: Recruiters need to optimise their CVs for the scan first.
If you don’t give context at the top of every role, you’re missing out.

People and Talent Leaders: Is your hiring process adjusted to the level of talent you’re targeting?

Because the steps look very different depending on whether you’re hiring for more accessible roles or competing for top-tier talent.

For roles where the talent bar is more accessible (say high-volume, less specialised), the process can be summarised quite simply as “interviews”:

- Screening Call
- Hiring Manager Interview
- Final Interview
- Offer

→ Candidate Accepted

But when you’re competing for scarce or high-bar talent, the process cannot be summarised as just “interviews.” And it shouldn’t be.

For senior, niche, or high-impact roles, the process should look more like:

- Problem Alignment (why the role exists / clarity of success metrics)
- Value Alignment (candidate sees the mission, EVP, team fit)
- Skill Validation (structured assessment of technical/functional skills)
- Stakeholder Alignment (multi-disciplinary panel, cross-team buy-in)
- Decision & Offer Alignment (timing, competing offers, motivators)

These stages track specific agreements and validations that have to be made in the hiring journey.

They usually have clear entry/exit criteria and defined actions.

For Skill Validation, it might look like this:

Entry Criteria
- Candidate has already shown alignment with role scope and career trajectory.
- Candidate is motivated to invest time in assessment.

Actions
- Run structured technical or practical assessment.
- Ensure panel has consistent scoring rubric.
- Calibrate with benchmarks (internal & external).

Exit Criteria
- Panel agrees candidate meets or exceeds the hiring bar.
- Feedback documented in structured format with rationale.

👉 The catch: depth always trades off against speed.

- Go too “deep” and you lose top talent to faster-moving competitors.
- Go too “fast” and you risk poor signal or mis-hires.

The best scale-ups calibrate their process so each stage is both rigorous and lightweight. For example:

- Replacing generic take-home tasks with short, live working sessions.
- Combining multiple stakeholder conversations into a single panel.
- Pre-aligning on what’s “must-have vs nice-to-have” so decisions don’t drag.

⚖️ The art is finding the balance: rigorous enough to protect quality, but lean enough to win talent before someone else does.

Neugenba

I have a passion for recruiting excellence and helping Talent Functions prepare for now and the future.

I'm working with TA Leaders offering advisory on TA and HR Tech.

Managing Partner

Datapeople

Datapeople is an AI-powered Talent Attraction and Productivity platform. With Datapeople, hiring teams can instantly generate job ads that are inclusive, compliant, and high-performing, based on data from over 100 million jobs. Our platform enables your team to work twice with accessible data insights, collaboration, and process organization directly within your ATS.

Customer Advisory Board Member

Grab

I lead Grab's global Talent Sourcing & Channels, Executive Leadership Hiring, and Employer Branding & Marketing. 
► Founding Member: Grab Talent Acquisition Leadership team
►Talent Acquisition Leadership: Extensive leadership of sourcing and talent acquisition teams, driving best practices in the art and science of recruiting
► Strategic Talent Sourcing: Spearheading tactical and strategic sourcing for critical talent, including executive leadership, through targeted engagement of passive candidates to support tech location strategy in SEA
► Technology Innovation: Developing and implementing cutting-edge talent sourcing and engagement technologies by applying AI-first People-Centric solutions
► Business Partnering: With Hiring Leaders to make a real difference in our critical hiring by combining our tech know-how with their team's needs, and using talent intelligence strategies and innovative targeted outreach
► Talent Acquisition Enablement: Driving TA capability development, enablement, HR tech adoption and integration, and performance metrics
► Data-Driven Talent Acquisition: Leveraging talent insights and mapping to identify and attract top-tier talent
► Employer Branding & Marketing: Leading employer branding and recruitment marketing initiatives 
► Channels Management: Optimising recruiting channels and platforms, including internal mobility, referrals, job boards, agencies, Workday/SmartRecruiters, LinkedIn, hireEZ, Beamery, Codility, Datapeople and others
► Regional Expertise: Extensive experience managing teams and hiring across Southeast Asia, India and China, 
► RPO:  Implemented and managed Sourcing RPO solution based in the Philippines and fully integrated into the Grab Sourcing function 
► Vendor Management: RFI/RFP solution architecture, onboarding and overseeing HR Tech vendor relationships to optimise talent acquisition outcomes to drive business impact

Head of Talent Sourcing & Channels

Techmar 

Key focus:

► Sourcing and engagement strategy and tactics to identify and engage high value talent
► Outbound (direct) sourcing & Inbound (content marketing) sourcing
► Talent mapping and insights (supply & demand) of critical and scare talent
► Advice and implementation of Sourcing/CRM/Engagement & Recruitment technology 
►Health check of recruitment practices and capability
►Targeted training of internal and agency recruitment teams
► HR tech startup advisory working with new breed HR Tech in SEA

Founder & Principal Consultant

Kacific Broadband Satellites

Talent Advisory

impress.ai

HR Tech Advisor

vsource.io

In talent acquisition it’s important to stay ahead of the competition. Recruiters engage in a competitive community where the focus of making contact and securing placements is key. Time is wasted examining large pools of recycled candidates, and incomplete or outdated profiles. vsource offers a wide range of candidate sourcing solutions that deliver candidates quickly and efficiently, saving your recruiters time to get ahead.

http://www.vsource.io/

Advisory Board Member

Allegis Global Solutions

Allegis Global Solutions (AGS) is a world-class Managed Services Provider (MSP) and Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) partner, supplying workforce solutions for organizations across the globe. With more than 30 offices around the world, our teams are skilled in coupling local insights with decades of global workforce management experience to design and deliver customized solutions that achieve business success for our clients.

Strategic Sourcing Specialist

Randstad Enterprise

Regional Sourcing specialist developing strategies to source and engage critical talent across South East Asia and Australia/New Zealand Region.

My role was to bring a strategic approach and greater structure by research based thinking and execution to enhance the capability, process, quality and productivity on how the RPO TA teams and KL Sourcing Centre deliver sourcing and engagement across the region.

Geographical locations worked across included Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand and others within the Information Technology, Aerospace, Filtration, Digital Media, FMCG and others industry sectors.

Area's of focus include:

► Tactical & Strategic Sourcing Planning for Critical Talent
► Development Recruitment Strategy Frameworks
► Critical Talent Engagement
► Coaching and Training Sourcing & Talent Acquisition Teams in the Art and Science of Sourcing
► Assessment and Implementation Sourcing & Engagement Technology
► Developing Market Insights, Market Scans and Talent Mapping Framework and Reporting

Regional Sourcing Leader 

HCMS

Human Capital Management Solutions is an independent consultancy, providing clients with leading-practice advice and support.  My role included:

► Consulting - develop and build innovative strategies to source and engage critical talent. 

Clients include: Westpac, Bank of Melbourne, SKM, URS Corp, New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, Curtin University, Queensland University of Technology, Syngenta Singapore, Origin Energy, Singapore Stock Exchange, E&Y Australia, GE and others.

► Sourcing Capability - design, build and implement sourcing teams, process and technology.

Clients included: Curtin University, E&Y Australia, SKM, URS Corp, Westpac and others.

► HR/Recruitment Technology - consulting, process and workflow design, implementation and training.

Clients included: SKM, Deloitte Australia, Macquarie Telecom, IBM Singapore, E&Y Australia, Curtin University, Origin Energy

► Insidejob - corporate recruitment training

I specialised in developing & delivering innovation classroom & virtual recruitment training programs for talent acquisition professionals. 

I have  helped many corporate recruitment teams enhance their recruitment capability and increase their productivity.

Programs include strategic planning for sourcing of critical skills, internet sourcing, defining critical skills for talent pooling, candidate engagement tactics, social media for recruitment, managing your workload, account and relationship management, promoting your brand, compelling intake meeting and others.

Over the last 10 years I have trained 1500 talent acquisition professionals in Australia, New Zealand & South East Asia. 

I have developed & delivered specific programs for companies such as NZ Post, GE, Westpac, Suncorp, EY, SGX (Singapore), PWC, Kiwi Bank, SKM (now Jacobs), Talent 2 (now Allegis) , Hudson RPO, Curtin University, Brisbane City Council, Optus, IBM (Australia and Singapore), CGU, Shell, Transfield, BEA Systems, Santos, Woodside, Air NewZealand, Aurecon and others.

Martin Warren, Director & Principal Consultant

✔️ Built global Talent Sourcing and Channel COE (Centre of Excellence) functions to spearhead the development and execution of innovative global sourcing and engagement strategies 
✔️ Led and mentored high-performing regional and diverse talent sourcing and recruitment teams
✔️ Drove operational excellence and fostered a culture of innovation and experimentation within the sourcing and recruitment teams
✔️ Successfully sourced and engaged leadership talent globally, filling critical C-suite and senior tech and management roles across South East Asia & APAC
✔️  Leveraged critical thinking, problem-solving, and relationship management skills to solve complex talent acquisition challenges
✔️ Provided expert guidance on the assessment, selection, implementation, and utilisation of HR technology solutions
✔️ Designed and implemented TA Enablement programs, workflows and operations to increase utilisation and efficiencies of HR Tech Stack and business outcome-based solutions
✔️ Foundation member of LinkedIn APAC Customer Advisory Board 2021, 2022, 2023 & 2024 providing real-time feedback and strategic recommendations to help shape product roadmap.

📌Domain Expertise📌
Startup, Tech, Aviation, Engineering, Tertiary Education, Life Sciences, Financial Services, FMCG

📌HR Tech Stack📌
LinkedIn Recruiter (LIR), LinkedIn Talent Insights (LTI), hireEZ, Avature, Talent Neuron, PageUp, Taleo, Workday, SmartRecruiters, Beamery, Smashfly, Clinch, Codility, Broadbean, Vonq, Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, Reejig, Gloat, Datapeople, Vouch and others.....

📌TA Enablement [RecOps]📌
Trained 1500+ recruiters in AUS, NZ, and SE Asia.  Developed and delivered in-house,  public programs and Webinars for Talent Sourcing, Candidate Engagement, LinkedIn, Recruiting Marketing, Talent Mapping and Insights, Job KickOff, Promoting Your Brand, Managing Your Workload, Introduction to Gen AI & Agentic AI, Prompt Engineering, TA Workflow and Process Mapping and others...

taplio

The Battle

Adriano Herdman

Martin Warren

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance ScoreAdriano Herdman's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

taplio

The Battle

Adriano Herdman

Martin Warren

Followers

Posts

Engagements

Likes

Performance Score.css-goub6s{font-size:var(--chakra-fontSizes-md);font-weight:500;color:var(--chakra-colors-gray-600);display:block;margin-top:var(--chakra-space-1);}Adriano Herdman's LinkedIn Performance

Ready to grow your LinkedIn presence?

Performance ScoreAdriano Herdman's LinkedIn Performance